On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 8:02 PM, Paul Wise [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can you paste the binary-indep/binary-arch targets of your debian/rules file?
Perhaps you are missing a call to dpkg-gencontrol/dh_gencontrol?
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
On Sat, Oct 4, 2008 at 1:35 AM, Jann Horn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
dpkg-genchanges: failure: cannot read files list file: No such
file or directory
H.
Can you paste the binary-indep/binary-arch targets of your debian/rules file?
--
bye,
pabs
On Sat, Oct 4, 2008 at 4:28 AM, Jann Horn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I uploaded a package, but it causes the following message:
...
N: dpkg-source searches for this in
N: ../package_upstream-version.orig.tar.gz.
N:
As the warning suggests, the tarball needs to be named
On Sat, Oct 4, 2008 at 8:50 AM, Kapil Hari Paranjape [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is a guide covering some of the basic issues at
http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer/column/libpkg-guide/libpkg-guide.html
Unfortunately it doesn't yet cover using symbols files, for more info
on that see these:
On Sun, Oct 5, 2008 at 2:35 PM, ivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I try build debian package, but see error:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/data/soft/pkg/astral/libastral-0.4% dpkg-buildpackage
...
install -s
libastral.so /data/soft/pkg/astral/libastral-0.4/debian/tmp/usr/lib/
install: указанная цель
Hi Rex,
Just now I was looking for a way to remove attachments in evolution.
While searching I found your plugin on mentors.debian.net. Since I'd
like to use it (and therefore upload it to Debian), here is a review:
Firstly it didn't actually work as expected. I attached your .dsc file
to this
On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 10:18 AM, Charles Plessy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
just for curiosity, how does recoverjpeg compare to photorec?
A year ago I tried to get recoverjpeg, recoverPhotos and PhotoRec to
merge into PhotoRec, at the time it appeared there was no difference
between recoverjpeg
On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 9:10 PM, Shankaranarayanan Rajakkannan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I need some help in creating Linux debian packages. I am interested in
knowing how to create deb files using my source code. i saw checkinstall,
but it is specific to my computer, which i do not want to
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 12:14 PM, Rex Tsai [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, the behavior is designed for purpose. I have many business
emails with large attachments, and I like to keep the emails for record
without the attachments. So, the plugin would not actually delete it but
replace a
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 9:46 PM, Michal Čihař [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- dget
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/cuneiform/cuneiform_0.4.dfsg.1-1.dsc
Not Found.
It appears a new version was uploaded:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/cuneiform/
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 10:01 PM, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
could be in main? (so is dfsg)
Yes.
I think that yes, but I must admit that the legal stuff is something unclear
to me. Something as the classical licenses are clear, but this custom makes
me crazy.
It is
On Sat, Oct 18, 2008 at 8:18 AM, Ben Finney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You might want to investigate the 'pbuilder' package for maintaining a
chroot specifically to build your packages inside.
You should also test your packages in unstable too.
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
On Sun, Oct 19, 2008 at 3:55 PM, Elías A. M. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/j/jigzo/
First issue: the package is a native package, instead of a normal
package (.dsc, .diff.gz and .orig.tar.gz). Likely you just need to
rename jigzo_0.6.1-1.tar.gz to
On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 6:14 AM, Ben Finney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Eric Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I need to run a script as part of debian/rules. I can't rely on it
being executable when unpacked, since dpkg-source doesn't preserve the
mode.
Specifically, files that are created by
On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 3:56 PM, Robert Wohlrab [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there a site/README were I can read more about that upcoming changes?
Search for Format: 3.0 (quilt) in the dpkg-source manual page:
http://manpages.debian.net/cgi-bin/man.cgi?query=dpkg-source
As for when this format
On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 11:24 PM, Jose Luis Blanco
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2) chm (MS' compressed html format) help files: Is it preferred to include
only
HTML help files in foo-doc packages? I find CHM files quite useful for
example,
for searching, but I don't know if there's any policy
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 3:10 AM, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, I decided to stop talking about contributing to Debian and start
*actually* contributing to Debian.
