On Sat, Jun 24, 2000 at 03:41:15AM +0300, Shaul Karl wrote:
make install prefix=`pwd`/debian/tmp CONFPATH=`pwd`/debian/tmp/etc/nut
BASEPATH=`pwd`/debian/tmp STATEPATH=`pwd`/debian/tmp/var/state/nut
make[1]: Entering directory `/home/shaul/debian/nut/nut-0.44.0'
/usr/bin/install: cannot
On Sat, Jul 08, 2000 at 02:30:43PM +0300, Shaul Karl wrote:
I have packaged TkMan and the deb seems to work. However I am not getting a
.diff.gz file. Instead, I am told by dpkg-buildpackage that it is a
Debian-specific package. Which is not, of course.
I have unpacked the src, created a
On Sun, Jul 09, 2000 at 09:37:08AM +0300, Shaul Karl wrote:
I have packaged TkMan and the deb seems to work. However I am not getting a
.diff.gz file. Instead, I am told by dpkg-buildpackage that it is a
Debian-specific package. Which is not, of course.
I have unpacked the src,
On Sat, Aug 12, 2000 at 12:20:14PM +0200, Martin Bialasinski wrote:
I have a problem with gnome-users-guide-en
in the current version 1.2-1, there is a symlink
/usr/share/doc/gnome-users-guide-en/html -
/usr/share/gnome/help/users-guide/C
dwww won't follow this symlink, so I turned
On Tue, Aug 22, 2000 at 11:07:29PM +0200, Hugo van der Merwe wrote:
Where does one draw the line about how much documentation should be
included? I just finished the first version of my first package, I threw
in everything. In debian/docs:
ABOUT-NLS
This one is probably the generic file
On Mon, Aug 28, 2000 at 06:47:59PM +0200, "Jürgen A. Erhard" wrote:
INSTALL
Josip If it's generic, don't include it. If it explains only
Josip stuff about compiling from source, don't include it either.
But beware... it might mention config stuff inside this (or
dependencies
On Wed, Aug 30, 2000 at 11:27:08AM -0400, Peter S Galbraith wrote:
where do /usr/info/dir.gz and /usr/share/info/dir.gz come from?
On master usr/share/info/dir.gz is part of emacs20, on va /usr/info/dir.gz
is part of emacs20 and on my (potato) system it does not exist at all (no
On Tue, Sep 19, 2000 at 12:48:18AM +0200, Daniele Cruciani wrote:
dh_shlibdeps -l/usr/lib/mozilla
dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: unknown output from ldd on `debian/tmp/usr/bin/galeon-bin':
`libgtkembedmoz.so = /usr/lib/mozilla/libgtkembedmoz.so (0x40505000)'
dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: unknown
On Thu, Sep 28, 2000 at 10:33:25PM +0200, Stefan Alfredsson wrote:
1. Developer lives on the edge and usually has the latest libs installed
2. Package becomes dependant upon bleedingedge version of libs
-- BUT it is not really needed, for example gtk1.2.1 might
do just aswell as
On Tue, Oct 10, 2000 at 05:17:35PM +, Gerd Knorr wrote:
What is the recommended way to deal with bugs which are present in
the potato package but already fixed in woody?
There is none. You're free to keep them open, or close them.
--
Digital Electronic Being Intended for Assassination
On Tue, Oct 17, 2000 at 09:50:46PM -0500, Warren A. Layton wrote:
I am currently in the process of becoming a new maintainer. However, I'm
having trouble finding Debian developers near Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. I
know David Huggins-Daines lives here, but he hasn't replied to the 3
messages
On Sat, Oct 21, 2000 at 05:03:21PM +0200, Christian Marillat wrote:
YA $(MAKE) install DESTDIR=`pwd`/debian/tmp
This is dangerous, because if a package use i18n the Makefile
in po/ don't
understand DESTDIR, and all locale aren't installed.
