Hello,
On Sat, 21 Nov 2009, ERSEK Laszlo wrote:
I *really* feel my work between lbzip2-0.15 and lbzip2-0.17, both
upstream and packaging, is down the drain.
At the very least this work was of use to _you_ --- so it is not down
the drain.
I was pestering the bzip2 and tar package maintainers
Hello,
On Tue, 02 Jun 2009, Dominik Bruhn wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.8-1
of the package obexpushd.
On Sat, 06 Jun 2009, Dominik Bruhn wrote:
I'm looking for someone to sponsor a new version (0.8) for obexpushd.
The changes are small, so it should be reasy to
Hello,
On Fri, 05 Jun 2009, Romain Beauxis wrote:
Can't you just create a version number that fits ?
For instance, if your version schema is x.y.z-t, and you want all versions,
you can use for instance 0.0.0
I think this means also that the version passed in -v does not have to be
Hello,
In the context of the RFS for febootstrap,
On Wed, Jun 03, 2009 at 01:16:26AM +0530, Y Giridhar Appaji Nag wrote:
Another note: I built with -v2.1-1 in debbuildopts but that doesn't include
the changelog entry for 2.1-1 in the changes file.
I have wondered why dpkg-genchanges takes the
Hello,
On Thu, 04 Jun 2009, Ben Finney wrote:
Kapil Hari Paranjape ka...@debian.org writes:
One suggestion I found (I think in Neil William's sponsoring
requirements write-up) was to use an empty argument for -v but I
couldn't get that to work.
It works fine for me. Perhaps show a VCS
Hello,
On Fri, 29 May 2009, Alexander Prinsier wrote:
Anything else that keeps my package from getting sponsored?;)
Uploading!
I'm uploading the package. However, you should find a different way
to handle the manpage patches in the long run.
- send those patches upstream so they can be
Hello,
On Fri, 29 May 2009, Alexander Prinsier wrote:
PS: can I bother you when I have an update available for agedu or should
I mail to debian-mentors again?
You could email to me with a cc to debian-mentors. It may just happen
that I am unavailable at the time and someone else will sponsor
Hello,
On Wed, 27 May 2009, Alexander Prinsier wrote:
* Package name: agedu
Version : 8442-2
Upstream Author : Simon Tatham ana...@pobox.com
* URL : http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/agedu/
* License : MIT
Section : utils
It builds
Hello,
On Tue, 05 May 2009, Petr Pudlak wrote:
The problem is that if pbuilder is invoked with --binary-arch, it still tries
to build the whole project, including the documentation (indep). It looks to
me as if the problem
is with pbuilder (or with the tools it's invoking), but of course the
Hello,
On Mon, 30 Mar 2009, Davide Puricelli wrote:
I'm asking you help about bug #509367.
As you can imagine similar problems have come-up in the past.
2) just putting a Conflicts between mono-devel and chicken-bin,
but I think it's not a good solution for users.
This is not correct since
Hellom
On Wed, 25 Mar 2009, Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
I got these warnings in lintian for my package, having no idea how to solve
this issue.
I probably have to manage to same man pages opening like this:
man jack-jconv
will be opened on these too:
man jconv
man fconv
man mkwavex
This
Hello,
On Wed, 11 Mar 2009, Karl Ferdinand Ebert wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.7-1
of my package tmux.
Here are some comments:
- add FAQ to docs
- add CHANGES file as upstream changelog
- ITP bug will be closed by the first upload not the first packaging attempt
So
Hello,
On Thu, 12 Mar 2009, Paul Wise wrote:
This sounds very much like 'screen', what advantages does it have over
'screen'?
Just quoting from the FAQ:
* How is tmux different from GNU screen? What else does it offer?
tmux offers several advantages over screen:
- a
Hello,
On Sat, 24 Jan 2009, Johan Henriksson wrote:
Johan Henriksson wrote:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=509601
http://mahogny.areta.org/temp/debs/
Source: pidgintex
Section: net
Priority: optional
Maintainer: Johan Henriksson maho...@areta.org
Build-Depends:
Hello,
On Sat, 24 Jan 2009, Johan Henriksson wrote:
Johan Henriksson wrote:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=509626
http://mahogny.areta.org/temp/debs/
Source: mathtex
Section: graphics
Priority: optional
Maintainer: Johan Henriksson maho...@areta.org
Hello,
On Fri, 27 Feb 2009, Luke Faraone wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for my package libpam-paperauth.
