[CC'ing Mathew just in case he stopped reading this thread; sorry for
the possibly duplicate email]
Paul Wise wrote:
I just realised that what you have just done violates the license of
Matthew's document. Please read the copyright / license section of it
at the very end.
Mathew had answered
Paul Wise wrote:
Changing the URL for that FAQ needs:
Matthew to be willing to edit and maintain the new URL. Some people do
not like using Debian's wiki, not sure if Matthew feels that way.
I understand not liking wiki markup, but for a text document with just
simple bullet lists, links and
Paul Wise wrote:
On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 4:23 AM, Leo costela Antunes
cost...@debian.org wrote:
Putting my money where my mouth is: done.
http://wiki.debian.org/DebianMentorsFaq
I just realised that what you have just done violates the license of
Matthew's document. Please read the
On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 7:17 AM, Nicolas Alvarez
nicolas.alva...@gmail.com wrote:
Paul Wise wrote:
On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 4:23 AM, Leo costela Antunes
cost...@debian.org wrote:
Putting my money where my mouth is: done.
http://wiki.debian.org/DebianMentorsFaq
I just realised that what you
Paul Wise wrote:
That isn't the problem, the problem is that Matthew's document is GPL
and he has designated the HTML document as the source code, which is
obviously not being distributed on the wiki.
So if I download a GPL program written in Python and translate it to C, then
distribute both
Leo costela Antunes wrote:
Matthew Palmer wrote:
In addition, the FAQ for this list:
http://people.debian.org/~mpalmer/debian-mentors_FAQ.html might answer some
of your questions.
As a side note, wouldn't the wiki be the perfect place for this?
Don't get me wrong, I totally appreciate the
Putting my money where my mouth is: done.
http://wiki.debian.org/DebianMentorsFaq
Thanks again for putting it all together! I hope the footer suffices as
an expression of that gratitude! :)
Great. While I was browsing throu it, I notice the following issues (I
don't thing I know the
On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 4:23 AM, Leo costela Antunes
cost...@debian.org wrote:
Putting my money where my mouth is: done.
http://wiki.debian.org/DebianMentorsFaq
Changing the URL for that FAQ needs:
Matthew to be willing to edit and maintain the new URL. Some people do
not like using Debian's
On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 4:23 AM, Leo costela Antunes
cost...@debian.org wrote:
Putting my money where my mouth is: done.
http://wiki.debian.org/DebianMentorsFaq
I just realised that what you have just done violates the license of
Matthew's document. Please read the copyright / license section
Hello,
My name is Luis Pedro and I would like to join you all, and try to do
something useful for free software. I am familiar with Linux, familiar
with programming, but not much familiar with software development for
Debian Linux. I followed some tutorials from Ubuntu, which is the son
of
Hi Luis,
You should take a look at the documents located at http://www.debian.org/devel/
Namely you should read the New Maintainers Guide:
http://www.debian.org/doc/maint-guide/
The Debian Developers' Reference:
http://www.debian.org/doc/developers-reference/
And you should also read the
On Mon, Feb 08, 2010 at 01:40:29PM -0800, Chris Taylor wrote:
You should take a look at the documents located at
http://www.debian.org/devel/
Namely you should read the New Maintainers Guide:
http://www.debian.org/doc/maint-guide/
The Debian Developers' Reference:
Matthew Palmer wrote:
In addition, the FAQ for this list:
http://people.debian.org/~mpalmer/debian-mentors_FAQ.html might answer some
of your questions.
As a side note, wouldn't the wiki be the perfect place for this?
Don't get me wrong, I totally appreciate the work. It just seems like a
bit
On Monday 08 February 2010 15:26:49 Luis Pedro wrote:
My name is Luis Pedro and I would like to join you all, and try to do
something useful for free software. I am familiar with Linux, familiar
with programming, but not much familiar with software development for
Debian Linux. I followed some
Jeremy Lainé [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
You might be interested in
http://www.whinlatter.uklinux.net/buildd/
Definitely, I'm looking through it right now.
You should probably subscribe to buildd-discuss at nocrew.org.
Done, and browsing through the archives I see I'm going pretty
Jeremy Lainé [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
You might be interested in
http://www.whinlatter.uklinux.net/buildd/
Definitely, I'm looking through it right now.
You should probably subscribe to buildd-discuss at nocrew.org.
Done, and browsing through the archives I see I'm going pretty
You should probably subscribe to buildd-discuss at nocrew.org.
done, but no reply so far.
In the meantime, I have started work using your package as a base, and
have got the buildd package to generate an /etc/default/buildd via
debconf. It is structured exactly like the current
You might be interested in
http://www.whinlatter.uklinux.net/buildd/
Definitely, I'm looking through it right now.
You should probably subscribe to buildd-discuss at nocrew.org.
Done, and browsing through the archives I see I'm going pretty much
the same way as you as I also rely on
You should probably subscribe to buildd-discuss at nocrew.org.
done, but no reply so far.
In the meantime, I have started work using your package as a base, and
have got the buildd package to generate an /etc/default/buildd via
debconf. It is structured exactly like the current
Hi!
I am interested in becoming a Debian developer and have already
produced a number of Debian packages, but they fall in the pet
packages category referred to in another thread on this list. The
most recent ones are mpf70-source and mpf70-utils, respectively the
source for a kernel module
Hi!
I am interested in becoming a Debian developer and have already
produced a number of Debian packages, but they fall in the pet
packages category referred to in another thread on this list. The
most recent ones are mpf70-source and mpf70-utils, respectively the
source for a kernel module
Jeremy Lainé [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In the meantime, I think I've found something to sink my teeth in,
namely packaging buildd. I realise it's a big bugger, but as packaging
it seems to have been on the TODO list for a while I suppose any work
I put into it is that much done..
You might
22 matches
Mail list logo
