Bug#797634: RFS: network-config/0.2-2 [ITA] -- Simple network configuration tool

Hi >The respective dsc file can be found at: >http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/n/network-config/network-config_0.2-2.dsc I still don't like the rules file. I would appreciate a content like: #!/usr/bin/make -f # Uncomment this to turn on verbose mode. #export DH_VERBOSE=1 %:

Bug#797634: RFS: network-config/0.2-2 [ITA] -- Simple network configuration tool

>Sorry, for bother np >I don’t understand >Is to me install or no install . >Changeling of upstream ? look here https://sources.debian.net/src/network-config/0.2-1/debian/rules/ dh_installchangelogs ChangeLog so please provide a way to install it like it was before. (man

Bug#797898: RFS: caffe/0.9999~rc2+git20150902+e8e660d3-1 [ITP]

Hi Lumin, >I will keep those custom target in the bottom of d/rules. >Yes, all of custom-target-related lines had been already >clustered at the bottom of d/rules, and I have drew a big >split line at the beginning of them, in the updated version. wonderful! > >The custom stuff is

Bug#797766: RFS: pac/4.5.5.5 [ITP] -- friendly greeter

Control: tags -1 moreinfo Control: owner -1 ! Hi David, where is the packaging? Please upload it somewhere with a dsc file. thanks G. Il Mercoledì 2 Settembre 2015 14:03, David TV ha scritto: Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am

Bug#797888: RFS: panda3d/1.9.0-1 [put in ITP, ITA, RC, NMU if applicable]

Control: owner -1 ! Control: tag -1 moreinfo Hi, 1) can you please address the lintian issues about description duplicated? 2) bugs.debian.org/597172 you need to set yourself as owner, and ask sven if he still want to comaintain (and retitle to ITP) 3) d/docs is empty 4) d/copyright, you might

Bug#798186: RFS: node-punycode/1.3.2+git702cc2da-1 ITP

Control: owner -1 ! Control: tag -1 moreinfo Hi Bastien review: 1) "As an extra tip, don't use 'extra' as 'priority' (d/control) if your package doesn't conflict with other[1]. I suggest 'optional'. [1] https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-archive.html#s-priorities; this still

Bug#788653: RFS: ktap/0.4-1 [ITP] -- lightweight script-based dynamic tracing tool for Linux

Hi Azat, >dkms is good idea, thanks! (I was skeptic about linux-headers at the >very beginning). >Converted and uploaded to mentors. for sure the package is good now, there is still however a problem http://debomatic-amd64.debian.net/distribution#unstable/ktap/0.4-1/buildlog it fails to

Bug#792144: RFS: cunit/2.1-2.dfsg-3 -- Unit Testing Library for C [ITA]

Another issue you should address: I duplicate-long-description libcunit1-dev libcunit1 libcunit1-ncurses-dev libcunit1-ncurses libcunit1-doc (you might append something like "this is the development package" "this is the common documentation" or so) feel free to steal from python-pyqtgraph or

Bug#796030: tablesnap

Hi Jeremy, did you have time to look at my last review? let me know if you need help cheers, G.

Bug#788653: RFS: ktap/0.4-1 [ITP] -- lightweight script-based dynamic tracing tool for Linux

Hi, >You are correct, I've put debian/ktap.manpages statically. wonderful >s/dh_installmanpages/dh_installman/ yes, sure maybe something like override_dh_installman: help2man --no-discard-stderr -h-h --version-string $(VERSION) -n "$(DESCRIPTION)" ./ktap > debian/ktap.1

Bug#797766: pac is not really ready yet

Control: noowner -1 Since for now pac has an autogenerated Debian directory I guess it isn't ready for inclusion. Feel free to ping me as soon as you have a debian packaging, and I'll reassing myself back to this task. cheers, G.

Bug#787396: mupen64plus-qt ping

Hi Sergio, did you have time to look to my package review? cheers, G.

