On Tue, Apr 22, 2003 at 01:04:52PM +1000, Matthew Palmer wrote:
On Fri, 18 Apr 2003, Pete Ryland wrote:
Or would you like to accuse me of tampering with the list archives while
you're at it?
Oh, ok. If you'd like. ;-)
Consider me offended. g
:-)
Out of interest, are there any
On Fri, 18 Apr 2003, Pete Ryland wrote:
Or would you like to accuse me of tampering with the list archives while
you're at it?
Oh, ok. If you'd like. ;-)
Consider me offended. g
Out of interest, are there any MUAs which have a separate reply to list
function?
Most do AFAIK. Not
On Thu, 17 Apr 2003, Pete Ryland wrote:
On Thu, Apr 17, 2003 at 11:46:21AM +1000, Matthew Palmer wrote:
On Wed, 16 Apr 2003, David Z Maze wrote:
Your mailer doesn't have a reply to all button? Get a better one,
Debian has lots.
The problem we're discussing, though, is that reply to
On Thu, 17 Apr 2003, Bob Proulx wrote:
Tony Maro wrote:
Why do I feel like I opened a can of worms?
It is that squirmy feeling in the gut. Like just before the alien
claws its way out.
Tony really should read the labels better.
- Matt
On Fri, Apr 18, 2003 at 01:54:59PM +1000, Matthew Palmer wrote:
Out of interest, are there any MUAs which have a separate reply to list
function?
Yes, Mutt. See the 'Mailing Lists' and 'Handling Mailing Lists' sections of
its manual (/usr/share/doc/mutt/manual.txt.gz in its package.)
--
Matthew Palmer wrote:
Out of interest, are there any MUAs which have a separate reply to list
function?
KDE's 'kmail' for those into GUIs to read text. But you have to
configure the list address on a per folder basis.
Bob
pgpKg8pXDLrj4.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Fri, 2003-04-18 at 09:56, Bob Proulx wrote:
Matthew Palmer wrote:
Out of interest, are there any MUAs which have a separate reply to list
function?
KDE's 'kmail' for those into GUIs to read text. But you have to
configure the list address on a per folder basis.
Evolution also has a
On Fri, Apr 18, 2003 at 01:54:59PM +1000, Matthew Palmer wrote:
On Thu, 17 Apr 2003, Pete Ryland wrote:
On Thu, Apr 17, 2003 at 11:46:21AM +1000, Matthew Palmer wrote:
On Wed, 16 Apr 2003, David Z Maze wrote:
Your mailer doesn't have a reply to all button? Get a better one,
Debian
On Thu, Apr 17, 2003 at 11:46:21AM +1000, Matthew Palmer wrote:
On Wed, 16 Apr 2003, David Z Maze wrote:
Your mailer doesn't have a reply to all button? Get a better one,
Debian has lots.
The problem we're discussing, though, is that reply to all means exactly
that - to *all*.
Hmm.. I
Pete Ryland wrote:
On Thu, Apr 17, 2003 at 11:46:21AM +1000, Matthew Palmer wrote:
On Wed, 16 Apr 2003, David Z Maze wrote:
Your mailer doesn't have a reply to all button? Get a better one,
Debian has lots.
The problem we're discussing, though, is that reply to all means
On Don, 2003-04-17 at 03:46, Matthew Palmer wrote:
Of course, depending on your POV, it might be seen as less resource
intensive just to set up a procmail duplicate-killer instead of trying to
educate the entire Internet on proper e-mail technique.
Does that even depend on the POV? :) Those
Tony Maro wrote:
Why do I feel like I opened a can of worms?
It is that squirmy feeling in the gut. Like just before the alien
claws its way out.
Bob
pgpClP4tDDzjT.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] (2003-04-15 09:04:55 BST):
Quoting Andrew Stribblehill [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
You're still better off building from source even if your software
doesn't use a Makefile. Just think Do whatever is necessary to
compile where the docs say make and Get
Andrew Stribblehill wrote:
However, you're not that far yet, in that you probably don't have an
archive you can upload to. To get a package into Debian, it needs to
be sponsored, often by someone on this list.
Of course. I actually still have a lot to learn of the package format
before I
On Wed, Apr 16, 2003 at 08:12:26AM -0500, Tony Maro wrote:
Andrew Stribblehill wrote:
PPS. Most people who read the Debian mailing lists are subscribed to
them. Mailing them as well as the list means they get two copies.
Being a cantankerous lot as a rule, we don't like this :)
Odd
Tony Maro [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Odd considering that so far most every reply that I've received
(except yours of course) included two copies. And the fact that you
can't just hit reply and have it go back to the list - it wants to
only reply to the sender.
Your mailer doesn't have a
On Wed, 16 Apr 2003, David Z Maze wrote:
Odd considering that so far most every reply that I've received
(except yours of course) included two copies. And the fact that you
can't just hit reply and have it go back to the list - it wants to
only reply to the sender.
Your mailer doesn't
17 matches
Mail list logo
