Re: task-*

2001-05-17 Thread Robert Bihlmeyer
Josip Rodin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Right, but what I'm asking is how to include a handful of plaintext files with filesystem locations in an otherwise empty task-* package. Should I make a custom Makefile or have I missed a useful dpkg tool to help with this? Just use install -m

Re: Re: source NMU

2001-05-17 Thread GerhardTonn
Are you planning to set up an autobuilder for s390? Yes, I am currently working on it. -- Gerhard GMX - Die Kommunikationsplattform im Internet. http://www.gmx.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[new package]Should all the rm scripts be ok before uploading?

2001-05-17 Thread Sebastien Chaumat
Hello, I'm about to upload replicator (replicator.sourceforge.net at present) on master but I have some questions: - there's no postrm script yet althougth there's a real need for that. Should I write it before uploading? - I'd like to engage many discussion about replicator on debian

RE: GStreamer package explosion

2001-05-17 Thread Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
Putting -all- the plugins in one package would be nice but I don't know how happy users will be if they are forced to download a truckload of extra libs they may not want. I'll probably add a top level pseudo package depending on all the other packages just for user convenience. Perhaps

file move between versions

2001-05-17 Thread Steve M. Robbins
Suppose version 1 of the package had a file named /foo/A, and version 2 had changed the location to be /bar/A. Without doing anything special on the part of the developer, is it always true that upgrading the package version 1-2 will remove /foo/A before installing /bar/A? If so, has there ever

Re: [new package]Should all the rm scripts be ok before uploading?

2001-05-17 Thread Sebastien Chaumat
Hello, thanks for this short/efficient anwser. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: this may change in the future if my proposition to debian policy are accepted. Do you think this is possible? What proposition? To replicate a Debian system we need to know which configuration files are

Re: file move between versions

2001-05-17 Thread Josip Rodin
On Thu, May 17, 2001 at 11:38:06AM -0400, Steve M. Robbins wrote: Suppose version 1 of the package had a file named /foo/A, and version 2 had changed the location to be /bar/A. Without doing anything special on the part of the developer, is it always true that upgrading the package version

Re: task-*

2001-05-17 Thread Josip Rodin
On Thu, May 17, 2001 at 10:12:29AM +0200, Robert Bihlmeyer wrote: Right, but what I'm asking is how to include a handful of plaintext files with filesystem locations in an otherwise empty task-* package. Should I make a custom Makefile or have I missed a useful dpkg tool to help with

Re: [new package]Should all the rm scripts be ok before uploading?

2001-05-17 Thread sharkey
To replicate a Debian system we need to know which configuration files are replicable and which ones are not. What would you consider to be non-replicable? I would imagine that there would be few enough of such files that you could keep track of them internally to your package. The word

Re: file move between versions

2001-05-17 Thread Steve M. Robbins
On Thu, May 17, 2001 at 07:36:34PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote: On Thu, May 17, 2001 at 11:38:06AM -0400, Steve M. Robbins wrote: Suppose version 1 of the package had a file named /foo/A, and version 2 had changed the location to be /bar/A. Without doing anything special on the part of the

Re: .deb packages including kernel modules?

2001-05-17 Thread Marc Haber
On 15 May 2001 09:16:10 +0200, Jens Schmalzing [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Marc Haber writes: All three of these packages are quite large packages with a lot of framework. Actually, I was hoping that there is a package that simpily includes a kernel module, for example a network driver, that I

Re: USA crypto rules and libssl-dependent packages

2001-05-17 Thread Jimmy Kaplowitz
On Mon, May 14, 2001 at 10:32:07AM +0200, Robert Bihlmeyer wrote: Jimmy Kaplowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Choice 3: Just change the main althea package to include ssl support, and add to the package description and README.Debian notification to that effect, with instructions on how to

Re: Re: source NMU

2001-05-17 Thread Matt Zimmerman
On Thu, May 17, 2001 at 12:48:14PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Are you planning to set up an autobuilder for s390? Yes, I am currently working on it. Would you be willing to grant developer accounts on such a system? I am very interested in working on the s390 port, but I don't have

Re: Re: source NMU

2001-05-17 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Matt Zimmerman [EMAIL PROTECTED] [20010517 18:31]: Are you planning to set up an autobuilder for s390? Yes, I am currently working on it. Would you be willing to grant developer accounts on such a system? I am very interested in working on the s390 port, but I don't have any hardware

2 packages sharing the same config file.

2001-05-17 Thread ericvb
I just adopted xabacus. It conflicts with xmabacus because both try to install the same config file /etc/X11/app-defaults/Abacus. Policy is really strict about this : 11.7.4 Sharing configuration files Packages which specify the same file as `conffile' must be tagged as conflicting

Re: task-*

2001-05-17 Thread Robert Bihlmeyer
Josip Rodin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Right, but what I'm asking is how to include a handful of plaintext files with filesystem locations in an otherwise empty task-* package. Should I make a custom Makefile or have I missed a useful dpkg tool to help with this? Just use install -m

Unidentified subject!