YA :( :( :(
YA I guess the Makefile in
On Fri, Oct 20, 2000 at 12:16:21PM -0600, Wesley W. Terpstra wrote:
debian/rules:
make install DESTDIR=`pwd`/debian/tmp
BTW s/`pwd`/$(CURDIR)/
--
Digital Electronic Being Intended for Assassination and Nullification
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
On Sat, Oct 21, 2000 at 08:59:17PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
I fail to see how to run configure twice, with different options in the
build-stamp rule and then install both into the right place in the install
rule (I just get identical stuff pacakged in two locations),
Well, it's simple really
On Sun, Oct 22, 2000 at 02:46:18PM +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
debian/rules:
make install DESTDIR=`pwd`/debian/tmp
BTW s/`pwd`/$(CURDIR)/
Why not just
make install DESTDIR=debian/tmp
? I've never understood why an absolute path is needed for that command.
It's safer, because
On Sun, Oct 22, 2000 at 10:07:12AM -0400, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
I fail to see how to run configure twice, with different options in the
build-stamp rule and then install both into the right place in the install
rule (I just get identical stuff pacakged in two locations),
Well, it's
On Sun, Oct 22, 2000 at 06:03:07PM +0100, Steve Dobson wrote:
dh_testdir
mkdir option1-build-dir
cd option1-build-dir
../configure --with-one-set-of-options $(MAKE)
cd ..
Only you can't have cd's on separate lines, because it's a
On Tue, Oct 24, 2000 at 01:46:15PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
Is it ok to put a symlink in /usr/doc to link stcolortool to
stcolortool-lprng?
If stcolortool package has Depends: stcolortool-lprng. (or the other way
around, maybe I misunderstood you)
I modified the following target (from the
On Thu, Oct 26, 2000 at 09:08:00AM +0200, Marco Kuhlmann wrote:
1. Although the Debian Policy says that info documents should
be put into /usr/share/info, they really *shall* be put into
/usr/info for compatibility reasons.
No, actually, it's just the dir file that stays in /usr/info.
The
On Thu, Oct 26, 2000 at 10:36:40PM +0400, Alexander Kotelnikov wrote:
May be I am missing something, but who can tell me what does mean
DH_COMPAT variable?
The debhelper(1) manual page explains it.
New dh_make set it to 2 in rules and simple binary package built with this
rules appears to
On Mon, Oct 30, 2000 at 08:11:41AM +, Colin Watson wrote:
If I run 'dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot' as root, files belong to root,
which looks saner, but it doesn't ask for any GPG key.
Install the devscripts package and use 'debuild' instead, which has the
added bonus that it
On Mon, Oct 30, 2000 at 05:03:26PM -0700, Wesley W. Terpstra wrote:
I've got a package that would like to place files in /var/www.
Note that the admin can (and probably will) set his website root directory
to point to someplace else, so you should provide a README.Debian file
explaining how
On Tue, Oct 31, 2000 at 10:19:35AM +0200, Shaul Karl wrote:
The following is probably a dpkg or policy matter that I do not understand.
Can you explain it to me?
[10:12:54 /tmp]$ dpkg -S /var/cache/man
dpkg: /var/cache/man not found.
See the relevant bits from
On Fri, Nov 10, 2000 at 03:19:55PM +1100, Chanop Silpa-Anan wrote:
On my woody i386 box, when I try to build xiterm+thai-1.03-1 I've got the
wrong dependency from dh_libdeps. If I have xlib6 (3.3.6-13) installed, I'll
get the wrong dependency like
Depends: libc6 (=2.1.97), xlib6 (=3.3.6-4),
On Sat, Nov 11, 2000 at 10:58:49PM +0100, Mariusz Przygodzki wrote:
Is anybody know what's wrong if lintian sings:
defined(@array) is deprecated at /usr/share/lintian/checks/perl line 154
(Maybe you should just omit the defined()?)
defined(%hash) is deprecated at
On Sat, Nov 18, 2000 at 06:01:19PM +0100, Roberto Suarez Soto wrote:
Lintian (v1.117) complains about the 'config' and 'templates' file. I
Ignore it... debconf isn't certified by Policy, so lintian puts out a
warning, that's all.
Ok, but I was warned that lintian "dirty"
On Sat, Nov 18, 2000 at 12:27:57PM -0600, Clay Crouch wrote:
Lintian (v1.117) complains about the 'config' and 'templates' file. I
Ignore it... debconf isn't certified by Policy, so lintian puts out a
warning, that's all.
