On Wed, 21 Aug 2002 14:53:54 -0700
Matt Kraai [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here are the solutions I've considered:
* merge them into one source package. This would diverge from
upstreams distribution model.
There are many examples of putting multiple source packages
in one Debian source
On Mon, 19 Aug 2002 21:40:16 -0400
David Z Maze [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think you need root privileges to actually enter the chroot jail.
Other than that, it does seem like it should be possible to build the
chroot image entirely in a fakeroot world, but I remember having tried
this
to
dpkg-genchanges.
Try something like:
DEBBUILDOPTS=-sa
regards,
junichi
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] : Junichi Uekawa http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
GPG Fingerprint : 17D6 120E 4455 1832 9423 7447 3059 BF92 CD37 56F4
Libpkg-guide: http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer/column/libpkg-guide
-genchanges.
Try something like:
DEBBUILDOPTS=-sa
regards,
junichi
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] : Junichi Uekawa http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
GPG Fingerprint : 17D6 120E 4455 1832 9423 7447 3059 BF92 CD37 56F4
Libpkg-guide: http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer/column/libpkg-guide/
not already
read it, is in my sig.
regards,
junichi
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] : Junichi Uekawa http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
GPG Fingerprint : 17D6 120E 4455 1832 9423 7447 3059 BF92 CD37 56F4
Libpkg-guide: http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer/column/libpkg-guide/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
not already
read it, is in my sig.
regards,
junichi
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] : Junichi Uekawa http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
GPG Fingerprint : 17D6 120E 4455 1832 9423 7447 3059 BF92 CD37 56F4
Libpkg-guide: http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer/column/libpkg-guide/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
libtarget.whatever.so: ${sources:.c=.lo}
libtarget.a: ${sources:.c=.o}
%.lo: %.c
gcc -fPIC ..
%.o: %.c
gcc
regards,
junichi
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] : Junichi Uekawa http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
GPG Fingerprint : 17D6 120E 4455 1832 9423 7447 3059 BF92 CD37 56F4
Libpkg
] : Junichi Uekawa http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
GPG Fingerprint : 17D6 120E 4455 1832 9423 7447 3059 BF92 CD37 56F4
Libpkg-guide: http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer/column/libpkg-guide/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] : Junichi Uekawa http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
GPG Fingerprint : 17D6 120E 4455 1832 9423 7447 3059 BF92 CD37 56F4
Libpkg-guide: http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer/column/libpkg-guide/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
I have had a similar problem and solved it by exporting a LIBRARY_PATH
variable during the install step :
replacing
$(MAKE) install ...
by
export LIBRARY_PATH=`pwd`/debian/tmp/usr/lib; $(MAKE) install ...
NOTE : LIBRARY_PATH not LD_LIBRARY_PATH.
Hmm... this hack seems to
I have had a similar problem and solved it by exporting a LIBRARY_PATH
variable during the install step :
replacing
$(MAKE) install ...
by
export LIBRARY_PATH=`pwd`/debian/tmp/usr/lib; $(MAKE) install ...
NOTE : LIBRARY_PATH not LD_LIBRARY_PATH.
Hmm... this hack seems to be
should create something reasonable for an unstable shared
library, suggest using this for the upstream (if they do versioning at all).
But I suggest reading libtool/autoconf/automake manual a bit.
regards,
junichi
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] : Junichi Uekawa http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
GPG
On Mon, 10 Jun 2002 08:24:39 +0200
Eric Gentilini [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Considering a given library libfoo, which of another version supporting
multithreading is available, called libfoo-mt.
libfoo-mt offers all the functionnalities offered by libfoo and programs
compiling with libfoo
it was compressed
at a different time.
regards,
junichi
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] : Junichi Uekawa http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
GPG Fingerprint : 17D6 120E 4455 1832 9423 7447 3059 BF92 CD37 56F4
Libpkg-guide: http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer/column/libpkg-guide/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
it was compressed
at a different time.
regards,
junichi
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] : Junichi Uekawa http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
GPG Fingerprint : 17D6 120E 4455 1832 9423 7447 3059 BF92 CD37 56F4
Libpkg-guide: http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer/column/libpkg-guide/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
On Sat, 25 May 2002 00:44:11 -0700
Osamu Aoki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My thoughts:
This is not my bug but a limitation of buildd. What should I do?
