Hello legal team,
I am trying to update the Tuxguitar package from version 1.2 to 1.5.6.
The new version includes the soundfont "Magic Sound Font v2.0". While Tuxguitar
is licensed under LGPL-2.1+, the license of the soundfont file
(MagicSFver2.sf2) is not 100% clear.
The issue was discussed
Your message dated Sat, 14 Jan 2023 16:21:26 +0100
with message-id
and subject line Re: RFS: sioyek/2.0.0+dfsg-2 -- PDF viewer with a focus on
technical books and research papers
has caused the Debian Bug report #1028639,
regarding RFS: sioyek/2.0.0+dfsg-2 -- PDF viewer with a focus on technical
On Sat, 2023-01-14 at 16:48 +0100, Adam Borowski wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 13, 2023 at 05:15:29AM +, Philip Wyett wrote:
> > I thought any change to push soname bumps through experimental was still
> > only a discussion?
> >
> > As you are aware, libfilezilla is only consumed by filezilla and any
On Sat, Jan 14, 2023 at 11:02:46AM +0100, Helmar Gerloni wrote:
> Hello legal team,
>
> I am trying to update the Tuxguitar package from version 1.2 to 1.5.6.
>
> The new version includes the soundfont "Magic Sound Font v2.0". While
> Tuxguitar is licensed under LGPL-2.1+, the license of the
On Fri, Jan 13, 2023 at 05:15:29AM +, Philip Wyett wrote:
> I thought any change to push soname bumps through experimental was still only
> a discussion?
>
> As you are aware, libfilezilla is only consumed by filezilla and any
> soname bumps are not dangerous to other libaries or
Hi Matteo,
Please address the following things and then I am going to sponsor spek:
Exclude the dist and web directories. There are several non-source files and
files where the license is not clear.
This means introducing a Files-Excluded in debian/copyright and a repacksuffix
in the watch
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: important
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "pvm":
* Package name : pvm
Version : 3.4.6-5
Upstream contact : [fill in name and email of upstream]
* URL : https://www.csm.ornl.gov/pvm/
* License
7 matches
Mail list logo
