Hi,
I've been maintaining a number of packages for about 5 years. For these
packages, I've been working with a number of DDs and since the
cooperation was so satisfactory, I never had the need (and for a couple
of years, the time) to apply for DD myself.
Last week, I made packages for Quake III.
Stan Vasilyev [EMAIL PROTECTED] schreef:
How do I add an application to IceWM menu without manually editing
/etc/X11/icewm/menu file?
Maybe http://linux-cd.com.ar/manuales/debian-menu/ch3.html and
http://packages.debian.org/stable/admin/menu is what you are looking
for?
--
Met vriendelijke
Dear debian mentors,
I have made another attempt at creating a debian package for rkward, a
scientific KDE application I develop. Naturally, I would like to get this app
into the main debian archive.
Could somebody please sponsor me an upload, and/or help me fix up the package
to meet the
Hi
I am not yet a DD so I can't sponsor your package sorry.
But maybe I can give you some advice for improving the packaging.
OK there are some issues:
1. Well you provide a native debian package as I can see.
I don't think that your package should be a native one, although you are the
Hi Mario,
please send your answers on my list mails back to the list, so others
can also help or could correct me, if I'm wrong.
Mario Iseli Mario Iseli [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Sun, 2005-11-06 at 16:42 +0100, Erik Schanze wrote:
Perhaps you should mention, that irmp3 was recently removed from
Hi,
* Jakson A. Aquino [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-11-09 17:43]:
I'm sorry for still using the wrong FSF address. Now it's
really fixed. The new links are:
http://wald.intevation.org/frs/download.php/43/statist_1.3.1-1.diff.gz
http://wald.intevation.org/frs/download.php/44/statist_1.3.1-1.dsc
Hi,
I am not yet a DD so I can't sponsor your package sorry.
But maybe I can give you some advice for improving the packaging.
Thanks very much for your advice. I'll work on those areas. A few questions:
1. Well you provide a native debian package as I can see.
I don't think that your
Erik Schanze wrote:
Your way will not fail, but could be improved.
The advantage of Build-Depends on autotools-dev is to have the newest
config.* stuff available. There is no need to include the new config.*
files into diff. If you do so, you don't need to Build-Depend on
autotools-dev,
Op di 8 nov 2005 om 09:28:37 -0500 schreef Alejandro Ríos P.:
Hello.
I'm trying to package a program [1] that has a Perl server and a SWF
client made with ming.
What's the name of the program? What does it do?
Since ming is not in Debian anymore,
You're talking about libming, which is
Hi again,
on more thing:
8. There is a rpath (as lintian told me). See the lintian warning:
W: rkward:
binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath ./usr/bin/rkward
/usr/lib:/usr/share/qt3/lib:/usr/X11R6/lib:/usr/lib/R/lib/
I think you can directly fix it (upstream) ;)
Yeah, but I'll have to
On Wed, Nov 09, 2005 at 09:09:03AM +0100, Marc Leeman wrote:
Anyone intersted in answering the call?
A link to actual packages files would be good...
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.djpig.de/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
Packages marked Essential: yes have to be operational before they
are configured, and packages need not (and should not) depend on them,
in the same was as they needn't and shouldn't to build-depend on
build-essential packages such as gcc and make. Essential packages are
also the only ones which
Justin Pryzby [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Packages marked Essential: yes have to be operational before they are
configured, and packages need not (and should not) depend on them, in
the same was as they needn't and shouldn't to build-depend on
build-essential packages such as gcc and make.
On Wed, Nov 09, 2005 at 01:13:44PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
Justin Pryzby [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Packages marked Essential: yes have to be operational before they are
configured, and packages need not (and should not) depend on them, in
the same was as they needn't and shouldn't to
Justin Pryzby [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, Nov 09, 2005 at 01:13:44PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
Essential means that it's very difficult to remove the package and you
have to jump through extreme hoops to do so, and that removing it may
break the system.
Yes, but how is that different
Unfortunately the Debian menu doesn't solve my problem because IceWM
doesn't support it. Basically the issue is that the software I'm
packaging, IceWM Control Center is strictly for IceWM and it doesn't
make sense to use it in other window managers. However, in KDE,
BlackBox, Fluxbox and Gnome I
Hi Daniel,
Daniel Baumann [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Erik Schanze wrote:
Your way will not fail, but could be improved.