Ok, but I was warned that lintian "dirty"
On Wed, Nov 22, 2000 at 03:22:55AM +0800, zhaoway wrote:
i'm wondering where i could find info on the debian autobuilder.
What autobuilder?
in particular, i'm wondering if a `closes: Bug#X' in changelog
could actually close a bug in BTS ? Is that the preferred way to
close bugs ?
If
On Wed, Nov 22, 2000 at 05:40:48PM -0500, Joe Drew wrote:
I maintain distributed-net, which is created from multiple architectures
of upstream binary-only files. The problem is, I also need to depend on
another package, so on certain architectures (ie i386) ${shlibs:Depends}
is empty, and on
On Fri, Nov 24, 2000 at 01:04:13AM +0100, Denis Barbier wrote:
mandb: warning: /usr/share/man/man1/wml_aux_linklint.1.gz: whatis parse for
wml_aux_linklint(1) failed
i am a new Debian developer, and have no idea how to fix this bug.
It appears that previous Debian maintainers added some
On Sat, Nov 25, 2000 at 02:18:26PM +0100, Denis Barbier wrote:
mandb: warning: /usr/share/man/man1/wml_aux_linklint.1.gz: whatis parse for
wml_aux_linklint(1) failed
i am a new Debian developer, and have no idea how to fix this bug.
It appears that previous Debian maintainers added
On Sun, Nov 26, 2000 at 02:10:44PM +0100, peter karlsson wrote:
I have a program that is building against Qt 2.1 that I would like to
upload, but I notice that only Qt 2.2 is available in woody, and I
would prefer not to install Qt 2.2, since it requires XFree86 4.0.1,
which removes a number
On Sun, Nov 26, 2000 at 02:46:37PM +0100, peter karlsson wrote:
You can upload the sources only nowadays...
There are autobuilders for all platforms that handle the compilations
for me, then?
Yes, build daemons for i386, m68k, sparc, powerpc should be active.
I'm not sure about the alpha
On Mon, Nov 27, 2000 at 10:54:53PM +0100, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
E: libmstore0: pkg-without-shlibs-has-shlibs-control-file
N:
N: Though the package does not include any shared libraries, it does have
N: a shlibs control file.
N:
N: Processing binary package libicap0 (version 0.8-1) ...
On Fri, Dec 01, 2000 at 11:59:37PM +0300, Alexander Kotelnikov wrote:
Does the menu file perhaps have any opened quotes that aren't closed?
It seems to be ok. But if I delete everything the foregoing to these three
lines I get
E: fvwm: old-format-menu-file /usr/lib/menu/fvwm
from
On Fri, Dec 01, 2000 at 08:19:31PM -0500, Dave Baker wrote:
I'm using debconf to postinst the scsiadd package and lintian complains
about the unknown templates file. I've noticed that several other
packages also have this same lintian error if they use debconf.
Is this a known issue with
[BTW this is a genuine bug with the BTS, not related to -mentors list, so
let's move off of it]
On Tue, Sep 12, 2000 at 10:54:09AM +0200, Christian Hammers wrote:
I (aka [EMAIL PROTECTED]) get flooded by identical copies of the mail attached.
I count about 40 mails during the weekend and I get
On Wed, Dec 13, 2000 at 10:24:01AM +1100, Drew Parsons wrote:
If you don't want to do SGML, you could always edit the nroff source directly.
This is what has been done historically.
I wouldn't necessarily mind using SGML, but which tools exactly do you use.
For creating man pages I mean.
On Thu, Dec 14, 2000 at 11:13:14PM -0800, Mike Markley wrote:
As read from packaging-manual, there're two ways to handle
system specific config files, one to list them in debian/conffiles,
the other is (optionally write a /usr/bin/pkgxxxconfig to aid) to
write/modify the config file in
On Tue, Dec 19, 2000 at 01:39:13PM +0100, Christian Marillat wrote:
I've this strange output with lintian and I see nothing wrong in these
scripts (debhelper scripts)
W: sawfish-lisp-source: possible-bashism-in-maintainer-script postinst:4
[...]
if [ -d /usr/doc -a ! -e
On Sun, Dec 24, 2000 at 08:38:17PM +, John Leuner wrote:
I issue:
$ dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot
which subsequently does:
dpkg-source -b makeme-0.00
dpkg-source: building makeme using existing makeme_0.00.orig.tar.gz
gunzip: stdin: not in gzip format
dpkg-source: failure: gzip
On Tue, Dec 26, 2000 at 12:49:53AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've adopting xmorph and I've found a very old bug open. The bug is more
than 2 years old. Somebody couldn't load .tga files from gimp in xmorph.