Bug#792144: RFS: cunit/2.1-2.dfsg-3 -- Unit Testing Library for C [ITA]

(please also address issues from other emails) http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/cunit/cunit_2.1-3-dfsg1.dsc quoting changelog: + * Bump to 2.1-3 + * Fix versions I see two patches dropped and the watch file updated (diff between this version and your previous one, not complete

Bug#792144: RFS: cunit/2.1-2.dfsg-3 -- Unit Testing Library for C [ITA]

Hi, I'm referring to: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=792144#54 and (sorry for that I forgot to send the mail) to the need to mark the package as multiarch where needed https://wiki.debian.org/Multiarch/Implementation also, please rebase the changelog into one entry. (I

Bug#788418: nfft

Hi Ghislain, with the gcc-5 transition almost done, how do you feel about looking at the nfft review? cheers, G.

Bug#787148: gambatte ping

Hi Sergio, did you had time to look at the gambatte review? cheers, G.

Bug#788653: RFS: ktap/0.4-1 [ITP] -- lightweight script-based dynamic tracing tool for Linux

>Hm, there is linux-headers package, why build bot can't install it? >vms? don't know, it doesn't install in a clean sid environment. maybe you want to deal with the module with some runtime build, like it is done with virtualbox-dkms package otherwise you need to force the module rebuild

Bug#798423: RFS: alien/8.95 [QA] -- convert and install rpm and other packages

Control: owner -1 ! Control: tags -1 moreinfo Hi Fabiano, +++ alien-8.95/alien.spec 2015-09-09 02:28:26.0 +0200 @@ -1,12 +1,12 @@ Summary: Install Debian, Slackware, and Stampede packages with rpm. Name: alien Packager: Joey Hess -Version: 8.93 +Version: 8.95

Bug#789699: ping :)

yntax is it normal? cheers, G. Il Mercoledì 9 Settembre 2015 10:44, Daniel Stender <deb...@danielstender.com> ha scritto: On 09.09.2015 08:55, Daniel Stender wrote: > On 09.09.2015 08:50, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: >> Hi, Ping about 789699 (vulture) >> >> :

Bug#788653: RFS: ktap/0.4-1 [ITP] -- lightweight script-based dynamic tracing tool for Linux

>You are correct, there is no need in "linux-headers-amd64", however there >is second option just "linux-headers", and I don't understand why it >doesn't work for you. it does work for *me*, it doesn't for buildd system. IIRC they are configured to pick only the first version... >Anyway I

Bug#786795: dhcp-probe review

Hi Laurent, I'm pinging you because I think you missed my review on #786795 Let me know if you intend to address the issue I raised here :) cheers, G.

Bug#798423: RFS: alien/8.95 [QA] -- convert and install rpm and other packages

>Somehow, dch --qa automatically pushes the minor version up. I have >realized it just now, >by testing is again in a new directory. Is there a way I could do the >QA work without changing >the tarball version? I guess this is because the package is native >Having two separate patches

Re: RFS: ranger/1.7.1-1 (new upstream release)

Hi, Built, the package is in a really good shape :) Just a nitpick, you might want to mention copyright changes in the changelog (this wasn't a showstopper since the license didn't change, the changes were minimal) keep up the good work! cheers, G.

Bug#787148: gambatte review

Hi Sérgio, >> what about maintaining it under Debian Games Team? > >What should I do? Send a message to the mailing list? With all my packages? just join the Games Team, set it as uploader or maintainer and live happy. I guess all the packages that are games should live under that pkg-games

Bug#798507: RFS: node-wrench -- Recursive filesystem (and other) operations for Node.js

Control: owner -1 ! Hi, the packaging looks good, just set the priority to optional in the control file and we should be good. cheers, G.

Bug#787328: RFS: mpd-sima/0.13.1-1

Control: owner -1 ! Hi Geoff, lets review: 1) you dropped 0.10.0-2 entry from changelog 2) entry 0.10.0-1 is targeted wrongly 3) bump compat level not mentioned in changelog 4) according to setup.py install_requires=['python-musicpd>=0.4.1', 'requests>= 2.0.2'], so I guess there is no need to

Re: Seeking help with submission of package

Hi, please open an RFS bug if you need a sponsor. Handling requests from debian-mentors mail list is not easy. cheers, Gianfranco Il Domenica 13 Settembre 2015 16:37, マイリノデイヴィッド ha scritto: Hello ChangZhuo, Thank you for the quick reply! I will make those

Re: Seeking help with submission of package

Hi ChangZhuo, I didn't find any more copyright issue in the package. Actually I can ask ftpmasters to reject, but I looked at the RFS log, and every copyright issue seemed fixed to me. did I miss anything important? cheers, G.