Excellent!
acpi-support, so I looked it up on PTS and got started. Maybe this isn't
the right way to
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 2:31 PM, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there anything I can do here to move the fixes from sid to lenny? I
know this is normally automated, but I seem to remember that lenny is in
deep freeze so packages don't get auto-migrated anymore. (?)
Check
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 1:12 AM, GouNiNi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't know if I'm on the good place...
The maintainer's email would have been better.
Someone know why qmail is not packaged to provide binary?
I guess the maintainer didn't find the time to update it and move it
to main
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 7:45 AM, Pau Garcia i Quiles
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In the latest version (2.2.0-1), I added a symbols file I generated on my
i386 machine. Turns out witty requires a different symbols file for each
platform (i. e. the amd64 symbols file is not the same as the i386
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 7:21 AM, André Gaul [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://web-yard.de/user/public/[EMAIL
PROTECTED]/debian/libalberta2_2.0.1-1.dsc
Since this is a library, it should probably use the new symbols files
feature, to make shlibs as minimal as possible and also to detect ABI
On Sat, Nov 1, 2008 at 5:43 AM, Heikki Mäntysaari
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/n/neotool/neotool_1.2-1.dsc
A review of your package:
Please send the manual page, .desktop file and menu icon upstream if
you have not already.
Please ask upstream to split
On Sat, Nov 1, 2008 at 2:29 PM, Paul Wise [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The contents of README.debian should be merged into debian/copyright.
One thing I forgot, not shipping the SVG used to generate the XPM file
is both a GPL violation and a DFSG violation (#2). I think it would
also be a good idea
On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 6:37 AM, Eric Pozharski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hence the problem; Sometimes I FTBFS some package -- because
Build-Depends either misses some package or lacks explicitly set
relation.
FTBFS itself doesn't make problem for me (each time I'd managed to
figure out a
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 7:45 AM, M G Berberich
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/plotmm/plotmm_0.1.2-1.dsc
A review of your source package:
Package descriptions need work, please ask for a review on the
debian-l10n-english email list.
Since the
On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 6:41 AM, Norman Messtorff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- dget
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/postfixadmin/postfixadmin_2.2.1.1-1.dsc
A review of your source package:
Please send your changes upstream if you haven't already.
The cp calls can be moved into
On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 5:54 AM, Giuseppe Iuculano [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/mod-spamhaus/mod-spamhaus_0.6-1.dsc
A review of your source package:
debian/watch should use the standard sf qa redirector, please read the
uscan manual page.
The upstream
On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 7:09 PM, Giuseppe Iuculano [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is a LICENSE file, isn't it enough?
License and copyright holder are two different things. Licenses
specify what you are allowed to do with the work, the copyright holder
information tells you who is giving you a
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 2:15 AM, Giuseppe Iuculano [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/mod-spamhaus/mod-spamhaus_0.7-1.dsc
Some more things:
Your package description needs some grammar fixes, please ask for a
review on debian-l10n-english.
You don't specify
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 12:42 PM, Paul Wise [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Upstream's license grant is unclear about the GPL version; either
version 3 of the License. doesn't make sense.
In addition, the Makefile and the source code say it is GPL v2 or
later. I think upstream should make up
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 10:43 PM, Giuseppe Iuculano [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Fixed and uploaded again on mentors.
Sorry about this, but I just noticed that there is already a DNSBL
module for apache2 in Debian (libapache2-mod-defensible). Please
investigate if mod-spamhaus is useful to add
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 11:29 PM, Giuseppe Iuculano [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, I know, but I prefer (and I'm using) mod-spamhaus because:
Fair enough, I've uploaded the package.
Thanks for your work, please mail debian-mentors for future uploads
and I'll upload if I am able.
--
bye,
pabs
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 8:22 PM, David Faerman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i need use asterisk 1.4.21 which is in intrepid but my system is hardy...
there is 1.4.17 for hardy but it is a bit old...
i tried to change the control file (debian/control) in the 1.4.21 whit
the control file from 1.4.17
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 11:19 AM, Kumar Appaiah
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1. Is there a way to set an arbitrary environment variable while
running pbuilder (in my case, LD_LIBRARY_PATH).
grep export ~/.pbuilderrc
export CCACHE_DIR=/var/cache/pbuilder/ccache
export PATH=/usr/lib/ccache:${PATH}
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 2:23 PM, José Fonseca [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm planning to request lintian override. If anybody has a better
suggestion please let me know.