Why buildd even bother to build documentation (ALL) package?
Can anyone give me educated guide how to handle this?
My impression is that
On Fri, 24 May 2002 11:27:59 -0700 (PDT)
Sean 'Shaleh' Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
auto-apt only detects file not found and does a look up in the file list for
the package which owns it. It is not of much help during the package build.
It installs the package.
--
[EMAIL
The x11 section is reserved for X server software, window managers
and such.
This package should be in devel.
Hmm. That does seem to make more sense. But... I can't find where this is
spelled out.
It's not really spelled out. Use of some kind of common sense,
and getting it fixed
maintainer has
caused enough problems that I decided to write the guide.
regards,
junichi
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] : Junichi Uekawa http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
GPG Fingerprint : 17D6 120E 4455 1832 9423 7447 3059 BF92 CD37 56F4
Libpkg-guide: http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
/rules.
I don't know, but it should probably be done in debian/rules clean
target.
I'd rather use objdump -p debian/tmp/usr/lib/libwhatever.so | grep SONAME
than $(UPSTREAM_VERSION).
regards,
junichi
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] : Junichi Uekawa http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
GPG
auto-generates debian/control.
I am starting to think that it doesn't really scale up, however.
I'm inclined to use a error-out-if-it-doesn't-match approach
(d-shlibs)
regards,
junichi
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] : Junichi Uekawa http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
GPG Fingerprint : 17D6 120E 4455
having so many shared libraries
in one package, but this is what you get as a result
running dpkg-shlibsdeps on such package.
I don't think it will gain anything.
regards,
junichi
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] : Junichi Uekawa http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
GPG Fingerprint : 17D6 120E
? The only one required is
Conflicts: libijs-dev.
regards,
junichi
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] : Junichi Uekawa http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
GPG Fingerprint : 17D6 120E 4455 1832 9423 7447 3059 BF92 CD37 56F4
Libpkg-guide: http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer/column/libpkg-guide
at the changelogs, but is there a way to know
which packages entered woody last week, or given a package, when it
entered woody ?
I doubt it, but it would help if you name the # of bug.
regards,
junichi
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] : Junichi Uekawa http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
GPG
versioning than unversioned static library because it is easier to track
bugs on them, and fix them.
However, please see my libpkg-guide.
I'm trying to collect some more information/examples
into the list.
regards,
junichi
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] : Junichi Uekawa http://www.netfort.gr.jp
?
libtool is quite useful.
regards,
junichi
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] : Junichi Uekawa http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
GPG Fingerprint : 17D6 120E 4455 1832 9423 7447 3059 BF92 CD37 56F4
Libpkg-guide: http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer/column/libpkg-guide/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
library links properly.
Also, use
libtool install whatever.la $(DESTDIR)/usr/lib/
libtool rm -f *~ *.lo whatever.la
etc.
regards,
junichi
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] : Junichi Uekawa http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
GPG Fingerprint : 17D6 120E 4455 1832 9423 7447 3059 BF92 CD37 56F4
PROTECTED] : Junichi Uekawa http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
GPG Fingerprint : 17D6 120E 4455 1832 9423 7447 3059 BF92 CD37 56F4
Libpkg-guide: http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer/column/libpkg-guide/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
.
Don't just split without good reason.
Just making sure one of the good reasons was seen in the discussion.
Trying,
junichi
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] : Junichi Uekawa http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
GPG Fingerprint : 17D6 120E 4455 1832 9423 7447 3059 BF92 CD37 56F4
Libpkg-guide
?
(is both of them maintained in a good shape or is only one of them?)
Note: Splitting packages up causes more work, and maintenance
cost.
regards,
junichi
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] : Junichi Uekawa http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
GPG Fingerprint : 17D6 120E 4455 1832 9423 7447 3059 BF92
that it will cause problems.
For example, try compiling against tck/tk 8.3, and remove
8.3 and install 8.0, and then run the program.
The program should fail to start.
regards,
junichi
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] : Junichi Uekawa http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
GPG Fingerprint : 17D6 120E
PROTECTED] : Junichi Uekawa http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
GPG Fingerprint : 17D6 120E 4455 1832 9423 7447 3059 BF92 CD37 56F4
Libpkg-guide: http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer/column/libpkg-guide/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
-data?
Why do you have to make it a symlink at all ?
