Le dimanche 09 juillet 2006 à 19:56 +0100, Michael Stevens a écrit :
Hi.
I've got a new package which seems to be all good to me so far. The
only problem is that I've built it on sarge, so now I want to get it
updated and building against sid.
How do I setup pbuilder to manage this? when
On Mon, Jul 10, 2006 at 11:54:43AM +0200, Thibaut Paumard wrote:
E: Couldn't download slang1a-utf8
pbuilder: debootstrap failed
Use pbuilder and cdebootstrap from http://www.backports.org/ .
To do that, put:
deb http://www.backports.org/debian/ sarge-backports main
in your
Le lundi 10 juillet 2006 à 13:23 +0200, Adam Borowski a écrit :
[...]
Then add the following to /etc/apt/preferences :
[...]
Package: cdebootstrap
Pin: release a=sarge-backports
Pin-Priority: 999
[...]
uhm, why?
The whole point of setting the priority at 200 when the default
source
On Sun, Jul 09, 2006, Tyler MacDonald wrote:
I only did this before because of the weird 'tar' problems in
unstable... What's bad about building a package out of testing?
This is not what the buildds of the other arches will do, and you will
create a weird package on $arch-you-uploaded
Le lundi 10 juillet 2006 à 14:05 +0100, Michael Stevens a écrit :
I think it'll be simplest for me to get a machine/vm running sid
though, in the long term.
I use a sid chroot to debug my packaging, but I try to always do my
final build with pbuilder (to test the build-depends). So I would
Michael Stevens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How do I setup pbuilder to manage this? when I try to just do
'pbuilder create', it gives the error:
E: Couldn't download slang1a-utf8
pbuilder: debootstrap failed
I've got it working using '--distribution sarge', which is nice for
checking the
On Sun, Jul 09, 2006 at 12:31:34PM -0700, Tyler MacDonald wrote:
Michael Stevens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How do I setup pbuilder to manage this? when I try to just do
'pbuilder create', it gives the error:
E: Couldn't download slang1a-utf8
pbuilder: debootstrap failed
I've got it
Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have found that it is easier to have machines running each distro
you want to build against, but it shouldn't be neccessary. Try a
--distribution etch though; something that builds under etch should still
run under sid.
And no, you should
On Sun, Jul 09, 2006 at 01:21:18PM -0700, Tyler MacDonald wrote:
Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have found that it is easier to have machines running each distro
you want to build against, but it shouldn't be neccessary. Try a
--distribution etch though; something that
9 matches
Mail list logo
