Florian Ernst wrote:
Well, IMHO it is. Just uploaded.
Thanks, your help is very much appreciated.
If you want to update your packaging any time in the future please
simply contact me directly via private mail.
Will do :)
Cheers,
Jack
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
On Tue, Sep 26, 2006 at 11:10:58PM +0100, Jack Grahams wrote:
Thanks again for your help. I've uploaded it to mentors.debian.net.
Please let me know if it's suitable for sponsorship.
Well, IMHO it is. Just uploaded.
If you want to update your packaging any time in the future please
simply
Hello there,
On Tue, Sep 26, 2006 at 04:29:16PM +0100, Jack Grahams wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.1-5 of my package png2html
(This package was previously orphaned). I would like to thank those who have
taken the time to look at this package and make suggestions for
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Flo,
The CFLAGS are not passed to make, so setting -g effectively yields
no result as upstream uses his own set of flags.
Good point, I hadn't noticed that - I thought I'd got rid of all the
pointless parts of debian/rules...
DH_COMPAT is
On Tue, Sep 26, 2006 at 07:42:56PM +0100, Jack Grahams wrote:
The CFLAGS are not passed to make, so setting -g effectively yields
no result as upstream uses his own set of flags.
Good point, I hadn't noticed that - I thought I'd got rid of all the
pointless parts of debian/rules...
Umm,
...so what I meant was: please take care that the CFLAGS from your previous
debian/rules get passed on correctly.
Ugh. Of course. I knew I kept it in for a reason ;) Now I feel stupid...
I hope I've done this okay now.
Both texts better shouldn't go into too much detail about how certain
On Sunday 24 September 2006 02:33, Jack Grahams wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.1-5
of my package png2html (This package was previously orphaned).
Regarding debian/patches/01_makefilefix.dpatch:
Wouldn't it be easier if you installed the files into the appropriate
Christoph Haas wrote:
Regarding debian/patches/01_makefilefix.dpatch:
Wouldn't it be easier if you installed the files into the appropriate
locations using dh_install in debian/rules later? Patching the Makefile
looks a bit unusual to me.
That is a much better method, thanks.
s/pixer by
Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 09:43:08 -0800
Jack Grahams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Jack,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.1-5
of my package png2html. This package was previously orphaned.
I took a look to your package and it looks nice, i only caught the
following minor mistakes:
Nacho Barrientos Arias wrote:
- Consider deleting all the obvious comments in debian/rules like:
* # Build commands.
* # Nothing to do.
* and more.
- debian/control
* s/pixer/pixel
- You can use this upload to close fixed in NMU bugs like #343915 :)
Thank you very much
10 matches
Mail list logo