Never mind -- I've just learned about --as-needed ld flag that solves
both issues.
Please also contact upstream about
On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 12:37 PM, Charles Plessy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am working on a package that, when unmodified, fails on 32bits arches
because
-m64 is in the CFLAGS. We solved the problem by patching the configure file,
but of course this breaks when new upstream releases refresh
On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 3:01 AM, Jonathan Wiltshire
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/copher/copher_0.1.2-3.dsc
A review of your source package:
Standards-Version doesn't need the final .0, 3.8.0.X versions are compatible.
Depends should have
On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 3:44 PM, Jonathan Wiltshire
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ah, this fixes a query I had from long ago: I had ${misc:Depends} in
the build dependencies and it broke things, now that it's in Depends
everything is as expected.
build-deps
What does this substitution get
On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 3:50 PM, Paul Wise [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 3:44 PM, Jonathan Wiltshire
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ah, this fixes a query I had from long ago: I had ${misc:Depends} in
the build dependencies and it broke things, now that it's in Depends
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 8:39 AM, Neil Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This seems to bring up the issue if m.d.n should reject packages with
ubuntu in their version strings.
I agree - it would seem a fairly simple and painless step. I cannot see
a valid reason for retaining a ubuntu version
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 8:02 PM, Thibaut [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have noticed that one of my packages, yorick-ml4, is completely broken on
amd64 and presumably all other 64-bit archs. Because the package is unusable
on all amd64 machines (and more), I believe this is a release critical bug
On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 1:30 AM, Jonathan Wiltshire
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/copher/copher_0.1.2-4.dsc
More comments:
It is best not to speculate about future features in the package
description, please remove the last line.
Uhhh, Depends: is a
On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 4:51 PM, Thorsten Schmale
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/monkey/monkey_0.9.2-4.dsc
Firstly, please do not send HTML mail:
http://www.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct
You should not modify the changelog entries of versions
On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 5:59 PM, Jonathan Wiltshire
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My adopted package gxemul has a bug in Ubuntu[1] (seg fault on command
line parameters) which reproduces in the current Debian package. It has
been fixed recently in upstream's CVS so I plan to add a patch for the
On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 6:34 PM, Neil Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Maybe both of these should be default criteria for sponsoring? The
first upload of any non-native package should either include the
Homepage field or an explanation of why there might be no homepage.
I don't think this
On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 7:53 PM, Neil Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Right now, I'm looking for as many filters as possible until I can make
more time available for sponsoring, whilst also trying to help
maintainers make it easy for me to spot the packages that I *will*
sponsor (RC bugs).
On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 8:00 PM, Jonathan Wiltshire
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can you advise further or point me to somewhere to find out more? I've
never used testing-proposed-updates, but it would be a good thing to
learn about.
http://www.debian.org/doc/developers-reference/pkgs.html#t-p-u
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 7:18 AM, Jonathan Wiltshire
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do you think it is severe enough to be put forward for lenny?
I'm not sure. The patch looks straight-forward enough, so perhaps the
release team would approve it.
PS: it is a good idea to document in your patches why
On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 2:50 PM, Richard Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/k/kde-style-skulpture/kde-style-skulpture_0.2.0-1.dsc
I'm not a KDE persion, but why do you embed parts of CDBS/debhelper in
the source package?
Please also add
[ Please reply to -mentors at least ]
On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 5:37 PM, S'orlok Reaves [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have split libwaitzar off from scim-waitzar and built a separate package:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/scim-waitzar/
On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 4:26 AM, Matthew Palmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It builds these binary packages:
hexec - The hexec tool itself
That's a really crap short description.
Quite. Please read the developers reference:
On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 8:10 PM, Jonathan Wiltshire
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/copher/copher_0.1.2+20081201.dsc,
if there are other points to fix just let me know.
A few comments:
Your package version does not include a Debian revision number.
I
On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 7:49 PM, Jonathan Wiltshire
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Uploaded to
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/copher/copher_0.1.2+20081201-1.dsc
if you have a chance to look.
