On Tue, May 28, 2002 at 01:12:38AM -0700, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
setting it to Potato shows that it has either been fixed or obsoleted in more
recent versions.
Though the more common thing is just to close the bug unless it's
frequently reported.
--
You grabbed my hand and we fell into
On Tue, May 28, 2002 at 07:54:14PM +1000, Matthew Palmer wrote:
But a bug marked 'potato' but that won't be fixed because it's not security
critical - is that still a bug? I mean, it is an issue with the package,
but because it only affects potato (or, by extension, the stable
distribution,
Em Tue, 28 May 2002 09:19:26 -0500, Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED]
escreveu:
No, tagging the bug 'potato' only means that it's a bug that pertains
specifically to potato. There are NO RC bugs that are potato-specific,
because potato is already released. ;) And for security-related bugs,
3 matches
Mail list logo