I couldn't reproduce the error with gimp in stable and last version of
xmorph.
On Sat, Dec 30, 2000 at 01:56:05PM -0500, Bob Hilliard wrote:
Is it possible to create two binary debs with different version
numbers from one source package, using the standard debian package
building tools?
Yes. dpkg-gencontrol has an option, "-v", exactly for that purpose.
(If you
On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 11:00:11PM +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
The reason I wanted to try a recompressed tarball was that I use
cvs-buildpackage to make builds easier; if I have to futz about
copying the old .tar.gz into place it could be a little inconvenient,
but it's much better than
On Mon, Jan 22, 2001 at 05:39:56PM +0100, T.Pospisek's MailLists wrote:
A user reported to me that he can't find libstl for unstable. I checked
and it was available on my mirror and I told him so thinking maybe it was
a problem with pools and the package being somewhere in the middle of a
On Wed, Jan 24, 2001 at 03:38:09PM +0100, Rene Mayrhofer wrote:
What is the correct section for the freeswan (IPSec) package ? My sponsor
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh uploaded the package to non-US, but it does not get
installed into unstable (since about a week). Currently the section is
On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 01:43:29PM +0100, Domenico Andreoli wrote:
i'm looking for the incoming queue for non-US. as i see in the debian
developer reference, it seems it is reserved only for debian developer.
All of the upload queues are reserved for developers. The indirect queues
On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 06:45:43PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm a relatively new Debian maintainer, and I've now had several bugs filed
against some of my packages for which I never received email notification.
I've also had bugs filed for which I have received notification. I
was
On Fri, Jan 26, 2001 at 03:21:41PM -0500, Peter S Galbraith wrote:
I saw on package.d.o there is a quality percentage for each package. Would
you tell me how it counts? bug reports + lintian errors?
Those numbers have nothing to do with the quality of the
package; they refer to the
On Wed, Jan 31, 2001 at 10:24:07AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Although it hadn't been checked in, someone had already
made serious progress on the only package I knew I could
really get into working on.
How do I request that, at this time, I have no need for
anyone to be furthering
On Thu, Feb 01, 2001 at 01:39:04PM +0100, Andreas Schuldei wrote:
I want to read up on debian-bsd. I would like to do that in a
convenient and well supported manner.
Can I get the whole mbox (from where?) and read it at home?
Check out master.debian.org:~debian/lists/debian-bsd*
--
On Fri, Feb 02, 2001 at 03:22:04PM -0800, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
Does my gpg key need to be signed (I live in the sticks, so to speak,
probably not too many Debian developers around here), how do I get the
3.0 standards package to do all the things the older 2.6.x.x package
did, etc.
On Sun, Feb 04, 2001 at 01:22:07PM -0600, Ben Burton wrote:
Hi. I am packaging an application for which the original source installs
itself all into the same directory. In order to comply with the FHS, I have
split the application into pieces beneath /usr/lib, /usr/share and /usr/bin.
On Sun, Feb 04, 2001 at 10:54:00PM -0500, Jim Penny wrote:
Running lintian, I get warning
W: python-popy source: maintainer-script-lacks-debhelper-token debian/preinst
What is a debhelper token? Where does one put it to fix the problem
being warned about?
% echo 'W: python-popy source:
On Mon, Feb 05, 2001 at 11:06:27PM +1100, Drew Parsons wrote:
I am using dh_suidregister in my packages, one of those actually has to
register files as sgid games. How do I do that now with dpkg-stateoverride?
