On Sun, May 23, 2004 at 11:07:34PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi everybody, I'm looking for a sponsor to upload soon this
package of mine : plml
http://www.lulli.net/WEB/debian/plml_1.0-1.dsc
http://www.lulli.net/WEB/debian/plml_1.0-1.tar.gz
On Sun, May 23, 2004 at 10:06:26PM +0200, Roman Kennke wrote:
Does your package depend on the Blackdown JRE .deb? If so, then it would be
reasonable to rely on that package's file locations.
That was exactly my thought. My package depends on j2re1.4 and uses the
packages file locations.
On Mon, May 24, 2004 at 12:47:06AM +0200, Roman Kennke wrote:
'official' Java package from Blackdown. I have used the Blackdown
package from
deb http://jopa.studentenweb.org/debian/ ./
which works great. It's very likely, that other j2re1.4 packages (if
there are any) are
On Thu, May 20, 2004 at 11:05:06AM +0200, Turbo Fredriksson wrote:
The problem is that there's a REAL 'slapd' package on the Debian
GNU/Linux APT archive(s) which seem to override _my_ virtual
package(s).
I would like to have my packages to override the 'original' one
(they have A LOT newer
On Fri, May 14, 2004 at 11:07:47AM +0200, Stephan Brendel wrote:
i know, this doesn't belong to Debian Mentors, but i believe the
campaign from the german police needs to be supported.
I think the importance of my message trumps topicality. I've heard that
sort of justification before...
You
On Fri, May 14, 2004 at 11:07:47AM +0200, Stephan Brendel wrote:
i know, this doesn't belong to Debian Mentors, but i believe the
campaign from the german police needs to be supported.
I think the importance of my message trumps topicality. I've heard that
sort of justification before...
You
On Fri, Apr 23, 2004 at 12:56:22AM +0200, Jos? Luis Tall?n wrote:
The License reproduced hereunder comes from AlterMIME. It seems quite
similar to a modified BSD license, but there are some points which make me
suspect it could be non-free... can somebody please check it and offer some
On Thu, Apr 22, 2004 at 11:32:19PM -0400, Chris Anderson wrote:
I'm the current maintainer for xtrlock and it was abandoned upstream
years ago (1996?). I have an updated package where I rewrote the build
system since the old one used Imake and some flags that no longer were
relevant. I fixed a
On Fri, Apr 23, 2004 at 12:56:22AM +0200, Jos? Luis Tall?n wrote:
The License reproduced hereunder comes from AlterMIME. It seems quite
similar to a modified BSD license, but there are some points which make me
suspect it could be non-free... can somebody please check it and offer some
On Thu, Apr 22, 2004 at 11:32:19PM -0400, Chris Anderson wrote:
I'm the current maintainer for xtrlock and it was abandoned upstream
years ago (1996?). I have an updated package where I rewrote the build
system since the old one used Imake and some flags that no longer were
relevant. I fixed a
On Tue, Apr 20, 2004 at 03:04:50AM -0600, Benjamin Cutler wrote:
acc has a somewhat unclear license regarding distribution and
modification. It includes both a EULA that sounds like a commercially
purchased binary, and another license file that basically says modify
it, but don't sell it,
On Tue, Apr 20, 2004 at 04:19:19AM -0600, Benjamin Cutler wrote:
Matthew Palmer wrote:
If they're the typical .h files, /usr/include/acc would be as good a place
as any.
They're not, they're .acs files. I think I'm going to rename the package
What are .acs files when they're at home
On Tue, Apr 20, 2004 at 05:06:06AM -0600, Benjamin Cutler wrote:
Matthew Palmer wrote:
What are .acs files when they're at home? General data goes in either
/usr/share or /usr/lib, depending on the architecture-specificity.
They're uncompiled script files. It the case of the .acs files
On Tue, Apr 20, 2004 at 06:14:32PM -0600, Benjamin Cutler wrote:
Pending a response from Raven, would it be at all acceptable to place
the acc package somewhere offsite and have the zeth package tell you
where to get it, or is even that running afoul of policy?
