Bug#884780: RFS: piu-piu/1.0-1 [ITP]

On Sat, Dec 23, 2017 at 02:40:05PM +0300, Ivan Marov wrote: > Hi! > Actualy it's just a bash script, one file. There are no 'source', it is the > source. What shal i do? > https://github.com/vaniacer/piu-piu-SH/blob/master/piu-piu A source package for a shell script is pretty trivial -- there's

Bug#884555: marked as done (RFS: diodon/1.7.0-1)

Your message dated Sun, 24 Dec 2017 14:36:06 +0100 with message-id <1514122566.15478.4.ca...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Subject: RFS: diodon/1.7.0-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #884555, regarding RFS: diodon/1.7.0-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

Re: Bug#883702: RFS: lina/5.3.0-1 ( #859130 ITP: lina -- iso-compliant Forth interpreter and compiler )

On 2017-12-24 at 07:02, Albert van der Horst wrote: > Geert Stappers schreef op 2017-12-22 10:18: >> Control: owner -1 ! >>> Also, is this the real source (AKA, "preferred form for >>> modification")? Assembler is a valid language, generated >>> assembler (nor generated shell, generated C,

Bug#883702: RFS: lina/5.3.0-1 ( #859130 ITP: lina -- iso-compliant Forth interpreter and compiler )

Geert Stappers schreef op 2017-12-22 10:18: Control: owner -1 ! Also, is this the real source (AKA, "preferred form for modification")? Assembler is a valid language, generated assembler (nor generated shell, generated C, ...) is not. Some parts say about a configuration process that, as

Bug#883702: RFS: lina/5.3.0-1 ( #859130 ITP: lina -- iso-compliant Forth interpreter and compiler )

Adam Borowski schreef op 2017-12-21 20:26: On Wed, Dec 06, 2017 at 05:51:50PM +0100, Albert van der Horst wrote: * Package name: lina Version : 5.3.0-1 Hi! I for one don't know the slightest bit about Forth, but as no one has taken this RFS, I can review packaging only --

Re: Conflicting advise of lintian and Multiarch hinter

On Sun, Dec 24, 2017 at 12:42:29PM +0100, Thomas Schmitt wrote: > Hi, > > the package tracker page of libburn complains about two lintian errors > https://lintian.debian.org/tags/multiarch-foreign-pkgconfig.html > https://lintian.debian.org/tags/multiarch-foreign-static-library.html I suppose

Conflicting advise of lintian and Multiarch hinter

Hi, the package tracker page of libburn complains about two lintian errors https://lintian.debian.org/tags/multiarch-foreign-pkgconfig.html https://lintian.debian.org/tags/multiarch-foreign-static-library.html Both are about the line Multi-Arch: foreign which appears in debian/control only

Bug#885121: marked as done (RFS: gworkspace/0.9.4-1)

Your message dated Sun, 24 Dec 2017 12:09:43 +0100 with message-id <20171224110943.etllg6f3z3ks3...@angband.pl> and subject line Re: Bug#885121: RFS: gworkspace/0.9.4-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #885121, regarding RFS: gworkspace/0.9.4-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

Bug#885121: RFS: gworkspace/0.9.4-1

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gworkspace". * Package name: gworkspace Version : 0.9.4-1 Upstream Author : Enrico Sersale and others * URL :