On Sun, Jun 08, 2003 at 10:50:04AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Sun, Jun 08, 2003 at 10:10:33AM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
[...]
However, before you do anything like this, you should check that
binary compatibilty was indeed broken and that the soname change was
correct.
Mmm, how do i
On Sun, Jun 08, 2003 at 10:50:04AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Sun, Jun 08, 2003 at 10:10:33AM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
[...]
However, before you do anything like this, you should check that
binary compatibilty was indeed broken and that the soname change was
correct.
Mmm, how do i
On Sun, Jun 08, 2003 at 08:53:47AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
I am currently preparing a NMU for libgtop2, which is broken and whose
maintainer told me has no time to fix right now.
Now, the problem was that the libgtop library moved from 0.so.0.0.1 to
0.so.1.0.1, and the install rules didn't
On Sun, Jun 08, 2003 at 10:10:33AM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
On Sun, Jun 08, 2003 at 08:53:47AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
I am currently preparing a NMU for libgtop2, which is broken and whose
maintainer told me has no time to fix right now.
Now, the problem was that the libgtop
On Sun, Jun 08, 2003 at 08:53:47AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
Hello,
Hello,
(Currently reading the Policy document, but it doesn't say much about
this, is there another reference document speaking about shared lib
soname ?)
Quoting the developer-reference:
Good practices
On Sun, Jun 08, 2003 at 06:35:02PM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
I am currently preparing a NMU for libgtop2, which is broken and whose
maintainer told me has no time to fix right now.
Now, the problem was that the libgtop library moved from 0.so.0.0.1 to
0.so.1.0.1, and the install
The normal procedure is to rename the binary package to
libgtop2-1 (it should probably have been libgtop2.0-1, but
people seem to have their own tastes about this.)
Ok, thanks for the info, and what is the procedure concerning this and
NMUs ? Also, while this name change mean the
On Sun, Jun 08, 2003 at 10:22:51PM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
The normal procedure is to rename the binary package to
libgtop2-1 (it should probably have been libgtop2.0-1, but
people seem to have their own tastes about this.)
Ok, thanks for the info, and what is the procedure
Hello,
I am currently preparing a NMU for libgtop2, which is broken and whose
maintainer told me has no time to fix right now.
Now, the problem was that the libgtop library moved from 0.so.0.0.1 to
0.so.1.0.1, and the install rules didn't catch this changes.
Now, if i understood this change
On Sun, Jun 08, 2003 at 08:53:47AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
I am currently preparing a NMU for libgtop2, which is broken and whose
maintainer told me has no time to fix right now.
Now, the problem was that the libgtop library moved from 0.so.0.0.1 to
0.so.1.0.1, and the install rules didn't
On Sun, Jun 08, 2003 at 10:10:33AM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
On Sun, Jun 08, 2003 at 08:53:47AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
I am currently preparing a NMU for libgtop2, which is broken and whose
maintainer told me has no time to fix right now.
Now, the problem was that the libgtop
On Sun, Jun 08, 2003 at 08:53:47AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
Hello,
Hello,
(Currently reading the Policy document, but it doesn't say much about
this, is there another reference document speaking about shared lib
soname ?)
Quoting the developer-reference:
Good practices
I am currently preparing a NMU for libgtop2, which is broken and whose
maintainer told me has no time to fix right now.
Now, the problem was that the libgtop library moved from 0.so.0.0.1 to
0.so.1.0.1, and the install rules didn't catch this changes.
The normal procedure is to rename the
On Sun, Jun 08, 2003 at 06:35:02PM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
I am currently preparing a NMU for libgtop2, which is broken and whose
maintainer told me has no time to fix right now.
Now, the problem was that the libgtop library moved from 0.so.0.0.1 to
0.so.1.0.1, and the install
The normal procedure is to rename the binary package to
libgtop2-1 (it should probably have been libgtop2.0-1, but
people seem to have their own tastes about this.)
Ok, thanks for the info, and what is the procedure concerning this and
NMUs ? Also, while this name change mean the
On Sun, Jun 08, 2003 at 10:22:51PM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
The normal procedure is to rename the binary package to
libgtop2-1 (it should probably have been libgtop2.0-1, but
people seem to have their own tastes about this.)
Ok, thanks for the info, and what is the procedure
16 matches
Mail list logo