Generally looks good. However, it fails to build from source.
The pbuilder build returned the following error:
/usr/bin/ld: pam_ppp_so-pam_ppp.o: relocation R_X86_64_32 against
`a local
Hello,
On Fri, 27 Feb 2009, Petr Pudlak (Debian) wrote:
generating documentation also in HTML. I found a nice program, tex4ht, which
seems to work quite well.
Great to hear that!
I have a few question though:
2) The HTML page is quite large, ~300k, about the same size as the PDF.
Should
Hello,
On Mon, 19 Jan 2009, Ben Finney wrote:
* When packages are created by ‘dpkg-buildpackage’, the ‘*_changes’
files by default contain only changes from the latest entry in the
changelog.
By default, yes. However, there is the -vmmm.nnn-qqq option which makes the
changelog of all
Hello,
On Fri, 03 Oct 2008, Neil Williams wrote:
On Fri, 2008-10-03 at 16:16 -0400, Jonathan Steel wrote:
I'm trying to create a package of a shared library and I can't figure
out how to do it. I can do it for a normal binary using dh_make and
debuild. Ive read through all the debian
Hello,
On Tue, 30 Sep 2008 21:19:27 +0900 Charles Plessy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
whereas one of the goals of letting the user installing packages in his
home directory is to not bother the admins.
In that case, use fakechroot, it may be enough for you.
Alternatively use qemu or
Hello,
On Mon, 29 Sep 2008, Kruti wrote:
Can someone help me regarding how to install a package in any user defined
folder other than /usr using apt-get?
If you just want to examine the contents of the .deb package then you
can download the package (e.g. aptitude download pkgname) and
unpack
Hello,
On Fri, 26 Sep 2008, W. van den Akker wrote:
I am trying to get the maintainership for a package (SCID, et al).
Does this mean that you are:
1. Working on bugs in the package --- in which case please file patches
to the relevant bug report.
2. Working on a newer upstream version ---
Hello,
On Tue, 23 Sep 2008, Thomas Goirand wrote:
P.S: I also had hard time doing a backport of the Lenny version of
apt-cacher that depends on so many packages to be backported.
You can use schroot or chroot to run the lenny version of
software under etch (for example
Hello,
On Sat, 20 Sep 2008, Laurent Guignard wrote:
I think that the RFS procedure is too strict or legal for me
(at this moment according to my knowledge about Debian) and i would like
to have a mam to man discuss about... Is it possible ?
Don't ask whether you can ask! Just ask.
In other
Hello,
On Fri, 11 Jul 2008, Kurt B. Kaiser wrote:
I've uploaded -2, thanks! (Will need tarball upload)
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/r/remind/remind_03.01.05-2.dsc
Please note that the following changelog line was missing from
your package and was added:
* Update Standards
Dear Jan,
(I am cc-ing this to debian-mentors some of whom might be able to
help.)
I looked at your packaging at:
http://www-pool.math.tu-berlin.de/~hesso/deb/nvi_1.81.6-3.dsc
I agree that the copyright situation is a bit complex.
Basically, Joerg has raised the question because the
Dear Jan,
On Sun, 06 Jul 2008, Jan Christoph Nordholz wrote:
I've uploaded an updated package to the above URL and also uploaded the new
copyright file separately to
http://www-pool.math.tu-berlin.de/~hesso/deb/nvi.copyright
Short explanation:
* All files that refer to LICENSE
Hello,
On Thu, 03 Jul 2008, Kurt B. Kaiser wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 03.01.05-1
of my package remind.
Since the previous version (03.01.04) of the package has been accepted with
DM-Upload-Allowed: yes and you as the maintainer, it seems to me
that you should be able
Hello,
On Sat, 05 Jul 2008, Kurt B. Kaiser wrote:
I am not yet in the DM keyring. Once I get my package gambc uploaded, I
will apply.
