Paul Wise [EMAIL PROTECTED] (02/11/2008):
If the build-deps are satisfied and build-essential is installed, the
package should build, so yeah, file bugs at severity serious please.
For reference:
KiBi Do folks think #505040 is RC or should at least be
fixed for lenny?
luk_ KiBi: nope,
Kumar Appaiah [EMAIL PROTECTED] (01/11/2008):
The most foolproof way of testing whether the package in question
builds in pbuilder. pbuilder starts with a clean chroot, downloads the
build dependencies, installs them and then copies and builds your
package in that clean environment. If the
On 10/11/2008, Adeodato Simó wrote:
Hm, I thought you're not supposed to use debconf to display notes, and that
NEWS.Debian is preferred.
Yeah, otherwise Christian is coming after you; and you don't want that.
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Sandro Tosi [EMAIL PROTECTED] (09/11/2008):
yes it it: you have to provide a programmatical way to
retrive/generate the orig.tar.gz […]
FSVO “have to”. It is clearly tagged as optional in Policy §4.9.
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Luca Bruno [EMAIL PROTECTED] (28/11/2008):
I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
Taken care of after some modifications.
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Damien Raude-Morvan [EMAIL PROTECTED] (30/11/2008):
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/sqlline/sqlline_1.0.2-2.dsc
I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
Hi Damien,
it's fine, uploading it.
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Damien Raude-Morvan [EMAIL PROTECTED] (30/11/2008):
- dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/commons-vfs/commons-
vfs_1.0-3.dsc
Heh, please don't wrap URL lines. :)
I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
Sure, looks fine, uploading.
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Eugene V. Lyubimkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] (09/12/2008):
package-has-a-duplicate-relation depends: libflac++6, libflac++6 (= 1.2.1)
According to the man dpkg-gencontrol, just place 'libflac++6(=1.2.1)'
before the '${shlibs:Depends}', and dpkg-control with throw away less
strong dependency.
Wrong
Andy Hawkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] (09/12/2008):
Please file a bug about this.
Umm, I'll try. I'm not sure exactly what that bug report should say!
Kind of new to all this Debian packaging stuff (as of this time last
week I knew nothing about it!).
Short version: “Fix your shlibs.”
Slightly
Neil Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] (09/12/2008):
Short version: “Fix your shlibs.”
Cyril, we've had this discussion before - merely adding symbols does
NOT require a SONAME bump.
Neil, read.
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Neil Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] (09/12/2008):
Looks like you just found an RC bug in libflac++6 - includes new
symbols in version 1.2.1-1 according to mole but the shlibs does not
depend on that version:
That is not a bug - the package building against it merely has to
require that
Neil Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] (09/12/2008):
Adding a new function (or several hundred new functions) has
absolutely ZERO impact on the SONAME as long as the new functions do
not overlap existing functions, change existing functions or require
any changes elsewhere in the library that remove
Paul Wise [EMAIL PROTECTED] (10/12/2008):
Specify the strict version ahead of shlib:Depends and dpkg-shlibdeps
does the right thing.
Thats a hack. Another workaround for broken shlibs is
debian/shlibs.local.
A very dirty one. The other being the one recommended by the Policy, but
I don't
Andy Hawkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] (09/12/2008):
My .deb however doesn't depend on a specific version of libflac, is
that because there are no versions prior to this available?
It is because currently, libflac doesn't declare its shlibs properly.
Once this is fixed, and once your package has been
Neil Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] (09/12/2008):
You're talking about the shlib, as explained in my other message, I
was inadvertently folding the two into one. My mistake.
Finally.
You *do* understand the concept of SONAME and shlibs, right?
Yes, but adding symbols properly includes the
Jonathan Wiltshire [EMAIL PROTECTED] (09/12/2008):
This upload adds the VCS-* fields to debian/control and fixes some
minor lintian warnings.
Hi,
thanks for your attention to details. That doesn't really look like
needing an upload right now, though. I'd wait for a bugfix or a new
upstream
Resul Cetin [EMAIL PROTECTED] (11/12/2008):
I want that debcheckout will checkout debian instead of master.
Tweak HEAD in the repository to point to the wanted branch (yeah, that
shouldn't even exist in a bare repository, etc., but that does exactly
what you need, so… enjoy).
Mraw,
KiBi.