I just noticed that releaseforge already exists in Debian. From the
description it sounds like
On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 9:07 PM, Jonathan Wiltshire
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Copher is command line base rather than a GUI, is platform independent,
and works with other -forge-like sites (ex. Rubyforge) and protocols.
So I think it's not a replacement, but complimentary to releaseforge.
Fair
On Sat, Dec 6, 2008 at 11:42 PM, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One, there is no upstream tarball. There is a tagged svn release, but
it includes a lot of superfluous software, such as Sun's non-free JRE
(OpenJDK seems to work fine now), and build environments for Windows
On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 7:02 AM, Jonathan Wiltshire
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/w/whohas/whohas_0.21-1.dsc
Even if you are unable to sponsor I would appreciate a review.
Here is a review:
Why do you have Vcs-Browser, but not Vcs-Git?
${shlibs:Depends}
On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 10:18 PM, Paul Wise [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please file a bug about this.
I forgot to ask you to ask the release team for binNMUs for the
packages using those symbols once the shlibs is fixed.
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 4:01 PM, Jonathan Wiltshire
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Uploaded to
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/w/whohas/whohas_0.21-2.dsc
Uploaded.
In the next upload, please remove the duplicate space in the last
paragraph of the description.
Why was your orig.tar.gz not
On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 9:40 PM, Andy Hawkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
New symbols. It specifically has support for embedding images into the FLAC
file. This was introduced in 1.2.
Looks like you just found an RC bug in libflac++6 - includes new
symbols in version 1.2.1-1 according to mole but
On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 7:02 PM, Andy Hawkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I need to force the version of one particular component.
Why is that?
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 1:03 AM, Neil Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Cyril, we've had this discussion before - merely adding symbols does
NOT require a SONAME bump.
We are not talking about SONAME bumps, but shlib bumps.
Take a look at glib2.0, libgtk+2.0 and libqof1 - symbols are added
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 1:15 AM, Neil Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Cyril, we need to sort this out for that RC bug that doesn't exist but
which you raised the severity - adding a new symbol is NOT a bug, as
long as it is done properly (as above).
It is up to the package using the library
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 1:38 AM, Matthew Palmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sure, if the package that is building needs those symbols. But what about
other packages that *don't* necessarily need those symbols, but get built
against the newer version of the library anyway? Those symbols can end
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 12:36 AM, karthik ramalingam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can anyone please let me know how should i do it. I already did the
procedure, but i am not getting anythin.
Please upload the debian/ directory somewhere so we can tell you what
you did wrong.
--
bye,
pabs
On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 10:18 PM, Salvatore Bonaccorso
salvatore.bonacco...@gmail.com wrote:
I would simply proceed by removing the non-free parts from source
tarball and repackage the sources.
And maybe ask upstream to distribute the non-free bits separately.
Also ask them if it would be
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 4:02 PM, Salvatore Bonaccorso
salvatore.bonacco...@gmail.com wrote:
After some rechearch since ZipArchive uses a slightly modified zlib to
fit it's need it seams not easy to use system zlib.
Perhaps you could convice upstream to push those changes into zlib upstream?
On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 9:37 PM, Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org wrote:
Neil Williams codeh...@debian.org (19/12/2008):
- Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, ${misc:Depends}, ${xserver:Depends}
+ Depends: libts-0.0-0 (= 1.0-5), ${shlibs:Depends}, ${misc:Depends},
${xserver:Depends}
That's ugly. Use
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 10:19 AM, Balázs Hámorszky bal...@gmail.com wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1:0.4.2-1.1
of my package ming.
Did you try to contact the maintainer before preparing this NMU?
You didn't document any of the debian/ changes in the debian/changelog
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 7:47 PM, Balázs Hámorszky bal...@gmail.com wrote:
I've made a bugreport:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=509401
That isn't much notice for an NMU (especially for a package in
experimental) and also it isn't recommended to upload new upstreams in
an NMU.
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 11:17 PM, Stuart Anderson ander...@netsweng.com wrote:
Did you try to contact the maintainer before preparing this NMU?
Unless it got mistakenly overlooked, or mistaken for spam, I was not
contacted. I'm not dead yet, and an inquiry is usually sufficient to
get
On Sun, Dec 28, 2008 at 6:18 AM, Daniel Aleksandersen wrote:
I requested furl because I think it is much easier to use than the
alternates.