By doing that you are distributing a .deb file
which does not contain copyright information, etc.
regards,
junichi
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] : Junichi Uekawa http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
GPG Fingerprint : 17D6 120E 4455 1832 9423
.
Don't just split without good reason.
Just making sure one of the good reasons was seen in the discussion.
Trying,
junichi
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] : Junichi Uekawa http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
GPG Fingerprint : 17D6 120E 4455 1832 9423 7447 3059 BF92 CD37 56F4
Libpkg-guide
to care about python-version compatibility,
do they ? Their primary aim is to write code that works for them, not
write code that works on both.
maybe I am wrong, I don't code in python (yet).
regards,
junichi
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] : Junichi Uekawa http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
GPG
{print sum / i }'
12.3125
grep-available -FMaintainer [EMAIL PROTECTED] -sPackage| awk '{sum+= length($2); i ++}
END{print sum / i }'
10.3571
regards,
junichi
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] : Junichi Uekawa http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
GPG Fingerprint : 17D6 120E 4455 1832 9423 7447 3059
to care about python-version compatibility,
do they ? Their primary aim is to write code that works for them, not
write code that works on both.
maybe I am wrong, I don't code in python (yet).
regards,
junichi
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] : Junichi Uekawa http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
GPG
++} END{print sum / i }'
12.3125
grep-available -FMaintainer [EMAIL PROTECTED] -sPackage| awk '{sum+=
length($2); i ++} END{print sum / i }'
10.3571
regards,
junichi
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] : Junichi Uekawa http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
GPG Fingerprint : 17D6 120E 4455 1832 9423 7447
On Wed, 3 Apr 2002 00:07:47 +
David H. Askew [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok.. so i'm working on packages for jedit .. and I'm contemplating
splitting the documentation into its own sepperate package.
That I would object.
Splitting the docs when it doessn't have to happen, it not useful.
On Fri, 5 Apr 2002 15:04:41 +0200
Russell Coker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 5 Apr 2002 14:42, Stefan Schwandter wrote:
I know that policy recommends not to use uppercase letters in package
names, but I'd like to package jack (jackit.sourceforge.net).
Unfortunately, there already is a
On Wed, 3 Apr 2002 00:07:47 +
David H. Askew [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok.. so i'm working on packages for jedit .. and I'm contemplating
splitting the documentation into its own sepperate package.
That I would object.
Splitting the docs when it doessn't have to happen, it not useful.
random segfault
o irrational behavior
regards,
junihi
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] : Junichi Uekawa http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
GPG Fingerprint : 17D6 120E 4455 1832 9423 7447 3059 BF92 CD37 56F4
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble
affect.
I don't know if there could be a systematic way to do it.
Warning might be possible, but not strict and real checking.
Lintian won't be able to do this, because lintian only has access
to one version of source at the time.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] : Junichi Uekawa http://www.netfort.gr.jp
Junichi Uekawa [EMAIL PROTECTED] cum veritate scripsit:
Well, now I updated the doc a little bit, I'll post it here.
I've received exactly one response so far, and I'm feeling a bit
naive about the contents of this document.
Please comment:
Library packaging Guide (very much a draft
random segfault
o irrational behavior
regards,
junihi
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] : Junichi Uekawa http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
GPG Fingerprint : 17D6 120E 4455 1832 9423 7447 3059 BF92 CD37 56F4
affect.
I don't know if there could be a systematic way to do it.
Warning might be possible, but not strict and real checking.
Lintian won't be able to do this, because lintian only has access
to one version of source at the time.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] : Junichi Uekawa http://www.netfort.gr.jp
Junichi Uekawa [EMAIL PROTECTED] cum veritate scripsit:
Well, now I updated the doc a little bit, I'll post it here.
I've received exactly one response so far, and I'm feeling a bit
naive about the contents of this document.
Please comment:
Library packaging Guide (very much a draft
it
0.3.0 (well, it's only natural).
However, in the library sense, if it is binary-incompatible,
it should have a new soname, i.e. 1.0.0
regards,
junichi
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] : Junichi Uekawa http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
GPG Fingerprint : 17D6 120E 4455 1832 9423 7447 3059 BF92
it
0.3.0 (well, it's only natural).