Oops. I should have checked with gpg --list-options show-keyring!
Sorry about that.
Also, remind has never been uploaded with the DM-Upload-Allowed field
On Fri, 27 Jun 2008, Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote:
New package on mentors:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/b/bindfs/bindfs_1.6.2-1.dsc
Uploaded.
Thanks for your contribution to Debian.
Regards,
Kapil.
--
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Dear Bernd,
On Thu, 26 Jun 2008, Bernd Schubert wrote:
Thanks at lot! I modified a bit following the wiki page Richard posted
(http://wiki.debian.org/Proposals/CopyrightFormat#head-133d3ff18d9a3119d48e96f0c8aca4a37391769f).
In detail I changed License to other. From the wiki page it not clear
Hello,
On Thu, 26 Jun 2008, Bernd Schubert wrote:
Thanks for spotting that. Fixed now. I just uploaded another version.
dget
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/u/unionfs-fuse/unionfs-fuse_0.20-4.dsc
Uploaded. Thanks for your contribution to Debian. Please check
Hello,
On Thu, 26 Jun 2008, Bernd Schubert wrote:
PS: I didn't try to upload the package for several months, since I was
all the time afraid of the formalisms like these.
I hope that this response has been encouraging rather than otherwise.
Well, yes and no ;) For this package all of
Hello,
On Thu, 26 Jun 2008, Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote:
Dear mentors, I'm looking for sponsor :)
- - dget
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/b/bindfs/bindfs_1.6.1-3.dsc
Here are some issues with this package.
- many source files have *no* copyright or author identification.
- there
Hello,
Mentors with some experience ith license issues may want to chip in
here!
On Mon, 23 Jun 2008, Bernd Schubert wrote:
- Please comply with section 4.2 of the Maintainer's guide
I tried my best to fulfill these reqirements
dget
Hello,
On Thu, 12 Jun 2008, Jan Christoph Nordholz wrote:
* nvi (1.79-26 = 1.81.6+debian-1)
Switch from the stable branch (which has been dead for ages) to the
development branch - it doesn't feel developmental though.
Package has been thoroughly revised (the 1.79 series didn't even employ
a
Hello,
On Thu, 12 Jun 2008, Jan Christoph Nordholz wrote:
* nvi (1.79-26 = 1.81.6+debian-1)
Switch from the stable branch (which has been dead for ages) to the
development branch - it doesn't feel developmental though.
Package has been thoroughly revised (the 1.79 series didn't even employ
a
Hello,
On Thu, 12 Jun 2008, Jan Christoph Nordholz wrote:
* nvi (1.79-26 = 1.81.6+debian-1)
Switch from the stable branch (which has been dead for ages) to the
development branch - it doesn't feel developmental though.
Package has been thoroughly revised (the 1.79 series didn't even employ
a
Hello,
On Fri, 20 Jun 2008, Bernd Schubert wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for my package unionfs-fuse.
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/u/unionfs-fuse/unionfs-fuse_0.9.20-2.dsc
This should have been:
-
Hello,
On Fri, 20 Jun 2008, Ken Bloom wrote:
Could someone please sponsor an upload of link-grammar for me? The
packages are at http://lingcog.iit.edu/~bloom/link-grammar/
Is there some reason to use this package rather than the more
actively developed one (current version 4.3.5) at the URL
Hello,
On Fri, 30 May 2008, Paul Johnson wrote:
I've been asking around for help on building debian packages.
changes, and all of those fiddles were getting wrapped up into the one
big diff file, making it impossible to figure out who did what.
One possible reason to do this is that the
Hello,
On Tue, 11 Mar 2008, Alexander Schmehl wrote:
Am 11.3.2008 schrieb Charles Plessy
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I am wondering how to find the origin of a binary package: if it was
built on a buildd or the machine of a developper, and in this case, who
uploaded it.
