On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 08:39:19PM +0200, Arjan Oosting wrote:
But when ghc6 6.4.2 hits unstable, all libghc6-* packages must be
rebuilt anyway.
That's also why you need to tighten up the existing ghc6 deps. See
On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 10:50:02AM -0500, John Goerzen wrote:
On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 08:39:19PM +0200, Arjan Oosting wrote:
But when ghc6 6.4.2 hits unstable, all libghc6-* packages must be
rebuilt anyway.
That's also why you need to tighten up the existing ghc6 deps. See
Op ma, 01-05-2006 te 14:29 -0700, schreef Steve Langasek:
I know, but the Depends are strict enough. And when a new version of ghc6
hits unstable haske-http can be bin-NMU-ed. The package is setup that that
should work. So no need for a new upload (and begging for sponsorship)
then.
Hi,
I checked out the package and there are some problems with your
dependencies. You need to make sure to depend on a specific version of
GHC, in both the build-deps and the package deps. ghc 6.4.2 is not in
sid yet, so referencing it doesn't help right now.
-- John
On Wed, Apr 26, 2006 at
Hi,
I checked out the package and there are some problems with your
dependencies. You need to make sure to depend on a specific version of
GHC, in both the build-deps and the package deps. ghc 6.4.2 is not in
sid yet, so referencing it doesn't help right now.
From the changelog:
-
On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 06:41:41PM +0200, Arjan Oosting wrote:
From the changelog:
- Add versioned libghc6-cabal-dev and ghc6 to the Build-Depends to
use Cabal version 1.1.1 or later which introduces a new
installation prefix for libraries.
The versioned depends
But when ghc6 6.4.2 hits unstable, all libghc6-* packages must be
rebuilt anyway.
That's also why you need to tighten up the existing ghc6 deps. See
http://urchin.earth.li/%7Eian/haskell-policy/haskell-policy.html/ch-libraries.html#s-library_impl_deps
for details.
I know, but the Depends
7 matches
Mail list logo