Resul Cetin [EMAIL PROTECTED] (11/12/2008):
Sry, but it is not possible to move head because otherwise upstream
will kill me. (It is a shared repository with upstream)
Just had a quick look at debcheckout's code, it looks like you would
need to open a bug against it so that you can specify the
Thomas Weber [EMAIL PROTECTED] (11/12/2008):
Am Donnerstag, den 11.12.2008, 13:09 + schrieb Neil Williams:
Everyone has to take account of transitions and blocks in unstable
between releases, the release freeze itself is just another issue to
consider with regard to unstable. Unstable
Andy Hawkins a...@gently.org.uk (11/12/2008):
I'm not sure I understand why the debian directory shouldn't be part
of my 'main' release? What problems does this cause?
Hello, see [1] for some reasons. Have a nice reading.
1.
Neil Williams codeh...@debian.org (11/12/2008):
Packages created by the upstream team are generally exceptionally poor
quality. Even if the upstream team is or includes the Debian
maintainer, there is no justification for having a .deb on the
upstream download page - leave it to the packagers.
Raphael Geissert atomo64+deb...@gmail.com (11/12/2008):
Why? there's no need to wait until work piles up.
If work is committed in $VCS, then no work is piled up.
No need to generate buildd, mirror, and upgrade noise only to fix some
lintian warnings with no real bug IMHO.
But YMMV.
Mraw,
Raphael Geissert atomo64+deb...@gmail.com (11/12/2008):
If it is lintian warning or error then chances are high that there
*is* a bug.
Chances.
1) ancient-libtool is about porting,
is there an FTBFS bug open? Said otherwise: is there an arch where there
is an actual FTBFS?
2)
Russ Allbery r...@debian.org (11/12/2008):
ancient-libtool was added at the explicit request of the porters
because they were seeing obscure bugs and issues on some architectures
unless a current version of libtool was used. These sorts of bugs
unfortunately are the kind that can be hidden or
Jonathan Wiltshire deb...@jwiltshire.org.uk (18/12/2008):
Hi George
Hello both of you,
Release have approved the debdiff and asked for the upload; it's on
mentors at [1] if you have a chance. Cheers :-)
[1]
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gxemul/gxemul_0.4.6.3-1+lenny1.dsc
Jonathan Wiltshire deb...@jwiltshire.org.uk (18/12/2008):
No problem by me :-)
Uploaded as is. I'm assuming you know about lintian and possible
enhancements for this package (and that you already fixed that in
unstable), and that you chose the minimalist approach for this tpu
upload. :)
Mraw,
Pietro Battiston too...@email.it (20/12/2008):
an ftp master told me that I can find the reason of the rejection of
the package I'm working on (python-shapely, for those who didn't read
the Non free license? thread) in folder
/srv/ftp.debian.org/queue/reject/ of server merkel.debian.org. It
Neil Williams codeh...@debian.org (19/12/2008):
I'm only mentioning this as a caution - I don't consider it a
practical problem for these particular changes to these particular
packages. Once Lenny is released and we migrate both tslib and the
xorg driver into unstable and thence into testing,
Christoph Egger christoph.eg...@gmx.de (21/12/2008):
Jup I know the procedure, I was more in trouble wether it is
reasonable. There is no need I guess to have this done for lenny.
You can propose/ask for opinion on debian...@.
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Jonathan Wiltshire deb...@jwiltshire.org.uk (27/12/2008):
I am seeking a sponsor for my adoption of the package 'adtool' (1.3-2).
I'm willing to take a look, I'll get back to you soonish.
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org (27/12/2008):
I'm willing to take a look, I'll get back to you soonish.
So, here it goes:
- there were some changes to upstream sources in the previous revision,
they went away but you're not mentioning it anywhere. Did you lost
them or did you trash them
Jonathan Wiltshire deb...@jwiltshire.org.uk (27/12/2008):
Ok, I'll address those now - would you like a version bump?
No need, but I can live with it. You can also point poke me on IRC if
you like.
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Jonathan Wiltshire deb...@jwiltshire.org.uk (27/12/2008):
Same package version is on mentors, if you've time to take a look.
After some nitpick on IRC, uploaded.
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Evgeni Golov sarge...@die-welt.net (03/01/2009):
Dear mentors (and KiBi o),
Taking it.
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
George Danchev danc...@spnet.net (03/01/2009):
(let me know if you'd prefer a version bump).
I do prefer version bump myself (since that avoids repetitive
reviewing from scratch, which to be honest turned out to gain over
some leftover improvements ;-), but I'm not that picky and leave
Charles Plessy ple...@debian.org (16/01/2009):
Examine the ‘foo.diff.gz’
cat foo.diff.gz | lsdiff, for instance
I think you wanted “zcat”. Anyway, no need to waste a fork:
| lsdiff -z foo.diff.gz
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Ruben Molina rmol...@udea.edu.co (17/01/2009):
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 4.4.7-1 of my package
dict-jargon.
