Hello, ...
I am sponsoring someone who wants to become a new maintainer, and well, i have
checked the packages and there are ok.
Now, what is the correct way for his packages to be uploaded into debian.
I thought that buildiing and signing the package myself, and then uploading
would be ok,
On Thu, Feb 15, 2001 at 06:03:10PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
On Thu, 15 Feb 2001, Sven LUTHER wrote:
Hello, ...
Hi Sven,
I am sponsoring someone who wants to become a new maintainer, and well, i have
checked the packages and there are ok.
Now, what is the correct way for his
On Thu, Feb 15, 2001 at 06:03:10PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
On Thu, 15 Feb 2001, Sven LUTHER wrote:
Hello, ...
Hi Sven,
I am sponsoring someone who wants to become a new maintainer, and well, i have
checked the packages and there are ok.
Now, what is the correct way for his
readable ...
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
there. (is there a
tool for doing this, or do i need to do it by hand like i currently do ?)
- copy the rest of the stuff, checking it is still needed/don't need to
be modified.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe"
will build your package against newer versions of the library.
What does policy say about this exactly ? I think it is to use unstable, but i
am not sure.
Ideally, you would also have a chrooted stable environment, to build potato
bug fixes or other such things. Or vice-versa ...
Friendly,
Sven Luther
On Thu, Mar 29, 2001 at 11:23:23AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
Sven LUTHER [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Say i have a multi-binary package, where one of the binaries does not get
build for one of the arches (namely arm in this case).
In this case, does the binaries that get build for all arches
. That is a feature in the debhelper ver 3.0. That may
explain the problem of building on a potato machine.
Is there any way of telling if we are building on a potato system or in a
woody or unstable system in the rules file ? This could be handy for other
kind of stuff also.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
On Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 03:16:57PM +0200, Ivo Timmermans wrote:
Sven LUTHER wrote:
On Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 09:04:41AM -0400, Gopal Narayanan wrote:
On Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 10:40:11AM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
I've done the ocaml-findlib package with 'export DH_COMPAT=3
on a potato machine.
If i want to do a package that can be compiled even on a potato machine,
what I have to do ?
What about testing the content of /etc/debian_version, and if it is potato,
then set DH_COMPAT to 2 ?
(the propper sh stuff is left as an excercice :)))
Friendly,
Sven Luther
the policy not say that all binaries should have a manpage.
having a manpage saying that there is no manpage is the same as having non,
and i think it is not in the spirit of the policy.
Maybe all manpage needing binaries could be listed somewhere, and we could
have a manpage writing task ?
Frien
On Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 09:40:43PM +0200, Ivo Timmermans wrote:
Sven LUTHER wrote:
or build dependencies on debhelper (3.0)
Yes, but since i want ot build the package on both potato and unstable, this
will not help.
Why exactly? It's not a crime to create two separate packages; one
On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 01:17:06PM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote:
On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 07:44:34AM +0200, Sven LUTHER wrote:
Why exactly? It's not a crime to create two separate packages; one
for stable and one for unstable. You can change the build
dependencies to match
versions, please read it).
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
a 'a' to the end or something
such will make pools happy (especially good if you did upload a bad
.orig.tar.gz to the pool).
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
the box. You need
acpi/or whatever that stuff is named working with your motherboard to have it
switch off your box.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
candidate, i think, but then maybe they
only don't like patent on medicine or such ?
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
about this ?
Friendl,y,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
is already some time ago).
Is it ok to upload such a package to contrib, and use the jdk available
elsewhere, or should i try to build it with java tools available in main
(it uses swing and threads among other stuff).
Friendly
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
.
Well, you could try running the program through strace, and then look at
all the opened files (with the proper strace flag) and then run dpkg -S
on them.
Same as for autodetecting build depends.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe
in /etc ?
BTW, i too found that the default are too small for the tex files i am
doing, but then i use mfpic ...
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
does not have .diff file.
A reason for this hapening, even when the upstream tarball is there, is
that the name is wrong (often happens when the _ after the package name
an d before the version is a - as upstream source often use, and is
difficult to spot)
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
from the interface is not the best of solutions.
Also some examples would be welcome in such a argouml-doc package.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
could ask them to upgrade the debian directory to your new work,
so other people can easily rebuild out of CVS and other such things.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
to fix dpkg so it finally supports versioned
provides ?
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
is that crafty-books-medium install a 30MB opening
book file, if we go copying it from /usr/lib to /var/lib, we're
wasting 30MB user's disk space, he might not like it.
What about a symlink ?
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe
is not and that to build a staging area, i need some
kind of copy of the dinstall scripts or something such and run them on
a private subdirectory somewhere ?
Any help or hint to information would be welcome.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe
with gshutdown in gnome, gnome2 does not seem to
have gshutdown, so i am out of luck).
That said, you still would need to have the corresponding user having
sudo privilege, and i think this need to be done by hand.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
description of those.)
Also, feel free to join the debian-ocaml-maint mailing list, which
altough is devoted to maintainers of ocaml related packages, may be of
interrest to you, especially regarding the moscow ML freeness stuff and
other.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
. The BTS is quite
noisy.
And -mentors is not ?
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
.
Is such a thing possible, how can it be done.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 10:06:37AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 11:09:38AM +0200, Sven LUTHER wrote:
I wish to be able, in a package postinst, to be able to know the
previously installed version of the package, so i can take different
actions depending of the version
was told it would be fixed post woody release) and it does not really
work (the symlink is to the original name, not the gzipped one).
I create the symlink by hand in a postinst.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
On Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 07:42:15PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
Sven LUTHER [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sun, Sep 08, 2002 at 08:21:09PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
Provided your packages conflict, you can make two files,
debian/server.conf.5 and debian/server-enhanced.conf.5. Make
to compare higher than any version number with a lower epoch or
- no epoch. See policy section 4 (Version numbering).
OK, I will try, even if it's not exactly what I meaned.
Well, you could also use the ugly :
Provides: package_name-1.0.0 or something such.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
.
Or is there another list where we could ask.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Sep 11, 2002 at 10:15:16AM +0200, Goswin Brederlow wrote:
Sven LUTHER [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, Sep 10, 2002 at 04:42:48AM +0200, Goswin Brederlow wrote:
Mmm, but what if there is a bug found in ocaml's native code compiler,
that forces me to disable one
later than 2.4.7 or something such ?).
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Sep 20, 2002 at 12:20:05AM +0200, Tore Anderson wrote:
Sven LUTHER [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, Sep 19, 2002 at 03:31:57PM +0200, Tore Anderson wrote:
I think policy should reccomend third-party modules to be installed
in the the directory common for all kernels
what is the best way to build only the
arch:all packages, or maybe i should hand generate the .changes file for
upload ?
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 11:38:02AM +0200, Remi VANICAT wrote:
Sven LUTHER [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hello, ...
[...]
After a bit more looking, i noticed that the arch: all packages were not
autobuilt, which seems normal to me with a bit more thinking about it,
but the binary
copy the .changes and
.dsc files to your local box and sign them there locally ?
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
packages, so that any dependency that relies
on one can depend on apache-ssl-ywesee instead.
Mmm, is Provides a superset of Replaces, or do you have to specify both
?
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
probably run with
problems on versioned dependencies, do someone know what is the problem
with that, if there is a fundamental flaw with doing them, or if it is
only the manpower to implement them which is at fault.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
On Fri, Oct 04, 2002 at 09:12:52AM +0200, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
Hi,
Sven LUTHER:
Is there a way to handle this so that apt will get the native code
package if it is available, and resort to the bytecode one on arches not
supporting the native code compiler ? Some sort of priorities
to the native code one (foo_1.0-1_i386.deb) when it
is available, and to the byte code one (foo_1.0-1_all.deb) if it is not.
But then this will not allow an user to install the bytecode executable
unless he hand installs it.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Fri, Oct 04, 2002 at 01:20:34PM +0200, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
Hi,
Sven Luther:
In case i submit a patch or something such, should i discuss things
first, or just go ahead and implement it ?
Probably talk about it first... though frankly I don't see a different way
of implementing
On Fri, Oct 04, 2002 at 01:44:50PM +0200, Michel D?nzer wrote:
On Fre, 2002-10-04 at 10:09, Sven LUTHER wrote:
On Fri, Oct 04, 2002 at 09:12:52AM +0200, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
Sven LUTHER:
Is there a way to handle this so that apt will get the native code
package
On Fri, Oct 04, 2002 at 11:25:55AM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
Sven LUTHER wrote:
Since the bytecode executables are arch independent, i think it would be
nice to build them arch: all, since this would mean, apart from smaller
sized packages, also that we don't have 12+ version of the same
On Fri, Oct 04, 2002 at 07:38:05PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
Sven LUTHER wrote:
Well, what about the coq for example, which is 7 MB package (on i386, so
maybe it is bigger for other arches) and 20MB installed.
I guess it's on the line.
I thought so, But sure, this is the biggest project
it is a dpkg issue.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
think they use the vloopback device to have more
than one app access the video device, namely motion and then vlc for video
streaming server.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
to build-depends on : ocaml-best-compilers, and it does the
necessary magic for you. ocaml-best-compilers is provided by ocaml-nox on
m68k, mipses and s390, and by ocaml-native-compilers in the other cases.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
package provided by ocaml-best-compilers on architectures
You can't Build-Depend on virtual packages.
Sure you can. You can't just not have a versioned dependency on them.
Also, now is the time to fix any brokeness in dpkg and co to make this move
more smoothly, if needed.
Friendly,
Sven
of virtual packages.
And to stefano, the problem was mostly with the autobuilders logic being too
broken to handle virtual packages correctly and needing hand intervention.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
, there is only one real pasckage providing those. The
same happens for things like spamoracle which is provided by spamoracle-byte
on non-native arches.
BTW, stefano, what happened to your presentation in helsinki ?
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
of things is mentioned in the ocaml-packaging-policy,
did you read it ?
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
So, can someone grab the patch from the bugfix branch and apply it to the
debian package ? I would do it but i am far from my ssh/gpg keys for another
two weeks.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
package provide a virtual
package.
No, but now is the time to fix this, at the start of the release cycle, so
maybe we should fill an important bug report about this ?
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
gpg key if nobody
does this before.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
right now, i
understand them quite well.
Friendly,
Sven LUTHER
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cd package-version
dh_make
and promptly i had a source package that i modified as needed.
but then, when i tried to build the package with dpkg-buildpackage, pgp
complained about not finding Sven LUTHER [EMAIL PROTECTED] which is normal
since i used my private address when
,
Sven LUTHER
patch, it is quite nice for doing
some documentation ...
Friendly,
Sven LUTHER
/lib/libgmp2.so
How do i tell the autostuff how to search for the library in the right place ?
Friendly,
Sven LUTHER
:
dbuild package.dsc
and it will build the package for you.
There are certain option you have to set so the package don't get signed, but i
don't remember them so check the man page. you can also p[ut them in a .rc
file, so you don't have to rewrite them each time.
Friendly,
Sven LUTHER
,
Sven Luther
think they use the vloopback device to have more
than one app access the video device, namely motion and then vlc for video
streaming server.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
, m68k, powerpc and sparc
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, Oct 20, 2002 at 02:49:37AM +1000, Andrew Lau wrote:
Hey everyone,
Package: cupsys-pt
Version: 1.0.2-1
Ok, i will look at the package and upload it.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
On Sat, Oct 19, 2002 at 07:09:04PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Sun, Oct 20, 2002 at 02:49:37AM +1000, Andrew Lau wrote:
Hey everyone,
Package: cupsys-pt
Version: 1.0.2-1
Ok, i will look at the package and upload it.
Ok, package uploaded.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
, you could login on a debian paroject machine, and build
the program yourself.
Or just upload a new version.
It may be right in this case as michel said, but in general i don't think
being impatient with the autobuilders warrants the upload of a new
version.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
On Sat, Oct 26, 2002 at 03:13:48PM +1000, Andrew Lau wrote:
On Sun, Oct 20, 2002 at 06:50:50PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
Yes, i uploaded it to ftp-master, but as it is a new package, it
needs a new entry in the override file, and thus human
intervention. It may take a few days
On Sat, Oct 26, 2002 at 03:13:48PM +1000, Andrew Lau wrote:
On Sun, Oct 20, 2002 at 06:50:50PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
Yes, i uploaded it to ftp-master, but as it is a new package, it
needs a new entry in the override file, and thus human
intervention. It may take a few days
On Sat, Oct 26, 2002 at 11:44:11AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
On Sat, Oct 26, 2002 at 03:13:48PM +1000, Andrew Lau wrote:
On Sun, Oct 20, 2002 at 06:50:50PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
Yes, i uploaded it to ftp-master, but as it is a new package, it
needs a new entry in the override file
it should
add the debconf template in the distributed package ?
Note that it is a multi-binary package.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 10:39:03AM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
Sven Luther wrote:
I created a templates file, put it in the debian directory, created a
config file and a postinst file, like was adviced.
Now, the package builds fine, i tried running the postinst by hand, and
it asked me
On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 11:05:59AM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
Sven Luther wrote:
Maybe this should be more proeminently said in
/usr/share/doc/debconf-doc/tutorial.txt.gz, no, there is only a quick
mention about installing in debian/tmp/DEBIAN/, which i missed, and the
fact that the newline
directory. You should get into the habit of doing this
when unpacking random tarballs anyway.
Especially since some random tarballs don't install in a subdirectory.
Maybe there is even tar option that helps you do it directly, read the
manpage.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 09:15:47AM +, Colin Watson wrote:
On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 08:24:16AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 12:54:28AM +, Colin Watson wrote:
On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 11:46:51PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
okay. and i still believe that it even
. This does not work
with unicorn-source, which needs to be root (with sudo). I tried
looking into the alsa-source code, but it is a huge and complex stuff,
and i am a bit lost.
Thanks for your help,
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe
On Wed, Nov 06, 2002 at 02:47:43PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
Hello, ...
I have packaged the unicorn driver for the Bewan ADSL PCI st and USB
modems. There are still some licencing issues which will be solved in
the next upstream release, but basically the package is ready.
In the meantime
, and the packaging changes go into the .diff.gz. You are free
to send the changes also upstream, so when the next release happens, the
.diff.gz would be empty. There is no problem in sending the debian
directory also upstream in this way.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
the problem, but then after a time the package built
correctly. You could simply look at it today to see if it is already
solved.
That said, the PTS seems to have frozen on november 2/3 or something
such, so you would need to look at the build logs directly.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
On Thu, Nov 07, 2002 at 07:15:06PM +0100, Oliver Kurth wrote:
On Thu, Nov 07, 2002 at 06:51:01PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
On Thu, Nov 07, 2002 at 06:08:04PM +0100, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote:
Hi Oliver,
I got same the problem with my pkg. the autobuilder have tried
again after
On Fri, Nov 08, 2002 at 10:46:52AM +0100, Oliver Kurth wrote:
On Fri, Nov 08, 2002 at 10:35:09AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
On Thu, Nov 07, 2002 at 07:15:06PM +0100, Oliver Kurth wrote:
On Thu, Nov 07, 2002 at 06:51:01PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
That said, the PTS seems to have frozen
On Fri, Nov 08, 2002 at 10:56:29AM +0100, Michael Koch wrote:
Am Freitag, 8. November 2002 10:35 schrieb Sven Luther:
That said, the PTS seems to have frozen on november 2/3 or
something such, so you would need to look at the build logs
directly.
Grmbl. I can't. See my
to the previous one ?
Using it requires patching all over the source to change the ndbm.h
includes into gdbm-ndbm.h ones.
Is using /usr/include/gdbm-ndbm.h the right solution, or does a copy of
/usr/include/db1/ndbm.h still be included in a non obvious place ?
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
, and i move them around during
the build and restore them when cleaning.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
, which may not all be using the same arch, while /usr/lib is arch
dependant.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
, but i don't really know how the testing scripts
could handle this.
That said, you could try using one of the free java suites, but maybe
nbio does not build with them. kaffe, jikes and gcj come to mind, but i
have no particular experience with any of them.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
for the information...
No problem,
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and go to bed. :-)
good night then, but i think nights are the best hack times.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
such.
Then, check the upstream makefile, if it supports the PREFIX thingy or
not, and modify it so it works as you want.
This would be a first step, if this don't work, we can search further.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble
On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 01:43:10PM +0100, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
On Sat, Nov 16, 2002 at 10:21:55AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
In the original version of my package, I just listed a Depends on
java-common. Is this still appropriate, even though I know that not
every package that provides
On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 07:49:10AM -0800, Stephen Zander wrote:
Sven == Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Sven BTW, i have tried to install the J2sdk1.4 packages, but they
Sven complain about a missing j2se-common. Is this the same
Sven package as java-common ?
Someone else
, i may be willing to provide a ppp+pppoatm package or something
such. That said, ideally this would be included in the CVS version in
ppp upstream, and hopefully when it is released (any ETA for it ?) then
we would have pppoatm without needing to patch ppp.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
On Sun, Nov 24, 2002 at 10:29:27AM +0100, Russell Coker wrote:
On Sat, 23 Nov 2002 14:25, Sven Luther wrote:
On Sat, Nov 23, 2002 at 07:57:15PM +0800, Matthew Bell wrote:
Once again, I rear my head from the deep, and bring news that I have a
version of pppoatm for ver. 2.4.2b1 of pppd
1 - 100 of 288 matches
Mail list logo
