On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 01:32:34PM +0100, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
I'm looking for a sponsor for my package simutrans (ITP #437627).
* Package name: simutrans
Version : 99.18~0.svn1661-1
Upstream Author : Simutrans Team [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL :
On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 07:04:31PM +0200, Daniel Knabl wrote:
after a long while I'm again searching for someone willing to sponsor
and/or upload vexim to Debian.
you can find the latest files here: http://tirolinux.net/~daniel/vexim/
* http://tirolinux.net/~daniel/vexim/vexim_2.2.1-5.1.dsc
On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 10:03:21PM +0200, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1:2.5.0~alpha3-2
of my package moc.
[...]
I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
Uploaded.
regards
fEnIo
--
,''`. Bartosz Fenski | mailto:[EMAIL
On Sat, Jun 21, 2008 at 02:57:23AM +0200, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for my package moc.
* Package name: moc
Version : 1:2.5.0~alpha3-3
Upstream Author : Damian Pietras [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://moc.daper.net
* License :
On Sun, Jul 02, 2006 at 12:11:36PM -0400, Ryan Coyner wrote:
Hello Mr. Fenski
Hi.
As the maintainer of the package calcurse (at least until yesterday) I
was surprised, both good and bad, this morning to check my email and
find that a new version of calcurse has been uploaded to Debian.
I
On Sun, Apr 15, 2007 at 04:00:06PM +0200, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for my package aufs.
* Package name: aufs
Version : 0.0.cvs20070409-1
Upstream Author : Junjiro Okajima [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://aufs.sourceforge.net/
*
On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 11:40:39AM +, Tadeusz Struk wrote:
Hi Guys,
My name is Tadeusz Struk. I'm looking for a sponsor for a Small
Privacy Guard (http://sourceforge.net/projects/spg/)
This software allows to encrypt/decrypt files as well as
generate/verify signature of a file.
It uses
On Tue, Jan 05, 2010 at 02:35:10PM +0100, Davide Cavalca wrote:
Dear mentors,
Hello.
I am looking for a sponsor for my package enna.
* Package name: enna
Version : 0.4.0-1
Upstream Author : The Enna Project
* URL : http://enna.geexbox.org
* License :
On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 01:10:29PM +0100, Jaroslav Imrich wrote:
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my packages ipwatchd.
* Package name: ipwatchd
Version : 1.2-1
Upstream Author : Jaroslav Imrich ja...@jariq.sk
* URL : http://ipwatchd.sf.net
*
On Thu, May 06, 2010 at 03:09:53AM -0500, Elías Alejandro wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for my package radiotray.
* Package name: radiotray
Version : 0.5.1-1
Upstream Author : Carlos Ribeiro carlosmribei...@gmail.com
* URL : http://radiotray.sourceforge.net/
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 04:23:15AM +, hungryh...@i2pmail.org wrote:
Right, but I can't seem to figure out how to make it non-native. I think
the problem is the missing .orig in the .tar.gz filename that
dpkg-buildpackage produces, but I haven't been able to get
dpkg-buildpackage to add it.
On Thu, Aug 05, 2004 at 09:54:43AM +0200, Alexander List wrote:
I uploaded a non-free package (diablo) two days ago and wonder what I can
do to make the buillds attempt to build it for all the non-i386 archs...
As far as I know autobuilders don't build non-free software.
Developer has to do it
On Thu, Aug 12, 2004 at 02:51:27PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
I've packaged polish help for openoffice.org. The package
openoffice.org-help-pl is now on mentors and I'm recently
looking for sponsor. Anyone?
Put it somewhere web-accssible (no, I don't mean mentors.debian.net) and
I'll
On Sun, Aug 15, 2004 at 10:23:23PM +0200, Laszlo 'GCS' Boszormenyi wrote:
I can not reach my sponsor for a while now, who is Martin F. Krafft.
Can someone help me out instead, and look up gradm2 package for me? It
was newly uploaded last month, and more than two weeks passed since
then, but
On Sun, Aug 22, 2004 at 08:24:42AM +0200, Martin Theiß wrote:
I've made a package for wininfo
http://dri.freedesktop.org/Software/wininfo
Before looking for a sponsor, I'd like to contact the author and ask him
officially for his permission to include it in Debian, but he doesn't
respond.