Hello,
only had a quick look since I'm missing time, but:
- You want to say Build-Depends rather than Depends in the changelog.
- You are *not* allowed to change
Jonathan Wiltshire deb...@jwiltshire.org.uk (18/01/2009):
I've also added DM-Upload-Allowed to debian/rules too, in advance of
applying for DM status, unless you want it missed out for now.
Hi,
I'd like to see how the things go on debian-newmaint@ first; so I don't
really want to add it
Ruben Molina rmol...@udea.edu.co (18/01/2009):
- You are *not* allowed to change past changelog entries. The changelog
Why not? I was unable to find any reference to this on the policy or
the developers reference...
Indeed, looks like I cannot back up that claim either. Ongoing
discussion on
Neil Williams codeh...@debian.org (19/01/2009):
Do you, as a developer, bump the debian revision each time you build
a package, are ready to upload it, and discover one final problem
with it? Do you, under that scenario, write in the changelog a new
bullet point Oh, I botched the rules
Paul Wise p...@debian.org (19/01/2009):
As a sponsor, usually I would do stuff like this:
dget http://mentors.foo...-3.dsc
apt-get source foo
interdiff -z -p1 foo...-1.diff.gz foo...-3.diff.gz | less
Why aren't you using “debdiff foo*-{1,2}.dsc”?
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Ben Finney ben+deb...@benfinney.id.au (19/01/2009):
latest_debian_version=$(rmadison --suite ${suitename} ${packagename} \
| cut -d'|' -f 2 | sed -e 's/^[[:space:]]+//')
Beware, you need to limit that to the source (in case there's a binary
built that has the same name, and in case there
Ben Finney ben+deb...@benfinney.id.au (19/01/2009):
Yes, that's exactly what I was hoping to get from my packages (and
thought it was my responsibility to do so; I wasn't fully aware that
the sponsor re-builds the package and uploads the result).
(Just for completeness, from a pratical point
Neil Williams codeh...@debian.org (19/01/2009):
It is simple to pass the -v option to dpkg-buildpackage and then dpkg
includes all the changes since the specified -v into the .changes file
and the bugs get closed just fine.
It is very simple to overlook/forget about passing once one is
(Not sure the Cc was needed, keeping it just in case.)
Bernd Zeimetz be...@bzed.de (21/01/2009):
I'll take care of this. Btw Juan, you could ping me directly, I'll
happily sponsor packages for my NMs.
Hello here,
as discussed on IRC, I finally will do. Note that I'm already sponsoring
Juan Angulo Moreno j...@apuntale.com (21/01/2009):
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/a/anyremote/anyremote_4.15-1.dsc
Here we go, based on the source package only:
- debian/anyremote-doc.docs:
+ Extra newline (cosmetic, doesn't hurt)
- debian/control:
+ I don't think
Miguel Landaeta mig...@miguel.cc (18/08/2009):
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.6.1.1-3 of
package jabberd14. The upload would fix this bug: 542131.
Hi,
please keep the submitter Cc'd when replying to some bug, or you're
not going to receive any feedback, except in rare cases.
Sandro Tosi mo...@debian.org (28/08/2009):
Hi Petr,
thanks for your email.
(For those wondering, I had it privately some days ago, but the reply
I was writing got lost.)
Since everyone can do QA uploads (it's not only the QA team ;) I
think this is a perfect task for any perspective
Sandro Tosi mo...@debian.org (28/08/2009):
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 14:19, Cyril Bruleboisk...@debian.org wrote:
Sandro Tosi mo...@debian.org (28/08/2009):
Since everyone can do QA uploads (it's not only the QA team ;) I
think this is a perfect task for any perspective maintainer to do
Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org (28/08/2009):
#322207 audiooss: FTBFS on GNU/kFreeBSD
I think that one is mostly OK, but I wanted to double-check
something too.
Uploading.
Also, people wanting to work on those packages may want to join
#debian-kbsd (OFTC) to coordinate and avoid double
Felipe Sateler fsate...@gmail.com (26/11/2009):
Your package build-depends on ccache, and it actively enforces it in
the debian/rules file. Why is that?
I would be willing to bet money that the problem is that buildd's
have no (writable) home directory, so ccache fails. Drop the ccache
Joachim Wiedorn ad_deb...@joonet.de (27/11/2009):
thanks for this informations!
Nice to see you noticed the FTBFS yourself. I opened a bug anyway
(before opening my =debian-mentors/ folder). :)
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Benoit Mortier benoit.mort...@opensides.be (21/11/2009):
So my question is can we use linux-any today or do we have to fix
the problem an other way ?
