Re: RFS: docutils-writer-manpage 0.1~svn.r5690-2, urgency=medium

2009-04-19 Thread Piotr Ożarowski
[Ben Finney, 2009-04-17] http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d/docutils-writer-manpage/docutils-writer-manpage_0.1~svn.r5690-2.dsc * 0.1~svn.r5690-1 was never uploaded to Debian, please mark it as UNRELEASED or (and I prefer this one, BTW) merge -2 and -1 * add minimum required runtime

Re: RFS: docutils-writer-manpage 0.1~svn.r5690-2, urgency=medium

2009-04-19 Thread Ben Finney
Piotr Ożarowski pi...@debian.org writes: * 0.1~svn.r5690-1 was never uploaded to Debian, please mark it as UNRELEASED or (and I prefer this one, BTW) merge -2 and -1 Okay, I will release 0.1~svn.r5690-3 and mark previous releases of the same version as ‘UNRELEASED’. * add minimum required

Re: RFS: docutils-writer-manpage 0.1~svn.r5690-2, urgency=medium

2009-04-19 Thread Russ Allbery
Ben Finney ben+deb...@benfinney.id.au writes: Piotr Ożarowski pi...@debian.org writes: * lintian 2.2.9 only informs about extended-description-is-probably-too-short, please remove all overrides Aren't we supposed to release packages that are lintian clean, even to the ‘info’ level? I would

RFS: docutils-writer-manpage 0.1~svn.r5690-2, urgency=medium

2009-04-16 Thread Ben Finney
Howdy mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.1~svn.r5690-2 of my package ‘docutils-writer-manpage’. Currently, the transition of a new ‘python-docutils’ is blocked (for users who have this package installed) because it conflicts with older versions of this package. This