You could put zeth in contrib
On Tue, Apr 20, 2004 at 03:04:50AM -0600, Benjamin Cutler wrote:
acc has a somewhat unclear license regarding distribution and
modification. It includes both a EULA that sounds like a commercially
purchased binary, and another license file that basically says modify
it, but don't sell it,
On Tue, Apr 20, 2004 at 05:06:06AM -0600, Benjamin Cutler wrote:
Matthew Palmer wrote:
What are .acs files when they're at home? General data goes in either
/usr/share or /usr/lib, depending on the architecture-specificity.
They're uncompiled script files. It the case of the .acs files
On Tue, Apr 20, 2004 at 06:14:32PM -0600, Benjamin Cutler wrote:
Pending a response from Raven, would it be at all acceptable to place
the acc package somewhere offsite and have the zeth package tell you
where to get it, or is even that running afoul of policy?
You could put zeth in contrib
On Mon, Apr 19, 2004 at 01:38:04PM +0800, Nima Talebi wrote:
My name is Nima Talebi and I'd like to become a Debian developer.
This would be a first port of call, I'd say:
http://people.debian.org/~mpalmer/debian-mentors_FAQ.html
That should answer your first round of questions.
- Matt
On Thu, Apr 15, 2004 at 07:57:35PM +0200, Jeremy Lain? wrote:
Anyhow, diogenes 0.9.9.3-4 fixes this, can you possibly confirm that
the installation works as expected?
Upload it to my queue (as described at
http://people.debian.org/~mpalmer/sponsorship.html) and I'll check it out.
This still
On Thu, Apr 15, 2004 at 07:57:35PM +0200, Jeremy Lain? wrote:
Anyhow, diogenes 0.9.9.3-4 fixes this, can you possibly confirm that
the installation works as expected?
Upload it to my queue (as described at
http://people.debian.org/~mpalmer/sponsorship.html) and I'll check it out.
This still
I found the following problems on an initial investigation of the package:
* No WNPP bug filed.
* Communicates with the user via the console. Consider using debconf notes
instead if it's vitally important.
* If you chose one of the first three options on a question that only has
two options in
I found the following problems on an initial investigation of the package:
* No WNPP bug filed.
* Communicates with the user via the console. Consider using debconf notes
instead if it's vitally important.
* If you chose one of the first three options on a question that only has
two options in
On Tue, Apr 13, 2004 at 09:43:50AM +0200, Jeremy Lain? wrote:
I am still looking for a sponsor for Diogenes! I am sure there is
someone with some PHP/MySQL/debconf experience out there to look at the
packages?
Experience, probably. Time is the pressing issue. Out of interest, what
does
On Tue, Apr 13, 2004 at 11:14:46AM +0200, Jeremy Lain? wrote:
I have looked through the MySource documentation and I won't claim that
Diogenes has all the features of MySource, that just wouldn't be true
(for instance there is no plugin mecanism in Diogenes currently). It
does however, have
On Tue, Apr 13, 2004 at 09:43:50AM +0200, Jeremy Lain? wrote:
I am still looking for a sponsor for Diogenes! I am sure there is
someone with some PHP/MySQL/debconf experience out there to look at the
packages?
Experience, probably. Time is the pressing issue. Out of interest, what
does
On Tue, Apr 13, 2004 at 11:14:46AM +0200, Jeremy Lain? wrote:
I have looked through the MySource documentation and I won't claim that
Diogenes has all the features of MySource, that just wouldn't be true
(for instance there is no plugin mecanism in Diogenes currently). It
does however, have
On Sat, Apr 03, 2004 at 06:12:52PM -0700, Benjamin Cutler wrote:
Just how important is it that a package be created on a box running sid?