Hello dear mentors!
I'm looking for sponsor for package habak.
Here goes relevant info:
* Package name: habak
Version : 0.2.4
Upstream Author : Grzegorz Nieweglowski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://lubuska.zapto.org/~hoppke/yellow_brown/index.html
* License :
Hello.
I'm looking for sponsor for skijump package.
Here goes relevant info:
* Package name: skijump
Version : 0.2.0
Upstream Author : Michal Brzozowski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://www.skijump.org
* License : GPL
Description : small and funny game
On Wed, Sep 22, 2004 at 02:46:08PM -0400, Lee Aylward wrote:
I noticed that Liferea had recently been orphaned, and that there is a
new upstream version. I packaged the new version (0.6.0), which can be
found on my repository at http://laylward.com/debian/
deb http://laylward.com/debian/
On Sat, Sep 25, 2004 at 08:14:16PM +1000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm looking for a sponsor for my software - mkat, released under GPL. The
package is Lintian clean. Description follows:
[...]
Line for /etc/apt/sources.list:
deb http://www.amur.ru/~ledestin/mkat/debian /
Could you
On Sun, Sep 26, 2004 at 10:59:44PM +0200, Florian Ernst wrote:
As possibly I'll become a DD one day, [...]
Heh... you're very optimistic ;)
Sort of, yes :) Certainly this is not supposed to call for any urgent
actions so it'll happen any earlier, I don't mind the waiting time or
any
On Fri, Oct 15, 2004 at 04:15:40PM -0300, Leo Costela Antunes wrote:
Hi all
What can I do about the forwarded problem?
I tried reuploading the files + the orig.tar.gz, but it generated the
same problem.
Any pointers?
Rejected: pearpc_0.3.1-2.dsc refers to pearpc_0.3.1.orig.tar.gz,
but
On Wed, Sep 29, 2004 at 05:41:22PM +0100, Ben Hill wrote:
Apologies if I'm being lame, this is my first Debian package.
I'm running lintian -i to check my built package, but I'm getting the
error:
binary-without-manpage
The software does not come with a manpage, but I've edited the
On Sat, Oct 09, 2004 at 04:16:06PM +0200, Julien Louis wrote:
* Package name: msmtp
Version : 1.2.3
Upstream Author : Martin Lambers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://msmtp.sourceforge.net
* License : GPL
Description : smtp client which can be used as
Hello.
I'm looking for one-time-sponsor for my package asc.
Usually Matthew Palmer uploads asc package for me, but he doesn't respond
for my mails so I'm looking for someone else to upload it this time.
Here goes relevant information:
Package name: asc - turn-based strategy game
Advanced
from you since the automated upload e-mail.
Check your mail logs.
Hmm..
Date: Sun, 10 Oct 2004 20:19:18 +0200
From: Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: new asc
I didn't receive any returning mail with errors :/
I've also been on holidays for the past
On Wed, Nov 03, 2004 at 10:47:45AM -0600, Zach Garner wrote:
[...]
First:
1. The sheer number of helper scripts, with layers and layers of
scripts built on top of each other is really confusing.
I'd agree it's pretty confusing, but only first time.
It's quite easy to understand it.
On Wed, Nov 03, 2004 at 04:06:01PM -0600, Zach Garner wrote:
Most of the apps are using `./configure make make install` so dh_make
tries to use that way.
In fact the only file you need is debian/rules.
It should be Makefile which create your package.
What bugs me is that as far as I
Hello.
My usual sponsor didn't respond for my mail for more than a week now, and
he isn't marked as on vacation.
Since my new package fixes all (6) outstanding bugs and is needed for other
package which depends on it, I'm looking for some other one time or even
permanent sponsor.
Here goes
On Mon, Dec 13, 2004 at 10:05:28PM +0100, Sven Mueller wrote:
In any event, the program starts in a terminal environment, but ultimately
must be run in an x11 environment.
