Your message dated Sat, 16 Jan 2016 13:28:31 + (UTC)
with message-id <1263208801.9607567.1452950911084.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#811164: RFS: policyd-weight/0.1.15.2-11
has caused the Debian Bug report #811164,
regarding RFS: policyd-weight/0.1.1
Package: sponsorship-requests
Subject: RFS - policyd-weight/0.1.15.2-11
Hi everybody,
I've created a new version of my package policyd-weight.
* Package name: policyd-weight
Version : 0.1.15.2-11
Upstream Author : Robert Felber
* URL : www.policyd-weight.org
Your message dated Sat, 17 Jan 2015 16:33:57 +0100
with message-id 20150117153357.gd3...@ramacher.at
and subject line Re: Bug#774753: sponsorship-requests: RFS - pu
policyd-weight/0.1.15.2-5+wheezy2
has caused the Debian Bug report #774753,
regarding RFS: policyd-weight/0.1.15.2-5+wheezy2
Your message dated Sun, 13 Jul 2014 20:34:19 +0200
with message-id 53c2d12b.20...@debian.org
and subject line Re: Urgent: could anyone please sponsor upload of
policyd-weight due to RC-Bug _before_ package will be removed?
has caused the Debian Bug report #753018,
regarding RFS - policyd-weight
Your message dated Sun, 13 Jul 2014 20:34:19 +0200
with message-id 53c2d12b.20...@debian.org
and subject line Re: Urgent: could anyone please sponsor upload of
policyd-weight due to RC-Bug _before_ package will be removed?
has caused the Debian Bug report #753018,
regarding RFS - policyd-weight
Package: sponsorship-requests
Subject: RFS - policyd-weight/0.1.15.2-8
Hi everybody,
currently, policyd-weight is broken in unstable/testing due to recent
libnet-dns-perl upgrade,
technically speaking policyd-weight used Net::DNS::Packet function dh_expand()
which does not
exist anymore
Package: sponsorship-requests
Subject: RFS - policyd-weight/0.1.15.2-8 (fixes broken policyd-weight in
unstable/testing rc bug #752845)
dget -x
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/policyd-weight/policyd-weight_0.1.15.2-6.dsc
Sorry, right URL is, of course:
dget -x
http
Your message dated Fri, 17 Jan 2014 03:15:06 -0800
with message-id
caczd_tb4qm6t6lcc3h9v588faeo45hqf1koqj4m9_8dtnjx...@mail.gmail.com
and subject line Re: RFS - policyd-weight/0.1.15.2-6
has caused the Debian Bug report #728758,
regarding RFS - policyd-weight/0.1.15.2-6
to be marked as done
Your message dated Fri, 17 Jan 2014 03:15:06 -0800
with message-id
caczd_tb4qm6t6lcc3h9v588faeo45hqf1koqj4m9_8dtnjx...@mail.gmail.com
and subject line Re: RFS - policyd-weight/0.1.15.2-6
has caused the Debian Bug report #728758,
regarding RFS - policyd-weight/0.1.15.2-6
to be marked as done
On Tue, 10 Dec 2013 07:14:02 +0100, Werner Detter wrote:
-. /lib/init/vars.sh
. /lib/lsb/init-functions
You'll have to explain to me why this is right? /lib/init/vars.sh still
exists and appears to contain default values. Although it does seem the
the policyd-weight init script
Am 10.12.13 09:04, schrieb gregor herrmann:
On Tue, 10 Dec 2013 07:14:02 +0100, Werner Detter wrote:
-. /lib/init/vars.sh
. /lib/lsb/init-functions
You'll have to explain to me why this is right? /lib/init/vars.sh still
exists and appears to contain default values. Although it does seem
On Tue, 10 Dec 2013 10:57:24 +0100, Werner Detter wrote:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=710559
So, I took it out.
deactivated it in lintian git for the time being.