However, in the library sense, if it is binary-incompatible,
it should have a new soname, i.e. 1.0.0
regards,
junichi
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] : Junichi Uekawa http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
GPG Fingerprint : 17D6 120E 4455 1832 9423 7447 3059 BF92 CD37
libmowitz0
Are you sure of the soname version number?
regards,
junichi
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] : Junichi Uekawa http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
GPG Fingerprint : 17D6 120E 4455 1832 9423 7447 3059 BF92 CD37 56F4
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe
libmowitz0
Are you sure of the soname version number?
regards,
junichi
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] : Junichi Uekawa http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
GPG Fingerprint : 17D6 120E 4455 1832 9423 7447 3059 BF92 CD37 56F4
/libMowitz.so.0.2.0
And the version number of the package is 0.2.0 as well.
That sounds like a bad news, a potential sign of
upstream changing binary interface between 0.1.0 and 0.2.0
regards,
junichi
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] : Junichi Uekawa http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
GPG Fingerprint
?
Binary package names are incorrect, name them
libmowitz0 and libmowitz-dev
The source package name is fine.
regards,
junichi
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] : Junichi Uekawa http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
GPG Fingerprint : 17D6 120E 4455 1832 9423 7447 3059 BF92 CD37 56F4
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
?
Binary package names are incorrect, name them
libmowitz0 and libmowitz-dev
The source package name is fine.
regards,
junichi
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] : Junichi Uekawa http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
GPG Fingerprint : 17D6 120E 4455 1832 9423 7447 3059 BF92 CD37 56F4
should have been
somewhere like /usr/share/sbuild/sbuild.default.conf.
regards,
junichi
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] : Junichi Uekawa http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
GPG Fingerprint : 17D6 120E 4455 1832 9423 7447 3059 BF92 CD37 56F4
and the newer version of the ocaml package.
If that is the case, it should be enough to specify ocaml (= version)
with high-enough version number (which includes the previous camlp4).
At least from the information given from your mail.
regards,
junichi
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] : Junichi Uekawa
and the newer version of the ocaml package.
If that is the case, it should be enough to specify ocaml (= version)
with high-enough version number (which includes the previous camlp4).
At least from the information given from your mail.
regards,
junichi
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] : Junichi Uekawa
running it?
Can you please explain me what I'm missing ?
That's what I want to know too.
regards,
junichi
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] : Junichi Uekawa http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
GPG Fingerprint : 17D6 120E 4455 1832 9423 7447 3059 BF92 CD37 56F4
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
.
regards,
junichi
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] : Junichi Uekawa http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
GPG Fingerprint : 17D6 120E 4455 1832 9423 7447 3059 BF92 CD37 56F4
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
running it?
Can you please explain me what I'm missing ?
That's what I want to know too.
regards,
junichi
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] : Junichi Uekawa http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
GPG Fingerprint : 17D6 120E 4455 1832 9423 7447 3059 BF92 CD37 56F4
.
regards,
junichi
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] : Junichi Uekawa http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
GPG Fingerprint : 17D6 120E 4455 1832 9423 7447 3059 BF92 CD37 56F4
similar
libgphoto2-dev Package would probably contain
/usr/lib/libgphoto.so which is a symlink to
/usr/lib/libgphoto.so.2, and etc. etc. etc.
The soname is the number 2 in this case
(but I have not looked at libgphoto2 to check)
regards,
junichi
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] : Junichi Uekawa
but it would be really small.
I might be missing something, but what is the soname for
libgphoto2 ?
regards,
junichi
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] : Junichi Uekawa http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
GPG Fingerprint : 17D6 120E 4455 1832 9423 7447 3059 BF92 CD37 56F4
libgphoto2-dev Package would probably contain
/usr/lib/libgphoto.so which is a symlink to
/usr/lib/libgphoto.so.2, and etc. etc. etc.
The soname is the number 2 in this case
(but I have not looked at libgphoto2 to check)
regards,
junichi
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] : Junichi Uekawa
| # define MAXPATHLEN 1024
| #endif
[everything else dropped]
regards,
junichi
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] : Junichi Uekawa http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
GPG Fingerprint : 17D6 120E 4455 1832 9423 7447 3059 BF92 CD37 56F4
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
?
Not yet.
Please do.
Reducing the -Wall warnings, and other things will
benefit everyone.
regards,
junichi
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] : Junichi Uekawa http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
GPG Fingerprint : 17D6 120E 4455 1832 9423 7447 3059 BF92 CD37 56F4
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
?