Well... If it was build
On Tue, 04 Mar 2008, Neil Williams wrote:
Note:
only fix bugs that are already filed to the BTS
The rest of the normal NMU rules still apply:
The following quote invites other fixes as well!
On Sun, 02 Mar 2008, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
Hello,
On Wed, 27 Feb 2008, Thorsten Schmale wrote:
i'm not on testing - i'm using etch currently. Is that a problem?
Even if you run etch you should probably have a testing/unstable copy
of lintian and the various documents like policy, developer's ref
and maint-guide. Of course, you should do
Hello,
On Thu, 07 Feb 2008, David Paleino wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.13 of the package
syslog-summary, which I'm also adopting (ITA: #455005).
On Thu, 21 Feb 2008, David Paleino wrote:
I've fixed everything, you can find the new package at the same url as before.
Hello,
On Wed, 20 Feb 2008, David Paleino wrote:
The package is now available on sourceforge.net:
http://sourceforge.net/projects/syslog-summary
The .dsc can be found on mentors:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/syslog-summary/syslog-summary_1.13-1.dsc
Could you please
Hello,
On Wed, 20 Feb 2008, David Paleino wrote:
is there any procedure to follow in case one needs to revoke his GPG key (thus
creating a new one)?
I mean, I have some packages in Debian, which are signed by my current key
(0x1392B174). Is it sufficient to start signing new packages with
Hello David,
On Wed, 20 Feb 2008, David Paleino wrote:
I've somehow lost my private key for encryption. That is, I can sign anything,
also encrypt, but not decrypt anything encrypted with my key.
I've already added a new encryption sub-key (and works), but having lost the
private part for
Hello,
Perhaps the following elaborate statement can be condensed (once
sufficient cooling has occurred :-))
1. Once pkg_ver.orig.tar.gz enters the Debian archive this is
considered the authoritative Debian version from which all the binary
Debian packages will be built (for that version of the
Hello,
On Wed, 20 Feb 2008, Paul Wise wrote:
On Feb 20, 2008 6:27 AM, Mauro Lizaur [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It builds these binary packages:
ee - An easy editor for novices and compuphobics
What are compuphobics? Sounds like a word that should not be in a
short description.
Hello,
On Mon, 18 Feb 2008, Mattia Oss wrote:
I'm trying to make a deb of kernel patch tuxonice[1], an alternative way
to suspend-to-disk and suspend-to-ram.
In which section should this package go? admin? devel?
At first glance this is likely to be more than one package. There is
the
Hello,
On Mon, 18 Feb 2008, Mattia Oss wrote:
On Mon, 18 Feb 2008 18:42:32 +0530
Kapil Hari Paranjape [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At first glance this is likely to be more than one package. There is
the kernel-patch which would be in devel, the hibernate script which
would be in admin
Hello,
On Mon, 18 Feb 2008, Mattia Oss wrote:
This is what I thought! But when I searched in the debian archive I
found:
linux-patch-aufs: Section: misc
linux-patch-bootsplash: Section: graphics
linux-patch-debian-2.6.24:Section: devel
linux-patch-debianlogo:
Hello,
One way to use pbuilder and avoid using aptcache is to use a
local mirroring tool as the MIRRORSITE. I use approx but YMMV.
Another way to avoid the massive file copying is to use a
BINDMOUNTS and set APTCACHE to . The tricky part is that
pbuilder's BINDMOUNTS allows you to specify the
Hello,
On Sun, 17 Feb 2008, Kapil Hari Paranjape wrote:
Then you configure apt in the chroot to use this directory
as its cache directory. I had this setup until I hit upon the first
option.
I forgot to say that you can use the APTCONFDIR option to
give a specialised configuration for APT
Hello,
On Sat, 16 Feb 2008, Andres Mejia wrote:
Second question is regarding a get-orig-source target I have for the package
mediatomb. It goes like:
# Common variables used to ease maintenance of the get-orig-source target.
MEDIATOMB_TARBALL = mediatomb-0.10.0.tar.gz
MEDIATOMB_VERSION =
Hello,
On Fri, 15 Feb 2008, David Paleino wrote:
Il giorno Fri, 15 Feb 2008 09:58:34 +0530
Kapil Hari Paranjape [EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto:
Could you please clarify the following issues:
1. The package does not seem to be Debian specific.
Yet it is packaged as such.
