Hi,
Charliej wrote:
That depends on what your definition of what mature is? If you mean
mature as in will the software do what it's suppose to do then yes.
If you mean mature as in time then probable not.
mature means for me that the package is somewhat ready for use by end users.
That means
Moin,
I made a small package with some X fonts. First I extracted the fonts into a
directory, startet 'dh_make' and after some modifications in postinst etc I
run 'dpkg-buildpackage -d'. As far as I see is the deb-package ok. But it is
a i386 package, I expected a package for any architecture
On Sun, 2008-09-21 at 13:41 +0200, Michael Renner wrote:
Moin,
I made a small package with some X fonts. First I extracted the fonts into a
directory, startet 'dh_make' and after some modifications in postinst etc I
run 'dpkg-buildpackage -d'. As far as I see is the deb-package ok. But it
On Sunday 21 September 2008, Stephan Peijnik wrote:
On Sun, 2008-09-21 at 13:41 +0200, Michael Renner wrote:
Moin,
I made a small package with some X fonts. First I extracted the fonts
into a directory, startet 'dh_make' and after some modifications in
postinst etc I run
On Sun, Sep 21, 2008 at 7:58 PM, Michael Renner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Architecture: any
Use 'all' not 'any'.
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
In debian/control, change Architecture: any to Architecture: all.
The Architecture field can take the following values:
- any: Build the package on all architecture.
- i386, amd64, etc.: Only build the package on the indicated architectures.
- all: the package is architecture
On Sun, 21 Sep 2008 13:41:31 +0200
Michael Renner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Moin,
I made a small package with some X fonts. First I extracted the fonts into a
directory, startet 'dh_make' and after some modifications in postinst etc I
run 'dpkg-buildpackage -d'. As far as I see is the
Hi,
Michael Renner wrote:
I made a small package with some X fonts. First I extracted the fonts into a
directory, startet 'dh_make' and after some modifications in postinst etc I
run 'dpkg-buildpackage -d'. As far as I see is the deb-package ok. But it is
a i386 package, I expected a
On Sunday 21 September 2008, Paul Wise wrote:
On Sun, Sep 21, 2008 at 7:58 PM, Michael Renner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Architecture: any
Use 'all' not 'any'.
thanks so much. To you and all others.
CU
--
|Michael Renner E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
|D-81541 Munich Germany
also sprach Paul Hardy [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008.09.21.0432 +0100]:
I also bought a copy of The Debian System, by Martin F. Krafft,
ISBN 1-59327-069-0. […] The book is also dated (it has a DVD of
sarge 3.1r0a in the back and now we're approaching a lenny release
three years later).
I should be
Moin,
I managed to build a font package that installs and uninstalls without
problems. Therefor I checked how the xfont-base package works. But while
there is a FontPath entry for /usr/share/fonts/X11/misc in /etc/X11/xorg.conf
there is none entry for the new directory
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package sqlmap.
* Package name: sqlmap
Version : 0.6-1
Upstream Author : Bernardo Damele A. G. and Daniele Bellucci
* URL : http://sqlmap.sourceforge.net
* License :
On Sun, Sep 21, 2008 at 6:13 AM, martin f krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nevertheless, in terms of the basics of packages and packaging, not
much has changed. I am going to provide additional information in
a new edition, but you won't waste time by reading the stuff in the
current edition.
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package flashblock.
* Package name: flashblock
Version : 1.3.10a~snapshot20080611-1
Upstream Author : Jesse Ruderman + Contibutors
* URL : http://flashblock.mozdev.org/
* License : MPL 1.1/GPL 2.0/LGPL 2.1
Krzysztof Burghardt [EMAIL PROTECTED] (18/09/2008):
It builds these binary packages:
elfrc - program to convert arbitrary files into elf objects
In addition to Patrick's comments, I'd suggest to “s/program to //” this
description.
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Jean Parpaillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] (09/09/2008):
Dear mentors,
Salut Jean,
I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
as you may know, I'm going to be more available nowadays. :)
See you tomorrow,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Charles Plessy [EMAIL PROTECTED] (17/09/2008):
the best way to figure out is to send a patch and see if it is
accepted ;)
IIRC, a bit of standardization got discussed already (on -devel), so a
potential patch sender may want to check that first.
