On Tue, Jan 23, 2007 at 09:01:52PM +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
Also, in the (rare but can occur) event of a svn rollback, r91 is not
necessarily accurate after the fact,whereas a datestamp is.
Uh? Is rollback (in the sense of undoing a commit) possible with SVN
without manually fiddling in the
On Tue, Jan 23, 2007 at 12:34:08PM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
On Tue, Jan 23, 2007 at 09:01:52PM +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
Also, in the (rare but can occur) event of a svn rollback, r91 is not
necessarily accurate after the fact,whereas a datestamp is.
Uh? Is rollback (in the
also sprach Marc Haber [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007.01.23.1137 +]:
Uh? Is rollback (in the sense of undoing a commit) possible with SVN
without manually fiddling in the repository at all?
Sure, svn merge.
?
svn merge is like applying a patch and will require a commit, which
will increase
On Tue, Jan 23, 2007 at 12:37:14PM +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
On Tue, Jan 23, 2007 at 12:34:08PM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
On Tue, Jan 23, 2007 at 09:01:52PM +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
Also, in the (rare but can occur) event of a svn rollback, r91 is not
necessarily accurate after
On Tue, 2007-01-23 at 12:34 +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
On Tue, Jan 23, 2007 at 09:01:52PM +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
Also, in the (rare but can occur) event of a svn rollback, r91 is not
necessarily accurate after the fact,whereas a datestamp is.
Uh? Is rollback (in the sense of
On Wed, Jan 24, 2007 at 12:05:02AM +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
On Tue, 2007-01-23 at 12:34 +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
Uh? Is rollback (in the sense of undoing a commit) possible with SVN
without manually fiddling in the repository at all?
If this is *not* the case and you're
also sprach Robert Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007.01.23.1305 +]:
Other VCS's however, allow rollbacks to occur much more easily ;).
Which is a design deficiency IMHO. But let's not go there. I believe
that discussion has been beaten to death.
--
Please do not send copies of list mail to
7 matches
Mail list logo