What does it need the terminal for? I mean if it actually runs in its
own X11 window, what does it use the terminal
On Sat, Dec 18, 2004 at 10:39:37PM +, Helen Faulkner wrote:
Hi,
Hello.
I hope this isn't a too dumb question!
;)
I'm the maintainer for xwrits, and partway through the NM process. My
application manager (Frank Lichtenheld) has sent me a review of my
packages, and I am confused
On Mon, Dec 20, 2004 at 10:20:53AM +0100, Maciej Dems wrote:
Currently I would like to add some of my packages to Debian. The first one
should be polcnv - Polish diacritics conventer, a tool simmilar to recode
but much easier to use.
Hi Maciek.
How does your package differ from konwert?
On Tue, Dec 21, 2004 at 01:13:29PM +0100, Maciej Dems wrote:
How does your package differ from konwert?
Has it got some advantages?
These two packages have very similar functionality. I dont know konwert
very well so I cannot tell much about differences between these two
packages. I
On Wed, Dec 22, 2004 at 10:38:58AM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote:
[...]
which seems to be used elsewhere. I thought lintian enforced this,
but I can't seem to find it in the code. I'm opening a couple bugs
now we speak.
Well the problem is that dh_make had wrong template few weeks ago.
I
On Thu, Dec 30, 2004 at 05:32:12PM +1100, Matthew Palmer wrote:
We need to know the following.
How to create a virtual or convinience package for debian web site listing.
For example a package called 'kdeedu' contains all the educational
packages like khangman,kalzium etc.
What they
Hello.
I prepared packages for Clanlib development branch.
I think everyone knows what it is so I won't describe it here.
Is someone interested in doing sponsored upload to experimental
distribution?
Packages can be fetched from http://skawina.eu.org/clanlib/
regards
fEnIo
--
_
On Mon, Jan 03, 2005 at 01:01:35AM -0800, TIFR students wrote:
I guess we can get the additional packages we want from the net,after
installing this minimal ISO.But the problem is,how then,do we convert
the whole thing into an ISO that we want.
You got some hints from others. I would like to
On Mon, Jan 03, 2005 at 05:31:06PM -0500, James Richardson wrote:
Greetings,
I request a sponsor for the setserial package.
I use this package regularly and would like to see it well maintained.
This will close out bug# 285355.
Great... but the usual way to find sponsors is to include URI
On Fri, Jan 07, 2005 at 02:47:14PM -0500, James Richardson wrote:
I have just packaged balance a generic userland tcp proxy with failover
and round robin functionality.
Balance can also be controlled at run time via simple command line
interface.
Please take a look at
On Sat, Jan 08, 2005 at 02:03:23PM -0500, Ryan Stutsman wrote:
With the aim of eventually becoming a full devel I have finished package
my first ever package.
Nice.
I'd be much appreciative if someone would take a look at sponsoring it
for inclusion in main.
Here is an overview of the
On Sat, Jan 08, 2005 at 02:54:45PM -0500, Ryan Stutsman wrote:
It's available at
http://www.cs.purdue.edu/homes/rstutsma/debian/
Ok. Here goes my comments:
First of all you made it as native Debian package. That's definitelly
wrong. You should put upstream sources as
On Tue, Jan 18, 2005 at 07:53:06AM -0500, Ryan Stutsman wrote:
Any takers? It's a very simple package.
Didn't you think about splitting it to two packages?
Consider that Debian supports 11 archs right now.
Your package is 800k big.
11 * 800k = 8,8M
Using one binary dependent package + one
On Sun, Jan 23, 2005 at 10:55:13PM +0100, Rafael Fernández López wrote:
Hi you all guys !!
Hello.
