Bug#892153: RFS: addresses-for-gnustep/0.4.8-3 [RC]

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: important Dear mentors, I'm looking for a sponsor for my package "addresses-for-gnustep". * Package name: addresses-for-gnustep Version : 0.4.8-3 Upstream Author : Björn Giesler * URL :

Bug#892129: RFS: urlwatch/2.8-3

On Mon, 2018-03-05 at 22:29 +0100, Maxime Werlen wrote: > * Fix missing optional dependencies (Closes: #891884) ... > + python-html2text, > + python-vobject, Since urlwatch uses Python 3, I think urlwatch should be suggesting the Python 3 html2text and vobject modules. > + sendmail, I don't

Bug#886399: RFS: opencascade/7.2.0-1 [ITP]

On 03/04/2018 01:11 AM, Anton Gladky wrote: Then after each release you one need to make a diff over all headers and create also symbols-files to be sure that the ABI is not broken. Anton I've got the symbols files set up now. By the way, while talking to upstream I've seen that they

Re: dch "eating" changelog entries?

Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > On Mon, Mar 05, 2018 at 10:44:13PM +0100, Sven Hartge wrote: >> I am co-maintaining bacula with Carsten Leonhardt and this problem >> now occured several times for me. (Most probably because of misuse by >> me, but I want to understand what went wrong.)

Re: dch "eating" changelog entries?

On Mon, Mar 05, 2018 at 10:44:13PM +0100, Sven Hartge wrote: > I am co-maintaining bacula with Carsten Leonhardt and this problem now > occured several times for me. (Most probably because of misuse by me, > but I want to understand what went wrong.) … > Note how the last entry is unfinished,

dch "eating" changelog entries?

Hi! I am co-maintaining bacula with Carsten Leonhardt and this problem now occured several times for me. (Most probably because of misuse by me, but I want to understand what went wrong.) Take the following debian/changelog file for example: ---8<

Bug#892134: RFS: pass-otp/1.1.0-1 [ITP]

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "pass-otp" * Package name: pass-otp Version : 1.1.0-1 Upstream Author : Tad Fisher * URL : https://github.com/tadfisher/pass-otp * License

Bug#892129: RFS: urlwatch/2.8-3

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal X-Debbugs-CC: p...@debian.org Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "urlwatch" * Package name: urlwatch Version : 2.8-3 Upstream Author : Thomas Perl * URL : https://thp.io/2008/urlwatch/ * License

Bug#884697: logrotate

> What is the best way to form a maintenance team? Probably opening a repo on salsa. It would be easier to communicate if you joined #debian-mentors on oftc. Bye. -- Salvo Tomaselli "Io non mi sento obbligato a credere che lo stesso Dio che ci ha dotato di senso, ragione ed intelletto

Bug#889515: Re: Re: Review of persepolis

Hi, Le 01/03/2018 à 01:24, Moein Alinaghian a écrit : > > I would be happy in case he makes it sometime in the next week. I am > patient :) And thanks again for the spending time helping me as well > as helping Debian. > My AM reviewed your package and found two things : - in d/control, the

Re: Why debian use postinst for declarative actions?

George Shuklin: > On 05/03/18 14:35, Paul Wise wrote: >> On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 7:08 PM, George Shuklin wrote: >> >>> There is a big question with torture me for awhile. Why some purely >>> declarative operations are performed by non-standard postinst scripts? >> Probably dpkg doesn't support

Re: Using meson from debhelper when configure.ac is present

On Mon, Mar 05, 2018 at 12:09:36PM -0500, Benjamin Redelings wrote: > Hi, > >     In my ITP for bali-phy, I ran into an issue, and I am wondering if there > is a recommended way to resolve it.  The upstream source has both a meson > build system and an autotools build system, but I would like to

Using meson from debhelper when configure.ac is present

Hi,     In my ITP for bali-phy, I ran into an issue, and I am wondering if there is a recommended way to resolve it.  The upstream source has both a meson build system and an autotools build system, but I would like to use the meson build system to build the debian package.     Debhelper

Bug#892103: RFS: bali-phy/3.0.1-1 [ITP]

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "bali-phy" * Package name: bali-phy Version : 3.0.1-1 Upstream Author : Benjamin Redelings * URL : http://www.bali-phy.org

Re: Why debian use postinst for declarative actions?

On 05/03/18 14:35, Paul Wise wrote: On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 7:08 PM, George Shuklin wrote: There is a big question with torture me for awhile. Why some purely declarative operations are performed by non-standard postinst scripts? Probably dpkg doesn't support declarative mechanisms for those

Re: Why debian use postinst for declarative actions?

On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 7:08 PM, George Shuklin wrote: > There is a big question with torture me for awhile. Why some purely > declarative operations are performed by non-standard postinst scripts? Probably dpkg doesn't support declarative mechanisms for those things. Some of them have

Why debian use postinst for declarative actions?

Hello. There is a big question with torture me for awhile. Why some purely declarative operations are performed by non-standard postinst scripts? I've checked few well-established packages (openssh, nginx, systemd, dbus, cups, etc) - each of them have slightly different code for such

Bug#890306: marked as done (RFS: sphinxcontrib-doxylink/1.5-1)

Your message dated Mon, 5 Mar 2018 11:32:10 +0100 with message-id <539abb0a-86df-c4a3-fd20-01629c828...@debian.org> and subject line Re: RFS: sphinxcontrib-doxylink/1.5-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #890306, regarding RFS: sphinxcontrib-doxylink/1.5-1 to be marked as done. This means that

Bug#891117: marked as done (RFS: python-schema/0.6.7-1)

Your message dated Mon, 5 Mar 2018 11:21:51 +0100 with message-id <418774b5-04a8-6435-3bcc-e23011be3...@debian.org> and subject line Re: RFS: python-schema/0.6.7-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #891117, regarding RFS: python-schema/0.6.7-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

Bug#891130: marked as done (RFS: python-mechanicalsoup/0.10.0-1)

Your message dated Mon, 5 Mar 2018 11:20:16 +0100 with message-id <21ac53da-bf08-6220-4cdb-d63a47308...@debian.org> and subject line Re: RFS: python-mechanicalsoup/0.10.0-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #891130, regarding RFS: python-mechanicalsoup/0.10.0-1 to be marked as done. This means

Bug#890666: RFS: mmh/0.3-3

On Sat, 17 Feb 2018 17:34:32 +0300 Dmitry Bogatov wrote: > > Package: sponsorship-requests > Severity: wishlist > > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "mmh" > ack, done G. > * Package name : mmh > Version : 0.3-3 > Upstream Author

Bug#891131: marked as done (RFS: pytest-qt/2.3.1-1)

Your message dated Mon, 5 Mar 2018 11:17:10 +0100 with message-id and subject line Re: RFS: pytest-qt/2.3.1-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #891131, regarding RFS: pytest-qt/2.3.1-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#890225: marked as done (RFS: flake8-polyfill/1.0.2-1)

Your message dated Mon, 5 Mar 2018 10:53:34 +0100 with message-id <501c59dd-18c6-19fe-285a-b48fe76f4...@debian.org> and subject line Re: RFS: flake8-polyfill/1.0.2-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #890225, regarding RFS: flake8-polyfill/1.0.2-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Bug#891066: marked as done (RFS: growl-for-linux/0.8.5-2)

Your message dated Mon, 5 Mar 2018 10:56:13 +0100 with message-id <451e4aab-15b3-6ff7-cb4f-bef183035...@debian.org> and subject line Re: RFS: growl-for-linux/0.8.5-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #891066, regarding RFS: growl-for-linux/0.8.5-2 to be marked as done. This means that you claim