Is it enough to just set the permissions in debian/rules (as before) and
On Mon, Feb 26, 2001 at 10:43:03AM +0100, Ove Kaaven wrote:
In the current crafty (17.13-3) these files are conffiles (look in
debian/conffiles or debian/crafty.conffiles), which means that they will only
overwrite the existing versions if they have not been modified or the user
On Mon, Feb 26, 2001 at 01:21:06PM +0100, Ove Kaaven wrote:
In the current crafty (17.13-3) these files are conffiles (look in
debian/conffiles or debian/crafty.conffiles), which means that they will only
overwrite the existing versions if they have not been modified or the user
On Mon, Feb 26, 2001 at 01:32:21PM +0100, Ove Kaaven wrote:
It does not violate 13.3 because at the time the package is newly installed,
/usr/share/doc/ppp/examples/* exists.
...so the system administrator won't get a chance to delete them and won't
cause the program (the script) to
On Mon, Feb 26, 2001 at 03:15:59AM -1000, Brian Russo wrote:
This isn't a very constructive thing to argue anyway...
no, but it is amusing, popcorn anyone?
There ain't no such thing as free popcorn ;(
--
Digital Electronic Being Intended for Assassination and Nullification
--
To
On Mon, Feb 26, 2001 at 03:33:55AM -1000, Brian Russo wrote:
This isn't a very constructive thing to argue anyway...
no, but it is amusing, popcorn anyone?
There ain't no such thing as free popcorn ;(
This popping corn is available under the terms of the Free Food
License
On Wed, Feb 28, 2001 at 07:38:43PM +0100, Valentijn Sessink wrote:
Unfortunately, the xreboot sources have an Imakefile instead of a
Makefile. Now I don't know enough of imake to know if I should just run
xmkmf -a and edit the Makefile as if it were there already (I guess I
should *not* do
On Sat, Mar 03, 2001 at 11:08:37PM +1100, Sam Couter wrote:
NJAMD works by being loaded with LD_PRELOAD. The normal package contains a
shared object (libnjamd.so.0.0.8) and two symlinks to it (libnjamd.so.0 and
libnjamd.so), just like most shared objects.
Just put the file in a private
On Sun, Mar 04, 2001 at 11:39:46AM +1100, Sam Couter wrote:
Just put the file in a private directory (i.e. /usr/lib/njamd/ or so) and
you'll be fine. No symlinks are necessary I'd think.
If the library is in some directory other than a normal library directory,
the full path will have to
On Mon, Apr 09, 2001 at 06:01:08PM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
I am cleaning up my packages, and one improvement
I want to add is that network daemon runs under its
own UID, not nobody (as it was until now).
What is the best way of testing (and adding) a new username
in postinst?
On Mon, Apr 09, 2001 at 01:47:08AM -0500, Eric Gillespie, Jr. wrote:
I've CC'd the debian-mentors list in hopes that some NMs or
candidate NMs will volunteer. I offer to sponsor any uploads.
What about us existing maintainers, would it be possible for us to
volunteer? ;)
ghex
On Sat, Apr 21, 2001 at 10:08:12AM -0400, Bob Hilliard wrote:
Josip Rodin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hmm, did you run strip --remove-section=.comment --remove-section=.note on
the binaries?
Carlos Laviola [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Call strip with '--strip-unneeded' in your debian/rules
On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 12:28:03AM -0700, Joshua Haberman wrote:
I'm trying to do my part to take a load off the porters by ensuring my
package compiles on all available architectures. However, I'm running
into questions:
1. It seems the only machine with chroots available is vore. What
On Sat, Apr 28, 2001 at 05:12:52PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
I have a pending bug on an old package that does not yet exists in
debian archive.
What I have to do ?
Have I to close the bug signalling that the package has been removed
from debian or have I to inform someone that the
On Sat, Apr 28, 2001 at 06:47:51PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
I have a pending bug on an old package that does not yet exists in
debian archive.
snip
Give us more exact information about which packages are included.
There's no general rule...
(maybe I misread :)
OK, the
On Fri, May 04, 2001 at 10:46:56AM +0200, Robert Bihlmeyer wrote:
Us lazy people would like to save 9 letters on the clean call, and of
course we're far too far in sloth as to
alias dcln='fakeroot debian/rules clean'
I always keep a 'fakeroot debian/rules something' in the shell history, so
On Wed, May 16, 2001 at 10:07:09AM +0800, Niall Young wrote:
I'm creating a bunch of custom task packages, mostly empty with
dependencies but a few will need to contain configs and pre-filled
debconf entries.