FYI
Hello,
On Thu, 14 Feb 2008, Thibaut Paumard wrote:
someone was so kind as to upload one of my packages, zerofree (now in
NEW). I'd like to be sure who that was, so I can contact them later for
the next upload for instance. How can I find out?
Usually, who-uploads from devscripts should
Hello,
On Thu, 07 Feb 2008, David Paleino wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.13 of the package
syslog-summary, which I'm also adopting (ITA: #455005).
Looks like a worthwhile package to keep going.
The package can be found on mentors.debian.net:
- dget
Hello,
On Wed, 13 Feb 2008, I wrote:
I've been trying to write a watch file for flpsed.
First of all sorry for hijacking the thread.
Secondly, it is amazing how writing down one's problem
makes it clear how to solve it!
As far as I can see the author's logic for this somewhat bizarre
Hello,
I've been trying to write a watch file for flpsed.
The upstream home page is at
http://www.ecademix.com/JohannesHofmann/flpsed.html
This lists two versions of flpsed based on which version of the
library fltk is being used. Since Debian only has fltk1.1.x at
the moment, I can
On Mon, 11 Feb 2008, Bas Wijnen wrote:
I suggest to mandate remove all generated files in the clean target
(formulated in a way which includes generated by upstream, not only
generated by the build target), which implies rebuild everything in
the build target.
With the current wording it is
Hello,
On Mon, 11 Feb 2008, Bas Wijnen wrote:
Secondly, when the clean target removes all generated files, they are
ignored when generating the diff.gz, so it doesn't actually clutter it.
It does produce some warnings during make clean, but those are not a
problem IMO.
Oops. I'd forgotten
Hello,
On Sat, 09 Feb 2008, David Paleino wrote:
You're right. Thanks for noticing this :)
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/libx86/libx86_0.99+ds1-1.dsc
Looks like there is convergence!
I'm currently away from my build machine. I'll upload as soon as I
get there.
Regards,
Hello,
On Wed, 06 Feb 2008, David Paleino wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.99-2+ds1 of the package
libx86, which I want to adopt.
On Sat, 09 Feb 2008, David Paleino wrote:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/libx86/libx86_0.99+ds1-1.dsc
Uploaded. Thanks for
Hello,
Sorry for the delay in responding. I had less free time than I thought.
gregor herrmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto:
So I suggest you use e.g. 0.99+ds-1 for your package.
On Fri, 08 Feb 2008, David Paleino wrote:
Now, after some reasoning, I believe that I should use something like
Hello,
On Sat, 09 Feb 2008, Kapil Hari Paranjape wrote:
I have not yet done the rest of my review so you may want to wait a
while before uploading a new version to mentors.
Since you are adding quilt, it is probably a good idea to modify/add
the Makefile in a quilt patch.
Once you take
Hello,
On Thu, 07 Feb 2008, David Paleino wrote:
I've merged the Ubuntu patch, and mentioned it in debian/changelog:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/libx86/libx86_0.99-2+ds1.dsc
2. You should perhaps request upstream author to
maintain a clean tarball.
I've
Hello,
On Mon, 04 Feb 2008, Barry deFreese wrote:
I've uploaded a version of imlib that fixes an important and RC bug. If
someone has time to review/sponsor.
Sune Vuorela wrote:
On 2008-02-05, Moritz Muehlenhoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've uploaded a version of imlib that fixes an
Hello,
On Wed, 06 Feb 2008, David Paleino wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.99-2+ds1 of the package
libx86, which I want to adopt.
Thanks for this work. This package is quite important for people with
laptops!
Some remarks:
1. The Ubuntu package seems to have
Hello,
On Tue, 05 Feb 2008, Charles Plessy wrote:
So in conclusion, we have nothing else to do than hoping that the
buildds will restart keeping up some day, or is it time to ask on
debian-release that packages not up to date on these arches are allowed
to migrate in testing anyway ?
