Le Sat, Apr 13, 2002 at 08:13:15PM +0200, Robert Bihlmeyer écrivait:
but still URL:
http://ftp-master.debian.org/testing/update_excuses.html.gz
shows:
* freenet-unstable (0.4.3+20020328-1 to 0.4.3+20020409-1)
* Maintainer: Robert Bihlmeyer
* Too young, only 1 of 10 days old
Le Fri, Aug 09, 2002 at 03:24:20PM +0200, Sven LUTHER écrivait:
So i would like to know, which of the gnome approach (uploading to
experimental) or the perl approach (using a staging area) is better or
more recomended, and also if there is some documentation available on
building a staging
Hi people,
I already proposed this a long time ago. I want to use the BTS to manage
the sponsorship request. I think it's a good idea because the current
CGI is awful (no way to update his own entry, hosted on a non debian
machine) and because the BTS can easily fullfill that role.
The current
Le Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 04:57:38AM +1000, Anthony Towns écrivait:
need to convince me that it's good. If that turns out to be harder than
doing it yourself, then do it yourself. Whatever. The only way you're
Why do I always find things to do that I can't do myself ?
Be sure that if I could
Le Mon, Aug 26, 2002 at 07:38:17PM +0200, Peter Palfrader écrivait:
I disagree. I don't see how this could work. FWIW I sponsor single
uploads of single packages. People seeking sponsors should mail to
-mentors. a BTS is not needed.
The BTS is to keep track of who request uploads of each
Le Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 06:57:11AM +1000, Anthony Towns écrivait:
And, as usual, we're obsessed about overruling people and forcing the
issue instead of working through the problems that other people have
identified.
What problem has been identified ?
I've seen no real problem !
Saying a
Le Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 01:12:46PM +0200, Peter Palfrader écrivait:
Sorry, you're just unconstructive... what overhead
The overhead of managing the bug.
It's not your work, but the sponsoree work. And managing the bug is not
harder for the sponsoree than managing its CGI entry or anything
Le Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 01:05:31PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli écrivait:
It's not bad, is an hack. Fullfill our need but isn't the right place.
It's a smart hack. As is the ftp.debian.org or lists.debian.org
pseudo-package ...
This has also a drawback: reconstructing history of threads between
Le Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 05:31:20PM +0200, Rune B. Broberg écrivait:
You are the person trying to change something, you should prove your
point, instead of worrying about people not proving why this should not
be established.
I'm the guy who invented sponsorship, I'm the one who wrote the
Le Thu, Aug 29, 2002 at 02:00:40PM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen écrivait:
Most of my sponsorees haven't come from the CGI of yours, but from
this list, or #debian-devel.
I know that. I observe myself that the CGI is most of the time out of
touch with the reality. That's why I want to get rid of it.
Le Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 06:09:53PM +0100, Mark Brown écrivait:
The BTS is all well and good but it isn't the answer to all our
problems.
It's the same for all bugs (even bugs on usual packages), people learn
to CC the submitter or to use the [EMAIL PROTECTED] form. And as you
said,
Le Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 12:16:11PM -0300, Leo Costela écrivait:
(again, I obviously don't), but you could be more concise and just make
up a list of Pro's and Con's for each system, then we could stand on
Duh, the various arguments have been given numerous times already.
I'll sum up yet
Le Thu, Aug 29, 2002 at 03:27:17PM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen écrivait:
| That's why I want us to switch to use the BTS.
This is usually called shotgun debugging. Try another solution until
you find one which fits. Obviously, this is not a good way to debug
problems.
Well, I have reasons to
Le Thu, Aug 29, 2002 at 10:12:18PM +0100, Andrew Suffield écrivait:
We've had this discussion before, on -newmaint, and other places. Go
and find a better idea does not mean Try and push the same idea on a
different group of people.
Because you're the one who will make the ultimate decision ?