I'm looking for a package that I like to keep it care of. I'm not sure
which to take. I'm a University student from Spain and I've to say that
I've a little time everyday to check for updates
On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 04:57:16PM +0200, Mugurel Tudor wrote:
I created some DEB packages, and everything is OK with one exception:
for every package that I created, at instalation time, I get the
following error (on Debian Stable and also on Debian Unstable):
# apt-get install foo
Reading
On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 05:22:44PM +0200, Mugurel Tudor wrote:
I created some DEB packages, and everything is OK with one exception:
for every package that I created, at instalation time, I get the
following error (on Debian Stable and also on Debian Unstable):
I have to mention also
On Sun, Jan 30, 2005 at 10:27:08PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I take it you are upstream as well? I think the recommended way of
doing upstream+debian is to have the .diff include all of ./debian/,
such that other distros don't have to deal with it. Also, that way
you can do a Debian
On Mon, Jan 31, 2005 at 10:08:50AM -0500, Chris Sacca wrote:
This is a single binary package. It's small, lintian and linda clean, I
have the blessing of the upstream maintainer, and have filed and ITP (
#292667 ).
You don't close it in your changelog entry. That's wrong.
[...]
On Mon, Feb 07, 2005 at 02:41:12AM -0400, Maykel Moya wrote:
I'm giving a try to pbuilder. I launched it with --no-targz to not
download everything with every build.
It's possible to tell pbuilder to get packages
from /var/cache/apt/archives ? Yes, I did a script that parses
pbuilder
On Mon, Feb 07, 2005 at 02:22:16AM +0100, Antoine Jacquet wrote:
Hello again,
Hello.
I am also looking for a sponsor for the following package :
Package: irssistats
Licence: GPL
Description: This tool generates HTML IRC stats based on irssi logs
Try to avoid starting description with
On Fri, Feb 18, 2005 at 10:52:48PM +, Helder Correia wrote:
Hello!
Hello.
I have used many GNU/Linux systems for 8 years, but only very recently I
found Debian, or at least the real wonder it is :)
I would like to start the process of becoming a DD as soon as possible, so I
want to
On Sat, Feb 19, 2005 at 09:05:04PM +0900, Masami Ichikawa wrote:
browsers. It is aware of X, y and z browsers and bookmark formats.
I'm not familiar with those browsers. Are they packaged for Debian? grin
bookmarkbridge is supports these browser.
Internet Explorer, Opera, Mozilla
On Sat, Feb 26, 2005 at 07:49:45PM +0900, Masami Ichikawa wrote:
uploaded bookmarkbridge.
http://moonlinux.sourceforge.jp/debian/
If you still don't have sponsor for that package, then I could upload it
for you.
There is however BIG problem in your package.
Build-Depends: debhelper (= 4.0.0)
On Sat, Feb 26, 2005 at 05:11:54PM +, Ben Hill wrote:
I'm updating some code from an upstream source, so do I give this
version a different version number?
For example, if it's 0.3.1, should I call it 0.3.1.1 or use a different
format?
No. In my opinion it is the best
On Sat, Feb 26, 2005 at 07:46:44PM +, Noel Torres wrote:
BTW, How to cope with Makefile having to create two different packages?
You don't have to cope with Makefile in that case. Just ensure that all
files are put in debian/tmp with `make install`, and the move them to
debian/library1 and
On Sat, Feb 26, 2005 at 08:19:21PM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote:
I've packaged gaim-extendedprefs and closed the ITP bug in revision
3 but my sponsors upload was not accepted by katie due to a missing
.orig.tar.gz. On request of my sponsor I'm making some changes to
the package, and I'm
On Mon, Mar 07, 2005 at 09:49:45PM +0200, Jan Zizka wrote:
However I'm not a DD so I would need a sponsor.
Would there be anyone willing to help me?
Request for sponsor for some package should contain:
1) description of package
I thought that this is already debian package that
On Mon, Mar 07, 2005 at 11:09:34PM +0200, Jan Zizka wrote:
Procedure is mentioned at WNPP pages. And there is some bugreport against
setserial. Wishlist with updated translation, but it's still bugreport ;)
Yes but that is already added in 2.17-40.
So I see no reason for keeping this
On Sat, Mar 12, 2005 at 09:49:41AM +, Qingning Huo wrote:
I am working on these two packages: libtorrent and rtorrent [1]. There
are no copyright claims on any source files or README files. There is
only an AUTHORS file with the name and email of the author. On the
other hand, it is
On Wed, Mar 23, 2005 at 01:13:15PM +0200, Charles Majola wrote:
Is editing upstream's makefile ok? the package doesn't use autoconf, it
just has a makefile with install and clean targets.