Bug#798976: RFS: dhcpcd5/6.9.3-1 [ITA] -- DHCPv4, IPv6RA and DHCPv6 client with IPv4LL support

Control: owner -1 ! Hi, please change the changelog: the bugs are not fixed by Debian packaging, but from upstream new release. I would change it that way + * New upstream release + - Fix Multiplication of IPv6 addresses for upstream (Closes: #791582) + - Fix dhcpcd doesn't configure

Bug#787328: RFS: mpd-sima/0.13.1-1

Hi Geoff >>> 2) entry 0.10.0-1 is targeted wrongly >I don't get what you mean. exactly what I wrote :) dget -x http://http.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/mpd-sima/mpd-sima_0.10.0-2.dsc dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/mpd-sima/mpd-sima_0.13.1-1.dsc debdiff

Re: RFS: eviacam

Hi Cesar, please open an RFS bug and fix the lintian stuff shown on mentors.d.o page. + Buildsystem: Package uses debhelper with an old compatibility level – Package uploaded for the unreleased distribution – Watch file is not present after that I'll have a look at it. cheers, G. Il

Bug#798423: RFS: alien/8.95 [QA] -- convert and install rpm and other packages

Hi, you can just dput again, it will override the previous upload! cheers G. -- Il ven 11 set 2015 01:05 CEST, Fabiano Antunes ha scritto: >Hi Gianfranco, >> Somehow, dch --qa automatically pushes the minor version up. I have >> realized it just now, >> >> I

Bug#798423: RFS: alien/8.95 [QA] -- convert and install rpm and other packages

Built, I tested and the package was looking good. Thanks for your contribution to Debian, I hope you will (as you said on irc) consider contributing more in this nice package! cheers, G.

Bug#787396: mupen64plus-qt ping

roc...@gmail.com> ha scritto: I'm there now, could you upload ? :) Sergio Benjamim On Mon, 14 Sep 2015 10:17:03 + (UTC) Gianfranco Costamagna <costamagnagianfra...@yahoo.it> wrote: > Hi Sérgio, did you get accepted in the pkg-games team? > > I can't see you > https://a

Bug#787328: RFS: mpd-sima/0.13.1-1

0) > > Cheers > > Le 2015-09-16 09:24, Gianfranco Costamagna : >> Hi Geoff >> >>>>> 2) entry 0.10.0-1 is targeted wrongly >>> I don't get what you mean. >> >> >> exactly what I wrote :) >> >> dget -x >> http://

Bug#787396: mupen64plus-qt ping

BTW I guess many people would agree about merging the qt code into the main mupen64plus package :) cheers, G. Il Giovedì 17 Settembre 2015 9:46, Gianfranco Costamagna <costamagnagianfra...@yahoo.it> ha scritto: Well, I spotted another issue :( sorry for that Copyright (c) 201

Re: RFS: eviacam

uot;. > > Cheers, > Alex > > 2015-09-17 3:38 GMT+08:00, Cesar Mauri <ce...@crea-si.com>: >> Hi Gianfranco (and all), >> >> I just filled a RFS bug [1]. Package seems know to be lintian clean (version >> 2.0.1-5). >> >> [1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-b

Bug#799205: RFS: eviacam/2.0.1-5 [ITP] -- webcam based mouse emulator

w.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/copyright-format/1.0/ Regards, Cesar El 17/09/2015 a las 17:16, Gianfranco Costamagna escribió: > Hi, can you please fix also this lintian pedantic? > P unversioned-copyright-format-uri > http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep5/ > > (sorry, due to lack of

Bug#799205: RFS: eviacam/2.0.1-5 [ITP] -- webcam based mouse emulator

Hi, can you please fix also this lintian pedantic? P unversioned-copyright-format-uri http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep5/ (sorry, due to lack of time I can't review it properly now) cheers, G. Il Mercoledì 16 Settembre 2015 20:57, Cesar Mauri ha scritto: Package:

Bug#798655: RFS: node-text-encoding/0.5.3-1 [ITP] -- Polyfill for the Encoding Living Standard's API

Control: owner -1 ! Hi Julien some issues: 1) copyright: please mention the apache documentation without the link (e.g. hedgewars/copyright package has a 14 lines version) 2) examples.html examples-no-indexes.html what about installing them? 3) bower.json what does this file do?