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital
Al Nikolov [EMAIL PROTECTED] (16/09/2008):
OTOH, devreference is not a collection of common used practices (what
is may be sad)
I beg to differ. Once a practice is common enough, it'd quite
interesting to have it documented so that others can easily follow
what de facto consensus has been
Julien Lavergne [EMAIL PROTECTED] (16/09/2008):
I am looking for a sponsor for my package gnome-art-ng.
The goal of Gnome-art-ng is to replace gnome-art (non maintained
upstream, see http://www.miketech.net/gnome-art/index.php). It provides
the same features: […]
Maybe you could keep the
Carlos Martín Nieto [EMAIL PROTECTED] (04/09/2008):
I am looking for someone to upload an updated version of mpop. Cyril
Brulebois originally reviewed it, but it has been more than a month
since that (I've been away from my computer and my keys), so I'm
asking in general again.
Yes, sorry
Giuseppe Iuculano [EMAIL PROTECTED] (02/09/2008):
My usual sponsor is Cyril Brulebois (kibi), I've tried asking him for
an upload several time, but never gotten a response
You had on IRC, and that was “too busy to sponsor anything for now”.
Mraw,
KiBi — M-x catchup-mode
signature.asc
Krzysztof Burghardt [EMAIL PROTECTED] (17/09/2008):
I'd like to remove bluetooth-alsa and libsbc from Debian completely.
It was already removed (at my request) from unstable, but it is still
in Lenny. How can I remove it from Lenny? Reportbug tell me that
package does not exist when trying to
Cyril Brulebois ha scritto:
You had on IRC, and that was “too busy to sponsor anything for now”.
No, that was I'm kinda busy right now, maybe in a few hours.
Giuseppe.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Damien Raude-Morvan [EMAIL PROTECTED] (29/07/2008):
I am looking for a sponsor for my package mina.
As said through private mail, finally taken care of.
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Sun, 24 Aug 2008 04:13:44 +0100
Daniel Watkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 4.5.3-1
of my package configobj.
This has now been uploaded. Thanks to Piotr. :)
--
Daniel Watkins (Odd_Bloke)
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Damien Raude-Morvan [EMAIL PROTECTED] (04/08/2008):
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.0.7-1
of package jzlib.
As said through private mail, finally uploaded.
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Philippe Coval [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I am looking for a sponsor for my package flashblock.
Thanks for this ITP (bug#469906), I use the Flashblock plugin and find
it very neat and useful.
It builds these binary packages:
flashblock - mozilla extension that replaces flash plugin by a
Damien Raude-Morvan [EMAIL PROTECTED] (29/07/2008):
I am looking for a sponsor for my package sqlline.
Again, after some private mails, finally uploaded.
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Mon, 22 Sep 2008, Ben Finney wrote:
I'd suggest:
web browser add-on that blocks playing each Flash object until clicked
Perhaps someone else can suggest a more snappy synopsis that still
retains accuracy.
Why not the 'official' description of Flashblock?
Blocks all Flash
Mauro Lizaur [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Why not the 'official' description of Flashblock?
Blocks all Flash content in a web page from loading automatically.
I think using it will be more than accurate than re-inventing another desc.
Yes, that's good. To make it a noun-phrase description of
Hello everybody,
there was recently a discussion on this list about the necessity of
using $(QUILT_STAMPFN) instead of patch as a patching target. I had a
look at /usr/share/dpatch/dpatch.make and /usr/share/quilt/quilt.make
and realised that only Quilt makes the patch target phony. Is there
Charles Plessy [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hello everybody,
there was recently a discussion on this list about the necessity of
using $(QUILT_STAMPFN) instead of patch as a patching target. I had a
look at /usr/share/dpatch/dpatch.make and /usr/share/quilt/quilt.make
and realised that only
Hi,
We've been using apt-proxy for about a year, and then found it quite
buggy. So we moved to using apt-cacher. Now we have loads of problems
with apt-cacher as well (like currently, a recurring tzdata size
mismatch error). I was wondering if approx is any better than the other
two. Did any of
On Sun, Sep 21, 2008 at 10:14 PM, Thomas Goirand [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We've been using apt-proxy for about a year, and then found it quite
buggy. So we moved to using apt-cacher. Now we have loads of problems
with apt-cacher as well (like currently, a recurring tzdata size
mismatch error).
On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 08:54:03AM +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
Philippe Coval [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I am looking for a sponsor for my package flashblock.
Thanks for this ITP (bug#469906), I use the Flashblock plugin and find
it very neat and useful.
It builds these binary packages:
35 matches
Mail list logo