Yes .. but .. Josh states:
/etc/init.d/skeleton is wrong; only sysvinit's own internal scripts
should
+++ Werner Detter [2013-12-10 10:57 +0100]:
Am 10.12.13 09:04, schrieb gregor herrmann:
On Tue, 10 Dec 2013 07:14:02 +0100, Werner Detter wrote:
-. /lib/init/vars.sh
. /lib/lsb/init-functions
You'll have to explain to me why this is right? /lib/init/vars.sh still
exists and
Hi Wookey,
So I'll upload as-is.
Thank you.
Cheers,
Werner
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/52a727f4.2090...@aloah-from-hell.de
Please, anybody? .
Am 08.12.13 15:32, schrieb Werner Detter:
Package: sponsorship-requests
Subject: RFS - policyd-weight/0.1.15.2-6
Hi everybody,
hi Jan,
I've recreated a new version of my package policyd-weight. This version
just adds a patch which fixes problems with policyd
+++ Werner Detter [2013-12-09 20:33 +0100]:
Please, anybody? .
OK. I'll bite.
Am 08.12.13 15:32, schrieb Werner Detter:
Package: sponsorship-requests
Subject: RFS - policyd-weight/0.1.15.2-6
That builds OK, and the diff looks sensible.
Furthermore - I've removed api call /lib/init
Hi,
-. /lib/init/vars.sh
. /lib/lsb/init-functions
You'll have to explain to me why this is right? /lib/init/vars.sh still
exists and appears to contain default values. Although it does seem the
the policyd-weight init script doesn't use of them - maybe that's the point?
Right, but I had
Package: sponsorship-requests
Subject: RFS - policyd-weight/0.1.15.2-6
Hi everybody,
hi Jan,
I've recreated a new version of my package policyd-weight. This version
just adds a patch which fixes problems with policyd-weight on
installations where only IPv6 resolvers (fixed DNS::Net usage
Package: sponsorship-requests
Subject: RFS - policyd-weight/0.1.15.2-6
Hi everybody,
hi Jan,
I've created a new version of my package policyd-weight. This version
just adds a patch which fixes problems with policyd-weight on
installations where only IPv6 resolvers (fixed DNS::Net usage
Werner Detter wer...@aloah-from-hell.de wrote:
Package: sponsorship-requests
Subject: RFS - policyd-weight/0.1.15.2-6
Hi everybody,
hi Jan,
I've created a new version of my package policyd-weight. This version
just adds a patch which fixes problems with policyd-weight on
installations where only
Package: sponsorship-requests
Subject: RFS - policyd-weight/0.1.15.2-6
Hi everybody,
I've created a new version of my package policyd-weight. This version
just adds a patch which fixes problems with policyd-weight on
installations where only IPv6 resolvers (fixed DNS::Net usage).
Furthermore
Hi,
could anyone upload this package for me ?
Thanks,
Werner Detter
Am 05.11.13 09:26, schrieb Werner Detter:
Package: sponsorship-requests
Subject: RFS - policyd-weight/0.1.15.2-6
Hi everybody,
I've created a new version of my package policyd-weight. This version
just adds
Package: sponsorship-requests
Subject: RFS - policyd-weight/0.1.15.2-6
Hi everybody,
I've created a new version of my package policyd-weight. This version
just adds a patch which fixes problems with policyd-weight on
installations where only IPv6 resolvers (fixed DNS::Net usage).
Furthermore
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Arno,
did you try to contact your previous sponsors? Could you reach Hauke?
Not yet, I will try to contact them and get back to this thread if none
of the previous sponsor has time for an upload.
This version includes a little bugfix and
Dear mentors,
I've recreated a new version of my package policyd-weight (previous version
0.1.15.2-2 was already
uploaded to unstable. This version includes a little bugfix and updates
standard versions from 3.9.2
to 3.9.3. Hence I'm looking for a sponsor for my package policyd-weight
*
Hi,
On 19.08.2012 12:38, Werner Detter wrote:
I've recreated a new version of my package policyd-weight (previous version
0.1.15.2-2 was already
uploaded to unstable.
did you try to contact your previous sponsors? Could you reach Hauke?
