Re: working on package

Hello, On Tue, 2009-03-31 at 17:02 +0200, Grammostola Rosea wrote: Should I post a message somewhere when I start to work on a package? as you already sent an email you could fill us in anyways, yes. Is it something completely new or an update to an existing package? If it's a new package you

Re: How to get an sponsor (need a bit more info)

On Tue, 2009-03-31 at 21:00 +0200, Grammostola Rosea wrote: Hi, O, I've uploaded an packages and requested for an sponsor, also mailed it to the list. What is next? Wait and see? But what if potential sponsors are not satisfied with my package? Can I get some comments, or does this mean

Re: working on package

On Tue, 2009-03-31 at 20:56 +0200, Grammostola Rosea wrote: Stephan Peijnik wrote: Hello, On Tue, 2009-03-31 at 17:02 +0200, Grammostola Rosea wrote: Should I post a message somewhere when I start to work on a package? as you already sent an email you could fill us

Re: RFS: rumor

On Sun, 2009-03-29 at 17:08 +0200, Grammostola Rosea wrote: Don't know if it has something to do with: fakeroot debian/rules clean test -x debian/rules

Re: [jack-mixer]bin/sh: no: command not found

On Tue, 2009-03-31 at 21:11 +0200, Grammostola Rosea wrote: Hi, I tried to build jack-mixer, but after running: pbuilder build *.dsc I get: You should probably not use globbing and use pdebuild instead. When using pdebuild you can change to the source directory and simply run pdebuild without

Re: Packaging a self-hosting assemler from source

On Fri, 2009-02-20 at 12:58 +, Peter Marsh wrote: I'm trying to package FASM (http://www.flatassembler.net/) from source. It's a self-hosting assembler, and upstream doesn't provide a makefile. I can't find anything in the docs about how I should correctly specify a make file and the

RE: Packaging a self-hosting assemler from source

Please keep debian-mentors CC'ed when replying... On Fri, 2009-02-20 at 15:53 +, Peter Marsh wrote: Thanks for the response but I don't see the restriction on commercial use, I thought it was under the BSD licence (according to licence.txt)? Oh, I misread a paragraph in license.txt, my

Re: What to do if the original tarball contains a debian subdirectory

On Wed, 2009-01-28 at 16:17 +0100, Luca Niccoli wrote: I found a very nice little program to take pictures from a webcam, and I would like to package it. The original tarball already contains a debian subdirectory (which needs some corrections anyway), how should I deal with that? If I

Re: RFH: dupload outguess.

On Thu, 2009-01-08 at 13:18 +0100, Anthony Gasperin wrote: HI, I am interested in adopting outguess package ! I have problems for the dupload, introduction's page at mentors.debian.net give a configuration for dupload to the root of ftp://mentors.debian.net; but it seems it is not the

Re: Average time to get an answer about package sponsoring

Hello Laurent, On Tue, 2008-11-18 at 21:55 +0100, Laurent Guignard wrote: I would like to know the average time to get an answer from the upload of the package on mentors.debian.net and an answer a mentor. After one month could i have any information about all errors i made in my package and

Re: RFS: courier-pythonfilter

Hello, First of all I'd like to mention that I am not a DD, so I cannot sponsor your package, but I do have a quick comment on your lintian problem. On Mon, 2008-11-03 at 14:52 +0100, Frederik Dannemare wrote: courier-pythonfilter: script-not-executable

Re: building for 'any' architecture?

On Sun, 2008-09-21 at 13:41 +0200, Michael Renner wrote: Moin, I made a small package with some X fonts. First I extracted the fonts into a directory, startet 'dh_make' and after some modifications in postinst etc I run 'dpkg-buildpackage -d'. As far as I see is the deb-package ok. But it

RFS: python-sptest

Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package python-sptest. * Package name: python-sptest Version : 0.2.1-1 Upstream Author : Stephan Peijnik [EMAIL PROTECTED] * URL : http://bitbucket.org/sp/sptest * License : GPL (v3 or later) Section

Re: RFS: python-sptest

Hello, On Thu, 2008-09-11 at 20:44 +0200, Bernd Zeimetz wrote: I am looking for a sponsor for my package python-sptest. what would you thi nk about maintaining the package within the Python Modules Team? It makes sponsoring much more easy for us, and it's more easy to find a sponsor for

Re: RFS: netmon-applet (updated package)

On Thu, 2008-08-28 at 21:51 +0300, George Danchev wrote: On Thursday 28 August 2008 17:17:20 Stephan Peijnik wrote: Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.4-12 of my package netmon-applet. Hello, here are some comments, you might want to address: 1

RFS: netmon-applet (updated package)

if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards Stephan Peijnik -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]