On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 11:25:59AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 12:06:29PM +0200, Dagfinn Ilmari Manns?ker wrote:
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 11:38:02AM +0200, Remi VANICAT wrote:
Of course this mean that you need to have your
On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 11:25:59AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 12:06:29PM +0200, Dagfinn Ilmari Manns?ker wrote:
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 11:38:02AM +0200, Remi VANICAT wrote:
Of course this mean that you need to have your gnupg
On Die, 2002-09-24 at 08:17, Sven LUTHER wrote:
Anyway, i tried to build only the arch:all package on voltaire also, but
without sucess. If you can rebuild only ocaml-source for ocaml 3.06-6
and upload that, please go ahead, it would be an NMU, i don't think
there is problem with the
On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 11:38:02AM +0200, Remi VANICAT wrote:
Sven LUTHER [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hello, ...
[...]
After a bit more looking, i noticed that the arch: all packages were not
autobuilt, which seems normal to me with a bit more thinking about it,
but the
On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 11:11:09AM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote:
On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 11:38:02AM +0200, Remi VANICAT wrote:
Another possibility is to go to one or another debian.org developer
machine an to make the build there. You may even be able to use screen
to not been forced to be
On Die, 2002-09-24 at 08:17, Sven LUTHER wrote:
Anyway, i tried to build only the arch:all package on voltaire also, but
without sucess. If you can rebuild only ocaml-source for ocaml 3.06-6
and upload that, please go ahead, it would be an NMU, i don't think
there is problem with the
On Tue, Sep 24, 2002 at 02:56:34PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
On Die, 2002-09-24 at 08:17, Sven LUTHER wrote:
Anyway, i tried to build only the arch:all package on voltaire also, but
without sucess. If you can rebuild only ocaml-source for ocaml 3.06-6
and upload that, please go ahead,
Hello, ...
Since i am right now settled with expensive and limited bandwith, i
decided some time ago to do a source only upload of my packages (well i
uploaded the first one (-1) fully, but for the next ones, i tested them
on my system, and then built them with -S and uploaded only the
.diff.gz,
Sven LUTHER [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hello, ...
[...]
After a bit more looking, i noticed that the arch: all packages were not
autobuilt, which seems normal to me with a bit more thinking about it,
but the binary-all package is rather huge, and i have difficulties
uploading it right
On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 11:38:02AM +0200, Remi VANICAT wrote:
Of course this mean that you need to have your gnupg secret key there,
and this may be unwanted.
No, build it unsigned on the remote machine, then copy the .dsc and
.changes back for signing on a local trusted machine.
--
Colin
On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 11:38:02AM +0200, Remi VANICAT wrote:
Another possibility is to go to one or another debian.org developer
machine an to make the build there. You may even be able to use screen
to not been forced to be connected for the whole build.
You should be able to build offline;
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 11:38:02AM +0200, Remi VANICAT wrote:
Of course this mean that you need to have your gnupg secret key there,
and this may be unwanted.
No, build it unsigned on the remote machine, then copy the .dsc and
.changes back for
On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 12:06:29PM +0200, Dagfinn Ilmari Manns?ker wrote:
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 11:38:02AM +0200, Remi VANICAT wrote:
Of course this mean that you need to have your gnupg secret key there,
and this may be unwanted.
No, build it
On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 11:38:02AM +0200, Remi VANICAT wrote:
Sven LUTHER [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hello, ...
[...]
After a bit more looking, i noticed that the arch: all packages were not
autobuilt, which seems normal to me with a bit more thinking about it,
but the
Hello, ...
Since i am right now settled with expensive and limited bandwith, i
decided some time ago to do a source only upload of my packages (well i
uploaded the first one (-1) fully, but for the next ones, i tested them
on my system, and then built them with -S and uploaded only the
.diff.gz,
Sven LUTHER [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hello, ...
[...]
After a bit more looking, i noticed that the arch: all packages were not
autobuilt, which seems normal to me with a bit more thinking about it,
but the binary-all package is rather huge, and i have difficulties
uploading it right
On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 11:38:02AM +0200, Remi VANICAT wrote:
Of course this mean that you need to have your gnupg secret key there,
and this may be unwanted.
No, build it unsigned on the remote machine, then copy the .dsc and
.changes back for signing on a local trusted machine.
--
Colin
On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 11:38:02AM +0200, Remi VANICAT wrote:
Another possibility is to go to one or another debian.org developer
machine an to make the build there. You may even be able to use screen
to not been forced to be connected for the whole build.
You should be able to build offline;
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 11:38:02AM +0200, Remi VANICAT wrote:
Of course this mean that you need to have your gnupg secret key there,
and this may be unwanted.
No, build it unsigned on the remote machine, then copy the .dsc and
.changes back for signing
On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 12:06:29PM +0200, Dagfinn Ilmari Manns?ker wrote:
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 11:38:02AM +0200, Remi VANICAT wrote:
Of course this mean that you need to have your gnupg secret key there,
and this may be unwanted.
No, build it
On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 11:25:59AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 12:06:29PM +0200, Dagfinn Ilmari Manns?ker wrote:
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 11:38:02AM +0200, Remi VANICAT wrote:
Of course this mean that you need to have your gnupg
21 matches
Mail list logo