I'm currently running sarge, and would like to package a program myself
instead of waiting for somebody else, but I'm not sure I want to start
running
On Tue, Mar 23, 2004 at 11:53:36AM +0100, KELEMEN Peter wrote:
[ Please Cc: answers as I'm not subscribed. Thanks. ]
I was about to vote when I realized that my GPG key has expired
exactly one year ago. In private communications this didn't pose
a problem, but chaning Debian password for
On Tue, Mar 23, 2004 at 11:53:36AM +0100, KELEMEN Peter wrote:
[ Please Cc: answers as I'm not subscribed. Thanks. ]
I was about to vote when I realized that my GPG key has expired
exactly one year ago. In private communications this didn't pose
a problem, but chaning Debian password for
On Sat, Mar 20, 2004 at 03:22:12PM +0200, Art??ras ??lajus wrote:
I am building package and file ec in /usr/share/doc/echat/ isn't
executable.
It's an script and makefile installs it with mode 755. What could be wrong?
Probably the fact that documentation is very rarely supposed to be
On Sat, Mar 20, 2004 at 03:22:12PM +0200, Art??ras ??lajus wrote:
I am building package and file ec in /usr/share/doc/echat/ isn't
executable.
It's an script and makefile installs it with mode 755. What could be wrong?
Probably the fact that documentation is very rarely supposed to be
On Fri, Mar 19, 2004 at 12:09:53PM +0200, Martin-?ric Racine wrote:
Subject says it all. Feel free to ask any clarification question.
The effort involved in going to the bug report and have a good read isn't
likely to be expended if I don't have any interest in the package.
You might get a
On Fri, Mar 19, 2004 at 12:35:32PM +0200, Martin-?ric Racine wrote:
On Fri, 19 Mar 2004, Matthew Palmer wrote:
On Fri, Mar 19, 2004 at 12:09:53PM +0200, Martin-?ric Racine wrote:
Subject says it all. Feel free to ask any clarification question.
You might get a better response if you
On Thu, Mar 18, 2004 at 12:55:33PM -0500, Stephen Gran wrote:
The version for this release is 0.70-rc, and upstream says the next
release will be 0.70. The obvious problem is:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ dpkg --compare-versions 0.70-rc-1 lt 0.70-1 echo yes
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$
That won't
On Fri, Mar 19, 2004 at 12:09:53PM +0200, Martin-?ric Racine wrote:
Subject says it all. Feel free to ask any clarification question.
The effort involved in going to the bug report and have a good read isn't
likely to be expended if I don't have any interest in the package.
You might get a
On Fri, Mar 19, 2004 at 12:35:32PM +0200, Martin-?ric Racine wrote:
On Fri, 19 Mar 2004, Matthew Palmer wrote:
On Fri, Mar 19, 2004 at 12:09:53PM +0200, Martin-?ric Racine wrote:
Subject says it all. Feel free to ask any clarification question.
You might get a better response if you
On Thu, Mar 18, 2004 at 12:55:33PM -0500, Stephen Gran wrote:
The version for this release is 0.70-rc, and upstream says the next
release will be 0.70. The obvious problem is:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ dpkg --compare-versions 0.70-rc-1 lt 0.70-1 echo yes
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$
That won't
On Wed, Mar 17, 2004 at 02:05:08AM -0500, Brian Russo wrote:
At Wed, Mar 17, 2004 at 05:20:14PM +1100, Matthew Palmer wrote:
Since you're still in db.debian.org, and not listed as an emeritus or
disabled maintainer, I think all you'd have to do is get a new key in the
keyring and you'd
On Wed, Mar 17, 2004 at 05:06:04AM -0500, Brian Russo wrote:
Seriously though, Any AM's around?
quietly raises hand
It's not an AM you've got to convince, though. Front Desk and the keyring
maintainer would be the people you'd have to convince that whatever
authentication method you were going
On Thu, Mar 18, 2004 at 12:50:24AM -0300, Everton da Silva Marques wrote:
I'm unsure on how to apply licensing terms to RULI
(GNU GPL)
plus this recently created PHP4-binding. Do we have
compatibility issues with the PHP license?