Bug#799022: RFS: mgba/0.3.0 [ITP] -- Game Boy Advance emulator

Control: owner -1 ! Hi Sérgio, 1) changelog: please do not mention "Bug" (nitpick) 2) sed 's/@DEB_HOST_MULTIARCH@/$(DEB_HOST_MULTIARCH)/g well, using -DLIBDIR= in cmake configure will simplify a lot this stuff I guess. look e.g.

Bug#798990: RFS: webdeploy/1.0-1 ITP #798716 -- deploy files via FTP

Hi Daniel, (please upload on mentors.debian.net next time) 1) changelog: you need to open an ITP bug and set the target distribution to unstable. 2) control: std-version should be 3.9.6 3) copyright should be in dep5 format https://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/copyright-format/1.0/

Bug#787396: mupen64plus-qt ping

Hi Sérgio, did you get accepted in the pkg-games team? I can't see you https://alioth.debian.org/project/memberlist.php?group_id=30862 this seems to be the last showstopper for me to upload, the package looks good. cheers, G.

Bug#799529: RFS: shc/3.8.9b-1 new upstream release

>> -shc (3.8.7-2) unstable; urgency=medium >> +shc (3.8.7-2) unstable; urgency=low > >> well your previous uploader uploaded with medium instead of low, please >> adapt the changelog accordingly > > >Please, read this[1]. > > >[1] >https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=730343 >

Bug#800140: RFS: traitlets -- Lightweight Traits-like package

Control: owner -1 ! Hi Julien, the packaging looks good, however I would appreciate if you could take the watch file from here http://pypi.debian.net/traitlets/watch and maybe fix it to avoid dev0 to show up as a newer version. Unfortunately I don't know how to uversionmangle it :) cheers,

Bug#788653: RFS: ktap/0.4-1 [ITP] -- lightweight script-based dynamic tracing tool for Linux

Hi, > first a question: does the user need to do modprobe ktapvm manually? well, can't the ktap tool do the job automagically? and moreover, how do the user know that a ktap source has a ktapvm kernel module? I mean, I would expect a kernel module called "ktap" and maybe a readme

Re: python-fabio circular dependency

Hi, Does this page help you? https://wiki.debian.org/PackageTransition unfortunately I don't know how to best solve this issue cheers, Gianfranco

Bug#792144: RFS: cunit/2.1-2.dfsg-3 -- Unit Testing Library for C [ITA]

Hi Azat, >No problem, replaced version in d/changelog and d/NEWS to >"2.1-3+dfsg-1". wonderful >Done using d/copyright, thanks. this is not really correct. I see you remove Makefiles in copyright, but why? that files-excluded needs to be used for non dfsg files, not for autogenerated

Bug#799205: RFS: eviacam/2.0.1-5 [ITP] -- webcam based mouse emulator

Hi, >done. thanks for the hint. >Those lines are probably the result of some trials >that I forgot to cleanup :) > >I tidied up a bit the configuration.ac and Makefile.am files wonderful >The point of that commit was to add the debugging flags to the >compiler command line. > > if !

Bug#800600: RFS: arrayfire/3.1.2+dfsg1-2

control: owner -1 ! Hi, the packaging looks good, however I'm not sure about this [1] apt-get install libblas.so Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done Package libblas.so is a virtual package provided by: libopenblas-dev 0.2.14-1 libblas-dev

Bug#799268: RFS: ck/1.6.2 [ITP]

Hi Grigori, >By the way, I also uploaded python3-ck: >https://mentors.debian.net/package/python3-ck this is a nack for me. You can build two binaries with the same source package, look e.g. to https://sources.debian.net/src/python-esmre/0.3.1-3/ this includes: compat level --> 9 debhelper >=

