Control: owner -1 !
Control: tag -1 moreinfo
Hi Johan,
* Imported Upstream version 2.3.0 (Closes: #726069)
* Bump standards version (no changes needed)
* Bump library package number
* Update install filename
* Switch to debhelper 9 - enable multiarch
multiarch should be mentioned in
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package libharu
* Package name: libharu
Version : 2.3.0+dfsg-1~exp1
Upstream Author : [fill in name and email of upstream]
* URL : http://libharu.org
* License
On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 11:19 AM, Gianfranco Costamagna
costamagnagianfra...@yahoo.it wrote:
Looking at the policy I think it is better to document this in
debian/copyright. I like to document why I remove files from the
original source.
but you didn't remove them anymore, right?
anyway, let
On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 10:29 AM, Gianfranco Costamagna
costamagnagianfra...@yahoo.it wrote:
Control: owner -1 !
Control: tag -1 moreinfo
Hi Johan,
multiarch should be mentioned in control file.
https://wiki.debian.org/Multiarch/Implementation
Ok, I will check - some time since I last
* Gianfranco Costamagna costamagnagianfra...@yahoo.it, 2015-08-20, 10:29:
Pre-Depends: ${misc:Pre-Depends} should be added,
FWIW, ${misc:Pre-Depends} was required for partial squeeze-wheezy
upgrades. It is no longer necessary.
and the dev package should not marked as multiarch same.
Why
On 20-08-15 12:52, Jakub Wilk wrote:
* Gianfranco Costamagna costamagnagianfra...@yahoo.it, 2015-08-20, 10:29:
Pre-Depends: ${misc:Pre-Depends} should be added,
FWIW, ${misc:Pre-Depends} was required for partial squeeze-wheezy
upgrades. It is no longer necessary.
and the dev package
I do remove them now. Not in the previous release where the tarball
was made with make dist (vs github snapshot now).
ok, so it is dfsg, well!
now the changelog has one line extra (line 1)
and maybe you can remove something, like a double
Imported Upstream version 2.3.0+dfsg
(but this is a
On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 12:29 PM, Gianfranco Costamagna
costamagnagianfra...@yahoo.it wrote:
now the changelog has one line extra (line 1)
and maybe you can remove something, like a double
Imported Upstream version 2.3.0+dfsg
I changed it to avoid confusion.
regarding multiarch
Hi,
A -dev package may contain an architecture dependent -config executable,
that cannot be included in a M-A: same package. The same goes for
headers which vary across architectures.
If there are no architecture dependent files in a -dev package M-A: same
should be fine.
isn't the so link
* Gianfranco Costamagna costamagnagianfra...@yahoo.it, 2015-08-20, 12:39:
A -dev package may contain an architecture dependent -config
executable, that cannot be included in a M-A: same package.
This particular package doesn't contain any executables, AFAICS.
The same goes for headers which
Hi Johan
Ok, I will check - some time since I last did this.
ack
Should I do so before uploading to experimental?
nope, experimental will setup an automatic tracker for you, they might even
tell you to go for unstable whenever you like
Looking at the policy I think it is better to
Hi Jakub,
This particular package doesn't contain any executables, AFAICS.
true
It is now permitted to put architecture-dependent headers files in
/usr/include/triplet, so this is no longer show-stopper.
nice to know :)
If the symlink lives in architecture-specific directory, it's not an
12 matches
Mail list logo