The advantage of Build-Depends on autotools-dev is to have the
newest config.* stuff available. There is no need to include the
new config.* files into diff. If you do so, you
On Mon, Nov 07, 2005 at 09:46:38PM -0500, Daniel Milstein wrote:
I was wondering if anyone would be interested in sponsoring bubnbros, a 2d
platform game that is a clone of Bubble Bobble. Parts of it are released
under the MIT License and the rest is under the Artistic LIcense. Its ITP bug
On Wed, Nov 09, 2005 at 11:30:23PM +0100, Erik Schanze wrote:
Hi Daniel,
Daniel Baumann [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Erik Schanze wrote:
Your way will not fail, but could be improved.
The advantage of Build-Depends on autotools-dev is to have the
newest config.* stuff available. There is no
ccbuild is a C++ source scanning build utility. This request is for
the new 1.5.0 version that is just out.
I have posted all my debian package work at:
http://www.ai.rug.nl/~bneijt/debian/
The sponsors record can be found at:
http://sponsors.debian.net/viewpkg.php?id=134
The ITP can be found
I'm interested in doing a package for spey, my greylisting SMTP proxy
(http://spey.sf.net). This isn't going to happen immediately, but I'm due to
make another upstream release soon, and if that goes well I want to start
work on the package.
Unfortunately, the application has its own coroutine
On Thu, Nov 10, 2005 at 12:38:26AM +, David Given wrote:
I'm interested in doing a package for spey, my greylisting SMTP proxy
(http://spey.sf.net). This isn't going to happen immediately, but I'm due to
make another upstream release soon, and if that goes well I want to start
work on
I need a clarification because I am confused. If I have a script that
uses awk do I need the package to Depends: awk? Or is awk like
basename where we are able to assume it is on the system without any
explicit dependencies?
I see that many packages do Depends: awk. But awk is an alternative
On Wed, Nov 09, 2005 at 06:43:51PM -0700, Bob Proulx wrote:
I need a clarification because I am confused. If I have a script that
uses awk do I need the package to Depends: awk? Or is awk like
basename where we are able to assume it is on the system without any
explicit dependencies?
I
On Wed, Nov 09, 2005 at 06:43:51PM -0700, Bob Proulx wrote:
I need a clarification because I am confused. If I have a script that
uses awk do I need the package to Depends: awk? Or is awk like
basename where we are able to assume it is on the system without any
explicit dependencies?
I see
On Wed, Nov 09, 2005 at 09:57:37PM -0500, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
On Wed, Nov 09, 2005 at 06:43:51PM -0700, Bob Proulx wrote:
I need a clarification because I am confused. If I have a script that
uses awk do I need the package to Depends: awk? Or is awk like
basename where we are able
On Wed, 2005-11-09 at 21:08 +0100, Joost van Baal wrote:
Since ming is not in Debian anymore,
You're talking about libming, which is still supported in woody
(oldstable). Do you know why it didn't make it to sarge? It might be
possible to get it re-enter Debian. (Just saw upstream
On Thu, Nov 10, 2005 at 12:29:27PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
If it _depends_ upon libming, your program can't be shipped with Debian
as long as libming is not in Debian.
It can be shipped in contrib though. contrib is for free packages with
dependencies (free or otherwise) that are not in
On Thu, Nov 10, 2005 at 12:29:27PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
On Wed, 2005-11-09 at 21:08 +0100, Joost van Baal wrote:
Since ming is not in Debian anymore,
You're talking about libming, which is still supported in woody
(oldstable). Do you know why it didn't make it to sarge? It might be
possible
After looking into the whole new maintainer process and application
and documentation and tomes of webpages on the Debian website, I
encountered a question. I sent an email three days ago to what I
thought was the most logical address, the Debian Front Desk, and
even though I'm not involved right
Op do 10 nov 2005 om 12:20:55 -0500 schreef DoyenGuy:
snip
I have written a program (and continue to improve) called ProShield
(proshield.sf.net) that I would like to get put into the official
debian apt repositories. This involves a new maintainer application
process, as well as a lot of
On Thu, Nov 10, 2005 at 12:20:55AM -0500, DoyenGuy wrote:
After looking into the whole new maintainer process and application
and documentation and tomes of webpages on the Debian website, I
encountered a question. I sent an email three days ago to what I
thought was the most logical address,
Hi,
On Wed, Nov 09, 2005 at 10:46:32PM -0200, Jakson A. Aquino wrote:
I added (Closes: #155073), but this bug was already
automatically closed on 22 Sep 2005 because there was no
activity around it in 365 days. Is there any problem in
trying to close an already closed bug?
This is
33 matches
Mail list logo