Bug#790125: RFS: dropbear/2015.68-1 - lightweight SSH2 server and client

Hi, I could own the bug no problem, just I would like to avoid stealing the package to Helmut! I did some new testing, and I'm really unsure about the upgrade procedure. I tried to install dropbear from jessie and then install the deb files. some issues: - dpkg shows that a default

Bug#800600: RFS: arrayfire/3.1.2+dfsg1-2

> Date:Thu, 1 Oct, 2015 at 19:09 Subject:Bug#800600: RFS: arrayfire/3.1.2+dfsg1-2 On 01/10/15 16:20, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > control: owner -1 ! > > Hi, > > the packaging looks good, however I'm not sure about this [1] > > apt-get install libblas.so > Reading pac

Bug#799205: RFS: eviacam/2.0.1-5 [ITP] -- webcam based mouse emulator

Hi Alex, >Notice the ``eviacam-doc'' package only includes the files installed >in ``/usr/share/doc/eviacam/help'' directory and nothing else. > > >Gianfranco, could you please see is the solution I found correct? The >Debian documentation on this seems to be a bit lacking, I found the

Re: Comments and Sponsor for new package privacyIDEA

Hi Cornelius, please read [1] to put the package on mentors and open an RFS bug [2] [1] http://mentors.debian.net/intro-maintainers [2] https://mentors.debian.net/sponsors/rfs-howto cheers, Gianfranco Il Sabato 3 Ottobre 2015 18:18, Cornelius Kölbel ha

Bug#781952: RFS:complexity/1.2-1 [ITP] -- tool for analyzing the complexity of C program functions

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi Paul, are you still interested in sponsoring this package? I did a quick look and it seems good now, however I'm wondering about some hidden issues... does this package have any showstopper to you? cheers, Gianfranco -BEGIN PGP

Bug#790125: RFS: dropbear/2015.68-1 - lightweight SSH2 server and client

<guil...@guilhem.org> ha scritto: Hi, On Fri, 02 Oct 2015 at 14:47:21 +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > cat of what? I'm not sure this is correct... can you please clarify? cat of the ‘showpubkey’ function's standard input :-) ‘showpubkey’ is used as follows: dropbearkey … | s

Bug#790125: RFS: dropbear/2015.68-1 - lightweight SSH2 server and client

Hi, continuing the review: debian/dropbear-initramfs.postinst "if ! which ssh-keygen >/dev/null 2>&1; then cat else " cat of what? I'm not sure this is correct... can you please clarify? after that well, I don't have any more issue. " dropbear (2015.68-1) experimental; urgency=low * New

Bug#781952: RFS:complexity/1.2-1 [ITP] -- tool for analyzing the complexity of C program functions

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Control: owner -1 ! Control: tags -1 moreinfo > I would suggest using https in all the debian/copyright URLs. this needs to be done :) (there is an http > gcc -std=gnu99 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -g - -O2 >

Re: Suggestion of new program: execute mathematical set operations on lists

Hi, >Thanks for this hint, and Gianfranco, also thanks for your answer, >especially the link. I should have stated more precisely that setop >shall be a command line tool. Python sets and combine are interesting >but not as much universal as I plan my program to be. well, I fail to

Bug#800140: RFS: traitlets -- Lightweight Traits-like package

Hi, Thanks for fixing the watch file, however there is still an issue there: "Depends: python:any (<< 2.8), python:any (>= 2.7.5-5~)" (runtime dependencies) I see in setup.py install_requires = setuptools_args['install_requires'] = [ 'ipython_genutils', 'decorator', ] so for some reasons

Bug#799268: RFS: ck/1.6.2 [ITP]

ange it? Thanks a lot and have a good week, Grigori -Original Message- From: Grigori Fursin Sent: Saturday, September 19, 2015 11:18 AM To: Gianfranco Costamagna ; Lucas Nussbaum ; 799...@bugs.debian.org Subject: Bug#799268: RFS: ck/1.6.2 [ITP] Actually, it's done more or less like tha

Bug#799268: RFS: ck/1.6.2 [ITP]

ng :( ... Maybe the package name is taken from the body of the original message, i.e. "ck" instead of "python-ck"? Sorry for bothering with that and thanks for your help, Grigori -Original Message- From: Gianfranco Costamagna Sent: Monday, September 28, 20