Since your library is under the GPL, I presume that the PHP4
On Tue, Mar 16, 2004 at 08:29:08PM -0800, Number Six wrote:
If the main binary in a package is named x and the package is named
x-package, should I ship
(a) a manpage x.1 ?
(b) a manpage x-package.[1-9]?
I'm pretty sure of (a). I think the answer to (b) is no, but I'm not
sure? If
On Wed, Mar 17, 2004 at 12:22:01AM -0500, Brian Russo wrote:
Looking to reactivate myself, gradually.
Can someone point me to the current procedure, Thanks.
Since you're still in db.debian.org, and not listed as an emeritus or
disabled maintainer, I think all you'd have to do is get a new key
On Wed, Mar 17, 2004 at 02:05:08AM -0500, Brian Russo wrote:
At Wed, Mar 17, 2004 at 05:20:14PM +1100, Matthew Palmer wrote:
Since you're still in db.debian.org, and not listed as an emeritus or
disabled maintainer, I think all you'd have to do is get a new key in the
keyring and you'd
On Wed, Mar 17, 2004 at 05:06:04AM -0500, Brian Russo wrote:
Seriously though, Any AM's around?
quietly raises hand
It's not an AM you've got to convince, though. Front Desk and the keyring
maintainer would be the people you'd have to convince that whatever
authentication method you were going
On Thu, Mar 18, 2004 at 12:50:24AM -0300, Everton da Silva Marques wrote:
I'm unsure on how to apply licensing terms to RULI
(GNU GPL)
plus this recently created PHP4-binding. Do we have
compatibility issues with the PHP license?
Since your library is under the GPL, I presume that the PHP4
On Tue, Mar 16, 2004 at 08:29:08PM -0800, Number Six wrote:
If the main binary in a package is named x and the package is named
x-package, should I ship
(a) a manpage x.1 ?
(b) a manpage x-package.[1-9]?
I'm pretty sure of (a). I think the answer to (b) is no, but I'm not
sure? If
On Wed, Mar 17, 2004 at 12:22:01AM -0500, Brian Russo wrote:
Looking to reactivate myself, gradually.
Can someone point me to the current procedure, Thanks.
Since you're still in db.debian.org, and not listed as an emeritus or
disabled maintainer, I think all you'd have to do is get a new key
On Mon, Mar 15, 2004 at 07:37:24PM -0800, Number Six wrote:
gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --send-key [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Okay, I did that. Is there a canonical-Debian way to point the world
there to verify it? So they'll actually trust the .dsc?
Or do I just do that in an out-of-band way
On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 07:38:45AM +, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
Matthew Palmer ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 05:32:03PM +0100, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
I have a package that has an optional part that cannot presently be
built in main but ships a (java bytecode) binary
On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 07:38:45AM +, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
Matthew Palmer ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 05:32:03PM +0100, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
I have a package that has an optional part that cannot presently be
built in main but ships a (java bytecode) binary
On Mon, Mar 08, 2004 at 01:27:39PM +, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
What strikes me as odd is why people think they will get any kind of
scholarship (which seems to be the objective) with such a mail.
It's like spam. They send an e-mail to anything that vaguely resembles an
e-mail address within
On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 05:32:03PM +0100, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
I have a package that has an optional part that cannot presently be
built in main but ships a (java bytecode) binary in the tarball.
Policy prevents me from adding this to the binary debs, but my
understanding of policy is that I
On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 01:55:21PM -0600, David Moreno Garza wrote:
In the documentation I been searching, I just can find some resources
with packaging which need to be compilated or so. In the package I would
need to set up a new MySQL database (I vaguely know I could use
wwwconfig, but not
On Mon, Mar 08, 2004 at 01:27:39PM +, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
What strikes me as odd is why people think they will get any kind of
scholarship (which seems to be the objective) with such a mail.
It's like spam. They send an e-mail to anything that vaguely resembles an
e-mail address within
On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 05:32:03PM +0100, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
I have a package that has an optional part that cannot presently be
built in main but ships a (java bytecode) binary in the tarball.