Le Tue, Oct 01, 2002 at 08:09:56PM -0400, sbt écrivait:
Hi,
Hi,
I am not (yet) a developer and have indicated my intention to adopt the
recently-orphaned package xeuklides to start the process of becoming
one. In the process of making the simple changes to adopt it, I
discovered that
On Wed, 24 Jun 2009, xiangfu wrote:
Hi
I want to be a New Maintainer, so I follow Debian New Maintainers' Guide
but when a use dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot
Please use debian-mentors@lists.debian.org for your packaging questions.
dpkg-gencontrol: error: must specify package since control
On Sun, 06 Dec 2009, Erik Schanze wrote:
Hi,
[Sorry for crossposting to debian-dpkg, but perhaps they could clarify this.
Orig. post was: http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2009/12/msg00075.html]
dpkg plays zero role in that problem, -devel would have been more
appropriate.
As far as I
On Wed, 26 Sep 2007, varun_shrivastava wrote:
i have made a package which is a simple gtk application.
it depends on gtk-directfb-2.0.so.0 ,
i included this library in the depends field in control file.
Please ask on debian-mentors, it's made for people who learn packaging.
after creating
On Tue, 18 Apr 2006, Neil Williams wrote:
On Tuesday 18 April 2006 9:26 am, Adriaan Peeters wrote:
Hello,
What is the correct way to handle copyright statements for translations?
When the package has only a few translations, I can easily add the
copyright statements to debian/copyright,
Hi,
On Thu, 20 Apr 2006, Marco Bertorello wrote:
denyhosts-python2.3
denyhosts-python2.4
denyhosts-common
the binaries are stored in packages -python2.X but the manpage (common
to alla packages) is stored in denyhosts-common.
Why would you have a binary in -python2.3 *and* in -python2.4 ?
On Thu, 20 Apr 2006, Steve Langasek wrote:
denyhosts-python2.3/2.4 do contain a python module. If and when the Great
Python Reorganization finally happens, this ought to be a single denyhosts
package depending on python ( 2.3), python ( 2.5).
This can already be done with python-support
On Fri, 21 Apr 2006, Paul Wise wrote:
You are welcome to take over maintainership of it, or co-maintain it
with me, perhaps buxy can add you to the python-modules SVN.
Given than Ian is the upstream author of the module, he is of course
welcome in the team if he so wishes. Ian, just give me
On Fri, 21 Apr 2006, Ian Ward wrote:
Given than Ian is the upstream author of the module, he is of course
welcome in the team if he so wishes. Ian, just give me your alioth login
if you are interested.
Sure, but I am not a debian developer.. should I create a guest account
on alioth?
Yes.
On Thu, 04 May 2006, Paul Wise wrote:
They were mostly fine for the current python policy (although a bit
overkill). I'm looking forward to a more sane python policy, as
described in this email:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-python/2006/01/msg00028.html
Who is the python policy
On Tue, 30 May 2006, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
A downloader package is a bit of grey area; much like a typical
contrib package, it has some more-or-less hardcoded string that
points to non-free data; it does not, however, depend on anything
outside of main to function (since main is
On Tue, 30 May 2006, Stephen Gran wrote:
Can't you just ship those ten lines in contrib, and the rest in main?
This may be archive bloat, but surely it's arch:all, so that minimizes
the bloat at least. I am not over fond of the freer-than-free holy
wars, but it does seem like this script is
On Tue, 30 May 2006, Bas Wijnen wrote:
Packages containing some contrib material, without which the package functions
well, can indeed go in main AFAIK.
Yes. That's enough. If you agree on that why do you need after that to
find a complicated explication on why finally this is not OK ?
On Thu, 08 Jun 2006, Bas Wijnen wrote:
Because the package (as I understood it, I don't actually know the package)
doesn't actually function at all for some people. That's not because they
aren't interested in it, it's because they need non-free stuff to make it
work.
Indeed and our job is
Hi,
On Tue, 17 Jan 2012, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
We plan to ask for the creation of a new pseudo-package
debian-mentors or mentors.debian.org [3] (contact:
debian-mentors@lists.debian.org) in Debian's bug tracking system (the
name is still subject to change). A workflow for handling
On Wed, 18 Jan 2012, Adam Borowski wrote:
Anyway, I don't think closing RFS bugs manually would be big hassle
to sponsors.
An additional manual step that takes time, is error-prone and brings nothing
new: if the upload fails somehow, the sponsor will be the first to get
notified.