Or you
Hello,
On Fri, 25 Jan 2008, Adam Borowski wrote:
Ok, I did this, then overwrote 0.3-5 on mentors. There's a watch file for
uscan now as well.
Good work. One last correction...
Under the new policy apt-get installs all recommended packages by
default. Moreover, Recommends: means that the
Hello,
On Thu, 24 Jan 2008, Adam Borowski wrote:
On Thu, Jan 24, 2008 at 09:10:11AM +0530, Kapil Hari Paranjape wrote:
Has this patch been submitted upstream?
Yes, albeit only a week ago.
Is upstream still working on this package? The last upload seems to
have been in 2004!
On Thu, 24 Jan
Hello,
Sorry about the delay in responding. Different time zones!
On Thu, 24 Jan 2008, Adam Borowski wrote:
Actually, it seems that reverting to upstream autotooling doesn't break
anything (except obviously being unfriendly to those who want to update
autotoolage themselves). I would need to
Hello,
Some quick comments.
On Thu, 24 Jan 2008, Adam Borowski wrote:
* Buffer overflow on RMD160:
It will cause only a crash instead of executing arbitrary code, and
considering the typical usage this is nearly always harmless. Yet, in
non-typical uses even wrong output can be pretty
Hello,
On Sat, 19 Jan 2008, Andreas Hoenen wrote:
as my default sponsor recently has not found the time for sponsoring,
and as he agrees I should better search another sponsor - well, here I
am :-)
and:
To finalize my advertisement: the dblatex package is not very
complicated (architecture
Hello,
On Sun, 30 Dec 2007, liran tal wrote:
Hey Richard,
By the way you have sent HTML mail to the list which you
should avoid.
but it does bother me on some level that someone whose suppose
to be a Mentor has taken such a lot of effort to discourage me from
building a package (whatever it
Hello,
On Thu, 20 Dec 2007, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
In other words, if you specifically do not want atlas3-base-dev to
be present during the build then you should put it in
Build-Conflicts.
I am aware, but want to avoid it.
It may not be avoidable. See
Hello,
On Thu, 20 Dec 2007, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
Also, when I try to build the package on my machine outside a
pbuilder, with the B-Deps installed, it works fine without atlas, and
generates packages which don't depend explicitly on libatlas. However,
the moment I try to use pbuilder on it,
Hello,
On Fri, 14 Dec 2007, iluvlinux wrote:
Storing your passphrase in a file or ENV variable is never safe as told in
documents and by mentors.
True enough. Yet ...
than here's what i found:
gpg's default home dir is ~/.gunpg (you can change it using --homedir
option, using this option
Hello,
On Fri, 14 Dec 2007, iluvlinux wrote:
but dpkg-buildpackage command asks for passphrase just before building the
package (at dh_builddeb ). so how can i check it with lintian etc.
Do you want that first i should build a package, check it and than use gpg
separately for signing the
Hello,
On Fri, 26 Oct 2007, Christoph Haas wrote:
That would mean getting the package in Debian (with the dependencies),
installing it, testing upgrading to the new deb etc., right? I just
worry what happens if I try that with a package that pulls in 1 GB of
dependencies. How would that work?
Hello,
On Thu, 11 Oct 2007, DS wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.0.3-1
of my package polipo.
It builds these binary packages:
polipo - a small, caching web proxy
$ who-uploads polipo
Uploads for polipo:
1.0.2-1 to unstable: Guus Sliepen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It is
Hello,
On Tue, 11 Sep 2007, Francesco Cecconi wrote:
this is my last attempt :)
You need to be more persistent than that :D
All the best with your effort for which we are all grateful.
Kapil.
--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
Hello,
On Mon, 03 Sep 2007, Joachim Reichel wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.7.7-2
of my package normalize-audio.
I haven't checked this in detail but a quick look shows additional
build-dependencies:
Build-Depends: debhelper (= 5), dpatch, autotools-dev,
Hello,
On Mon, 27 Aug 2007, Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz wrote:
Ready. The new package at
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/stunnel4/stunnel4_4.20-4~2.dsc
Uploading to master (via ftp to ftp-master.debian.org):
stunnel4_4.20-4.dsc: done.
stunnel4_4.20-4.diff.gz: done.