Policy prevents me from adding this to the binary debs, but my
understanding of policy is that I
On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 01:55:21PM -0600, David Moreno Garza wrote:
In the documentation I been searching, I just can find some resources
with packaging which need to be compilated or so. In the package I would
need to set up a new MySQL database (I vaguely know I could use
wwwconfig, but not
Ben Young wrote:
Yeah... but it was said in a quite arrogant manner. Matthew Palmer said
things neatly in his first email (which I think everybody understood
correctly!), then I didn't quite like the tone of his second one. Just
Yeah, the second one was a little over the top. How many
Ben Young wrote:
Yeah... but it was said in a quite arrogant manner. Matthew Palmer said
things neatly in his first email (which I think everybody understood
correctly!), then I didn't quite like the tone of his second one. Just
Yeah, the second one was a little over the top. How many
On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 01:23:39PM +0800, Didier Casse wrote:
On 02/03/04, at 15:31 +0100, Thomas Viehmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There's no reason to produce packages for a one liner.
As for your another way of doing things: Just because there's not one
exclusive right way doesn't mean
On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 12:33:39AM +0100, Philipp Gortan wrote:
The proper place for the script (after doing things right) is
ghostscript upstream. Take a look at pdf2ps and try to get your program
next to that. There's no reason to produce packages for a one liner.
ok, so we know the
On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 12:33:39AM +0100, Philipp Gortan wrote:
The proper place for the script (after doing things right) is
ghostscript upstream. Take a look at pdf2ps and try to get your program
next to that. There's no reason to produce packages for a one liner.
ok, so we know the
On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 05:25:05PM -0300, Everton da Silva Marques wrote:
The usual description for the RULI package is:
RULI stands for Resolver User Layer Interface. It's
a library built on top of an asynchronous DNS stub
resolver. RULI provides an easy-to-use interface
for
On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 09:39:57PM +0100, Philipp Gortan wrote:
Should the perl script be in the i386 architecture, or the any?
Have a quick look at some other perl scripts, and see what they've got. And
read the Debian Perl Policy, I would imagine it'd have some words of wisdom.
- Matt
--
On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 07:44:43PM -0300, Everton da Silva Marques wrote:
I do intend to push the library, but I actually don't
have a map of Debian applications which use SRV
records. I'm planning to contact those applications
(i.e. their maintainers) as soon as I find them,
but I would like
On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 05:25:05PM -0300, Everton da Silva Marques wrote:
The usual description for the RULI package is:
RULI stands for Resolver User Layer Interface. It's
a library built on top of an asynchronous DNS stub
resolver. RULI provides an easy-to-use interface
for
On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 09:39:57PM +0100, Philipp Gortan wrote:
Should the perl script be in the i386 architecture, or the any?
Have a quick look at some other perl scripts, and see what they've got. And
read the Debian Perl Policy, I would imagine it'd have some words of wisdom.
- Matt
On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 07:44:43PM -0300, Everton da Silva Marques wrote:
I do intend to push the library, but I actually don't
have a map of Debian applications which use SRV
records. I'm planning to contact those applications
(i.e. their maintainers) as soon as I find them,
but I would like
On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 02:38:53PM -0300, Everton da Silva Marques wrote:
This is my first Debian package.
The bug report for the package is here:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=234303
The tentative package files are here:
http://savannah.nongnu.org/download/ruli/
On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 02:38:53PM -0300, Everton da Silva Marques wrote:
This is my first Debian package.
The bug report for the package is here:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=234303
The tentative package files are here:
http://savannah.nongnu.org/download/ruli/
On Mon, Feb 23, 2004 at 12:49:54PM +0100, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
libming currently has two grave bugs, one of which indicates that it
needs source changes to make it work with the current PHP API.
Unless you can address all of these (upstream presumed dead and the
grave bugs), you should
On Mon, Feb 23, 2004 at 12:49:54PM +0100, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
libming currently has two grave bugs, one of which indicates that it
needs source changes to make it work with the current PHP API.