On Wed, 01 Feb 2012, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
In summary, before upload
1. run dpkg-buildpackage -b to reproduce buildd behavior
Looks like buildd are using `dpkg-buildpackage -B` by the way
Yes, -b would not help, you need -B. But as has been said, you must wait
for the next dpkg
Hi,
On Thu, 24 May 2012, Arno Töll wrote:
[*] jwilk looked into the code and it /seems/ to me, the bts
subscription does not contain control messages, whereas bts-control
control does. Can anyone verify this?
I confirm this.
Cheers,
--
Raphaël Hertzog ◈ Debian Developer
Get the Debian
Hello,
On Fri, 13 Jul 2012, Michael Gissing wrote:
Hi all,
I'm not sure whether that's the suitable mailing list, so if theres
a better one I would really appreciate a hint.
The correct list is debian-mentors@lists.debian.org. debian-dpkg is to
discuss the development of dpkg itself.
Hi,
On Tue, 07 Aug 2012, Christian PERRIER wrote:
Just in case Raphaël can't upload, I can do it. But I'd prefer doing
so as a backup only and keep Raphaël as main sponsor (because he is,
IIRC, a user of LedgerSMB in hiw own business).
I'll try to take care of it but I'm not using LedgerSMB,
Hi,
On Mon, 06 Aug 2012, Robert James Clay wrote:
Besides uploading the new package version to the Mentors site, I went
ahead submitted a Request for Sponsor bug as well (#684106 [1])
Here's my review of your package:
In control:
Recommends: default-mta | mail-transport-agent,
On Thu, 09 Aug 2012, Robert James Clay wrote:
Also; my inclination now is to do a 1.3.21-2 package with any
necessary changes and upload that (instead of removing the existing
1.3.21 package on mentors and uploading a new version of it after any
neccessary corrections). Doing it that way
Hi,
On Sat, 25 Aug 2012, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
Hello:
I have to build a module that exports only symbol with a given prefix:
in the pre-dh debian/rules , something as
CFLAGS=$(cflags) -Wl,--version-script,debian/PACAKAGENAME.version
was use. I cannot figure out how to proceed
Hi,
On Thu, 30 Aug 2012, Bart Martens wrote:
Hi Robert,
Have you noticed that there's a newer upstream release ?
http://sourceforge.net/projects/ledger-smb/files/
He did, but as he wanted to try to get an updated version into wheezy
(there are serious issues with the current version in
Hi,
On Wed, 10 Oct 2012, Jasmine Hassan wrote:
For instance, I'm packaging Compiz 0.8.8, for MATE desktop. This, at
least initially, requires a lot of code substitutions, and quite a few
file/dir renaming. (ex.: gnome - mate, gconf - mateconf, metacity -
marco, etc.) I use a home-brewed
On Wed, 10 Oct 2012, Jasmine Hassan wrote:
Exactly, and gnome 2.x is no longer maintained, nor is Compiz 0.8.8,
last in release 0.8.x from April 2011
So you have no other solution than to take over upstream maintenance.
In that case, I truly believe that MATE should fork Compiz as well
and
On Sun, 28 Oct 2012, Robert James Clay wrote:
A new version of the LedgerSMB package, v1.3.23-1, is now available
and has been uploaded to the Mentors site pending a sponsor.
Raphael; if you're able to take a look at it, I'd appreciated it!
Do you want to upload it to unstable or to
On Mon, 19 Nov 2012, Arno Töll wrote:
Thing is, you can't use the QA forwarder because it relies on your
source control field to learn about actual forwardings. If you would add
right that address, the result would be an infinite loop because you
would essentially forward mail to
Hi,
On Mon, 05 Apr 2010, Osamu Aoki wrote:
On Mon, Apr 05, 2010 at 03:30:50PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
The commands listed below are run twice, once with the -a option (in
binary-arch) and once with the -i option (in binary-indep):
Actually, it doesn't. dh binary just runs whatever
On Wed, 07 Apr 2010, Osamu Aoki wrote:
What is needed is documentation on dh_listpackages and its usage to sort
out binary-indep and binary-arch difference for override commands.