This version includes a little bugfix and updates
On 02/17/2012 03:13 AM, Werner Detter wrote:
Did you ask zigo who sponsored your last upload?
sure i did. But he just became a father so he had no time left for uploading
the package.
Also, I'm busy with other packages, and did that last upload
because I thought it was important that
Hi,
so, it seems to me as nobody cares about uploading this package (and it's
really just the
upload) Well, I've done my Job. I can't do more then asking for a sponsor
that will
upload the package Meanwhile I'm thinking about orphaning the package if
it's always
the same procedure of
Hi,
Please do not top-post.
Le 16/02/2012 à 16:41, Werner Detter wer...@aloah-from-hell.de écrivit :
Dear mentors,
I've recreated a new version of my package policyd-weight (previous version
0.1.15.2-1 was already
uploaded to unstable. This version includes another bugfix,
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 04:41:39PM +0100, Werner Detter wrote:
so, it seems to me as nobody cares about uploading this package (and it's
really just the
upload) Well, I've done my Job. I can't do more then asking for a
sponsor that will
upload the package Meanwhile I'm thinking
On Thu, 16 Feb 2012, Werner Detter escribió:
Hi,
so, it seems to me as nobody cares about uploading this package (and it's
really just the
upload) Well, I've done my Job. I can't do more then asking for a
sponsor that will
upload the package Meanwhile I'm thinking about
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
so, it seems to me as nobody cares about uploading this package (and it's
really just the upload) Well, I've done my Job. I can't do more
then asking for a sponsor that will upload the package Meanwhile I'm
thinking about
Hi,
The sponsoring game in Debian is a game of patience[1]. Sending an email
every two days telling you are waiting for an upload doesn't do much
more than annoy the very few people that are keen on sponsoring
packages.
It's not my first sponsored upload but the second one. The first one is
Hi,
The sponsoring game in Debian is a game of patience[1].
As the process is pretty new and I'm not (yet) familiar with normal time
slots for
sponsored uploads this is something learned. Thomas helped me a lot for which
I'm
really grateful, working with him is fun and it went fast. I've
Is there ANY DD that would upload the package? That would be sooo nice if
anyone DD
could care ... I'm, in principal, waiting since three weeks for an upload.
... cheers and thanks,
Werner
Dear mentors,
I've recreated a new version of my package policyd-weight (previous version
Dear mentors,
I've recreated a new version of my package policyd-weight (previous version
0.1.15.2-1 was already
uploaded to unstable. This version includes another bugfix, delivers the
/etc/default/policyd-weight
and has some modifications within the init-script. Hence I'm looking for a
Anyone ? :)
Am 08.02.12 12:53, schrieb Werner Detter:
Hi everybody
I've received an email from Thomas. He proposed that it would make sense to
have not only one sponsor for my package but maybe two So if one is busy
the other one can do the sponsoring.
Thomas had no time to upload my
Hi everybody
I've received an email from Thomas. He proposed that it would make sense to
have not only one sponsor for my package but maybe two So if one is busy
the other one can do the sponsoring.
Thomas had no time to upload my package which I've uploaded on Januar 24th.
But he suggested to
Hi everybody,
as Thomas is non responsive since about two weeks I'll try to find somebody
that uploads the package for me.
* Package name: policyd-weight
Version : 0.1.15.2-2
Upstream Author : Robert Felber
* URL : www.policyd-weight.org
* License :
Dear mentors,
I've recreated a new version of my package policyd-weight (previous version
0.1.15.2-1 was already
uploaded to unstable. This version includes another bugfix, delivers the
/etc/default/policyd-weight
and has some modifications within the init-script. Hence I'm looking for a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Werner,
On 14.01.2012 15:15, wer...@aloah-from-hell.de wrote:
I've recreated a new version of my package policyd-weight (previous version
0.1.15.2-1 was already
uploaded to unstable. This version includes another bugfix, delivers the
Hi Arno,
thanks for the hint. I will get back to Zigo directly. Sorry for
the noise caused and have a nice weekend.