Keep “Architecture: any” for now, possibly FTBFS very early when not
on a Linux architecture (you could use a check on DEB_HOST_ARCH_OS in
(Getting rid of all Cc's…)
Cristian Greco crist...@regolo.cc (26/11/2009):
Please file a bug against the pseudo-package ftp.debian.org
requesting mppenc to be removed from the archive, then.
It'd be nice to update #540131 accordingly, I almost sponsored the
source package linked there. Sounded
David Claughton d...@eclecticdave.com (28/11/2009):
So, rather than jumping straight in with a ITA, I wonder if I could
ask someone to take a look at what I've done and see if it looks OK?
If it's not too far off the mark, I'd be interested in maintaining
it. OTOH if the response is go away
Felipe Sateler fsate...@gmail.com (27/11/2009):
Which would be...?
That KiBi should have checked facts better when reporting the FTBFS
bug. The B-D was indeed there. Lalala. :)
(Sorry for the lag, I only open -mentors@ from time to time.)
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital
Rodolphe Quiédeville rodol...@quiedeville.org (02/12/2009):
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/pgpool2/pgpool2_2.2.5-2.dsc
For -mentors@'s record, I reviewed this package and made a few
remarks, being integrated/worked on. Please hold on any upload.
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Christoph Egger christ...@debian.org (08/12/2009):
I'm rather tempted to sponsor your fixed package.
Good call. ;)
As for config.{guess,sub}, no need to conditionalize the
'cp'. autotools-dev is in Build-Depends and if it'd stop shipping
those files, or in different locations, you want to
used in practice and is no
| longer recommended.
|
`---
1. http://www.networksorcery.com/enp/rfc1700.htm
2. http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3886
(Appendix C. Delimiting a URI in Context)
--
Cyril Brulebois
pgpADQYtD8SPd.pgp
Description: PGP signature
, if it is a perl app, asking the pkg-perl group).
It has, at least git. See for yourself at http://git.debian.org/,
there are many collab-maint/* projects.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois
pgpC5j9eL4ruB.pgp
Description: PGP signature
/copyright and give wrong information to users, or
b) Use the current address, at the cost of not using upstream's
licence statement verbatim.
b)
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois
pgp3y75tbqNlJ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Wesley J. Landaker [EMAIL PROTECTED] (29/08/2007):
Uploaded.
Hi,
looks like using -sa would be needed, upload REJECTED due to the absence
of .orig.tar.gz.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois
pgpfZlnSqnXWC.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Jörg Sommer [EMAIL PROTECTED] (04/09/2007):
Where's this written? In the policy?
Policy 12.3.
--
Cyril Brulebois
pgpSkc1fC38kr.pgp
Description: PGP signature
the
ChangeLog as is.
They are merged, fullstop. No “master” bug or “duplicates”, just close
both in the changelog and you're done. The order matters when one uses
the “forcemerge” command, though.
--
Cyril Brulebois
pgpJu3Fpipp2h.pgp
Description: PGP signature
that it is required. In fact, it isn't even
suggested.
You may want to read libpkg-guide.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois
pgpptCn5I8Cip.pgp
Description: PGP signature
at all,
because they depend on a volatile library.
You aren't speaking about the ffmpeg case, are you?
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois
pgpuDj9nemsmT.pgp
Description: PGP signature
is a more general
document.
I recommended to Patrick, the maintainer of guichan, that he writes to
this list to ask about how he should handle his package.
Thanks for that.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois
pgpVqAZPtg3jc.pgp
Description: PGP signature
efforts on helping with the gnome-games
package, please consider asking for the removal of this extra package.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois
pgprhyiiwlQBJ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
for summarizing my thoughts.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois
pgp3EY1ebAoj9.pgp
Description: PGP signature
[ I bounced the two previous mails to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
and put the list back in the loop with this mail. ]
Cyril Brulebois [EMAIL PROTECTED] (12/09/2007):
My questions about the exact content of the bug remains, because “FHS
violations” isn't self-explanatory.
For the sake of completeness
all the documentation yet... but it was
not obvious from what I read so far.
admin? ;-)
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois
pgp4sfk1vBhRK.pgp
Description: PGP signature
use.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois
pgpU7z8JL8tC3.pgp
Description: PGP signature
supports overwritting already existing
packages).
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois
pgpWCAI6C1SNy.pgp
Description: PGP signature
.
