Re: dch multi-maintainer mode

Thanks a lot everyone =D -- With best regards Dmitrijs Ledkovs (for short Dima), Ледков Дмитрий Юрьевич

Re: dch multi-maintainer mode

On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 09:22:49PM +0200, Stéphane Glondu wrote: > Neil Williams a écrit : > >> Is it still allowed as per 3.8.1 policy to use multi maintainer style > >> changelogs? > > > > Yes. > > And what was the prevous style of changelog allowed, by the way? Originally, the debian changelo

Re: dch multi-maintainer mode

Dmitrijs Ledkovs writes: > Is it still allowed as per 3.8.1 policy to use multi maintainer style > changelogs? > (Asking because of the explicit statement of one type of changlelog > and new upgrade to must) That type of changelog allows anything at all following the two space indent for entries

Re: dch multi-maintainer mode

Neil Williams a écrit : >> Is it still allowed as per 3.8.1 policy to use multi maintainer style >> changelogs? > > Yes. And what was the prevous style of changelog allowed, by the way? -- Stéphane -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscr

Re: dch multi-maintainer mode

On Tue, 21 Apr 2009 20:06:23 +0100 Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote: > Dear all > > Is it still allowed as per 3.8.1 policy to use multi maintainer style > changelogs? Yes. > (Asking because of the explicit statement of one type of changlelog > and new upgrade to must) The important lines are: > fooba

dch multi-maintainer mode

Dear all Is it still allowed as per 3.8.1 policy to use multi maintainer style changelogs? (Asking because of the explicit statement of one type of changlelog and new upgrade to must) Eg. foobar (1.5.11-1) unstable; urgency=low [ Joe Plow Mber ] * New upstream release [ Vasja Pupkin ]