Hello,
I got hit by this so I wanted to note it down where it might be of
use to others. It *is* elementary but then ...
Suppose pkg_123.45.orig.tar.gz is already in the Debian archive.
To build a new version pkg_123.45-xxx of the Debian package.
*Always* use the Debian version of the
Hello,
On Mon, 27 Aug 2007, Neil Williams wrote:
I'm confused. Is this related to the other messages in this thread or
did you mean to start a new thread?
I'm sorry that I posted to your thread and confused the issue. Many
apologies for the hijack.
On Mon, 27 Aug 2007, Neil Williams wrote:
Hello,
On Mon, 27 Aug 2007, Jörg Sommer wrote:
Do *not* get the upstream .tar.gz which may have changed for some
mysterious reason.
I don't think the upstream tar.gz have changed, but your orig.tar.gz is
not the same as the upstream tar.gz. This happens if the orig.tar.gz was
repacked to
Hello,
On Tue, 28 Aug 2007, Kapil Hari Paranjape wrote:
In any case if this is done then it *must* be documented in
debian/changelog and/or README.Debian-source.
The *must* in the above line is not supported by Debian policy.
So I'll change that to a *should* :-)
Regards,
Kapil
Hello,
On Sun, 26 Aug 2007, Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz wrote:
Should I upload with just the change from (1)?
Yes. I agree with your reasoning.
Regards,
Kapil.
--
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hello,
On Thu, 23 Aug 2007, Kapil Hari Paranjape wrote:
Package looks fine. I'm currently updating my local pbuilder base and
will upload when that is done.
Unfortunately, I just realised that there are a few more changes that
I think you should make!
While looking through your debian/rules I
Hello,
On Wed, 22 Aug 2007, Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz wrote:
I have uploaded a new version with the suggested fixes. Following your
sugestion I used 3:4.20-4~1 as version. If you consider it worthy of
upload, please change it to -4. And please build with -v3:4.20-2
Thanks for pointing this
Hello,
On Sat, 18 Aug 2007, Thomas Jollans wrote:
In future, I would like to maintain my packages in Mercurial (or git)
repositories. It seams the best place for these to be would be alioth, but
I'm not sure where is the best place -- should I rather request a private
sub-directory or
Hello,
On Fri, 10 Aug 2007, Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 3:4.20-3
of my package stunnel4.
The package can be found on mentors.debian.net:
- URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/stunnel4
- Source repository: deb-src
Hello,
On Mon, 13 Aug 2007, Kevin Coyner wrote:
Such is the case with my packages. Upstream does strip in the
Makefile. Aside from editing the Makefile using dpatch, is there
anything else that is easily done to correct this?
Different strokes for different folks.
I got away with redefining
Hello,
Could some mentors help me here?!
I uploaded tex4ht version 20070717-1 to ftp-master.debian.org.
Unfortunately, a couple of typos slipped in which make this package
un-installable.
I have now prepared a fixed version 20070717-2 which has been checked
really properly (this time!) and
Hello,
On Mon, 04 Jun 2007, Eric Cooper wrote:
What is the best way to notify the user or administrator when a new
version of a package changes the format of a configuration file in a
backwards-incompatible way?
These options occurred to me:
Try to upgrade the user's old configuration
Hello,
On Fri, 13 Apr 2007, Steve Kemp wrote:
Sure, I primarily thinking of pbuilder when I wrote that. Sorry!
You can use unionfs wth a (pbuilder) chroot to test most things without
damaging the pristine nature of the build environment.
Secondly you need not run a full-fledged X server
Hello,
On Tue, 06 Feb 2007, Charles Plessy wrote:
$ apt-cache show latex2html
Package: latex2html
Priority: optional
Section: non-free/tex
There are alternatives like hevea and tex4ht. Both of them work
on generic LaTeX documents. Unusual uses of latex may require fine
tuning to get the
1 - 100 of 151 matches
Mail list logo