Not yet.
Please do.
Reducing the -Wall warnings, and other things will
benefit everyone.
regards,
junichi
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] : Junichi Uekawa http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
GPG Fingerprint : 17D6 120E 4455 1832 9423 7447 3059 BF92 CD37 56F4
muha.sh
fuu
$ MUHA=fuu muha.sh
regards.
junichi
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] : Junichi Uekawa http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
GPG Fingerprint : 17D6 120E 4455 1832 9423 7447 3059 BF92 CD37 56F4
.
It is not for a normal user.)
Packaging of setuid programs is very discouraged for first-time packagers.
Are you sure you want to do that ?
regards,
junichi
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] : Junichi Uekawa http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
GPG Fingerprint : 17D6 120E 4455 1832 9423 7447 3059 BF92 CD37 56F4
-specific modifications.
regards,
junichi
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] : Junichi Uekawa http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
GPG Fingerprint : 17D6 120E 4455 1832 9423 7447 3059 BF92 CD37 56F4
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
in the BTS.
It is pretty difficult to see if the person is doing anything useful.
regards,
junichi
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] : Junichi Uekawa http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
GPG Fingerprint : 17D6 120E 4455 1832 9423 7447 3059 BF92 CD37 56F4
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
.
It is not for a normal user.)
Packaging of setuid programs is very discouraged for first-time packagers.
Are you sure you want to do that ?
regards,
junichi
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] : Junichi Uekawa http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
GPG Fingerprint : 17D6 120E 4455 1832 9423 7447 3059 BF92 CD37 56F4
-specific modifications.
regards,
junichi
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] : Junichi Uekawa http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
GPG Fingerprint : 17D6 120E 4455 1832 9423 7447 3059 BF92 CD37 56F4
in the BTS.
It is pretty difficult to see if the person is doing anything useful.
regards,
junichi
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] : Junichi Uekawa http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
GPG Fingerprint : 17D6 120E 4455 1832 9423 7447 3059 BF92 CD37 56F4
, but not quite, lintian clean; it produces one error ---
Have you considered asking the upstream to
change the license ?
regards,
junichi
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] : Junichi Uekawa http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
GPG Fingerprint : 17D6 120E 4455 1832 9423 7447 3059 BF92 CD37 56F4
, but not quite, lintian clean; it produces one error ---
Have you considered asking the upstream to
change the license ?
regards,
junichi
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] : Junichi Uekawa http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
GPG Fingerprint : 17D6 120E 4455 1832 9423 7447 3059 BF92 CD37 56F4
which simply depends on the above three
I have not publicly released the packages yet, but I can point potential
sponsors to a download location.
Could you put it up somewhere public, so that someone who cares may be
able to examine.
regards,
junichi
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] : Junichi
many notes.
regards,
junichi
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] : Junichi Uekawa http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
GPG Fingerprint : 17D6 120E 4455 1832 9423 7447 3059 BF92 CD37 56F4
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
many notes.
regards,
junichi
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] : Junichi Uekawa http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
GPG Fingerprint : 17D6 120E 4455 1832 9423 7447 3059 BF92 CD37 56F4
recommend build depending on bison, and building it.
Having intermediate files included in the distribution is rather wrong,
and I think the preferred source format for editing is the bison
source, not the bison-generated source.
regards,
junichi
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] : Junichi Uekawa
.
Don't use debhelper, or keep your debhelper compatibility level
at 2 or less, because debhelper v3 was not available in potato.
regards,
junichi
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] : Junichi Uekawa http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
GPG Fingerprint : 17D6 120E 4455 1832 9423 7447 3059 BF92 CD37 56F4
idea to do this on ia64. The details are not available
to me.
regards,
junichi
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] : Junichi Uekawa http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
GPG Fingerprint : 17D6 120E 4455 1832 9423 7447 3059 BF92 CD37 56F4
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
idea to do this on ia64. The details are not available
to me.
regards,
junichi
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] : Junichi Uekawa http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
GPG Fingerprint : 17D6 120E 4455 1832 9423 7447 3059 BF92 CD37 56F4
.. sounds hacky.
Anyway, I was trying to do this kind of stuff, but I have not gone too
far. I stopped at trying to set up a buildd for athlon (I have effectively
stopped at making athlon-builder)
Please do.
regards,
junichi
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] : Junichi Uekawa http://www.netfort.gr.jp
versions.
