[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bob Proulx) schrieb:
Andreas Metzler wrote:
Frank Küster wrote:
If coreutils wouldn't be of priority required, I would just add
coreutils | stat to the dependencies. What should I do in this case?
Stat was in coreutils from the first time it appeared in Debian, so a
Am Sonntag, 2. November 2003 20:56 schrieb Scott James Remnant:
You are not required to list dependencies on 'Essential' packages (those
marked Essential: yes).
But you ar not required doesn't mean you are not allowed.
So what would be wrong with depending on coreutils | stat?
Ciao,
On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 01:54:17PM +0100, Eike Sauer wrote:
[...]
BTW: Since I posted to this ML (and debian-devel), I get more mail
worms than my mailbox at my ISP can hold. Strange for linux developer
MLs...
The MLs are mirrored to usenet, and recent worms (Swen) search the
local mailfolders
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Eike Sauer) schrieb:
Am Sonntag, 2. November 2003 20:56 schrieb Scott James Remnant:
You are not required to list dependencies on 'Essential' packages (those
marked Essential: yes).
But you ar not required doesn't mean you are not allowed.
So what would be wrong with
On Tue, 2003-11-04 at 10:55, Eike Sauer wrote:
Am Sonntag, 2. November 2003 20:56 schrieb Scott James Remnant:
You are not required to list dependencies on 'Essential' packages (those
marked Essential: yes).
But you ar not required doesn't mean you are not allowed.
So what would be wrong
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bob Proulx) schrieb:
Andreas Metzler wrote:
Frank Küster wrote:
If coreutils wouldn't be of priority required, I would just add
coreutils | stat to the dependencies. What should I do in this case?
Stat was in coreutils from the first time it appeared in Debian, so a
Am Sonntag, 2. November 2003 20:56 schrieb Scott James Remnant:
You are not required to list dependencies on 'Essential' packages (those
marked Essential: yes).
But you ar not required doesn't mean you are not allowed.
So what would be wrong with depending on coreutils | stat?
Ciao,
On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 01:54:17PM +0100, Eike Sauer wrote:
[...]
BTW: Since I posted to this ML (and debian-devel), I get more mail
worms than my mailbox at my ISP can hold. Strange for linux developer
MLs...
The MLs are mirrored to usenet, and recent worms (Swen) search the
local mailfolders
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Eike Sauer) schrieb:
Am Sonntag, 2. November 2003 20:56 schrieb Scott James Remnant:
You are not required to list dependencies on 'Essential' packages (those
marked Essential: yes).
But you ar not required doesn't mean you are not allowed.
So what would be wrong with
On Tue, 2003-11-04 at 10:55, Eike Sauer wrote:
Am Sonntag, 2. November 2003 20:56 schrieb Scott James Remnant:
You are not required to list dependencies on 'Essential' packages (those
marked Essential: yes).
But you ar not required doesn't mean you are not allowed.
So what would be wrong
Andreas Metzler [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
On Sun, Nov 02, 2003 at 08:27:28PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
in a package that I maintain (sponsored by a DD), I use a call to
stat. In sarge, /usr/bin/stat is in coreutils - of course I don't need a
dependency on that. However, in woody stat was in
Andreas Metzler wrote:
Frank Küster wrote:
in a package that I maintain (sponsored by a DD), I use a call to
stat. In sarge, /usr/bin/stat is in coreutils - of course I don't need a
dependency on that. However, in woody stat was in a separate
package. Usually packages keep really old
Andreas Metzler [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
On Sun, Nov 02, 2003 at 08:27:28PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
in a package that I maintain (sponsored by a DD), I use a call to
stat. In sarge, /usr/bin/stat is in coreutils - of course I don't need a
dependency on that. However, in woody stat was in
On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 10:26:24AM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
Andreas Metzler [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
On Sun, Nov 02, 2003 at 08:27:28PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
in a package that I maintain (sponsored by a DD), I use a call to
stat. In sarge, /usr/bin/stat is in coreutils - of course
Andreas Metzler wrote:
Frank Küster wrote:
in a package that I maintain (sponsored by a DD), I use a call to
stat. In sarge, /usr/bin/stat is in coreutils - of course I don't need a
dependency on that. However, in woody stat was in a separate
package. Usually packages keep really old
On Sun, 2003-11-02 at 19:27, Frank Kster wrote:
in a package that I maintain (sponsored by a DD), I use a call to
stat. In sarge, /usr/bin/stat is in coreutils - of course I don't need a
dependency on that.
*snip*
If coreutils wouldn't be of priority required,
(Policy 3.5).
You are required
On Sun, Nov 02, 2003 at 08:27:28PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
in a package that I maintain (sponsored by a DD), I use a call to
stat. In sarge, /usr/bin/stat is in coreutils - of course I don't need a
dependency on that. However, in woody stat was in a separate
package. Usually packages keep
On Sun, 2003-11-02 at 19:27, Frank Küster wrote:
in a package that I maintain (sponsored by a DD), I use a call to
stat. In sarge, /usr/bin/stat is in coreutils - of course I don't need a
dependency on that.
*snip*
If coreutils wouldn't be of priority required,
(Policy 3.5).
You are
On Sun, Nov 02, 2003 at 08:27:28PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
in a package that I maintain (sponsored by a DD), I use a call to
stat. In sarge, /usr/bin/stat is in coreutils - of course I don't need a
dependency on that. However, in woody stat was in a separate
package. Usually packages keep
19 matches
Mail list logo
