closing old bugs

2001-06-25 Thread Muhammad Hussain Yusuf
Hi, I would like some advice about closing old (?outdated) bug reports. I've been going through the old bugs for my packages and found a few so old they used old libraries etc (e.g from Debian release 1.3). There are no recent reports about the same problem and the upstream source has gone

closing old bugs

2001-06-25 Thread Muhammad Hussain Yusuf
Hi, I would like some advice about closing old (?outdated) bug reports. I've been going through the old bugs for my packages and found a few so old they used old libraries etc (e.g from Debian release 1.3). There are no recent reports about the same problem and the upstream source has gone

removing old conffiles on upgrade

2001-06-19 Thread Muhammad Hussain Yusuf
Hi, I've just changed the directories of the conffile, binaries etc. to conform with Policy 3.5.5.0. The old conffile dir was /etc/X11/filerunner and the new one is /etc/filerunner and the problem is that when installing new package, and an older version is installed, dpkg gives an error message,

license question and problems

2001-06-13 Thread Muhammad Hussain Yusuf
Hi, I have an ITP for a program (gdis, which is GPL) which requires another program (babel) whose license is a bit vague, at least to me. I intend to create binary for babel from the babel source in a sub directory of my package. I have e-mailed the authors of this program (babel) about my

Re: license question and problems

2001-06-13 Thread Muhammad Hussain Yusuf
Hi, Thanks for all the helpful replies. On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 05:49:17PM +0200, Uwe Hermann wrote: Hi Hussain, On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 04:18:38PM +0100, Muhammad Hussain Yusuf wrote: Hi, I have an ITP for a program (gdis, which is GPL) which requires another program (babel) whose

license question and problems

2001-06-13 Thread Muhammad Hussain Yusuf
Hi, I have an ITP for a program (gdis, which is GPL) which requires another program (babel) whose license is a bit vague, at least to me. I intend to create binary for babel from the babel source in a sub directory of my package. I have e-mailed the authors of this program (babel) about my ITP

Re: license question and problems

2001-06-13 Thread Muhammad Hussain Yusuf
Hi, Thanks for all the helpful replies. On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 05:49:17PM +0200, Uwe Hermann wrote: Hi Hussain, On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 04:18:38PM +0100, Muhammad Hussain Yusuf wrote: Hi, I have an ITP for a program (gdis, which is GPL) which requires another program (babel) whose

/usr/share policy

2001-06-03 Thread Muhammad Hussain Yusuf
Hi, I have a package, gstar, which places various lists of stars in /usr/share/starchart since gstar is a gtk front-end to the starchart programme. My question is: is there any policy or guidelines about naming stuff in in /usr/share? Should the dir be named /usr/share/gstar as that is the name

/usr/share policy

2001-06-03 Thread Muhammad Hussain Yusuf
Hi, I have a package, gstar, which places various lists of stars in /usr/share/starchart since gstar is a gtk front-end to the starchart programme. My question is: is there any policy or guidelines about naming stuff in in /usr/share? Should the dir be named /usr/share/gstar as that is the name

Anyone upload package for me? (Awaiting DAM approval)

2001-05-29 Thread Muhammad Hussain Yusuf
Hello, Apologies for asking again, but can anyone upload a package for me? The package is ncftp (version 2: 3.0.3-1) which is a new upstream release of ncftp (previous version 3.0.2 is already in unstable). I recently adopted the package. Lintian gives no errors, and AFAIK it works OK. It's

sponsor required for gstar (ITP #88503)

2001-05-27 Thread Muhammad Hussain Yusuf
Hi, Would anyone like to sponsor/upload a new Debian package for me? I'm awaiting DAM approval, so need someone to upload the package to testing since I've not yet got an account. I've already got a couple of packages in testing (uploaded by others). The new package is gstar (ITP #88503) and

sponsor required for gstar (ITP #88503)

2001-05-27 Thread Muhammad Hussain Yusuf
Hi, Would anyone like to sponsor/upload a new Debian package for me? I'm awaiting DAM approval, so need someone to upload the package to testing since I've not yet got an account. I've already got a couple of packages in testing (uploaded by others). The new package is gstar (ITP #88503) and

Packaging Xfonts

2001-02-17 Thread Muhammad Hussain Yusuf
Hi, I intend to package a small collection of Arabic fonts, currently availble as pcf, and would like to know if, for the Debs source package, they have to be in bdf and then compiled into pcf for the Debs font package itself. I have xtobdf, and was wondering if there are any other such

Hoping for sponsorship - hdate

2000-02-16 Thread Muhammad Hussain Yusuf
Hi, I have packaged hdate, with the deb and source available at: http://www.crosswinds.net/~yusuf/hdates.html and I am looking for a sponsor, as I am not yet a developer. hdate calculates lunar Hijra dates and calenders, as used by about one-fifth of the world's population. I would also like to

ITP hdate

2000-01-17 Thread Muhammad Hussain Yusuf
hdate is a simple package to generate Hijra dates from AD dates and to print a Hijra calender for a given AD month or year (past, present and future). The Hijra (lunar) calender is used by Muslims worldwide. The Debian packages and source code are available at: