Hi, Russ.
I'd like to make it clear that I'm just brainstorming here and that at
this stage, I'm not really concerned with the feasibility of the ideas.
I'm just doing a what if thing.
On May 02 2009, Russ Allbery wrote:
Rogério Brito rbr...@ime.usp.br writes:
* for instance deprecated
Rogério Brito rbr...@ime.usp.br writes:
I'd like to make it clear that I'm just brainstorming here and that at
this stage, I'm not really concerned with the feasibility of the ideas.
I'm just doing a what if thing.
Oh, sure, totally understood.
On May 02 2009, Russ Allbery wrote:
Lintian
On Sun, 03 May 2009 01:01:51 -0700
Russ Allbery r...@debian.org wrote:
* seeing if a given package providing a library has the -dev package
containing the soname in the name of the package (e.g., libfoo0-dev).
This is sometimes the right thing to do, sometimes not.
I know, I know.
On Sun, May 3, 2009 at 4:01 PM, Russ Allbery r...@debian.org wrote:
I wonder if the easy way to do this would be to write something (this
wouldn't be Lintian) that analyzes a build log for interesting issues.
debexpo will probably do this. IIRC the hppa (or was it ia64) porters
do this for gcc
Hi.
I think that this discussion is a nice opportunity to view a bigger
picture on what the best practices mentors use in a way to automate
things.
On May 02 2009, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
I think it's not running lintian at all, that text is just boilerplate
which assumes mentees did run
Well, more tests could be included (suggestions), but something along
the lines of the package elida would be nice to have (disclaimer: I
still don't have used this package).
I think most tests could be included in Lintian. Please file a wishlist
bug against Lintian.
Paul
signature.asc
Rogério Brito rbr...@ime.usp.br writes:
* for instance deprecated debhelper programs should generate a big fat
warning and, while they don't do that, detecting them.
Lintian should catch this already, although we may not have the most
recent ones. If you know which are missing, please file
2009/5/3 Rogério Brito rbr...@ime.usp.br:
Maybe things that the devscripts package does could be integrated...
Some facts that are not exactly errors, but that might be annoying
include and could lead to a lot of false positives, but also finer
points where the attention of sponsors should be
8 matches
Mail list logo
