On Tue, 26 Sep 2006 00:31:07 +0100, James Westby wrote:
On (25/09/06 23:34), James Stone wrote:
m.d.n still has version -4. So you wish to upload an updated version?
James
Don't know what happened, I had a .upload file but it was not on the
server. I have re-uploaded it now.
Il giorno Mon, 25 Sep 2006 20:07:59 +0100
James Westby [EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto:
On (23/09/06 13:36), Luca bedogni wrote:
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package webcam-server.
* Package name: webcam-server
I cannot sponsor the package for you but I have
Le Tue, Sep 26, 2006 at 04:28:14PM +1000, Matthew Palmer a écrit :
On Tue, Sep 26, 2006 at 02:44:14PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
For one of the packages I created, the upstream sources I used were a
version 1.x accidentally released as version 2.0 on sourceforge.
Accidentally?
Well,
ITP: #386445
* Package name: littex
Version : 20060922
Upstream Authors: Sigitas Tolusis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Vytas Statulevicius [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yannis Haralambous
* URL : http://www.vtex.lt/tex/distfiles
* License : LPPL
On Tue, Sep 26, 2006 at 02:44:14PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
For one of the packages I created, the upstream sources I used were a
version 1.x accidentally released as version 2.0 on sourceforge.
Accidentally? Did you package and upload this new upstream release? Has
upstream gone back to
Hi,
An, 2006 09 26 10:52 +0200, Norbert Preining rašė:
On Die, 26 Sep 2006, K??stutis Bili??nas wrote:
This packages can be found on my repository at
http://kebil.ghost.lt/debian/pool/littex/
Nice package, well done. SOme comments:
- build-depends on tex-common (= 0.19) would be good
Hi!
On Die, 26 Sep 2006, K??stutis Bili??nas wrote:
- why do you recommend tetex-extra? Is there a specific reason? And if
yes, could you provide an alternative rec on a texlive package?
The main fonts for Lithuanian documents will be l7x-lm fonts, so
I made the Depends: lmodern. The
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Daniel Baumann wrote:
Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
Are you still looking for a sponsor to upload xml-im-exporter?
I sponsored it a while ago, it's sitting in NEW.
Thanks.
- --
Arnaud Vandyck, STE fi, ULg
Formateur Cellule Programmation.
Java Trap:
As propesed, I added a copyright and licence notice about the two files
I took from the linux kernel source tree. Hopefully that is sufficent.
On 2006-09-22 at 20:56:02 +0200, Tobias Klauser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for my package inotail.
* Package name:
On Tue, 26 Sep 2006 09:05:01 -0300, Nelson A. de Oliveira [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi mentors!
I am creating a package of a program that have several files with:
* The contents of this file are subject to the Netscape Public
* License Version 1.1 (the License); you may not use this file
Once again ;-)
Message original
Sujet: RFS: libmtp
Date de renvoi: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 10:13:45 -0500 (CDT)
De (renvoi):debian-mentors@lists.debian.org
Date: Wed, 09 Aug 2006 17:13:17 +0200
De: Jean Parpaillon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Pour:
On (26/09/06 09:05), Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote:
Hi mentors!
I am creating a package of a program that have several files with:
* The contents of this file are subject to the Netscape Public
* License Version 1.1 (the License); you may not use this file
* except in compliance with the
On (25/09/06 19:01), holoturoide wrote:
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.5.6-3
of my package gtksee.
Hi, I cannot sponsor but I have some comments,
* Your debian/copyright does not reflect current best practices,
please see
On (26/09/06 07:15), James Stone wrote:
On Tue, 26 Sep 2006 00:31:07 +0100, James Westby wrote:
- add a copyright/license statement about your packaging.
Can you give an example of what you mean?
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/03/msg00023.html
* Does your
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.0-1
of my package page-crunch.
It builds these binary packages:
page-crunch - GUI/frontend to psutils programs, like psnup, psbook
The package is lintian clean.
The upload would fix these bugs: 387323
The package can be found on
Hi mentors!
I am creating a package of a program that have several files with:
* The contents of this file are subject to the Netscape Public
* License Version 1.1 (the License); you may not use this file
* except in compliance with the License. You may obtain a copy of
* the License at
On Monday 25 September 2006 16:19, Benjamin Mesing wrote:
Hello
Options I have thought about, but found not to be optimal:
* File a bug report against apt-file, and block the bug against
packagesearch by the new one - close the bug against
packagesaerch as soon
Hi,
Am Montag, 25. September 2006 18:40 schrieb Timo Jyrinki:
URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/o/openoffice.org-voikko
I uploaded this packages despite the remaining problems, so that there'd
be the newest version at mentors.debian.net anyway. Hopefully the first
3-4
On Tue, 2006-09-26 at 15:20 +0300, George Danchev wrote:
On Monday 25 September 2006 16:19, Benjamin Mesing wrote:
clone 12345 -1
reassign -1 apt-file
retitle -1 apt-file: known to break packagesearch ...
thanks
However, the bugs live seperated from each other after cloning. So
Nelson A. de Oliveira -- 26.09.2006 15:05 --:
Hi mentors!
I am creating a package of a program that have several files with:
* The contents of this file are subject to the Netscape Public
* License Version 1.1 (the License); you may not use this file
* except in compliance with the
On (26/09/06 10:20), Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote:
Hi!
On 9/26/06, James Westby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Asking the upstream author about the license of the program, he said
that it's legacy code and the program is licensed under GPL only.