Unless you can address all of these (upstream presumed dead and the
grave bugs), you should
On Sat, Feb 21, 2004 at 01:35:23PM +0100, Eike zyro Sauer wrote:
Matthew Palmer schrieb:
I have no particular need for a software binary clock, though, as I've got
a breadboard of LEDs doing the job for me.
Are you going to package it? ;o)
I could put in a jiffy box.
- Matt
On Sat, Feb 21, 2004 at 01:35:23PM +0100, Eike zyro Sauer wrote:
Matthew Palmer schrieb:
I have no particular need for a software binary clock, though, as I've got
a breadboard of LEDs doing the job for me.
Are you going to package it? ;o)
I could put in a jiffy box.
- Matt
On Sat, Feb 21, 2004 at 01:29:50AM +0100, Nico Golde wrote:
I think it should be in because its a nice toy and you can practise your
math skills and your brain.
Not to mention that watching the binary digits tick over can be quite
hypnotic. grin
I have no particular need for a software binary
On Sat, Feb 21, 2004 at 01:29:50AM +0100, Nico Golde wrote:
I think it should be in because its a nice toy and you can practise your
math skills and your brain.
Not to mention that watching the binary digits tick over can be quite
hypnotic. grin
I have no particular need for a software binary
On Wed, Feb 18, 2004 at 10:08:34AM +, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
Matthew Palmer ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
2) Download tracking, both by count and yes I'll upload this via web
browser. I'm still up in the air about whether there will be apt-getable
resources, or whether pre-built binary debs
On Thu, Feb 19, 2004 at 08:23:05AM +, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
It'll probably be more timely and less bandwidth intensive to track -changes...
Well, I mostly have Packages/Sources for unstable available. In my book, I prefer
parsing those over automatically processing email. Also, it doesn't
On Thu, Feb 19, 2004 at 09:39:31AM +, Colin Watson wrote:
On Thu, Feb 19, 2004 at 06:42:42PM +1100, Matthew Palmer wrote:
On Wed, Feb 18, 2004 at 10:08:34AM +, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
Maybe you could also reuse / build upon rene from the dak suite. (Maybe it's not
That's
On Thu, Feb 19, 2004 at 01:05:08PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
Matthew Palmer wrote:
package I sponsor. I want to know if they are not able to send me a
package that will build properly. I want to work with them and be
Since you only get packages for sponsorship which have built in a clean
On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 11:21:11PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
Matthew Palmer wrote:
So, comments, brickbats, acclaim, whatever. Throw it at me.
Well I don't think that this system as described would be of any use to
me. I want to maintain a close relationship with the people whose
A worthy
On Wed, Feb 18, 2004 at 10:08:34AM +, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
Matthew Palmer ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
2) Download tracking, both by count and yes I'll upload this via web
browser. I'm still up in the air about whether there will be apt-getable
resources, or whether pre-built binary debs
On Thu, Feb 19, 2004 at 08:23:05AM +, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
It'll probably be more timely and less bandwidth intensive to track
-changes...
Well, I mostly have Packages/Sources for unstable available. In my book, I
prefer
parsing those over automatically processing email. Also, it
On Thu, Feb 19, 2004 at 09:39:31AM +, Colin Watson wrote:
On Thu, Feb 19, 2004 at 06:42:42PM +1100, Matthew Palmer wrote:
On Wed, Feb 18, 2004 at 10:08:34AM +, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
Maybe you could also reuse / build upon rene from the dak suite. (Maybe
it's not
That's
On Thu, Feb 19, 2004 at 01:05:08PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
Matthew Palmer wrote:
package I sponsor. I want to know if they are not able to send me a
package that will build properly. I want to work with them and be
Since you only get packages for sponsorship which have built in a clean
On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 08:45:00AM -0700, Jamin W. Collins wrote:
The final question I'd like feedback on is this: how many sponsors
would consider pointing their sponsees to this service, rather than
whatever methods you're using now? The benefits are that other
sponsors might
On Wed, Feb 18, 2004 at 10:22:22AM +0100, Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder wrote:
On Tuesday 17 February 2004 19.52, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Having a new-maintainer keyring, to which keys could get added by any
AM after it has been verified, and checking the
On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 11:21:11PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
Matthew Palmer wrote:
So, comments, brickbats, acclaim, whatever. Throw it at me.