Otherwise, buildd may fail if they only install Build-Depends: (I vaguely
remember, they install
On Wed, 07 Apr 2010, Osamu Aoki wrote:
But are you sure this holds for dh_auto_build. If buildd only install
Build-Depends and dh_auto_build initiate doc building using latex listed in
-indep, then we are in trouble. As I understand, it usually run $(MAKE) for
any case. So if doc package
[ Bcc debian-mentors as some prospective DD might be interested in
packaging those ]
Hello,
I would like to be able to use ubuntu's indicator applets in Debian but
very few of the required packages are in Debian (only libindicator is
available).
Here are some of the design pages if you don't
On Sun, 07 Nov 2010, Alejandro Garrido Mota wrote:
My motivation for maintaining this package is: I use this application
like my personal task manager,.
The package can be found on mentors.debian.net:
- URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/t/taskcoach
- Source repository: deb-src
On Mon, 08 Nov 2010, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
On Sun, 07 Nov 2010, Alejandro Garrido Mota wrote:
My motivation for maintaining this package is: I use this application
like my personal task manager,.
The package can be found on mentors.debian.net:
- URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian
On Fri, 12 Nov 2010, Cristian Henzel wrote:
dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: dependency on libpthread.so.0 could be avoided
if debian/clipit/usr/bin/clipit were not uselessly linked against it
(they use none of its symbols).
but this last one is unnecessary, because my program actually uses
Hi,
On Fri, 12 Nov 2010, Cristian Henzel wrote:
thanks for your reply! I have also tried removing the reference to
pthread.h in my program, hoping that it would take the symbols from
libc, but I still got the same warning from dpkg-shlibdeps.
So, should I put the reference to pthread back in
Hi,
On Fri, 12 Nov 2010, Cristian Henzel wrote:
P.S. I find it odd that it includes the package even if there's no
referece to it and I also use -Wl,--as-needed...
Maybe -Wl,--as-needed is not smart enough to cover this case. Entirely
dropping the -lpthread is the only way to fix this
On Fri, 12 Nov 2010, Cristian Henzel wrote:
If it's a harmless warning and the rest of it is fine, could it get in
the repos like this?
Sure, this warning is not a reason to block an upload. Many packages in
the archive have this kind of warnings. They are not bugs but things
that can be
Hi,
On Fri, 12 Nov 2010, Cristian Henzel wrote:
Sure, this warning is not a reason to block an upload. Many packages in
the archive have this kind of warnings. They are not bugs but things
that can be improved.
ok, so is there anything else that I need to do, or will you upload it?
I
On Sat, 20 Nov 2010, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
In 20101120223808.ga15...@mea.homelinux.org, Mats Erik Andersson wrote:
Question: Is there some mechanism I can use in the postinst
script that lets me determine whether the upgrade
is being conducted in non-interactive
Hi,
On Fri, 03 Dec 2010, Daniel Lazzari wrote:
I have a collection of SDK packages we are building using dpkg -b that
we need to distribute to our external developers. Because some of the
libraries come from proprietary code, and others from assets, they
should only be binary packages, not
On Sun, 05 Dec 2010, Paul Wise wrote:
On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 5:03 AM, Raphael Hertzog hert...@debian.org wrote:
Using dpkg -b directly is still not the right way to build a package.
If you don't want to distribute a source package, that's fine don't
distribute it. But a debian binary
Hi,
On Sun, 16 Jan 2011, pablo platt wrote:
I'm using dh_help to build a package template and trying to follow the
debian packaging guide for creating a binary package.
Please ask your packaging questions on debian-mentors@lists.debian.org.
This list is for developing dpkg.
Just a quick hint
Hi,
your questions are probably better answered on
debian-mentors@lists.debian.org.
On Tue, 18 Jan 2011, harish badrinath wrote:
Given that i was told that you can deterministically determine which
file would run first DEBIAN/control _or_ DEBIAN/preinst, I have this
following query.
You
On Tue, 18 Jan 2011, Joachim Wiedorn wrote:
I want to realize the idea of a debian directory usable for Debian *and*
Ubuntu. It works with a switch in the clean target of debian/rules:
Great!
ifeq ($(shell dpkg-vendor --is Ubuntu echo yes),yes)
@echo modify changelog and control file
On Tue, 18 Jan 2011, Joachim Wiedorn wrote:
Ok, but how should I manage the last changelog entry (in time frame and
in handling)?