I need it to install the python files it contains in a diff directory,
not the one in the makefile(its
On Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 06:27:52PM -0300, Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote:
I disagree. ./debian is the domain of the Debian maintainer, not of
the upstream. Unless you are developing software *for* *Debian*
(native), there is no reason why you should bother with ./debian at
all.
What about the
On Sat, Apr 23, 2005 at 12:53:57PM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
Whee!
Hello.
So, uhm... They say that fonts are among the easiest things to package,
and thus probably also to check. Here's one that I'm looking a sponsor
for:
Package: ttf-antp
Apt line: deb-src
On Sat, Apr 23, 2005 at 02:26:39PM +0200, Johnny Mast wrote:
Hello there im looking for a sponsor/mentor for my extreme ftpd
package can you guys help me out ?
That's proper place for such request but not proper form.
Usually if someone is looking for sponsor he/she pastes here information
On Fri, Apr 22, 2005 at 12:39:15PM -0300, Lucas Di Pentima wrote:
Hi there,
Hello.
I'm packaging ZABBIX (http://www.zabbix.com), a resource monitor
agent. The original programs in the upstream source tgz file are
generated with names like this:
* zabbix_agent
* zabbix_agentd
*
On Mon, Apr 25, 2005 at 03:33:28PM -0500, Johnny Mast wrote:
My question is simple, to find a sponsor i need to have my project being
ready
for distribution if i am correct ??..
Well if you don't consider your project to be in releasable state, then
why would you like to distribute it?
On Sat, Apr 30, 2005 at 08:25:57PM +1000, David Clarke wrote:
Nico probably wants to see the *.dsc and *.diff.gz files
as well.
There's no diff file as it's a native package (that's right isn't it?).
No that's not right.
You should make .orig.tar.gz file without your debian/* stuff,
On Tue, May 03, 2005 at 10:28:28PM +1200, Carlos Z.F. Liu wrote:
Hello, dear mentors
Hello.
I'm looking for a sponsor willing to check and upload deb packages for
python-pychm and gnochm. python-pychm is the python binding for CHMLIB
library, and gnochm is the file viewer based on
On Tue, May 03, 2005 at 04:39:07PM +0100, Rob Bradford wrote:
* You don't close your WNPP bugs with changelogs entries.
Uhm. No, I don't think thats right. Its a very common practices to close
ITP bugs with the initial release, O/ITA bugs with the first upload by
the new maintainer.
Well
On Tue, May 03, 2005 at 09:22:28PM +0200, Mauro Darida wrote:
I have written an advanced debian tutorial and decided to try to build a
debian package from it. I used the pdf format as source and, after reading
the maintainer stuff, tried to build the package thinking it would be easy
since
On Wed, May 11, 2005 at 12:01:06PM +0300, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
[...]
Now here are the questions:
1. What is the correct order of things? Should I first upload a package
for argtable, wait for it to pass ftpmasters, and only then upload the
latest rsyncrypto version, or should I upload
On Fri, May 20, 2005 at 02:09:39PM +0200, Njes Nilsen wrote:
[...]
What I want is to edit the installation so the user get another option
here, which will install some given packages.
I've read some of the information about how to hack the installer on the
debian wiki page, but can't
On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 04:51:18PM +0200, Martin Mewes wrote:
maybe this is a most wanted question, but maybe someone can dump the
information to me.
I am not a developer but I have started trying to pack things for debian
but somehow it is to complex for me. So I thought about to sponsor
On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 11:21:54PM -0600, Sebastian Kuzminsky wrote:
The new cogito package (0.11.3+20050610-1) is on its way into sid.
It does not install /usr/bin/git or /usr/bin/cg, and so it does not
conflict with git or with cgvg.
I made a note about this in
On Sun, Jun 12, 2005 at 02:57:38PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
- ipcalc - Parameter calculator for IPv4 addresses
: http://packages.qa.debian.org/i/ipcalc.html
I would be interested in adoptioning or co-maintaining this package, since
I'm using it quite often.