Cheers,
Werner
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
Hi Ansgar,
sorry that I could not look at your package even after I said that I
would earlier, but I did not have enough free time. But it was uploaded
in the end anyway :)
No problem - I've just fixed another bug (#641538) in my local packet.
It is not possible to change the package
Hi,
can anyone re-upload the package ? :)
regards,
Werner Detter
Am 07.01.12 11:45, schrieb wer...@aloah-from-hell.de:
Dear Mentors,
I've just installed my policyd-weight package from unstable. There my
/etc/default/policyd-weight file is not created, currently I'm not sure
if the version
On 01/06/2012 09:32 PM, wer...@aloah-from-hell.de wrote:
Hi Thomas,
I've received an email from Debian FTP-Masters with the information that the
package got
rejected:
---
Reject Reasons:
policyd-weight_0.1.15.2-1_all.deb: deb contents timestamp check failed [type
On 01/08/2012 10:27 PM, wer...@aloah-from-hell.de wrote:
Hi,
can anyone re-upload the package ? :)
regards,
Werner Detter
http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=wer...@aloah-from-hell.de
It's in, as you can see!
I don't think re-uploading only for the /etc/default/policyd-weight
is worth
Hi,
sorry that I could not look at your package even after I said that I
would earlier, but I did not have enough free time. But it was uploaded
in the end anyway :)
wer...@aloah-from-hell.de writes:
Could you please re-upload the package? I've just uploaded the latest
version to mentors.
Dear Mentors,
I've just installed my policyd-weight package from unstable. There my
/etc/default/policyd-weight file is not created, currently I'm not sure
if the version that has been uploaded to mentors does include the
/etc/default/policyd-weight file already so I've downloaded the source
and
On 01/06/2012 01:14 PM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
Your debian/init.d script shouldn't set the PATH at all.
All the folders it is putting in PATH are already accessible
in the default $PATH, so don't change it.
FYI, pabs don't agree with me, and think declaring the $PATH
is the way to go. So
Hi Thomas,
thanks for your helpfull comments.
What was in /etc/default/policyd-weight? Why aren't you using
it anymore?
It behaves like the current package in unstable/testing/stable.
The file /etc/default/policyd-weight isn't created but the init
script takes account of it.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Werner,
On 06.01.2012 12:44, wer...@aloah-from-hell.de wrote:
What should we do here? Generate the file? Or don't take account of
it in the init script?
there is a slight disagreement between several positions within Debian
regarding
Hi Arno,
there is a slight disagreement between several positions within Debian
regarding /etc/default/daemon options. That's confusing and something we
should work on, but that needs to be addressed at a higher level.
Ok, i see.
For you, in particular, you can choose either alternative for
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Werner,
On 06.01.2012 13:32, wer...@aloah-from-hell.de wrote:
I think that's the way to go. But where in source package should i put
the file in my source package? I would then copy the file by postinst
to /etc/default/policyd-weight ?
On 01/06/2012 07:44 PM, wer...@aloah-from-hell.de wrote:
Hi Thomas,
thanks for your helpfull comments.
What was in /etc/default/policyd-weight? Why aren't you using
it anymore?
It behaves like the current package in unstable/testing/stable.
The file /etc/default/policyd-weight
Hi Thomas,
I'd add a file there, with lots of comments, and all the options that
you can put in it. It doesn't mater if absolutely every options are
commented out, the point is to document what can be done with
useful comments.
