Hi,
On Donnerstag, 12. März 2009, Eric Cooper wrote:
I'm packaging approx, which for compatibility with apt-proxy defaults
to port (not in /etc/services). That was fine when approx, like
apt-proxy, was run as a standalone daemon from an initscript. But I
just changed it to run (only)
On Mar 12 2009, Russ Allbery wrote:
Yeah, I disagree with the idea that inetd is a bad choice for new
programs.
In the particular case of approx (which I have installed, thanks to some
comments on the -mentors list), I run it from a private package of
ucscpi-tcp: in particular, tcpserver.
I'm
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 04:56:20PM +0100, Giacomo A. Catenazzi wrote:
how to had new services in /etc/services database?
ciao
cate
Asking netbase maintainer(s)? Just read /etc/services about that.
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 04:56:20PM +0100, Giacomo A. Catenazzi wrote:
how to had new services in /etc/services database?
Asking netbase maintainer(s)? Just read /etc/services about that.
Hmm. Reading your and dato answers, it seems I wrote wrongly my mail.
The
Hi,
On Donnerstag, 12. März 2009, Giacomo A. Catenazzi wrote:
But now I'm not sure about:
- if it is a good thing to have admin choosed ports
I dont think so and I guess I'm not alone and thats why there is no best
practice to do that. The only (typo of) package where I can think off where
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 02:13:12PM +0100, Holger Levsen wrote:
On Donnerstag, 12. März 2009, Giacomo A. Catenazzi wrote:
But now I'm not sure about:
- if it is a good thing to have admin choosed ports
I dont think so and I guess I'm not alone and thats why there is no best
practice to do
Eric Cooper e...@cmu.edu writes:
Regarding the other thread in -devel about the future of inetd: in my
case I found it very sensible to jettison all the code for opening
sockets, binding ports, handling IPv6, handling tcp-wrappers,
daemonizing processes, etc. and punt it to inetd. Since apt
Giacomo A. Catenazzi c...@debian.org writes:
Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 04:56:20PM +0100, Giacomo A. Catenazzi wrote:
how to had new services in /etc/services database?
Asking netbase maintainer(s)? Just read /etc/services about that.
Hmm. Reading your and dato
Eric Cooper e...@cmu.edu writes:
What is the best way to register a daemon under inetd with a
user-chosen port? (I am packaging a daemon that is run by inetd, but
does not have a standard port number.)
Currently I am prompting the user for the port via debconf, grepping
/etc/inetd.conf to
Eric Cooper e...@cmu.edu writes:
What is the best way to register a daemon under inetd with a
user-chosen port? (I am packaging a daemon that is run by inetd, but
does not have a standard port number.)
Currently I am prompting the user for the port via debconf, grepping
/etc/inetd.conf to
* Giacomo A. Catenazzi [Wed, 11 Mar 2009 16:56:20 +0100]:
how to had new services in /etc/services database?
By filing a bug like #353835 (against netbase).
--
- Are you sure we're good?
- Always.
-- Rory and Lorelai
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
What is the best way to register a daemon under inetd with a
user-chosen port? (I am packaging a daemon that is run by inetd, but
does not have a standard port number.)
Currently I am prompting the user for the port via debconf, grepping
/etc/inetd.conf to make sure it's not already there, and
12 matches
Mail list logo