So please decide whether
On Thu, Jun 16, 2005 at 09:25:35PM -0300, Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote:
Hi mentors!
Hello.
[...]
It's released under Artistic license, linda and lintian clean and builds
OK on pbuilder.
Package, source and other files available at
http://biolinux.df.ibilce.unesp.br/naoliv/qsf/
On Mon, Jun 20, 2005 at 09:47:29PM +0200, Geoffroy Carrier wrote:
I'm Geoffroy Carrier, a student from Grenoble, France.
I've been using Debian GNU/Linux for years, and I (nearly) always wanted
to become a maintainer.
I have been reading all the important documentation these days: that's
On Sat, Apr 03, 2004 at 11:14:22AM -0600, Steve Langasek wrote:
Well I thought about it, but this doesn't solve every my doubt.
How could I name this package? Are there any policies about it?
What if next version occures? How to solve it?
Upstream maintainer answered me, and he told,
On Sat, Apr 03, 2004 at 11:30:13AM -0600, Steve Langasek wrote:
libnetwibab-dev ? what's that suffix ab ?
I made libnetwib-dev now.
It was part of the name of the static lib quoted in your previous email.
If it's not supposed to be part of the lib name, then yes, amend the
package name
On Sat, Apr 03, 2004 at 05:53:21PM +0200, Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo wrote:
Hello.
I'm looking for sponsor for my newly created package libnetwib.
Here goes relevant information:
===
* Package name: libnetwib libnetwib
Hello.
I'm looking for sponsor for my newly created package netwox.
Netwox is very powerful utility combained with many small
sub-utilities[1].
Here goes relevant information:
Package name : netwox
Version : 5.12.0
Upstream Author : Laurent Constantin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
URL :
On Sat, Apr 03, 2004 at 06:12:52PM -0700, Benjamin Cutler wrote:
Just how important is it that a package be created on a box running sid?
I'm currently running sarge, and would like to package a program myself
instead of waiting for somebody else, but I'm not sure I want to start
running
Hello.
I'm looking for sponsor for my another package netwag.
Netwag is a graphical frontend for netwox, which is
very powerful network utility combined with many small
sub-utilities[1].
Here goes relevant information:
Package name : netwag
Version : 5.12.0
Upstream Author : Laurent
Hello.
Is there any policy describing location of .desktop files?
I've just checked Debian Policy, FHS and Developer's Reference, but
I couldn't find anything related to these files. Maybe I searched
wrongly, then tell me where can I find it.
I tried to check some packages to find how do they
Hello.
I'm looking for sponsor for package otak.
It's a visual interface for commandline programs. It can be used as
abook replacement if you use it with mutt, but it's not limited only to
that application.
Here goes relevant information:
* Package name: otak
Version : 1.3.4
On Mon, Apr 05, 2004 at 09:58:28PM +0200, Martin Albert wrote:
qt3-designer: usr/share/applnk/Development/designer-qt3.desktop
rhythmbox: usr/share/applications/rhythmbox.desktop
pppoeconf: usr/share/gnome/apps/Internet/pppoeconf.desktop
texmacs:
Hello.
Because I didn't find any sponsors last time, I've decided to made some
webpage with packages that I am looking sponsor for[1].
Therefore here I only describe those packages shortly:
netwox - network utilities[2]
otak - text-based visual interface for commandline programs[3]
siefs -
On Wed, Apr 07, 2004 at 10:02:46PM +0200, Emanuele Rocca wrote:
otak - text-based visual interface for commandline programs[3]
There is a discrepancy between the .orig.tar.gz available on your
website and the one listed in the .dsc
Files:
1f11039b70a20db4edf0a5c1e6819f48 357758
On Wed, Apr 07, 2004 at 11:35:28PM -0700, Scott Robinson wrote:
Here's the original posting:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2003/debian-mentors-200302/msg00287.html
That is one weird bot.
Unfortunatelly this makes such messages very hard to clasify as spam
with software :(
Hello.