Debian should have e.g:
lilo (1:23.1-1) unstable; urgency=low
and then Ubuntu should have e.g:
lilo (1:23.1-1ubuntu1) natty; urgency=low
lilo
Le Wed, Jul 29, 1998 at 12:42:13PM -0400, Shaleh écrivait:
I just recieved a bug report on Enlightenment asking for me to put it in
/etc/X11/window-managers. Fairly confident that touching another
packages files would be wrong, what is the correct way to get E into
this file? Or should my
Hello,
I'm happy to announce you the birth of my first packages...
You cand find them here : http://prope.insa-lyon.fr/~rhertzog/debian/
Any comments is welcome... especially about the scripts.
Thanks.
PS: the sympa package depends on libmsgcat
--
Hertzog Raphaël -+- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -+-
Le Mon, Aug 03, 1998 at 10:24:04AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog écrivait:
Any comments is welcome... especially about the scripts.
[sympa is a mailing-list manager libmsgcat-perl a small perl
module who enable the use of catclose/catopen/catgets in perl]
Since nobody wants to look a the (binaries
Le Wed, Aug 05, 1998 at 02:10:18PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava écrivait:
Hi,
Should configuration not go under /etc/sympa/? I note th you
do have /etc/sympa.conf; are trhewse configuration files supposed to
be edited by the user? If yes, then they should go under /etc; if
not, then
Le Fri, Sep 04, 1998 at 09:28:09AM +0200, Stephane Bortzmeyer écrivait:
Hi Stéphane,
IMHO, that's one of the problems that beginners packagers have: there are
several docs, which say different things (because they have been written at
different time and not upgraded) and they often let you
Le Fri, Sep 04, 1998 at 11:26:22AM +0200, Sven écrivait:
Hi,
this is true, and a bit sad, it would be very nice to have this solved ...
Of course.
seriously tough, in the new maintainer doc it says that encrypting is not
permitted in francebut signature yes ? does anyone know something
Le Fri, Sep 04, 1998 at 12:00:45PM +0200, Stephane Bortzmeyer écrivait:
Please don't. I've learned from him and from fellow developers that he his
indeed quite busy (of course, you know he does it for Debian for free) and it
processes registrations, just a bit slowly.
Ok, I said that only
Hello everybody,
some weeks ago I've learned that I should not modify any conffiles
including /etc/aliases. But today while re-reading the debian policy
manual (2.4.1.4) I read :
| /etc/aliases is the source file for the system mail aliases
| (e.g., postmaster, usenet, etc.)--it is the one
Le Mon, Oct 05, 1998 at 05:51:38PM +0200, Philipp Frauenfelder écrivait:
I'm a new maintainer (a few weeks only) and have a package with
Architecture: i386
Today I got a bug report saying it also compiled on a m68k. Is
there a possibility for me to test (try it out) beforhand or do
I have
Hello everybody,
as we speak about new-maintainers problems, I think a document
intented for them could be helpful. I'll write something as soon as
I can.
Here's the summary and some ideas I wrote down. Feel free to propose
addendums. And I you wish to write one of those paragraphs, go on
and
Le Fri, Oct 30, 1998 at 03:03:59PM -0500, Shaleh écrivait:
Hi,
Raphael, this info exists already. It is on our web site and in debian
packages. Rather than wasting effort, why not help make the current documents
come up to date?
I just had a look to the latest developers-reference doc. OK,
Le Wed, Nov 11, 1998 at 04:03:25PM +0100, Falk Hueffner écrivait:
I think this is a good proposal. We need to identify the problems with
the current situation and find workarounds and longterm solutions.
I've nothing against creating a new mailing-list, but a big part of
what you call
Le Tue, Nov 17, 1998 at 11:34:06AM +0100, Stephane Bortzmeyer écrivait:
Is there a policy about developer's Web pages? I saw that I can put pages on
master and they are available as http://master.debian.org/~bortz. But I would
like them to be on www.debian.org (specially since master is not
Le Sun, Jun 27, 1999 at 04:52:47PM -0400, Matthew Sachs écrivait:
I'm packaging some Perl modules and a program which is a bunch of Perl
scripts. Everything in these packages is Perl code (and documentation).
Do I need to make source packages for these? How would I go about doing
that?
Of
Le Thu, Jul 01, 1999 at 01:03:54PM -0500, Kermit Tensmeyer écrivait:
Can someone explain to me, the hows and whys of libdb and libdb2 as
used in Debian 2.1.
libdb == libdb2. It's provided by the glibc2.1 ...
If you want to use the old db 1.85 you must compile your programs with
-ldb1
It
Le Fri, Jul 02, 1999 at 09:52:17AM -0500, Kermit Tensmeyer écrivait:
/lib/libdb.so. = libdb-2.0.7.so
/usr/lib/libdb.so = libdb-2.0.7
/usr/lib/libdb2.so = libdb2.so.2.4.14
/lib/libdb.so.2 - libdb1-2.1.1.so
/lib/libdb.so.3 - libdb-2.1.1.so
/lib/libdb1.so.2 - libdb1-2.1.1.so
Le Sun, Jul 04, 1999 at 04:17:11AM +, Bradley Bell écrivait:
Where does one look to see if a certain package has anybody working on it?
i.e. when it is not currently in the distribution, and is not listed in
the WNPP...
You should post in Intent to Package on debian-devel and if somebody
Le Thu, Jul 08, 1999 at 11:50:36AM +0200, Sami Dalouche écrivait:
I'm learning how to create a package but I don't understand why the dirs
file exists. All the directories are created when we type a make install,
aren't they ?
Usually yes. But you may need additional (empty or not) directories
Le Sat, Jul 10, 1999 at 12:04:01AM +1000, Shao Zhang écrivait:
A package that contains only one font file.
I have followed the HOWTO. But my problem is that this is not a src
file. So there
is no need for a make file.
If you have no makefile then modify the rules file in
Le Sun, Jul 18, 1999 at 01:21:40PM +0100, Oliver Elphick écrivait:
I put commands in debian/rules to fix this, but somehow that isn't reflected
in the .deb files.
Here's an extract from the build output; commands are in the rules file.
I suppose you're using fakeroot ... you shouldn't
Le Sun, Jul 18, 1999 at 06:45:44PM +0100, Jules Bean écrivait:
fakeroot seems to have some problems, but it does still work. I think
it's better to use fakeroot when it works (and sudo if fakeroot doesn't
work for a particular package) than to always use sudo.
Sudo is dangerous if there are
Le Tue, Jul 20, 1999 at 09:41:29AM +0200, Jérôme Marant écrivait:
Hi,
The Debinaa New Maintainer's Guide explains how to package
apps from sources. But sometimes, one just have binaries (mainly when
non-free).
So, how to package from binaries?
Put your binaries in the source package and
Le Fri, Jul 23, 1999 at 02:36:30AM +1200, Michael Beattie écrivait:
I'd like to do that, but am not yet a sanctioned developer;
do you think I should send that email, or do I really have
to wait? Thanks.
I think you should wait. What I would suggest is that you find someone
who would be
[ Large crosspost to start the discussion, please reply to debian-devel
only. Simply respect the reply-to. ]
Hello everybody,
you may or not be aware that getting a Debian developer is quite long. I
want to propose a solution to facilitate the integration of new
Debian developers.
It's quite
Le Fri, Jul 23, 1999 at 09:32:08PM +0200, Radovan Garabik écrivait:
1) I am the author of program I am packaging. To save myself
some work, I have packaged it as a native debian package. Is this
allowed? (There was some discussion about it a long time ago,
and it seemed possible to do so)
Le Sat, Jul 24, 1999 at 08:43:50PM +, Lazarus Long écrivait:
I believe libgeo-metar-perl to be consistent with standard naming
Yes it's ok.
dpkg um, dists/potato/main/binary-i386/interpreters/libwww-perl_5.44-2.deb
Yes interpreters is the most used for perl modules. Sometimes maintainers
Le Tue, Jul 27, 1999 at 01:14:41PM -0400, Benjamin Gray Darnell écrivait:
I have a package (pose - PalmOS emulator) that should be in contrib, but
I just noticed that it is currently in main. Is there a line I should add
to the control file to make this change, or should I email the archive
Le Wed, Jul 28, 1999 at 06:28:21PM +, Steven V. Russo écrivait:
I wonder if anyone can tell me why no one has responded to me from
[EMAIL PROTECTED] I submitted my application months ago, and
sent two follow up applications. I believe I followed their procedure
as closely as possible...