Bug#798990: RFS: webdeploy/1.0-1 ITP #798716 -- deploy files via FTP

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Control: owner -1 ! Hi Daniel, > I'm not sure what's wrong here, the upstream makefile contains this > install rule which installs the script and the man page, have I > done something wrong?: install: all > > install webdeploy $(DESTDIR)$(bindir)

Bug#792144: RFS: cunit/2.1-2.dfsg-3 -- Unit Testing Library for C [ITA]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi, sorry for the long wait! I did a deep review, and I guess I found the last "showstoppers" 1) Upstream revision seems to be "2.1-3" and you seem to have introduced a first dfsg revision so it becomes 2.1-3+dfsg and then the debian revision,

Re: Looking for sponsor to upload a fix to Midori

Hi, next time you might want to just open an RFS bug. Anyway, I sponsored the debdiff, it was looking fine to me. (you forgot to tag the previous version in your repo, please do) cheers, Gianfranco Il Sabato 19 Settembre 2015 17:37, Sergio Durigan Junior ha

Bug#799094: RFS: node-kerberos/0.0.14-1 [ITP]

Control: owner -1 ! Hi: control/compat: debhelper and compat: please set to 9 control: priority: optional patches: debian.patch is not a good patch name, maybe "change-path or similar might be" (the patch might be even split in two, since it does two different things) rules: I see some

Bug#799557: RFS: progress/0.9-1 -- Coreutils Progress Viewer

Control: owner -1 ! Hi Zhou the packaging looks fine, I have found just an issue: Vcs-Git: http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/users/cdluminate-guest/progress.git this seems to be wrong. (it might be good as VCS-Browser, but VCS-Git needs a git:// protocol I guess) can you please add them both?

Bug#799205: RFS: eviacam/2.0.1-5 [ITP] -- webcam based mouse emulator

> > >Not sure how to change this. I think this string comes from here [1]. > >[1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=634840 hint: https://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control#retitle >OK. I want to maintain this feature available for win32 and manually builds. I >could add a

Re: Modifying the environment variables of a parent process

Hi Markhazy, first I guess this isn't the right place, but well, the damage is done :) TLTR; you have a cdiv code that gives in output two numbers, real and the imaginary part you want to store them into bash variables. so, why can't you do a simple bash script for doing this? I see a

Bug#799205: RFS: eviacam/2.0.1-5 [ITP] -- webcam based mouse emulator

I guess something like (checked for override_dh_auto_configure: on codesearch.debian.net) override_dh_auto_configure: dh_auto_configure -- --disable-update or something similar cheers, G. Il Mercoledì 23 Settembre 2015 16:34, Cesar Mauri ha scritto: > hint: >

Bug#799498: RFS: neko/2.0.0-4

Hi Andy, the packaging looks good. I did two builds with DH_VERBOSE=1 in a sid chroot (the unstable and mentors versions) I did a meld between them, and I see some "issues" -"Wall" flag has disappeared (I guess not a real problem here :) ) - many lines are like this one gcc -O3 -DEAPI

Bug#799498: RFS: neko/2.0.0-4

5 at 5:54 PM, Gianfranco Costamagna <costamagnagianfra...@yahoo.it> wrote: Hi Andy, > > > >the packaging looks good. > >I did two builds with DH_VERBOSE=1 in a sid chroot >(the unstable and mentors versions) > >I did a meld between them, and I see some "i

Bug#799768: RFS: ismrmrd/1.3.1-1

Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android From:"Ghislain Vaillant" <ghisv...@gmail.com> Date:Tue, 22 Sep, 2015 at 19:33 Subject:Bug#799768: RFS: ismrmrd/1.3.1-1 On 22/09/15 17:32, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > I would appreciate a lintian warning instead of a broken documentation > &g

Bug#799205: RFS: eviacam/2.0.1-5 [ITP] -- webcam based mouse emulator

ening-no-fortify-functions' and `binary-without-manpage'. I think `hardening-no-fortify-functions' has to do with `dpkg-buildflags' in `debian/rules'. About man page, is it essential? Cheers, Alex 2015-09-22 22:07 GMT+08:00, Gianfranco Costamagna <costamagnagianfra...@yahoo.it>: > Hi again, &g