Maybe you can do that on your next upload?
done :) I've added
Hi Thomas,
I've received an email from Debian FTP-Masters with the information that the
package got
rejected:
---
Reject Reasons:
policyd-weight_0.1.15.2-1_all.deb: deb contents timestamp check failed [type
'exceptions.NameError': global name 'MTime' is not defined]
---
What's wrong?
Thanks,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06.01.2012 14:32, wer...@aloah-from-hell.de wrote:
What's wrong?
That seems to be a bug in in dak to me. I've tried to ask relevent
persons, maybe they can help you out.
- --
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC
Hi Arno,
That seems to be a bug in in dak to me. I've tried to ask relevent
persons, maybe they can help you out.
OK, thank you :)
Have a nice day,
Werner
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06.01.2012 14:45, wer...@aloah-from-hell.de wrote:
That seems to be a bug in in dak to me. I've tried to ask relevent
persons, maybe they can help you out.
Mark fixed a bug in dak which produced your faulty error message. The
problem was the
Hi again,
I do have another question left.
I've just discovered that there are some files left in the debian directory
after package
creation, e.g.
debian/files
debian/policyd-weight.*
debian/policyd-weight.*.debhelper
debian/*.dephelper.log
debian/policyd-weight/
As source packages should
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Werner,
On 06.01.2012 21:24, wer...@aloah-from-hell.de wrote:
a) it's ok that the files reside in the debian directory ?
b) I missed a dh_clean (or pedant) somewhere ?
c) I have to delete those manually?
I didn't actually try your source
Hi Arno,
a) it's ok that the files reside in the debian directory ?
b) I missed a dh_clean (or pedant) somewhere ?
c) I have to delete those manually?
I didn't actually try your source package, but it looks feasible. These
files are created by a regular build process and entirely typical
Hi Ansgar,
And the version with unpatch and the include removed? From the error I
suspect you moved the dh_testdir one line up behind the clean.
With:
# include /usr/share/quilt/quilt.make
# clean: unpatch
clean: dh_testdir
dh_testroot
dh_clean build-stamp
That is
Hi all,
just check the package, this thread here is already done :) So it makes no
sense to comment stuff that's already fixed.
thank you,
Werner
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Dear mentors,
sorry that I've created two threads for my package. Please correspond on this
thread to avoid confusion. All comments from mentors have been considered,
the latest package is clean and awaits a sponsor :)
thank you,
Werner Detter
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On 12/30/2011 05:54 AM, wer...@aloah-from-hell.de wrote:
With:
# include /usr/share/quilt/quilt.make
# clean: unpatch
clean: dh_testdir
dh_testroot
dh_clean build-stamp
I get:
dpkg-buildpackage: source package policyd-weight
dpkg-buildpackage: source version 0.1.15.2-1
On 12/30/2011 06:30 AM, wer...@aloah-from-hell.de wrote:
seems like this entry in debian/rules fixed it :)
clean:
rm -fr debian/files
dh_clean
*NO* !!! :)
You really need the dh_testdir and dh_testroot calls.
Thomas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
* Thomas Goirand z...@debian.org, 2012-01-05, 18:10:
seems like this entry in debian/rules fixed it :)
clean:
rm -fr debian/files
dh_clean
*NO* !!! :)
You really need the dh_testdir and dh_testroot calls.
dh_testdir and dh_testroot act only as extra safety nets. Their use
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package policyd-weight.
* Package name: policyd-weight
Version : 0.1.15.2-1
Upstream Author : Robert Felber
* URL : www.policyd-weight.org
* License : GPL-2+
Section : mail
It builds those binary
On 01/06/2012 02:07 AM, wer...@aloah-from-hell.de wrote:
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package policyd-weight.
* Package name: policyd-weight
Version : 0.1.15.2-1
Upstream Author : Robert Felber
* URL : www.policyd-weight.org
* License
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package policyd-weight.
