Bug#795347: RFS: pkwalify/1.22-1 (Closes: #792031)

2015-08-13 Thread Victor Seva
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package pkwalify * Package name: pkwalify Version : 1.22 Upstream Author : Slaven Rezic sla...@rezic.de * URL : https://github.com/eserte/p5-Kwalify/ * License :

Bug#795347: RFS: pkwalify/1.22-1 (Closes: #792031)

2015-08-13 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Hi Victor, some spurious commenting (not a perl user, so I can't help in sponsoring) d/control: debhelper =9 might be better perl, perl (= 5.13.11) | libtest-simple-perl (= 0.98) seems hacky, but I understand simple-perl might be needed only for older perl releases (note: I'm not sure

Bug#795347: RFS: pkwalify/1.22-1 (Closes: #792031)

2015-08-13 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
For perl arch:all packages there are no relevant changes between debhelper compat level 8 and 9. But yes, it at least makes lintian (with its new pedantic warning) happy. exactly :) That's perfectly fine, is used all over the place in perl packages and works. so my guess was true,

Bug#795347: RFS: pkwalify/1.22-1 (Closes: #792031)

2015-08-13 Thread gregor herrmann
On Thu, 13 Aug 2015 12:09:26 +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: d/control: debhelper =9 might be better For perl arch:all packages there are no relevant changes between debhelper compat level 8 and 9. But yes, it at least makes lintian (with its new pedantic warning) happy. perl, perl (=