Does a rejected package require a version bump?

My original submission was rejected while in the FTP Master's NEW queue and required a minor correction. Should I bump the version with a new changelog entry when I resubmit it or should I just keep it at the initial entry? -- Sent from my Nexus 4 with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.

Bug#1063884: RFS: python-autodocsumm/0.2.12-1 [ITP] -- API that automatically extends sphinx (common documentation)

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "python-autodocsumm": * Package name : python-autodocsumm Version : 0.2.12-1 Upstream contact : Philipp S. Sommer * URL :

Handling a file with mixed copyrights

I have a project where most files are under the original author copyright and license, but within one source file, there is a different copyright as it is copied from another source. The section of code in question is delineated with comments indicating the start and end. It is under a different

Bug#1063840: marked as done (RFS: python-airspeed/0.6.0-1 -- Python template engine)

Your message dated Tue, 13 Feb 2024 23:18:48 +0100 with message-id <1497ea6b-7d9e-4660-bafa-aaf6f13cf...@debian.org> and subject line Re: RFS: python-airspeed/0.6.0-1 -- Python template engine has caused the Debian Bug report #1063840, regarding RFS: python-airspeed/0.6.0-1 -- Python template

Bug#1063763: marked as done (RFS: python-shtab/1.6.5-1 -- Automagic shell tab completion for Python CLI applications)

Your message dated Tue, 13 Feb 2024 23:18:55 +0100 with message-id and subject line Re: RFS: python-shtab/1.6.5-1 -- Automagic shell tab completion for Python CLI applications has caused the Debian Bug report #1063763, regarding RFS: python-shtab/1.6.5-1 -- Automagic shell tab completion for

Bug#1063861: RFS: astro/0.25.1-1 [ITP] -- Gemini web browser using shell script

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "astro": * Package name       : astro    Version                : 0.25.1-1    Upstream contact : Brian Mayer * URL                          : https://github.com/blmayer/astro * License 

Bug#1063704: marked as done (RFS: tiny-initramfs/0.1-5.1 [NMU] [RC] -- Minimalistic initramfs implementation (automation))

Your message dated Tue, 13 Feb 2024 16:02:14 +0100 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#1063704: RFS: tiny-initramfs/0.1-5.1 [NMU] [RC] -- Minimalistic initramfs implementation (automation) has caused the Debian Bug report #1063704, regarding RFS: tiny-initramfs/0.1-5.1 [NMU] [RC] --

Bug#1063704: RFS: tiny-initramfs/0.1-5.1 [NMU] [RC] -- Minimalistic initramfs implementation (automation)

Hi Victor, uploaded to DELAYED/5 and sent the nmudiff to the package. Thanks for your contributions to Debian! Cheers, -- tobi On Sun, Feb 11, 2024 at 12:10:48PM +0100, Victor Westerhuis wrote: > Package: sponsorship-requests > Severity: important > X-Debbugs-Cc: christ...@iwakd.de > >

Bug#1057098: marked as done (RFS: runit/2.1.2-57 -- system-wide service supervision)

Your message dated Tue, 13 Feb 2024 15:06:46 +0100 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#1057098: RFS: runit/2.1.2-57 -- system-wide service supervision has caused the Debian Bug report #1057098, regarding RFS: runit/2.1.2-57 -- system-wide service supervision to be marked as done. This

Bug#1063840: RFS: python-airspeed/0.6.0-1 -- Python template engine

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "python-airspeed":  * Package name : python-airspeed    Version  : 0.6.0-1    Upstream contact : Steve Purcell  * URL  : https://github.com/purcell/airspeed  * License 

Bug#1063839: lwm: fixed bugs, lintian clean, cross compiles, please review

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-cr...@lists.debian.org, s...@debian.org, np.bam...@gmail.com I have forked lwm so that my work can be reviewed: https://salsa.debian.org/npbamber/lwm If this is approved please grant me permission so I can keep the repository

Re: Regarding: New contributor question, where to start

73, Darren Tomblin KC9JJJ > On Feb 13, 2024, at 3:12 AM, Geert Stappers wrote: > > Hello Darren, > >> On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 02:58:48AM -0500, Darren Tomblin wrote: >>> On Feb 12, 2024, at 1:20 AM, Geert Stappers wrote: >>> Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 07:07:55AM +0100, Geert Stappers wrote: