Jean-Yves Avenard a écrit :
Is there a way to force which version of the dependency is going to be
installed?
Like right now, my package automatically add a dependency to version
1.0.19 of the library, I want that dependency to be on version 1.0.17
I think your approach is wrong. You should
Neil Williams a écrit :
Is it still allowed as per 3.8.1 policy to use multi maintainer style
changelogs?
Yes.
And what was the prevous style of changelog allowed, by the way?
--
Stéphane
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe.
Richard W.M. Jones a écrit :
filelight is useful to find out which parts of the filesystem are
consuming too much space. [...]
However filelight is a very large dependency (pulls in large
parts of KDE + X11) so it's only a suggestion.
What about suggesting filelight | gnome-utils, then?
Harald Dunkel a écrit :
I have a question, anyway: The game is supposed to build and
work on all platforms, but I can build it only for i386 and
amd64. Are non-free packages built for the other platforms
automagically? Or would you suggest to restrict the list of
platforms?
See:
Jason Morawski a écrit :
The source package is named dojo and the binary package produced is
named jslib-dojo. This follows the naming scheme used by the other
jslib packages. However, if the naming policy has changed regarding
these types of packages, I will be more than happy to oblige.
Le 10/01/2012 15:56, Hendrik Tews a écrit :
- in debian/changelog, there are two extraneous blank lines after the
first entry; don't do that
Done.
I was talking about the lines *between* changelog entries, not inside
the last one.
- consider using
Le 11/01/2012 14:13, Hendrik Tews a écrit :
I've just noticed that there are files under CC-BY-NC-SA-3.
Upstream has just changed the license to CC-BY-SA-3, see
http://www4.in.tum.de/~wenzelm/cgi-bin/repos.cgi/ProofGeneral/file/be73425fbe77/images/README
Therefore the issue is probably
Le 12/01/2012 21:52, Hendrik Tews a écrit :
For now I moved the package to non-free, see the latest instance
on mentors.debian.
There was a prerelease this evening, containing the license
change. I've just uploaded a new package, which is now in section
main again.
Great! You should
Le 13/01/2012 08:59, Hendrik Tews a écrit :
Done and uploaded. The new version should appear soon.
debian.mentors dropped my upload from yesterday evening. But now
the package is there.
Uploaded to Debian.
Thank you for your contribution!
--
Stéphane
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Le 05/03/2012 12:33, Goswin von Brederlow a écrit :
I am looking for a sponsor for my package libaio-ocaml
I've looked at the git repository (037a448). It is written explicitly in
[1]:
Do not close RFS bugs in debian/changelog.
but the bug you refer to in debian/changelog is a RFS bug
Le 06/03/2012 15:22, Benoît Knecht a écrit :
I think it important for any maintainer to clearly differentiate in
their mind upstream from Debian, even if they happen to be the same
person. Otherwise, you're artificially limiting your software to Debian,
which is at the opposite side of what
Le 07/03/2012 09:14, Goswin von Brederlow a écrit :
I really don't get that argument. Nothing in having a debian directory
in the source hinders any other distribution. And plenty of sources
contain spec files for building rpms to no detriment to Debian. If any
non rpm based distribution picks
Le 07/03/2012 09:52, Goswin von Brederlow a écrit :
That is what major, minor and subversions (x.y.z) are for. If I change
only something in Debian I would not increment x or y and I would not
create a new tarball for release on e.g. ocamlforge.
I find this confusing. Debian has standardized
Le 25/10/2011 16:00, Nicolas Dandrimont a écrit :
I'm Cc:'ing the OCaml Team which may be interested in your package. I'll
try to take a look tonight, unless someone beats me to it.
Thank you for bringing this to our attention.
I am looking for a sponsor for my package ocaml-fdinfo.
*
Le 23/05/2013 05:45, Prach Pongpanich a écrit :
Packaging a new upstream 2.2.0:
Sorry for taking so long, but I wanted to look at the whole thread
first... which I haven't done so far. Anyway, since you've been waiting
for some time now, I've just directly looked at your package without
looking
Le 24/05/2013 10:09, Prach Pongpanich a écrit :
Thanks for your review and suggestion, I have done all of the above.
Your Replaces/Breaks clause is always satisfied, even in oldstable...
isnt't? If so, it is pointless and you should remove it.
Does ocamlrss actually install files in the same
Le 02/12/2014 13:34, Thomas Calderon a écrit :
1. I have split the debian-related files from the master branch. I will
now use upstream and debian branches instead. Therefore, release
tarballs will not contain this directory.
$ tar tf ../caml-crush_1.0.4.orig.tar.gz|grep debian
Dear Bo,
Le 08/04/2024 à 17:05, Bo YU a écrit :
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "bisect-ppx":
[...]
I've reviewed the packaging and I have a few comments.
Standards-Version is not the latest.
Upstream copyright years are missing in debian/copyright.
A .cma file is in a "OPT:"
Hi,
Le 15/04/2024 à 17:12, Bo YU a écrit :
Again, I've seen this issue several times with OCaml packages, but I
didn't bother to investigate. It looks like another toolchain issue,
which should be fixed in a more central package, not in bisect-ppx
itself. So just leave the lintian warnings as
Dear Bo,
Le 14/04/2024 à 16:30, Bo YU a écrit :
I would not override dh_dwz nor dh_strip. My opinion is that what you
are trying to fix are deficiencies of the toolchain that should be fixed
there.
First to address dh_strip issue. From what I've researched. The issue
was raised by the static
Dear Bo,
On Mon, 4 Mar 2024 16:40:29 +0800 Bo YU wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "ocaml-linenoise":
Here is my review of the packaging:
- There is a comment about ocaml-parany in debian/salsa-ci.yml I don't
understand.
- In debian/liblinenoise-ocaml.install.in, the *.cma
21 matches
Mail list logo