2001-05-17 Thread Graham Simpson
subscribe

Re: Re: source NMU

2001-05-17 Thread GerhardTonn
Are you planning to set up an autobuilder for s390? Yes, I am currently working on it. -- Gerhard GMX - Die Kommunikationsplattform im Internet. http://www.gmx.net

[new package]Should all the rm scripts be ok before uploading?

2001-05-17 Thread Sebastien Chaumat
Hello, I'm about to upload replicator (replicator.sourceforge.net at present) on master but I have some questions: - there's no postrm script yet althougth there's a real need for that. Should I write it before uploading? - I'd like to engage many discussion about replicator on debian

Re: [new package]Should all the rm scripts be ok before uploading?

2001-05-17 Thread sharkey
- there's no postrm script yet althougth there's a real need for that. Should I write it before uploading? Yes, of course. All packages should install and uninstall cleanly before being uploaded. - I'd like to engage many discussion about replicator on debian lists. Should I wait for the

RE: GStreamer package explosion

2001-05-17 Thread Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
Putting -all- the plugins in one package would be nice but I don't know how happy users will be if they are forced to download a truckload of extra libs they may not want. I'll probably add a top level pseudo package depending on all the other packages just for user convenience. Perhaps

file move between versions

2001-05-17 Thread Steve M. Robbins
Suppose version 1 of the package had a file named /foo/A, and version 2 had changed the location to be /bar/A. Without doing anything special on the part of the developer, is it always true that upgrading the package version 1-2 will remove /foo/A before installing /bar/A? If so, has there ever

Re: [new package]Should all the rm scripts be ok before uploading?

2001-05-17 Thread Sebastien Chaumat
Hello, thanks for this short/efficient anwser. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: this may change in the future if my proposition to debian policy are accepted. Do you think this is possible? What proposition? To replicate a Debian system we need to know which configuration files are

Re: GStreamer package explosion

2001-05-17 Thread Robert Bihlmeyer
Dave Baker [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: My opinion only - 30 and growing is too large. Group the plugins by type if possible. That's preferrable. What does your list of packages currently look like? I might prefer to download a little more if I use it than have everyone else suffer through

Re: file move between versions

2001-05-17 Thread Josip Rodin
On Thu, May 17, 2001 at 11:38:06AM -0400, Steve M. Robbins wrote: Suppose version 1 of the package had a file named /foo/A, and version 2 had changed the location to be /bar/A. Without doing anything special on the part of the developer, is it always true that upgrading the package version

Re: task-*

2001-05-17 Thread Josip Rodin
On Thu, May 17, 2001 at 10:12:29AM +0200, Robert Bihlmeyer wrote: Right, but what I'm asking is how to include a handful of plaintext files with filesystem locations in an otherwise empty task-* package. Should I make a custom Makefile or have I missed a useful dpkg tool to help with

Re: [new package]Should all the rm scripts be ok before uploading?

2001-05-17 Thread sharkey
To replicate a Debian system we need to know which configuration files are replicable and which ones are not. What would you consider to be non-replicable? I would imagine that there would be few enough of such files that you could keep track of them internally to your package. The word

Re: file move between versions

2001-05-17 Thread Steve M. Robbins
On Thu, May 17, 2001 at 07:36:34PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote: On Thu, May 17, 2001 at 11:38:06AM -0400, Steve M. Robbins wrote: Suppose version 1 of the package had a file named /foo/A, and version 2 had changed the location to be /bar/A. Without doing anything special on the part of the

Re: .deb packages including kernel modules?

2001-05-17 Thread Marc Haber
On 15 May 2001 09:16:10 +0200, Jens Schmalzing [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Marc Haber writes: All three of these packages are quite large packages with a lot of framework. Actually, I was hoping that there is a package that simpily includes a kernel module, for example a network driver, that I

Re: USA crypto rules and libssl-dependent packages

2001-05-17 Thread Jimmy Kaplowitz
On Mon, May 14, 2001 at 10:32:07AM +0200, Robert Bihlmeyer wrote: Jimmy Kaplowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Choice 3: Just change the main althea package to include ssl support, and add to the package description and README.Debian notification to that effect, with instructions on how to

Re: Re: source NMU

2001-05-17 Thread Matt Zimmerman
On Thu, May 17, 2001 at 12:48:14PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Are you planning to set up an autobuilder for s390? Yes, I am currently working on it. Would you be willing to grant developer accounts on such a system? I am very interested in working on the s390 port, but I don't have

Re: Re: source NMU

2001-05-17 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Matt Zimmerman [EMAIL PROTECTED] [20010517 18:31]: Are you planning to set up an autobuilder for s390? Yes, I am currently working on it. Would you be willing to grant developer accounts on such a system? I am very interested in working on the s390 port, but I don't have any hardware

2 packages sharing the same config file.

2001-05-17 Thread ericvb
I just adopted xabacus. It conflicts with xmabacus because both try to install the same config file /etc/X11/app-defaults/Abacus. Policy is really strict about this : 11.7.4 Sharing configuration files Packages which specify the same file as `conffile' must be tagged as conflicting