Looks like #434989.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois
pgpUWMWFWmuir.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Francesco Namuri [EMAIL PROTECTED] (07/10/2007):
Quoting Bill Allombert, the author of the bug report:
…
I've searched in the menu policy…
Bill has been working on the menu related problems for years as far as I
can tell, I'd say: “trust him”.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois
pgpgT6a3zKQ5v.pgp
. Usually your changelog entries
should be so verbose that the full title isn't needed anyway. I'd say it
is mostly a matter of taste, but YMMV. ;-)
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois
pgpqeU1ixoJoI.pgp
Description: PGP signature
is quite quiet today.
TIA. Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois
diff -u grig-0.7.2/config.sub grig-0.7.2/config.sub
--- grig-0.7.2/config.sub
+++ grig-0.7.2/config.sub
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
# 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006 Free Software Foundation,
# Inc.
-timestamp='2006-09-20'
+timestamp='2007-06-28
might have done so for a several
kB config.* update, though, but we're far from here.)
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois
pgpuMSbZClpfv.pgp
Description: PGP signature
which you
propose to remove them. I might have troubles understanding your logic,
if any.
Anyway, I found a sponsor in the meanwhile, cancelling my request.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois
pgpXPrb0dsaSg.pgp
Description: PGP signature
entry. The
policy isn't updated yet (nor lintian) but a consensus was reached on
debian-devel, so I think it might be good to start using it.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois
PS: Sorry for somehow hijacking that thread, but I really wanted to see
esmtp's homepage, and it looked like that subject
.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois
pgpKisfdvzTYZ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
is the best; maintaining
patches to upstream sources is a nuisance, while fixing things up
afterwards in debian/rules is easier.
ACK. I must confess I don't even remember why I did that this way…
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
the appropriate bug in the changelog. You
can check that by looking at [2] and at the “Source:” line. And there's
still no news about the maintainer of grig, which you (Patrick) dropped
from the Cc list (along with the original bugreport).
--
Cyril Brulebois
signature.asc
Description: Digital
schoenfeld / in-medias-res [EMAIL PROTECTED] (16/10/2007):
On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 01:18:11AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
You might not be aware of [1,2,3]. Reading the (originally) Cc'd
bugreport might help…
You are right. I'm not aware of this. You are irritating me a bit: The
thread
, aptitude).
Regards,
--
Cyril Brulebois
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
team?
If there's no O:, I'd say: no need. Since it is announced on
debian-devel@, someone could have picked it up, but since it was
explicitly targeted at the Games Team, I'd still say: no need.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
.
--
Cyril Brulebois
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
the problems are and to fix them.
Depending on the archs, it can be easy to get an account (hppa is a very
good example, thanks to the available clusters), or it can be very
tricky; in that latter case, emulation can help a lot.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
there are several DDs in those teams; manpower is lacking, not
upload rights.
--
Cyril Brulebois
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
.
--
Cyril Brulebois
Footnotes:
1. The exact quote is “I don't understand why, please ignore it or fix
it by yourself”.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
,
--
Cyril Brulebois
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
, but not in /usr/bin (see its
manpage). I guess your build system is somehow missing a chmod +x on the
generated binary.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
if you
don't have anything specific in mind.
1. http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois
pgpC9k7IbyTdX.pgp
Description: PGP signature
://svn.debian.org/wsvn/secure-testing/data/embedded-code-copies?op=file
2. http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.devel.announce/1136
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois
pgpGjlqCG1O0R.pgp
Description: PGP signature
description proofread by the English localization team might be an idea.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois
pgpDcED0L92zQ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
,
--
Cyril Brulebois
pgp4s8GbVmuqv.pgp
Description: PGP signature
been already
deleted from unstable.
Note that there are gcc-4.3/g++-4.3 packages in experimental, which
might help.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois
pgp7CpbPdX7PG.pgp
Description: PGP signature
/10_gcc4.3_includes
| * Drop trailing spaces in debian/rules at the same time.
| * Bump Standards-Version from 3.7.2 to 3.7.3 (no change needed).
|
| -- Cyril Brulebois [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu, 20 Dec 2007 02:49:18 +0100
`---
About k3dsurf (http://k3dsurf.sourceforge.net/):
,---
| K3DSurf is a program
architecture-independant data: “all”. “any”
otherwise, unless it is supposed to only run on this and that
architecture, in which case you put “Architecture: this that” there.
In most cases, you're going to use either “all” or “any”.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois
pgpw65qglxDud.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On 20/12/2007, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
I'd be glad if someone could check and possibly upload the following
source package for me:
http://alioth.debian.org/~kibi-guest/k3dsurf/k3dsurf_0.6.2-2.dsc
Still the same location, with the attached additional commit, which
takes care of extra linking
1 - 100 of 267 matches
Mail list logo
