* Bas Wijnen:
This is slightly off-topic, for which I apologise. It's just that I
learned about symbol versioning during my NM process, and nobody outside
Debian seems to understand what it is. :-(
*sigh* It's a bit sad that this is still being used in the NM process.
I have a library,
On 2007-05-25, Florian Weimer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Bas Wijnen:
This is slightly off-topic, for which I apologise. It's just that I
learned about symbol versioning during my NM process, and nobody outside
Debian seems to understand what it is. :-(
*sigh* It's a bit sad that this is
On Fri, May 25, 2007 at 09:57:41PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
This is slightly off-topic, for which I apologise. It's just that I
learned about symbol versioning during my NM process, and nobody outside
Debian seems to understand what it is. :-(
*sigh* It's a bit sad that this is still
On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 05:03:42PM +0200, Bas Wijnen wrote:
I have a library, which I want to package for Debian. I felt it would
be a good idea to use symbol versioning, since most of my programs (and
in some cases other libraries) use it. The library is written in C++,
which seems to be
Hi,
This is slightly off-topic, for which I apologise. It's just that I
learned about symbol versioning during my NM process, and nobody outside
Debian seems to understand what it is. :-(
I have a library, which I want to package for Debian. I felt it would
be a good idea to use symbol
On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 05:03:42PM +0200, Bas Wijnen wrote:
Then I tried to give the whole shevek::fd class a different version by
adding:
SHEVEK_2 {
global:
shevek::fd::*;
};
(and some variations.) That didn't work at all: it defines the version:
gDO
6 matches
Mail list logo