It's not too clear from the NMG and the DDR on how to do this. I can
On Thu, May 17, 2001 at 11:38:06AM -0400, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
Suppose version 1 of the package had a file named /foo/A,
and version 2 had changed the location to be /bar/A.
Without doing anything special on the part of the developer, is it
always true that upgrading the package version
On Thu, May 17, 2001 at 10:12:29AM +0200, Robert Bihlmeyer wrote:
Right, but what I'm asking is how to include a handful of
plaintext files with filesystem locations in an otherwise
empty task-* package. Should I make a custom Makefile or
have I missed a useful dpkg tool to help with
On Sun, May 20, 2001 at 04:40:08PM +0200, peter karlsson wrote:
What does this error message mean?
No `START-INFO-DIR-ENTRY' and no `This file documents'.
install-info: unable to determine description for `dir' entry - giving up
Your info file should have something like this near the top:
On Sun, May 20, 2001 at 07:18:09PM +0200, peter karlsson wrote:
In Texinfo sources, you'd write that like this:
The source document is an SGML file, which is run through sgml2info.
There ought to be a way to do it in your SGML flavor, I guess...
It's either that or having to specify
On Tue, May 29, 2001 at 08:49:52PM +0200, peter karlsson wrote:
Lintian warns me about that I should add --section to install-info and
points me to check for a good section in /usr/share/info/dir, but that
directory doesn't exist on my system...
It's a file, it's called /usr/info/dir. You can
On Thu, May 31, 2001 at 10:36:34AM -0400, Jason Lunz wrote:
When I installed pure-ftpd_0.98.4-1_i386.deb , at the end of the
install pure-ftpd said Starting ftp server: pure-ftpd and nothing
else happened, i.e. I do not have the prompt, enter do not give me
the prompt.If I do a ps I cans
On Sun, Jun 03, 2001 at 11:40:26PM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
Most of the time, no. Upstream debian/ cruft gets in the way of the updated
debian/ files, especially if you need to delete files there. Even if
upstream keeps its debian/ up-to-date, it will still cause you trouble
On Tue, Jul 03, 2001 at 11:37:33AM +0200, peter karlsson wrote:
Can a single binary package have a different name than the source package
it comes from?
Yes, it can.
I am packaging the LysKOM tty-client, which has the upstream name
tty-client, but I have received requests for renaming the
On Fri, Jul 13, 2001 at 05:24:23PM +0200, Robert Bihlmeyer wrote:
The upstream author gave me a list, and he is reliable.
Since he keeps an eye on our BTS, why not try to persuade him to put
the bug# into his changelog, when he thinks a bug is down? That's
probably not significantly more
On Sat, Jul 14, 2001 at 12:21:53PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
* Fixed in previous upload: Closes #xxx, #yyy, #zzz
That makes no sense to me; it's just noise in the changelog (and it
doesn't tell the submitter anything useful, since it doesn't say *how*
Hear, hear. The real reason
On Fri, Jul 20, 2001 at 10:21:37AM +0200, Robert Bihlmeyer wrote:
It should be noted that this requirement is broken when your rules
have something like:
install: install-stamp
install-stamp: build-stamp
install stuff
chown someuser stuff
binary-arch:
On Fri, Jul 20, 2001 at 11:24:31AM -0400, Richard A Nelson wrote:
install: install-stamp
install-stamp: build-stamp
install stuff
chown someuser stuff
binary-arch: install-stamp
build package
BTW install-stamp is evil, don't use it.
I've
On Wed, Jul 25, 2001 at 08:29:09AM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
FWIW, I get virtually no spam through my debian.org e-mail address which
is what appears on that page.
I am getting a W32.Sircam virus attachment every few hours through
[EMAIL PROTECTED] It is beginning to drive me nuts.
On Wed, Jul 25, 2001 at 12:57:36AM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
FWIW, I get virtually no spam through my debian.org e-mail address which
is what appears on that page.