I think it involves
(mkdir BUILD; cd BUILD; ../configure )
kind of thing...
regards,
junichi
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] : Junichi Uekawa http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
GPG Fingerprint : 17D6 120E 4455 1832 9423 7447 3059 BF92 CD37 56F4
.. sounds hacky.
Anyway, I was trying to do this kind of stuff, but I have not gone too
far. I stopped at trying to set up a buildd for athlon (I have effectively
stopped at making athlon-builder)
Please do.
regards,
junichi
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] : Junichi Uekawa http
versions.
I think it involves
(mkdir BUILD; cd BUILD; ../configure )
kind of thing...
regards,
junichi
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] : Junichi Uekawa http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
GPG Fingerprint : 17D6 120E 4455 1832 9423 7447 3059 BF92 CD37 56F4
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
Nikolaus Regnat [EMAIL PROTECTED] immo vero scripsit
I'm searching for a manual (like New Maintainers' Guide) how to craete a
package from a libary. Is there anything like that?
As far as I know, the answer is No, and I think we need one too.
You can see some of it in the debian-policy.
Nikolaus Regnat [EMAIL PROTECTED] immo vero scripsit
I'm searching for a manual (like New Maintainers' Guide) how to craete a
package from a libary. Is there anything like that?
As far as I know, the answer is No, and I think we need one too.
You can see some of it in the debian-policy.
Robert Bihlmeyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] immo vero scripsit
If you want to provide further hints, upload a final version containing
you can remove me without ill effects in the description.
I think I would just remove the package, since the package has
only entered unstable, and not on testing nor
Hello,
Upstram of qtecasound has depricated libqtecasound,
and the only application which depended upon libqtecasound (qtecasound, and ecawave)
no longer need the library.
How would I handle this situation smoothly?
Any ideas?
Would I need to make an empty package of libqtecasound to ensure
Hello,
Upstram of qtecasound has depricated libqtecasound,
and the only application which depended upon libqtecasound (qtecasound, and
ecawave)
no longer need the library.
How would I handle this situation smoothly?
Any ideas?
Would I need to make an empty package of libqtecasound to ensure
Othmar Pasteka [EMAIL PROTECTED] cum veritate scripsit:
Hmm... anyone going to package manedit ?
I tried it. It was rather fun to play with. It edits in roff.
Should I upload it ?
regards,
junichi
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
-BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-
Othmar Pasteka [EMAIL PROTECTED] cum veritate scripsit:
Hmm... anyone going to package manedit ?
I tried it. It was rather fun to play with. It edits in roff.
Should I upload it ?
regards,
junichi
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
-BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-
to your new
mail address, it should change.
regards,
junichi
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] : Junichi Uekawa http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
GPG Fingerprint : 17D6 120E 4455 1832 9423 7447 3059 BF92 CD37 56F4
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe"
to your new
mail address, it should change.
regards,
junichi
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] : Junichi Uekawa http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
GPG Fingerprint : 17D6 120E 4455 1832 9423 7447 3059 BF92 CD37 56F4
/init.d/
#!/bin/sh -e
# hacked version of Adam Heath's code by Junichi Uekawa 22 Oct. 2000
# modified 25 oct 2000
if [ -e /etc/init.d/$(basename $0) ]; then
# inside chroot
hostname -F /etc/hostname
HOME=/root
exec /bin/sh --login
else
# starting outside the chroot
dir=$(realpath $(dirname
/
#!/bin/sh -e
# hacked version of Adam Heath's code by Junichi Uekawa 22 Oct. 2000
# modified 25 oct 2000
if [ -e /etc/init.d/$(basename $0) ]; then
# inside chroot
hostname -F /etc/hostname
HOME=/root
exec /bin/sh --login
else
# starting outside the chroot
dir=$(realpath $(dirname $0
help some applications to compile?
regards,
junichi
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] : Junichi Uekawa http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
GPG Fingerprint : 17D6 120E 4455 1832 9423 7447 3059 BF92 CD37 56F4
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Tro
applications to compile?
regards,
junichi
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] : Junichi Uekawa http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
GPG Fingerprint : 17D6 120E 4455 1832 9423 7447 3059 BF92 CD37 56F4
101 - 200 of 232 matches
Mail list logo