Well I don't think that this system as described would be of any use to
me. I want to maintain a close relationship with the people whose
A worthy
On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 08:45:00AM -0700, Jamin W. Collins wrote:
The final question I'd like feedback on is this: how many sponsors
would consider pointing their sponsees to this service, rather than
whatever methods you're using now? The benefits are that other
sponsors might
On Wed, Feb 18, 2004 at 10:22:22AM +0100, Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder
wrote:
On Tuesday 17 February 2004 19.52, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Having a new-maintainer keyring, to which keys could get added by any
AM after it has been verified, and checking
Prompted by a comment made by one of my potential sponsees, I've been
reworking my semi-automated sponsorship queue from a helps me thing to a
could help lots of people thing. The comment was along the lines of
wouldn't it be cool if we could remove the SPOF of sponsors, and have a
group of
On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 03:04:39PM +0200, Radu Spineanu wrote:
I have to apply a small patch to my xmail package,
however
i ran into different opinions while looking on how
to do this.
Some suggested dbs, others dpatch, others just
applying the
patch dirrectly to the source.
I
On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 07:11:08PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Prompted by a comment made by one of my potential sponsees, I've been
reworking my semi-automated sponsorship queue from a helps me thing to a
could help lots of people thing. The comment was along the lines of
wouldn't
Prompted by a comment made by one of my potential sponsees, I've been
reworking my semi-automated sponsorship queue from a helps me thing to a
could help lots of people thing. The comment was along the lines of
wouldn't it be cool if we could remove the SPOF of sponsors, and have a
group of
On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 03:04:39PM +0200, Radu Spineanu wrote:
I have to apply a small patch to my xmail package,
however
i ran into different opinions while looking on how
to do this.
Some suggested dbs, others dpatch, others just
applying the
patch dirrectly to the source.
I
On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 07:11:08PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Prompted by a comment made by one of my potential sponsees, I've been
reworking my semi-automated sponsorship queue from a helps me thing to a
could help lots of people thing. The comment was along the lines of
wouldn't
On Mon, Feb 16, 2004 at 11:16:28PM +0100, Thorsten Haude wrote:
I want to adopt an orphaned package, but haven't worked with packages
yet. Before I go in a completely wrong direction: Is the Debian New
Maintainers' Guide (package maint-guide) a good way to start?
Yep. Move from there onto the
On Mon, Feb 16, 2004 at 11:16:28PM +0100, Thorsten Haude wrote:
I want to adopt an orphaned package, but haven't worked with packages
yet. Before I go in a completely wrong direction: Is the Debian New
Maintainers' Guide (package maint-guide) a good way to start?
Yep. Move from there onto the
On Sat, Feb 14, 2004 at 02:47:00AM -0300, Lucas Wall wrote:
Hi! I'm still looking for a sponsor for the popfile[1] package I made.
Interesting. Have a look at
http://people.debian.org/~mpalmer/sponsorship.html, and if you like, contact
me privately and we can discuss sponsorship.
- Matt
On Sat, Feb 14, 2004 at 02:47:00AM -0300, Lucas Wall wrote:
Hi! I'm still looking for a sponsor for the popfile[1] package I made.
Interesting. Have a look at
http://people.debian.org/~mpalmer/sponsorship.html, and if you like, contact
me privately and we can discuss sponsorship.
- Matt
--
On Thu, Feb 12, 2004 at 09:19:16AM +0100, Juergen Strobel wrote:
The PTS shows cryptoloop-source to be orphaned, with a note that
someone is intending to take over. The note is quite old now and
references a bugreport which gives no further clues.
Have you attempted to contact Vincent Bernat
301 - 400 of 596 matches
Mail list logo