I am getting a W32.Sircam virus attachment every few hours through
[EMAIL PROTECTED] It is beginning to drive me nuts
On Wed, Aug 01, 2001 at 09:28:08PM -0400, Peter S Galbraith wrote:
Should the new powstatd (say 1.5.1-2) have:
Package: powstatd
Version: 1.5.1-2
Provides: ups-monitor
Conflicts: powstatd-crypt, ups-monitor
Replaces: powstatd-crypt ( 1.5.1-2)
Does the version in the Replaces add
On Thu, Aug 09, 2001 at 09:52:49PM -0700, Tor Slettnes wrote:
I need to orphan a package that's specific to the ARM architecture,
because my Netwinder broke down (We had some severe power spikes about
a month ago, which killed it). I no longer have an ARM build machine.
The Debian
On Sun, Aug 26, 2001 at 04:33:07PM -0500, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
close 60852
Bug#60852: glimpse: full of temp races
Bug closed, send any further explanations to Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[snipped a lot of the same]
People! Yes,
On Sun, Sep 02, 2001 at 02:26:03PM +0200, Martin Albert wrote:
Using 'close' to close bugs, especially those which arn't really
fixed but just no longer useful, is WRONG. The submitter only gets
If this abuse continues, I might just exercise my ability to
disable the close command
On Sat, Sep 08, 2001 at 11:17:47PM +0300, Baruch Even wrote:
I've taken over wvdial package with permission. The package had several
bugs fixed in former NMUs and I've uploaded a new version to fix another
one, but the bugs fixed in former NMUs are still marked as fixed in NMU
instead of
On Sun, Sep 09, 2001 at 12:27:11AM +0300, Baruch Even wrote:
I've taken over wvdial package with permission. The package had several
bugs fixed in former NMUs and I've uploaded a new version to fix another
one, but the bugs fixed in former NMUs are still marked as fixed in NMU
instead
On Sun, Sep 09, 2001 at 01:36:31AM +0300, Baruch Even wrote:
I've taken over wvdial package with permission. The package had several
bugs fixed in former NMUs and I've uploaded a new version to fix another
one, but the bugs fixed in former NMUs are still marked as fixed in NMU
On Thu, Sep 13, 2001 at 12:01:29PM +0200, Christian Marillat wrote:
I received a bug report #112103, where somebody complains because my
debian/rules doesn't work with ash.
Is there a good reason to change this file ?
Either fix the nonPOSIXism in the rules file or declare SHELL=/bin/bash.
On Fri, Sep 14, 2001 at 06:16:23PM -0600, Matt Kraai wrote:
[Please CC me, as I'm not on the list.]
I'd like to package an alpha release of Tux of Math Command[1].
The upstream version number is 2001.09.07-0102. I believe that
upstream will eventually move to the x.y.z numbering scheme.
On Wed, Sep 19, 2001 at 07:16:49AM +0200, peter karlsson wrote:
without seeing the files, why is changelog not human readable?
Well, because it has a lot of noise, with minor changes to files that
are not interesting for those that do not download the source package.
The NEWS file, on the
On Sun, Sep 30, 2001 at 04:29:14AM +0200, Christian Surchi wrote:
If I have a package that changed its name because of upstream
maintainer's choice, should I merge new and old changelogs or what?
I'd do that.
--
2. That which causes joy or happiness.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Wed, Oct 10, 2001 at 11:26:00AM -0700, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
Now running lintian...
W: komba2: menu-item-contains-unknown-tag kderemove
/usr/lib/menu/komba2:7
Finished running lintian.
How can I correct this ?
what does kderemove do? I have never seen this, nor is it in
On Fri, Oct 26, 2001 at 06:23:53PM +0200, Amaya wrote:
I am trying to reopen a bug, tag it and merge it with a more recent one.
This is the answer I get from the BTS:
Debian Bug Tracking System said:
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reopen 109629
Bug number 109629 not found.
On Sun, Oct 28, 2001 at 01:26:37AM -0200, Carlos Laviola wrote:
On Fri, Oct 26, 2001 at 06:23:53PM +0200, Amaya wrote:
I am trying to reopen a bug, tag it and merge it with a more recent one.
This is the answer I get from the BTS:
Debian Bug Tracking System said:
Processing commands
On Fri, Oct 26, 2001 at 05:27:25PM -0500, Colin Watson wrote:
I am trying to reopen a bug, tag it and merge it with a more recent one.
This is the answer I get from the BTS:
[...]
I guess it's older than 28 days, but... can't I access it anymore?
Unfortunately not, although the BTS
1 - 100 of 398 matches
Mail list logo