Re: Suspicious file changes in -dbg between old and new packages

Hi Niels, >The debug package needs a strictly equal dependency on the original >package, such as: "foo (= ${binary:Version})". That is orthogonal to >the usage of build-ids (that is, you must use the strictly equal with or >without build-id based debug paths). sure, I guess lintian even

Re: Suspicious file changes in -dbg between old and new packages

Hi Niels, >If the old and the new binary have the same build-id, they can reuse the >same debug symbols - regardless of the debug symbols are installed by >name or by build id. :) > so the __TIME__ __DATE__ macros are not used, but *might* be used and not during the build-id computation, but

Re: Suspicious file changes in -dbg between old and new packages

Hi Thomas, >And why does it still work when i install back 1.4.0-2 ? well, if -2 and -3 didn't change symbols (e.g. you didn't patch the source code), why shouldn't it work? (I'm not sure to know how exactly the build.ids are mapped to the binary code, but I guess they work as long as

Bug#799768: RFS: ismrmrd/1.3.1-1

> >I still don't get what the recommended solution is. So far, I have been >(wrongly?) following what Lintian suggested to do with embedded jquery. I would appreciate a lintian warning instead of a broken documentation e.g. look at https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=736360

Bug#799205: RFS: eviacam/2.0.1-5 [ITP] -- webcam based mouse emulator

Hi >I will try the help2man approach this is a string I used recently for another package help2man -N -n "enhanced HTTPS support for httplib and urllib2 using PyOpenSSL" /usr/bin/ndg_httpclient --version-string=v0.4.0 > ndg_httpclient.1 >The code overrides the CPPFLAGS thus, not sure if I

Bug#788653: RFS: ktap/0.4-1 [ITP] -- lightweight script-based dynamic tracing tool for Linux

the plain 0.4 and use dpkg-source to extract debian/patches. sorry for the long delay cheers, G. Il Giovedì 10 Settembre 2015 10:42, Azat Khuzhin <a3at.m...@gmail.com> ha scritto: On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 08:14:26AM +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > Hi Azat, > > > &g

Re: No host ftp.upload.debian.org found in config

are you a DD or a DM? otherwise you might want to put on mentors dput mentors file.changes. btw the correct command is to use the alias, I'm not sure it works with the url cheers, G. Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android From:"Sabniveesu Shashank" Date:Thu, 24 Sep, 2015

Bug#799813: RFS: snes9x [ITP] -- Cross-platform SNES emulator

Control: owner -1 ! Hi: 1) some licenses are missing. e.g. macosx/z*.h win32/* so much stuff. even if not used, I guess they should be mentioned because in the src packaging. 2) you seem to use both autotools-dev and autoreconf. autoreconf should be a superset of the first, can you please

Bug#787861: review: polyml

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi, this is really too much for an NMU. Did you test reverse dependencies? you are bumping shlibs, so you need to be sure to have requested a transition slot on release.debian.org (use reportbug against it to ask one). I would do rather a team

Bug#792156: cuba/3.0+20111124-3: review

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi, can you please update to the latest upstream and fix the lintian warnings? thanks! G. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJWBXdZAAoJEPNPCXROn13Z6DQP/iAGXJNJMN5JukBlWtmzj6j6

Re: Suggestion of new program: execute mathematical set operations on lists

Hi, a quick googling returns me this link [1] seems that python natively do some sort of this python3 >>> a = set([3, 3, 2, 5, 1]) >>> a {1, 2, 3, 5} >>> b = set([5, 90, 2, 7]) >>> b {90, 2, 5, 7} >>> a | b {1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 90} >>> a & b {2, 5} >>> [1]

Re: Suspicious file changes in -dbg between old and new packages

Hi, >So it is explainable that symbol loading works between >fewly different package versions. >I would still like to know how i managed to break it. >Just to be able to avoid this in future. as said before, the debug package should depend on binary:Version binary package. e.g. Package:

Bug#799205: RFS: eviacam/2.0.1-5 [ITP] -- webcam based mouse emulator

Hi Cesar, >> maybe run "debconf-updatepo" in the clean target, to avoid forgetting of >> updating translations. > >Done nack :) you did it correctly, but that way dh_clean is never called :) override_dh_clean: debconf-updatepo dh_clean this is what I meant. "#634840

Bug#799770: RFS: pyfftw/0.9.2+dfsg-3

Control: owner -1 ! Hi Ghislain, the packaging looks good, however: 1) watch file: what about using this one? http://pypi.debian.net/pyFFTW/watch 2)+ * d/control: bump standards version, no changes required. I would also mention "3.9.6" somewhere they are nitpicks, the packaging looks

Re: Multi-Arch and debian/control

>I would still appreciate an active DD in the team. you might consider applying for DM and ask somebody to give you upload permissions :) cheers G.

Bug#799768: RFS: ismrmrd/1.3.1-1

Control: merge -1 799767 Control: owner -1 ! Hi Ghislain, the packaging looks good, however I have some nitpicks/issues: rules file: "-DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=/usr" is this really needed? AFAIK it should be the default inside a dh build. (please check) "--builddirectory=$(BUILDDIR)" same

Bug#799205: RFS: eviacam/2.0.1-5 [ITP] -- webcam based mouse emulator

Hi again, some lintian stuff http://debomatic-amd64.debian.net/distribution#unstable/eviacam/2.0.1-5/lintian cheers, G.

Bug#799498: RFS: neko/2.0.0-4

Control: owner -1 ! Hi, quick review: 1) please bump debhelper and compat level to 9 (bonus points for converting the package to multiarch) 2) please drop useless build-dependencies (such as quilt and maybe some others, e.g. pkg-config?) 3) rules file, can you please convert in plain dh_

Bug#799205: RFS: eviacam/2.0.1-5 [ITP] -- webcam based mouse emulator

Hi Alex, > > >I grape the source from . I >think I find a problem with the build dependencies, the build >dependencies contain `libopencv-dev | libcv-dev'. I first choose to >install `libcv-dev', but I get a build failure. After that, I choose >to

Bug#799205: RFS: eviacam/2.0.1-5 [ITP] -- webcam based mouse emulator

Hi Cesar, lets review: d/changelog: please remove the space before ")" d/rules: usually it is better to use dh-autoreconf instead of autotools-dev, because the first is a superset (this means a change on control file too, and the drop of autotools-dev) d/control: please run "wrap-and-sort"

Bug#782074: (no subject)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi On Fri, 11 Sep 2015 13:14:14 +0300 Marius Gavrilescu wrote: > > Hi Matthew, > > I see you are packaging uBlock (by chrisaljoudi). You should > consider packaging uBlock Origin (by gorhill, the original author) > instead, as

Bug#797888: RFS: panda3d/1.9.0-1 [ITP] -- Panda3D free 3D engine SDK

Hi, wonderful! In the meanwhile: rules: - please switch the rules file to debhelper calls :) -"install -m 644 debian/shlibs debian/panda3d1.9.0/DEBIAN/shlibs" this seems wrong maybe rename the file in libpanda3d1.9.0.shlibs, but it should be picked up automagically. all the

Bug#799268: RFS: ck/1.6.2 [ITP]

> >> Oh, I didn't know that :( . Will it really be a problem (I didn't see any >> tool called ck yet)? The problem is that our users now share some artifacts >> in this format and they use this name (in scripts or internal calls), >> so changing this name now will be a nightmare :( ... > >I'm not

Re: Multi-Arch and debian/control

well, if nobody gives upload rights what is the difference? :) I agree DM is not exactly from newcomers, but well, maybe DC then? cheers, G. Il Lunedì 21 Settembre 2015 17:52, Jakub Wilk <jw...@debian.org> ha scritto: * Gianfranco Costamagna <costamagnagianfra...@yahoo.it>, 20

Re: Multi-Arch and debian/control

>Therefore i did not ITA the other two bug pairs after my sponsor >showed me what i did wrong with the first attempt. > >Is it appropriate to ITA them while it is not clear whether >any adoption will actually happen ? >As said, it depends on decisions by old and new friends whom >i do not want

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >