Re: help with python3 depends < 3.11

2023-01-16 Thread Adam Borowski
On Sun, Jan 15, 2023 at 04:20:35PM +0100, Stephen Sinclair wrote: > I have been trying to make an update to my package "siconos". > However, in the Salsa build, which nicely runs all tests, it fails on > "piuparts". > I am confused, because it fails with the following error: > > > The following

How to create multi-source tarball with different submodules for scipy

2023-01-16 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi, I tried to create a multi-source tarball for scipy in its experimental branch[1]. Upstream includes a set of git submodules in its build process. I intended to merge all these submodules in a single scipy_1.10.0.orig-submodules.tar.gz. This tarball is created with a script[2] which makes

Bug#1025274: Bug#819332: License question about sf2 soundfont in Tuxguitar

2023-01-16 Thread tony mancill
On Sun, Jan 15, 2023 at 10:02:55PM +0100, Helmar Gerloni wrote: > > https://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2023/01/msg5.html > > https://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2023/01/msg00097.html > Roberto, Tobias, thanks for your answers. > > I have removed MagicSFver2.sf2 from the package and

Bug#1029033: RFS: ruby-mdl/0.12.0-2 -- Markdown lint tool

2023-01-16 Thread Norwid Behrnd
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "ruby-mdl": * Package name : ruby-mdl Version : 0.12.0-2 Upstream contact : ["p...@ipom.com"] * URL : https://github.com/markdownlint/markdownlint * License

Re: How to create multi-source tarball with different submodules for scipy

2023-01-16 Thread Julian Gilbey
On Mon, Jan 16, 2023 at 05:05:39PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi, > > I tried to create a multi-source tarball for scipy in its experimental > branch[1]. Upstream includes a set of git submodules in its build > process. I intended to merge all these submodules in a single >

Re: How to create multi-source tarball with different submodules for scipy

2023-01-16 Thread Soren Stoutner
I haven’t looked closely at it myself, but qtwebengine-opensource-src accomplishes something along these lines using `get-orig-source` in their rules file. https://salsa.debian.org/qt-kde-team/qt/qtwebengine/-/blob/master/debian/rules[1] Note that, in their case, you must have the

Re: filename case policy inside /usr/bin ?

2023-01-16 Thread The Wanderer
On 2023-01-16 at 15:04, Fab Stz wrote: > Hello, > > Is there any policy for the filename case for the executables > installed in /usr/bin ? Most are lowercase. > > The package I maintain uses mixed uppercase & lowercase. For example: > /usr/bin/FreeFileSync I'm not aware of any specific

Demands Question Demandon

2023-01-16 Thread Simeone Dominique
Chers amis, dear friends, kara amikoj, exist package for anarkist on Debian, il existe un paquet anarchiste pour Debian, ekzitas pakon pri anarkisno ĉe Debian. Is-it possible to create a package for freemasonry(history,time,calendar...)? Est-il possible de créer un paquet sur la

Bug#1028423: RFS: spek/0.8.5-1 [ITP] [RC] -- acoustic spectrum analyser

2023-01-16 Thread Matteo Bini
Hi Bastian, thank you for your precious help. I think I've fixed everything, I just don't know what do you mean with > Please drop debian/autoreconf.*. There is no file named autoreconf.*. inside the debian dir. What exactly should I do? You can download the DFSG package with dget: dget -x

filename case policy inside /usr/bin ?

2023-01-16 Thread Fab Stz
Hello, Is there any policy for the filename case for the executables installed in / usr/bin ? Most are lowercase. The package I maintain uses mixed uppercase & lowercase. For example: /usr/bin/FreeFileSync I added a lowercase symlink also (+ symlink of manpages) Please, leave me in copy of

Bug#1029033: RFS: ruby-mdl/0.12.0-2 -- Markdown lint tool

2023-01-16 Thread Bastian Germann
On Mon, 16 Jan 2023 19:30:07 +0100 Norwid Behrnd wrote: * Vcs : https://salsa.debian.org/nbehrnd/ruby-mdl I am not very knowledgable about the Ruby Team's policy. They seem to have a salsa namespace for their packages at https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team. Shouldn't this be

Bug#1028423: marked as done (RFS: spek/0.8.5+dfsg-1 [ITP] [RC] -- acoustic spectrum analyser)

2023-01-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 16 Jan 2023 23:38:56 +0100 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#1028423: RFS: spek/0.8.5-1 [ITP] [RC] -- acoustic spectrum analyser has caused the Debian Bug report #1028423, regarding RFS: spek/0.8.5+dfsg-1 [ITP] [RC] -- acoustic spectrum analyser to be marked as

Bug#1025274: Bug#819332: License question about sf2 soundfont in Tuxguitar

2023-01-16 Thread tony mancill
On Mon, Jan 16, 2023 at 08:33:07AM -0800, tony mancill wrote: > On Sun, Jan 15, 2023 at 10:02:55PM +0100, Helmar Gerloni wrote: > > > https://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2023/01/msg5.html > > > https://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2023/01/msg00097.html > > Roberto, Tobias, thanks for your