Bug#880589: marked as done (RFS: libtoxcore/0.1.10-1 [ITP])

Your message dated Fri, 10 Nov 2017 08:26:35 +0100 with message-id <20171110072635.flwnqxzjtccyh...@angband.pl> and subject line Re: Bug#880589: RFS: toxcore/0.1.10-1 [ITP] has caused the Debian Bug report #880589, regarding RFS: libtoxcore/0.1.10-1 [ITP] to be marked as done. This means that you

Bug#881302: marked as done (RFS: gnustep-sqlclient/1.8.1-2)

Adam Borowski wrote: > The changelog looks... odd: Indeed, I merged the NMU which fixes #845851 as it still affects the version in experimental (that's why I close the bug once again, to be marked as "fixed" in 1.8.1-2). Isn't this the recommended practice? An upload to unstable requires the

Bug#881302: marked as done (RFS: gnustep-sqlclient/1.8.1-2)

Your message dated Fri, 10 Nov 2017 08:09:26 +0100 with message-id <20171110070926.w6jp24tbdylto...@angband.pl> and subject line Re: Bug#881302: RFS: gnustep-sqlclient/1.8.1-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #881302, regarding RFS: gnustep-sqlclient/1.8.1-2 to be marked as done. This means that

Bug#880591: marked as done (RFS: jieba/0.39-1 [ITP])

Your message dated Fri, 10 Nov 2017 07:19:03 +0100 with message-id <20171110061903.fvtj5hpoejc45...@angband.pl> and subject line Re: Bug#880591: RFS: jieba/0.39-1 [ITP] has caused the Debian Bug report #880591, regarding RFS: jieba/0.39-1 [ITP] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

Bug#881134: RFS: runescape/0.2-2 [QA] -- Multiplayer online game set in a fantasy world

Fixed 'disclaimer' and 'autobuilding' in d/copyright. --- Disclaimer:  This package is not part of the Debian distribution. It is provided in the  non-free file area as a convenience for Debian users.  The contents of this package is an unofficial installer of the Runescape  client and

Bug#881302: RFS: gnustep-sqlclient/1.8.1-2

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gnustep-sqlclient". * Package name: gnustep-sqlclient Version : 1.8.1-2 Upstream Author : Richard Frith-Macdonald * URL : http://gnustep.org *

Bug#881295: RFS: rednotebook/2.3-1 [ITP] [ITA] -- A cross-platform journal

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the package "rednotebook" * Package name: rednotebook   Version : 2.3-1   Upstream Author : Jendrik Seipp * URL : http://rednotebook.sourceforge.net/ *

Bug#881279: RFS: rednotebook/2.3-1 [ITP] [ITA] -- A cross-platform journal

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the package "rednotebook" * Package name: rednotebook Version : 2.3-1 Upstream Author : Jendrik Seipp * URL : http://rednotebook.sourceforge.net/ *

Bug#881260: marked as done (RFS: opencryptoki/3.8.1+dfsg-3)

Your message dated Thu, 9 Nov 2017 15:31:50 +0100 with message-id <20171109143150.epboknnxlvqcu...@angband.pl> and subject line Re: Bug#881260: RFS: opencryptoki/3.8.1+dfsg-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #881260, regarding RFS: opencryptoki/3.8.1+dfsg-3 to be marked as done. This means that

Bug#881260: RFS: opencryptoki/3.8.1+dfsg-3

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "opencryptoki" * Package name : opencryptoki Version : 3.8.1+dfsg-3 Upstream Author : openCryptoki team * URL : http://github.com/opencryptoki/opencryptoki * License : CPL Section :

Re: Problems with upload packages

El jue., 9 de nov. de 2017 a la(s) 10:16, Andrey Rahmatullin < w...@debian.org> escribió: > On Thu, Nov 09, 2017 at 12:40:11PM +, eamanu15 . wrote: > > So, I downloaded the package, I used the dsc to uncompress the folders, > and > > then I modified the "control file" and "changelog file"

Re: Problems with upload packages

On Thu, Nov 09, 2017 at 12:40:11PM +, eamanu15 . wrote: > So, I downloaded the package, I used the dsc to uncompress the folders, and > then I modified the "control file" and "changelog file" (with dch -i) with > the purpose tu add me how new Maintainer. > > Then, I build the package with*

Problems with upload packages

Hello everybody, I am a new maintainer. I find an interest (for me) package: cligh ( https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/cligh). This package was in RFA status and I try to adopted it, so I send my ITA request. This is the #851186 on bugs.debian.org. So, I downloaded the package, I used the dsc to

Bug#880590: RFS: webmin/1.860-1 [ITP]

Hmm, I'm sure I dput it, but I haven't got mentor.d.n reply yet, too. Maybe I'll retry later. 2017-11-09 16:11 GMT+08:00 Andrey Rahmatullin : > On Thu, Nov 09, 2017 at 04:02:51PM +0800, Yangfl wrote: >> Sorry for not checking lintian on source. I've fixed them and >> reuploaded

Bug#880589: RFS: toxcore/0.1.10-1 [ITP]

Sorry for typo, the correct git repo for packaging is https://github.com/yangfl/c-toxcore . And I've fixed the problem. 2017-11-05 8:31 GMT+08:00 Adam Borowski : > On Thu, Nov 02, 2017 at 11:32:50PM +0800, Yangfl wrote: >> * Package name: toxcore >> Version :

Bug#880590: RFS: webmin/1.860-1 [ITP]

On Thu, Nov 09, 2017 at 04:02:51PM +0800, Yangfl wrote: > Sorry for not checking lintian on source. I've fixed them and > reuploaded to mentor.d.n I don't see the new upload there. -- WBR, wRAR signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#880590: RFS: webmin/1.860-1 [ITP]

Sorry for not checking lintian on source. I've fixed them and reuploaded to mentor.d.n 2017-11-07 2:23 GMT+08:00 Andrey Rahmatullin : > Control: tags -1 + moreinfo > > The package has lots of lintian-detected problems, some of them critical. > You need to fix them first. > > -- >