Re: Bug#554167: RFC: mawk (not maintainer, updated package)

2009-12-13 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 12:04:17AM -0600, Jonathan Nieder wrote: I am wondering what to do next: should I pursue a 14-day delayed NMU? Do nothing and hope some of my changes are picked up? An unsanctioned NMU of a new upstream version of a Priority: required package? No. -- Steve Langasek

Re: Bug#554167: RFC: mawk (not maintainer, updated package)

2009-12-13 Thread Jonathan Nieder
Steve Langasek wrote: On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 12:04:17AM -0600, Jonathan Nieder wrote: I am wondering what to do next: should I pursue a 14-day delayed NMU? Do nothing and hope some of my changes are picked up? An unsanctioned NMU of a new upstream version of a Priority: required package?