Matthias Urlichs wrote:
As packages are normally upgraded through the life of a system I train
people to always say 'Y' to the replace a conffile question. Sure
this may leave the system in a generic and locally unworkable state.
So why not N? That may leave the package, at worst, in a I
Matthias Urlichs wrote:
As packages are normally upgraded through the life of a system I train
people to always say 'Y' to the replace a conffile question. Sure
this may leave the system in a generic and locally unworkable state.
So why not N? That may leave the package, at worst, in a I
Hi, Bob Proulx wrote:
As packages are normally upgraded through the life of a system I train
people to always say 'Y' to the replace a conffile question. Sure
this may leave the system in a generic and locally unworkable state.
So why not N? That may leave the package, at worst, in a I can't
Hi, Bob Proulx wrote:
As packages are normally upgraded through the life of a system I train
people to always say 'Y' to the replace a conffile question. Sure
this may leave the system in a generic and locally unworkable state.
So why not N? That may leave the package, at worst, in a I can't
Eric Winger wrote:
Can't I even Depend on a package and then fine tune its configuration
though?
I don't think you can depend upon a package and tweak its
conffiles. It would be interesting to be able to do that and it
certainly makes sense from an object oriented inherit and modify
Eric Winger wrote:
Can't I even Depend on a package and then fine tune its configuration
though?
I don't think you can depend upon a package and tweak its
conffiles. It would be interesting to be able to do that and it
certainly makes sense from an object oriented inherit and modify
Eric Winger [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
Jamie Wilkinson was heard to have trumpeted:
This one time, at band camp, Eric Winger wrote:
I'm thinking there's got to be a higher level way of handling this
type of scenario.
Firstly, you can't really Depend on and then Replace a package at
the
* Frank Küster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030901 11:20]:
Eric Winger [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
Can't I even Depend on a package and then fine tune its
configuration though?
Look at
http://people.debian.org/~ajt/sarge_rc_policy.txt
,
| Packages must not modify other packages'
Andreas Barth [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
* Frank Kster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030901 11:20]:
Eric Winger [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
Can't I even Depend on a package and then fine tune its
configuration though?
Look at
http://people.debian.org/~ajt/sarge_rc_policy.txt
,
|
* Frank Küster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030901 11:20]:
Eric Winger [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
Can't I even Depend on a package and then fine tune its
configuration though?
Look at
http://people.debian.org/~ajt/sarge_rc_policy.txt
,
| Packages must not modify other packages'
Andreas Barth [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
* Frank Küster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030901 11:20]:
Eric Winger [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
Can't I even Depend on a package and then fine tune its
configuration though?
Look at
http://people.debian.org/~ajt/sarge_rc_policy.txt
,
|
Eric Winger [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
Jamie Wilkinson was heard to have trumpeted:
This one time, at band camp, Eric Winger wrote:
I'm thinking there's got to be a higher level way of handling this
type of scenario.
Firstly, you can't really Depend on and then Replace a package at
the
The question, basically is this: How does one have a .deb package which
replaces/overwrites files from another package (in this case a
dependency)?
The specific example is this. We want to use autofs. For our turnkey
systems, we want to have our own little package, that configures the
autofs
On Wed, Aug 27, 2003 at 04:36:22PM -0700, Eric Winger wrote:
The question, basically is this: How does one have a .deb package which
replaces/overwrites files from another package (in this case a
dependency)?
The specific example is this. We want to use autofs. For our turnkey
systems,
Eric Winger [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
The question, basically is this: How does one have a .deb package
which replaces/overwrites files from another package (in this case a
dependency)?
The specific example is this. We want to use autofs. For our turnkey
systems, we want to have our own
This one time, at band camp, Eric Winger wrote:
I'm thinking there's got to be a higher level way of handling this
type of scenario.
Firstly, you can't really Depend on and then Replace a package at the same
time.
Package management is a small part of configuration management, there are
Geert Stappers wrote:
On Wed, Aug 27, 2003 at 04:36:22PM -0700, Eric Winger wrote:
The question, basically is this: How does one have a .deb package
which
replaces/overwrites files from another package (in this case a
dependency)?
Dependency means that a package with a foobar script
depends
Jamie Wilkinson was heard to have trumpeted:
This one time, at band camp, Eric Winger wrote:
I'm thinking there's got to be a higher level way of handling this
type of scenario.
Firstly, you can't really Depend on and then Replace a package at the
same
time.
Can't I even Depend on a package and
On Wed, Aug 27, 2003 at 04:36:22PM -0700, Eric Winger wrote:
The question, basically is this: How does one have a .deb package which
replaces/overwrites files from another package (in this case a
dependency)?
Dependency means that a package with a foobar script
depends on the foobar
This one time, at band camp, Eric Winger wrote:
I'm thinking there's got to be a higher level way of handling this
type of scenario.
Firstly, you can't really Depend on and then Replace a package at the same
time.
Package management is a small part of configuration management, there are
Geert Stappers wrote:
On Wed, Aug 27, 2003 at 04:36:22PM -0700, Eric Winger wrote:
The question, basically is this: How does one have a .deb package
which
replaces/overwrites files from another package (in this case a
dependency)?
Dependency means that a package with a foobar script
Jamie Wilkinson was heard to have trumpeted:
This one time, at band camp, Eric Winger wrote:
I'm thinking there's got to be a higher level way of handling this
type of scenario.
Firstly, you can't really Depend on and then Replace a package at the
same
time.
Can't I even Depend on a package
On Wed, Aug 27, 2003 at 04:36:22PM -0700, Eric Winger wrote:
The question, basically is this: How does one have a .deb package which
replaces/overwrites files from another package (in this case a
dependency)?
The specific example is this. We want to use autofs. For our turnkey
systems,
23 matches
Mail list logo
