Re: Dependancies within multi-binary packages

2006-07-03 Thread Nikolai Lusan
On Mon, 2006-07-03 at 12:02 +1000, Nikolai Lusan wrote: Does anyone know how I can fix this one? fixed it, turned out that I should have payed more attention when creating the .shlibs file :) On a-kind-of-related note ... can someone tell me what information from the .deb that dpkg uses when

Dependancies within multi-binary packages

2006-07-02 Thread Nikolai Lusan
Hi, I am building some multi-binary packages. The packages contain libraries that other packages in the same build will depend on. Because the packages I am building potentially conflict with some already in the repository I have renamed them all with an extenstion denoting their purpose

Re: Dependancies within multi-binary packages

2006-07-02 Thread Matthew Palmer
On Mon, Jul 03, 2006 at 12:02:24PM +1000, Nikolai Lusan wrote: Once I install the libpq4-hw package dpkg will still complain: [EMAIL PROTECTED] # dpkg -i postgresql-client-8.0-hw_8.0.7-1_i386.deb Selecting previously deselected package postgresql-client-8.0-hw. (Reading database ... 22134

Re: Dependancies within multi-binary packages

2006-07-02 Thread Nikolai Lusan
On Mon, 2006-07-03 at 12:15 +1000, Matthew Palmer wrote: On Mon, Jul 03, 2006 at 12:02:24PM +1000, Nikolai Lusan wrote: Versioned dependencies cannot be satisfied by Provided packages, AFAIK. Great :) Does anyone know how I can fix this one? I strongly suspect that You're Stuffed. For

Re: Dependancies within multi-binary packages

2006-07-02 Thread Matthew Palmer
On Mon, Jul 03, 2006 at 12:32:53PM +1000, Nikolai Lusan wrote: On Mon, 2006-07-03 at 12:15 +1000, Matthew Palmer wrote: I strongly suspect that You're Stuffed. For this sort of thing, I typically just create my own packages with the same name and cross my fingers that they don't get into

Re: Dependancies within multi-binary packages

2006-07-02 Thread Yaroslav Halchenko
postgresql-client-8.0-hw depends on libpq4 (= 8.0.4); however: shouldn't it be libpq8 really? or am I missing something? -- .-. =-- /v\ = Keep in touch// \\

Re: Dependancies within multi-binary packages

2006-07-02 Thread Nikolai Lusan
On Mon, 2006-07-03 at 13:04 +1000, Matthew Palmer wrote: looks like I remove the ${shlibs:Depends} from the control file and put them in by hand, praying I don't leave something out. :) Since all you'll be doing is putting in manually what shlibs:Depends would have added, I don't think

Re: Multi-binary packages?

2001-10-31 Thread Simon Richter
On Wed, 31 Oct 2001, Wartan Hachaturow wrote: Preferrably the one that needs to run configure with different options to build different binaries, and then package them into different packages. Take a look at python-imaging, in its present state it does just what you want (although I might

Multi-binary packages?

2001-10-31 Thread Wartan Hachaturow
Can somebody advise me an example of a clean and good debhelper-using (sorry, mhp ;) multi-binary package? Preferrably the one that needs to run configure with different options to build different binaries, and then package them into different packages. I need to create such a package, and

Re: Multi-binary packages?

2001-10-31 Thread Gustavo Noronha Silva
Em Wed, 31 Oct 2001 23:31:08 +0300 Wartan Hachaturow [EMAIL PROTECTED] escreveu: Can somebody advise me an example of a clean and good debhelper-using (sorry, mhp ;) multi-binary package? Preferrably the one that needs to run configure with different options to build different binaries, and

Re: Multi-binary packages?

2001-10-31 Thread Simon Richter
On Wed, 31 Oct 2001, Wartan Hachaturow wrote: Preferrably the one that needs to run configure with different options to build different binaries, and then package them into different packages. Take a look at python-imaging, in its present state it does just what you want (although I might

Empty directories in multi-binary packages

2000-03-06 Thread Simon Richter
Hi, I'm trying to put a multi-binary package together, and when I list the main package's contents, it contains a set of empty directories (those that were left behind from dh_movefiles). Is there any way to get rid of these other than manually rmdir'ing them after dh_movefiles? Simon PGP

Re: Empty directories in multi-binary packages

2000-03-06 Thread Josip Rodin
On Mon, Mar 06, 2000 at 09:00:19PM +0100, Simon Richter wrote: I'm trying to put a multi-binary package together, and when I list the main package's contents, it contains a set of empty directories (those that were left behind from dh_movefiles). Is there any way to get rid of these other than

Re: Empty directories in multi-binary packages

2000-03-06 Thread Ben Collins
On Mon, Mar 06, 2000 at 09:47:28PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote: On Mon, Mar 06, 2000 at 09:00:19PM +0100, Simon Richter wrote: I'm trying to put a multi-binary package together, and when I list the main package's contents, it contains a set of empty directories (those that were left behind

Re: Empty directories in multi-binary packages

2000-03-06 Thread Josip Rodin
On Mon, Mar 06, 2000 at 03:53:08PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote: I'm trying to put a multi-binary package together, and when I list the main package's contents, it contains a set of empty directories (those that were left behind from dh_movefiles). Is there any way to get rid of these