He holds the copyright on this code?
The full
On (26/09/06 11:09), Jean Parpaillon wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for my package libmtp.
Hi I cannot sponsor, but I have some comments,
* Can you please expand the long description. At least mention what
the MTP is, and what sort of devices support it.
* Should libmtp-doc be in
On (26/09/06 09:35), Luca bedogni wrote:
Il giorno Mon, 25 Sep 2006 20:07:59 +0100
James Westby [EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto:
On (23/09/06 13:36), Luca bedogni wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for my package webcam-server.
* You have created a very strange package with all of the
On Mon, 25 Sep 2006, Timo Jyrinki wrote:
* There is a lintian warning
W: tmispell-voikko: binary-without-manpage ispell
but I'm not sure how this should be handled.
Just uploaded 0.6-3 adds lintian override. I also changed dependencies
for it, malaga and libvoikko... hopefully
On (25/09/06 20:53), Muammar Wadih El Khatib Rodriguez wrote:
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.1-17
of my package blacs-pvm.
Hi,
I cannot sponsor, but I have some comments for you.
* Should the package names be prefixed with lib?
* blacs1-pvm.postinst is
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.1-5 of my package png2html
(This package was previously orphaned). I would like to thank those who have
taken the time to look at this package and make suggestions for improvements,
and I hope it is now ready for sponsorship.
It
Hi!
On 9/26/06, James Westby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Asking the upstream author about the license of the program, he said
that it's legacy code and the program is licensed under GPL only.
He holds the copyright on this code?
The full copyright message is:
* The contents of this file are
Hi!
On Die, 26 Sep 2006, K??stutis Bili??nas wrote:
This packages can be found on my repository at
http://kebil.ghost.lt/debian/pool/littex/
Nice package, well done. SOme comments:
- build-depends on tex-common (= 0.19) would be good as this fixes a
bug in dh_installtex. The bug doesn't hit
Hello,
On Thu, 21 Sep 2006, James Westby wrote:
On (21/09/06 12:47), Kapil Hari Paranjape wrote:
Consequently, I have newer versions at:
http://www.imsc.res.in/~kapil/debian/swish++/swish++_6.1.4-0pre4.dsc
Your debian/copyright is still not quite right. You can't say that the
Hello there,
On Tue, Sep 26, 2006 at 04:29:16PM +0100, Jack Grahams wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.1-5 of my package png2html
(This package was previously orphaned). I would like to thank those who have
taken the time to look at this package and make suggestions for
On Tuesday 26 September 2006 15:39, Benjamin Mesing wrote:
On Tue, 2006-09-26 at 15:20 +0300, George Danchev wrote:
On Monday 25 September 2006 16:19, Benjamin Mesing wrote:
clone 12345 -1
reassign -1 apt-file
retitle -1 apt-file: known to break packagesearch ...
thanks
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Flo,
The CFLAGS are not passed to make, so setting -g effectively yields
no result as upstream uses his own set of flags.
Good point, I hadn't noticed that - I thought I'd got rid of all the
pointless parts of debian/rules...
DH_COMPAT is
On Tue, Sep 26, 2006 at 07:42:56PM +0100, Jack Grahams wrote:
The CFLAGS are not passed to make, so setting -g effectively yields
no result as upstream uses his own set of flags.
Good point, I hadn't noticed that - I thought I'd got rid of all the
pointless parts of debian/rules...
Umm,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package libvrb. This is an update to
the (so far unsponsored) previous version 0.5.1-1.
* Package name: libvrb
Version : 0.5.1-2
Upstream Author : Philip Howard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL
On Tue, Sep 26, 2006 at 05:09:51PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
Le Tue, Sep 26, 2006 at 04:28:14PM +1000, Matthew Palmer a écrit :
On Tue, Sep 26, 2006 at 02:44:14PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
For one of the packages I created, the upstream sources I used were a
version 1.x accidentally
...so what I meant was: please take care that the CFLAGS from your previous
debian/rules get passed on correctly.
Ugh. Of course. I knew I kept it in for a reason ;) Now I feel stupid...
I hope I've done this okay now.
Both texts better shouldn't go into too much detail about how certain
On Tue, 26 Sep 2006 12:38:08 +0100, James Westby wrote:
* Is debconf really the best way of doing the adult/safe
configuration?
It is the only way I can think of. Do you have any better ideas?
Make it safe by default and add a script to change between them? Make it
an
On Tue, 26 Sep 2006 13:20:15 +0100, James Westby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On (26/09/06 09:02), Henrique Haas wrote:
hello james.
firstly I sorry by don't give the right attention yesterday.
I upload a new release of package, based in your comments.
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package scuttle.
* Package name: scuttle
Version : 0.7.2-1
Upstream Author : Marcus Campbell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/scuttle
* License : GNU General Public License (GPL)
Section
Le Fri, Sep 15, 2006 at 03:22:37AM +0200, Daniel Leidert a écrit :
In short: Change
#include pcre.h
to
#include pcre.h
and see 'man pcre-config' for the compilation arguments (you only need,
what --libs tells you in the linking step, IIRC).
Dear Daniel,
I have posted more
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package otserv.
* Package name: otserv
Version : 0.5.0-1
Upstream Author : Tliff
* URL : http://otserv.org
* License : GPL
Section : misc
It builds these binary packages:
otserv - Open Tibia Server
41 matches
Mail list logo