I know other programs does simular tasks, but furl formates the outbut
better.
Also, it does not require any deeper knowledge to get it working.
furl
On Sun, Dec 28, 2008 at 6:04 PM, Martin Godisch mar...@godisch.de wrote:
I'm not doing library packaging all day and I'm a bit unsure about the
new sleuthkit upstream release. It would be nice if some of you could
have a look at sleuthkit 3.0.0 here [1] and 2.0.5 in unstable and tell
me what
On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 4:48 AM, Jonathan Wiltshire
deb...@jwiltshire.org.uk wrote:
I've uploaded whohas/0.21-3 to m.d.n which has patches to close bugs
5099975, 510019 and 509981. They have gone upstream for his next
release.
Uploaded.
Next time, please depend on ${DPATCH_STAMPFN} instead
On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 5:12 AM, George Danchev danc...@spnet.net wrote:
Why is libfoo-X-dev better than libfooX-dev, where 'X' is being some sort of
API version discriminator ?
Both of those are the same, my comment was about libfooABI-API-dev vs
libfoo-API-dev.
--
bye,
pabs
On Wed, Dec 31, 2008 at 10:09 AM, Stefanos Harhalakis v...@v13.gr wrote:
The upload would fix these bugs: 507655, 510275
Firstly, there was no need to file 510275, instead you should have
just retitled the RFP 507655 to ITP and marked yourself as the owner.
Please read these:
On Wed, Dec 31, 2008 at 11:38 AM, Jonathan Wiltshire
deb...@jwiltshire.org.uk wrote:
Ok, sorry for the noise. I wasn't sure how closely you were watching
-mentors.
NP. I watch it quite closely, reading all the mails at least daily.
I've uploaded 0.21-4 to m.d.n which closes bugs 510189,
On Sat, Jan 3, 2009 at 6:50 AM, Peter Collingbourne pe...@pcc.me.uk wrote:
I am seeking comments on my package clojure;
Some comments on the diff.gz:
Please send the manual pages and patches upstream if appropriate and
you have not already.
Since the copyright/licensing is slightly complex,
On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 5:41 AM, Mahyuddin Susanto udi...@gmail.com wrote:
Upstream Author : Mohammad DAMT md...@gnome.org
URL: http://code.google.com/p/aksara-nusantara/
Licence: GNU General Public License v2
Uhh, if they haven't already, please ask upstream to add the GPL Font
Exception to
On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 9:38 AM, Jonathan Wiltshire deb...@jwiltshire.org.uk
On Wed, Dec 31, 2008 at 11:51:26AM +0900, Paul Wise wrote:
It might be a good idea to allow some kind of config file to override
the URLs/regexes, this would be useful for when the external websites
change
On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 5:11 PM, Robert David
robert.david.pub...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, I need to pack evolution and evolution-data-server with some extras
patched. But didnt find a way how to do that best to be user friendly.
I would suggest to get those patches included in evolution upstream
On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 4:02 PM, S'orlok Reaves sorlok_rea...@yahoo.com wrote:
Packages uploaded to mentors:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/libwaitzar/
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/scim-waitzar/
Review, replies below.
It might be a good idea to produce a kanaung
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 8:22 AM, Jonathan Wiltshire
deb...@jwiltshire.org.uk wrote:
I have uploaded whohas 0.22-1 to m.d.n, which is a new upstream
integrating a lot of the bugs, and some tweaks to the packaging because
of his changes.
...
I've also included a NEWS file detailing the patches
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 7:19 PM, Jonathan Wiltshire
deb...@jwiltshire.org.uk wrote:
On Thu, Jan 08, 2009 at 03:26:45PM +0900, Paul Wise wrote:
I've also included a NEWS file detailing the patches
that are still active.
I don't think that is an appropriate use of NEWS.Debian, documenting
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 7:48 PM, Jonathan Wiltshire
deb...@jwiltshire.org.uk wrote:
On Thu, Jan 08, 2009 at 07:37:52PM +0900, Paul Wise wrote:
I interpret that as being the changes since earlier versions of the
package, rather than changes to the upstream source code.