* Package name: policyd-weight
Version : 0.1.15.2-1
Upstream Author : Robert Felber
* URL : www.policyd-weight.org
* License : GPL-2+
Section : mail
It builds those binary
Hi,
wer...@aloah-from-hell.de writes:
I am looking for a sponsor for my package policyd-weight.
dget -x
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/policyd-weight/policyd-weight_0.1.15.2-1.dsc
Why do you list temporary files in debian/source/include-binaries? They
should be removed by
wer...@aloah-from-hell.de writes:
And the version with unpatch and the include removed? From the error I
suspect you moved the dh_testdir one line up behind the clean.
With:
# include /usr/share/quilt/quilt.make
# clean: unpatch
clean: dh_testdir
dh_testroot
dh_clean
Hi Ansgar,
thank you for your hints.
Why do you list temporary files in debian/source/include-binaries? They
should be removed by the clean target (dh_clean).
You're right. I just forgot to remove the file. Fixed.
Keeping dh_testdir in the clean target also should not hurt.
Thanks. Added to
wer...@aloah-from-hell.de writes:
I've recreated and reuploaded the package.
It looks okay, but you should no longer need neither the build
dependency on quilt (the include in d/rules is gone) nor the
d/README.source (it's a standard format and d/changelog already mentions
it was deleted).
Hi Ansgar,
thanks - again :)
It looks okay, but you should no longer need neither the build
dependency on quilt (the include in d/rules is gone) nor the
d/README.source (it's a standard format and d/changelog already mentions
it was deleted).
deleted quilt dependency, deleted
Hi,
Since I might be interested in using this software, I had
a quick look to the packaging. I've noticed some issues
that are remaining. Ansgar, feel free to correct me if you
don't agree with my remarks!
* Please run lintian with the options -Ii -E --pedantic so it
will show you more issues
Hi Thomas, hi Ansgar,
thanks for the hints. I will improve the package as suggested by you and
let you know when I'm done :)
Cheers,
Werner
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
Hi,
* Your debian/copyright doesn't mention yourself, I think
you should add yourself in the Files: debian/*. The
debian/copyright is also badly formatted, and generally
speaking seems to be using a very old definition of the
DEP5 specifications. It'd be great if you could update that.
Hi,
ntian with the options -Ii -E --pedantic so it
will show you more issues (like spelling mistakes in the
man pages, etc.). I wont details them here, since Lintian
does it better than me! :)
Thanks for the hint. How do you handle spelling errors by the upstream
author in the relevant
Hi,
As per:
http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/dep/web/deps/dep5/
the latest revision seem to be 240.
Thanks, that worked for me :)
Cheers,
Werner
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
On 01/03/2012 03:02 AM, wer...@aloah-from-hell.de wrote:
Hi,
* Your debian/copyright doesn't mention yourself, I think
you should add yourself in the Files: debian/*. The
debian/copyright is also badly formatted, and generally
speaking seems to be using a very old definition of the
DEP5
Hi Thomas,
* Your debian/copyright doesn't mention yourself, I think
you should add yourself in the Files: debian/*. The
debian/copyright is also badly formatted, and generally
speaking seems to be using a very old definition of the
DEP5 specifications. It'd be great if you could update
On 01/03/2012 03:03 AM, wer...@aloah-from-hell.de wrote:
Thanks for the hint. How do you handle spelling errors by the upstream
author in the relevant manpages? Should i create patches for it? How's
the workflow handling spelling errors by the upstream author?
Best is to create a patch,
Am Dienstag, den 03.01.2012, 04:10 +0800 schrieb Thomas Goirand:
OK, got it *but* what revision do i have to use?
http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/dep/web/deps/dep5.mdwn?revision=?
Thanks,
Werner
As per:
http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/dep/web/deps/dep5/
the latest
Hi again :)
Best is to create a patch, include it in your Debian package, and forward
that patch to upstream so he can have his manpage fixed upstream as
well (so you will later remove the debian-specific patch).
I've created a new Patch which fixes the spelling errors and mentioned that
in
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package policyd-weight.