CannonSmash was maintained by Wolfgang Sourdeau [EMAIL PROTECTED].
However he orphaned[1] this package some time ago.
I would like to adopt it. I prepared my own packages[2], and I'm looking
for sponsor for them.
I resolved one outstanding bug[3]. This could save some space on
Hello.
I'm looking for sponsor for newly created package starfighter.
Starfighter is 2D scrolling shooter game with the following features:
o 26 missions over 4 star systems
o Primary and Secondary Weapons (including a laser cannon and a charge weapon)
o A weapon powerup system
o Wingmates
o
On Mon, Apr 12, 2004 at 02:26:04PM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
- The program is packaged as Debian native. This shouldn't be, it should
have an orig.tar.gz and a diff.gz.
I wonder if it would be good idea to add some tests to lintian/linda
about it?
I often make similar mistakes... I make
On Mon, Apr 12, 2004 at 06:32:01PM +0200, Przemyslaw Frasunek wrote:
Hello,
Hello.
I'm looking for a sponsorship of plogd package:
[...]
ITP: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=225143
Download: http://www.frasunek.com/debian/pool/main/p/plogd/
First of all I'm not DD so I
On Mon, Apr 12, 2004 at 06:44:39PM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
[...]
Currently supported protocols include SMTP, IMAP, HTTP, TCP, UDP, NNTP, and
PING tests.
Please add
.
Homepage: http://www.sysmon.org/
Well as far as I remember Policy doesn't describe it.
It's mentioned
On Mon, Apr 12, 2004 at 06:46:49PM +0200, Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo wrote:
ITP: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=225143
Download: http://www.frasunek.com/debian/pool/main/p/plogd/
First of all I'm not DD so I could be wrong but:
* try to build this package and check
On Mon, Apr 12, 2004 at 07:22:42PM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
On Mon, Apr 12, 2004 at 06:53:37PM +0200, Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo wrote:
On Mon, Apr 12, 2004 at 06:44:39PM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
both on this ML
PING tests.
Please add
.
Homepage: http
Hello.
I've got question related to closing bugs.
Let's say I adopted some package, and with the new upstream version
I should close some outstanding bugs. And I did it in 1.1-1 version.
Then I ask previous maintainer to upload it, and he pointed me out some
other needed changes. So I made
On Thu, Apr 15, 2004 at 12:43:48PM -0700, Brian Nelson wrote:
This led to non-closed bugs which are fixed in fact.
What now? Should I close those bugs manually, or is it correct way to
upload another version (1.1-3) including changelogs from 1.1-1 to 1.1-3?
Just use the control interface
On Fri, Apr 16, 2004 at 10:56:43AM +0200, Steffen Nissen wrote:
Files:
1757f49ec7042da8d3ecaa183daafc27 512 - optional libfann1_1.1.0-1.dsc
[...]
apt-get update
apt-get upgrade
Thanks, but dpkg-dev is already the newest version (I am using testing),
should I get it from
On Fri, Apr 16, 2004 at 12:16:37PM +0200, Simon MARTIN wrote:
have I made a mistake in the way I've postet my question?
Are there any further informations required?
I'd be really thankful for any notes.
Could you please put your packages somewhere on the web?
So we could download it and
On Thu, Apr 22, 2004 at 12:09:17AM -0700, Nikolay Kokalichev wrote:
Hi,
Hello.
I've adopted the swatch package but I need your help
to continue working on it. As I red I need a sponsor
to approve and upload the package. Can you help me to
find a sponsor? I have a GPG key but I dont know who
Hello.
I'm looking for sponsor(s) for two packages which I would like to adopt.
1) libparagui1.0 - a real crossplatform widget set based on SDL
I've fixed 4 outstanding bugs and I need updated library for packaging
some game which utilizes it.
More information at
On Tue, May 04, 2004 at 10:46:50PM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
2) csmash - a table tennis simulation game
I've fixed one outstanding bug and I like this game very much ;)
[...]
Hello,
I have taken a short peek at this one and have some
questions/critizism:
First of all thanks for your
1 - 100 of 304 matches
Mail list logo
