Dear Mentors,
I'm having some trouble at creating a watch file for the packace preload.
The upstream tarballs are found as follows:
http://sourceforge.net/projects/preload/files/preload/0.6.4/preload-0.6.4.tar.gz
The problem lies where its parent folder changes at every release. Would
anyone
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 2:37 PM, Daniel Martí
danielmarti.deb...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear Mentors,
I'm having some trouble at creating a watch file for the packace preload.
The upstream tarballs are found as follows:
Le Thu, Feb 09, 2012 at 08:37:58PM +0100, Daniel Martí a écrit :
I'm having some trouble at creating a watch file for the packace preload.
The upstream tarballs are found as follows:
http://sourceforge.net/projects/preload/files/preload/0.6.4/preload-0.6.4.tar.gz
Dear Daniel,
I have the
Dear list (again :-)),
thank you very much for helping so far --
I have now another problem: the upstream url is something like
http://stsdas.stsci.edu/astrolib/pywcs-1.10-4.7.tar.gz, but the URL
http://stsdas.stsci.edu/astrolib/ just gives some errors, preventing
the watch file from working
Ole Streicher debian-de...@liska.ath.cx writes:
http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/maint-guide/dother.en.html#docs
| Normally with a watch file, the URL at http://sf.net/gentoo is
in my case, this is
On Thu, Mar 14, 2002 at 12:00:31PM -0800, Ian Duggan wrote:
And go for version 2.6.91 (which has just been uploaded) if you have
any FTP sites; version 2.6.90 was broken for them. See uscan(1) in
the new package for a description of the new watch file format.
The new devscripts also
On Thu, Mar 14, 2002 at 12:00:31PM -0800, Ian Duggan wrote:
And go for version 2.6.91 (which has just been uploaded) if you have
any FTP sites; version 2.6.90 was broken for them. See uscan(1) in
the new package for a description of the new watch file format.
The new devscripts also
And go for version 2.6.91 (which has just been uploaded) if you have
any FTP sites; version 2.6.90 was broken for them. See uscan(1) in
the new package for a description of the new watch file format.
The new devscripts also features a funky new config file.
It was probably my longest
On Thu, Mar 14, 2002 at 12:00:31PM -0800, Ian Duggan wrote:
I looked on the mirrors and the latest I can find is 2.6.90. Where would
I look to find 2.6.91? I looked in the /pool/d/devscripts/ dir on
mirrors.kernel.org/debian and http.us.debian.org.
At the time Julian posted, it was available
My uscan man page only uses one backslash..
On Wed, Mar 13, 2002 at 03:01:32PM -0800, Ian Duggan wrote:
When specifying the regexp to be used in a watch file, are backslashes
supposed to be escaped? The New Maintainer's Guide says one thing, but
the man page for uscan says another. Which is
Ian Duggan wrote:
When specifying the regexp to be used in a watch file, are backslashes
supposed to be escaped? The New Maintainer's Guide says one thing, but
the man page for uscan says another. Which is preferred/correct?
Install the uscan from unstable, and do not escape backslashes. The
On Thu, Mar 14, 2002 at 12:50:33AM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
Ian Duggan wrote:
When specifying the regexp to be used in a watch file, are backslashes
supposed to be escaped? The New Maintainer's Guide says one thing, but
the man page for uscan says another. Which is preferred/correct?
And go for version 2.6.91 (which has just been uploaded) if you have
any FTP sites; version 2.6.90 was broken for them. See uscan(1) in
the new package for a description of the new watch file format.
The new devscripts also features a funky new config file.
It was probably my longest
On Thu, Mar 14, 2002 at 12:00:31PM -0800, Ian Duggan wrote:
I looked on the mirrors and the latest I can find is 2.6.90. Where would
I look to find 2.6.91? I looked in the /pool/d/devscripts/ dir on
mirrors.kernel.org/debian and http.us.debian.org.
At the time Julian posted, it was available
When specifying the regexp to be used in a watch file, are backslashes
supposed to be escaped? The New Maintainer's Guide says one thing, but
the man page for uscan says another. Which is preferred/correct?
Where do I ask to get the incorrect version updated?
man uscan:
--
# Site
My uscan man page only uses one backslash..
On Wed, Mar 13, 2002 at 03:01:32PM -0800, Ian Duggan wrote:
When specifying the regexp to be used in a watch file, are backslashes
supposed to be escaped? The New Maintainer's Guide says one thing, but
the man page for uscan says another. Which is
Ian Duggan wrote:
When specifying the regexp to be used in a watch file, are backslashes
supposed to be escaped? The New Maintainer's Guide says one thing, but
the man page for uscan says another. Which is preferred/correct?
Install the uscan from unstable, and do not escape backslashes.
When specifying the regexp to be used in a watch file, are backslashes
supposed to be escaped? The New Maintainer's Guide says one thing, but
the man page for uscan says another. Which is preferred/correct?
Where do I ask to get the incorrect version updated?
man uscan:
--
# Site
18 matches
Mail list logo