* Package name: policyd-weight
Version : 0.1.15.2-1
Upstream Author : Robert Felber
* URL : www.policyd-weight.org
* License : GPL-2+
Section : mail
It builds those binary
Dear Ansgar,
thanks for your helpfull reply. I have some more questions.
From d/changelog:
++ * New upstream release
++- (Closes: #641227)
The second line misses something behind the dash.
Changed.
There is a debian/.pc directory which should not be there.
Removed.
You should
Hi,
I've added comments to my quilt patches and reuploaded the source package.
So there is stuff left:
+include /usr/share/quilt/quilt.make
+build-stamp: $(QUILT_STAMPFN)
clean: unpatch
I had to leave the line include /usr/share/quilt/quilt.make otherwise
the package build fails.
With
Hi,
wer...@aloah-from-hell.de writes:
+include /usr/share/quilt/quilt.make
+build-stamp: $(QUILT_STAMPFN)
clean: unpatch
I had to leave the line include /usr/share/quilt/quilt.make otherwise
the package build fails.
With what error? I guess you did not remove the unpatch dependency for
wer...@aloah-from-hell.de writes:
+include /usr/share/quilt/quilt.make
+build-stamp: $(QUILT_STAMPFN)
clean: unpatch
I had to leave the line include /usr/share/quilt/quilt.make otherwise
the package build fails.
With what error? I guess you did not remove the unpatch dependency for
the
Hi,
How did your rules file look like?
Currently:
#!/usr/bin/make -f
# written by Jan Wagner w...@cyconet.org
#
# Uncomment this to turn on verbose mode.
#export DH_VERBOSE=1
include /usr/share/quilt/quilt.make
clean: unpatch
dh_testdir
dh_testroot
dh_clean
Hi,
wer...@aloah-from-hell.de writes:
+include /usr/share/quilt/quilt.make
+build-stamp: $(QUILT_STAMPFN)
clean: unpatch
I had to leave the line include /usr/share/quilt/quilt.make otherwise
the package build fails.
With what error? I guess you did not remove the unpatch dependency for
wer...@aloah-from-hell.de writes:
How did your rules file look like?
Currently:
[...]
include /usr/share/quilt/quilt.make
clean: unpatch
dh_testdir
dh_testroot
dh_clean build-stamp
And the version with unpatch and the include removed? From the error I
suspect you moved
Hi,
And the version with unpatch and the include removed? From the error I
suspect you moved the dh_testdir one line up behind the clean.
With:
# include /usr/share/quilt/quilt.make
# clean: unpatch
clean: dh_testdir
dh_testroot
dh_clean build-stamp
I get:
dpkg-buildpackage:
Hi,
the package is built by using clean: without any parameters but if gives me
warnings like follows:
dpkg-genchanges -sa ../policyd-weight_0.1.15.2-1_amd64.changes
dpkg-genchanges: warning: duplicate files list entry for file
policyd-weight_0.1.15.2-1_all.deb (line 2)
dpkg-genchanges:
Hi,
dpkg-genchanges: warning: duplicate files list entry for file
policyd-weight_0.1.15.2-1_all.deb (line 7)
dpkg-genchanges: warning: duplicate files list entry for file
policyd-weight_0.1.15.2-1_all.deb (line 8)
dpkg-genchanges: including full source code in upload
Every time I
clean:
rm -fr debian/files
dh_clean
dh_clean does remove debian/files, you don't need that explicit rm -fr.
--
Jakub Wilk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
Hi Jakub,
dh_clean does remove debian/files, you don't need that explicit rm -fr.
good to know, thanks. Fixed, recreated and uploaded again on mentors.
thank you,
Werner Detter
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package policyd-weight.
* Package name: policyd-weight
Version : 0.1.15.2-1
Upstream Author : Robert Felber
* URL : www.policyd-weight.org
* License : GPL-2+
Section : mail
It builds those binary
1 - 100 of 115 matches
Mail list logo
