Bug#886190: marked as done (RFS: zapping/0.10~cvs6-13 [QA] [RC])

Your message dated Wed, 3 Jan 2018 02:10:15 +0100 with message-id <20180103011015.v3ttxgnqm6g5v...@angband.pl> and subject line Re: Bug#886190: RFS: zapping/0.10~cvs6-13 [QA] [RC] has caused the Debian Bug report #886190, regarding RFS: zapping/0.10~cvs6-13 [QA] [RC] to be marked as done. This

Bug#886190: RFS: zapping/0.10~cvs6-13 [QA] [RC]

Adam Borowski wrote: > > * Package name : zapping > > Version : 0.10~cvs6-13 > Alas, still fails on i386. Log attached. That's the old version (-12) according to the log. I tested -13 on i386 before uploading to mentors and it builds successfully.

Bug#886190: RFS: zapping/0.10~cvs6-13 [QA] [RC]

On Wed, Jan 03, 2018 at 12:53:41AM +0200, Yavor Doganov wrote: > > I'm looking for a sponsor for the orphaned package "zapping". I > introduced a FTBFS bug in my previous upload; a oneliner fixes it. > > * Package name : zapping > Version : 0.10~cvs6-13 > Changes since the last

Bug#877450: RFS: bash-completion/1:2.7-1 [ITA]

The repository for the packaging of bash-completion is now hosted on https://salsa.debian.org/debian/bash-completion/ The latest commit is not on the master branch, but on https://salsa.debian.org/debian/bash-completion/commits/unstable Mentors has been updated with a new build:

Re: Changes coming with VCS for Debian packaging (was: Bug#877450: RFS: bash-completion/1:2.7-1 [ITA])

On 02 Jan 2018, Andrew Shadura wrote: > >On 2 January 2018 at 02:17, Gabriel F. T. Gomes > wrote: >> >> When I created the repository in my own server, I named the >> repository bash-completion-debian.git. When I cloned it to >> salsa.debian.org, under my personal

Bug#886190: RFS: zapping/0.10~cvs6-13 [QA] [RC]

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: important I'm looking for a sponsor for the orphaned package "zapping". I introduced a FTBFS bug in my previous upload; a oneliner fixes it. * Package name : zapping Version : 0.10~cvs6-13 Upstream Author : Iñaki García Etxebarria

Bug#885795: marked as done (RFS: zapping/0.10~cvs6-12 [QA] [RC])

Your message dated Tue, 2 Jan 2018 19:14:18 +0100 with message-id and subject line Re: RFS: zapping/0.10~cvs6-12 [QA] [RC] has caused the Debian Bug report #885795, regarding RFS: zapping/0.10~cvs6-12 [QA] [RC] to be marked as done. This means

Bug#883627: RFS: network-manager-fortisslvpn/1.2.6-1 [ITP] -- NetworkManager Fortinet SSLVPN plugin

There's a review request open on mentors.debian.net now: https://mentors.debian.net/package/network-manager-fortisslvpn The up-to date version of the package is available here: https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/n/network-manager-fortisslvpn/ Download the package with dget using

Bug#881385: marked as done (RFS: cligh/0.3-1.1 [ITA] -- Command-line interface to GitHub)

Your message dated Tue, 2 Jan 2018 17:37:22 +0100 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#881385: RFS: cligh/0.3-1.1 [ITA] -- Command-line interface to GitHub has caused the Debian Bug report #881385, regarding RFS: cligh/0.3-1.1 [ITA] --

Bug#882817: marked as done (RFS: cligh/0.3-2 [ITA] -- Command-line interface to GitHub)

Your message dated Tue, 2 Jan 2018 17:37:22 +0100 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#881385: RFS: cligh/0.3-1.1 [ITA] -- Command-line interface to GitHub has caused the Debian Bug report #882817, regarding RFS: cligh/0.3-2 [ITA] --

Bug#874725: marked as done (RFS: tz-converter/1.0.1-1)

Your message dated Tue, 02 Jan 2018 16:26:52 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: tz-converter/1.0.1-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #874725, regarding RFS: tz-converter/1.0.1-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#881525: marked as done (RFS: python-ck/1.9.4)

Your message dated Tue, 2 Jan 2018 14:35:00 +0100 with message-id and subject line Re: RFS: python-ck/1.9.4 has caused the Debian Bug report #881525, regarding RFS: python-ck/1.9.4 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

Bug#878175: marked as done (RFS: python-mechanicalsoup/0.8.0-1)

Your message dated Tue, 2 Jan 2018 14:35:39 +0100 with message-id <00dc51fb-d791-a4cc-7d62-5889e0479...@debian.org> and subject line RFS: python-mechanicalsoup/0.8.0-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #878175, regarding RFS: python-mechanicalsoup/0.8.0-1 to be marked as done. This means that you

Bug#878174: marked as done (RFS: pytest-qt/2.2.1-1)

Your message dated Tue, 2 Jan 2018 14:29:58 +0100 with message-id and subject line done has caused the Debian Bug report #878174, regarding RFS: pytest-qt/2.2.1-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt

Re: Changes coming with VCS for Debian packaging (was: Bug#877450: RFS: bash-completion/1:2.7-1 [ITA])

On 2 January 2018 at 02:17, Gabriel F. T. Gomes wrote: > On 31 Dec 2017, Andrew Shadura wrote: > >>On 30 December 2017 at 15:08, Gabriel F. T. Gomes >> wrote: >>> >>> 2. Even though I read the discussions about salsa on debian-devel, I >>>

Bug#886095: marked as done (RFS: gnubik/2.4.3-2 [ITA])

Your message dated Tue, 2 Jan 2018 13:50:24 +0100 with message-id <20180102125024.wud6yzo6ngzkw...@angband.pl> and subject line Re: Bug#886095: RFS: gnubik/2.4.3-2 [ITA] has caused the Debian Bug report #886095, regarding RFS: gnubik/2.4.3-2 [ITA] to be marked as done. This means that you claim