Ok, if you think
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 8:51 PM, Jonathan Wiltshire
deb...@jwiltshire.org.uk wrote:
On Thu, Jan 08, 2009 at 07:52:37PM +0900, Paul Wise wrote:
Either is fine, slight leaning towards no need for a bump (so I don't
have to remember to use debuild -v...).
NP, uploaded to the same location.
I'd
On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 4:27 PM, S'orlok Reaves sorlok_rea...@yahoo.com wrote:
Are you able to ship the spec in the source package and generate
Myanmar.model from the spec at build time? Or ship a myanmar-spec
source package that builds and installs the the Model file?
Unfortunately, no. The
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 8:36 AM, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso
jord...@gmail.com wrote:
However, the library comes with many example programs, which currently
are compiled, *but not shipped in the binary*. What's the best way to
solve this? The GSL created a gsl-bin package where the examples go,
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 11:48 AM, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso
jord...@gmail.com wrote:
Compiling them during package build is also fine; it can be viewed as
a kind of test suite, which is always good.
But it takes a long-ass time to compile them, especially since all of
CImg has to be compiled
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 2:15 PM, Deng Xiyue
manphiz-gu...@users.alioth.debian.org wrote:
I'm now CCing debian...@lists.debian.org to query the MIA
status of Qingning Huo q...@mayhq.co.uk, and asking for suggestions
for the current situation: whether to continue this NMU or to
co-maintain the
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 5:07 PM, Ben Finney ben+deb...@benfinney.id.au wrote:
Okay. So is there a normal way to have the '-v' option during a run
set to include all entries newer than what's currently in Debian?
Or do I have to remember to set it manually each time I add a new
release and
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 5:40 PM, Ben Finney ben+deb...@benfinney.id.au wrote:
usually you would remember because you'd debdiff and interdiff
against the .deb and .diff.gz in the archive.
How will those help me to get information about the package I'm about
to build *before* issuing the
On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 7:03 PM, S'orlok Reaves sorlok_rea...@yahoo.com wrote:
Which fonts are these? I'm wary of adding fonts to source packages;
usually either the font is a copyright violation or should
be packaged separately.
It was just the Myanmar 3 font, which (according to a page on
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 1:12 AM, S'orlok Reaves sorlok_rea...@yahoo.com wrote:
If a third-party developer wants to create their own Myanmar.model, then they
will need their own language model software. (For example, they might use
weighted-difference pruning). Again, MyanmarList_v2.txt gives
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 4:26 PM, S'orlok Reaves sorlok_rea...@yahoo.com wrote:
Quick question between talks; is any of this language model
software FOSS-licensed?
There's
From my understanding, these are both free and provide source, but their
licenses restrict them from being FOSS.
On Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 3:02 PM, ukch j...@kazbak.co.uk wrote:
Thanks for the reply. Since posting my original RFS I fixed a lot of
the problems listed by Lintian. However, my Lintian did not list quite
as many problems as yours did (namely, 'build-depends-without-arch-dep
python-lxml' and
Please notify the security team of the code duplication in your package.
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 12:17 AM, Luca Niccoli lultimou...@gmail.com wrote:
The original tarball already contains a debian subdirectory (which
needs some corrections anyway), how should I deal with that?
Once lenny is released (hint hint) you will be able to just use the
dpkg-source v3 format,
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 10:06 AM, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso
jord...@gmail.com wrote:
- dget
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/q/qrupdate/qrupdate_1.0-1.dsc
Some comments on just the diff.gz:
You should use a Debian-specific SONAME if upstream doesn't have one.
Please teach upstream
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 12:24 AM, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso
jord...@gmail.com wrote:
patches/add-soname seems to change the whitespace in the definition of SRC,
why?
Why not? It fits into 80 columns that way. :-)
Just a gratuitous change, also unrelated to the purpose of the patch.
On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 1:55 PM, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso
jord...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/1/29 Paul Wise p...@debian.org:
tab character before the Source: package name in debian/control
Hm, I don't see this...
Look at the diff.gz with less.
I don't see it there either. Heisenbug.
hexedit
1 - 100 of 2536 matches
Mail list logo