Le Thu, Aug 12, 1999 at 04:36:25AM +0100, Frankie Fisher écrivait:
While I am waiting for my maintainership to go through (if it ever will), I
have put version 0.1.11 of SoundTracker (i386+source) on a website. Here is
the line for sources.list:
deb http://www.skunkpussy.ic24.net/debian
Le Thu, Aug 12, 1999 at 06:34:39AM -0700, Robert Jones écrivait:
I have downloaded all of the i386 unstable tree, but as main is 1.2 gigs
or so, I'm not sure how to split it up onto CDs to do the installation.
You can build CD images for potato with YACS :
Le Thu, Aug 12, 1999 at 10:28:10AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog écrivait:
deb http://www.skunkpussy.ic24.net/debian unstable main
An apt source file is not enough for me, I want the source as well the
binary packages but your server doesn't allow directory listing so I can't
see the files I want
Le Sat, Aug 14, 1999 at 06:50:04PM +0200, Oliver écrivait:
Hi,
I try to compile the apache modul for fastcgi but the linker can not found
the ldbm library. Can somebody help?
It's a basic problem I think :
$ zgrep libdbm.so /rack/ftp/debian/dists/potato/Contents-i386.gz
usr/lib/libdbm.so
Le Sat, Aug 14, 1999 at 09:36:22PM +0200, Domenico Andreoli écrivait:
in order to get both version i have to configure/make sources (for
plain version), save somewhere plain binary and clean reconfigure/remake
all (for ssl flavour).
well, multiple binary packages support goes well when with
Le Sun, Aug 15, 1999 at 01:55:33AM +0200, Domenico Andreoli écrivait:
care not to install in main something that could not be exported by US
residents.
right, i have to break source in two anyway. i can't put source in main
distribution that require some non-US packages, can i?
No.
Cheers,
Le Mon, Aug 16, 1999 at 01:53:13AM -0700, tony mancill écrivait:
dpkg-genchanges: failure: cannot read files list file: No such file or
directory
The file debian/files is removed by dh_clean. Check that you don't call
dh_clean somewhere unexpected. For a multi-binary package you may have to
use
Le Tue, Aug 17, 1999 at 04:44:08PM +0200, Jérôme Marant écrivait:
I'd like to read Packages[.gz] files,
# apt-cache dumpavail
read/modify files in
/var/lib/dpkg and other package administration things.
Those files are not modified by apt but by dpkg.
Does the libapt-pkg library allow to
Le Sun, Aug 22, 1999 at 07:00:37PM -0400, Matt Zimmerman écrivait:
cricket-0.70
|-- doc (documentation)
| `-- neta-paper
= /usr/share/doc
|-- images (used by the CGI)
An already used solution was to put them in /usr/doc/package/ and then
the images were available as /doc/package/image in
Le Mon, Aug 23, 1999 at 02:19:25PM -0400, Matt Zimmerman écrivait:
Do the default web server configurations allow symlinks like this?
Apache does but I don't know about the other webserver.
Hmm...I don't like the sound of that. The postinst will have to chown
directories to this user, which
[ I cced some future developers that expressed their interest in the
sponsorship ]
[ Follow-up on debian-devel please ]
Hi,
the sponsor idea has some success so I wrote a CGI script to keep
track of people looking for sponsors.
Here it is :
http://www.internatif.org/bortzmeyer/debian/sponsor/
Le Sun, Aug 29, 1999 at 04:17:04AM -0500, Stephen R. Gore écrivait:
Is this acceptable/normal? Does a GUI app that uses GUI help need a
man page regardless?
No, it's not acceptable. Please read man dh_undocumented. Yes you still
need man page.
dh_undocumented sclient.1
Cheers,
--
Raphaël
1 - 100 of 202 matches
Mail list logo
