*****SPAM***** Re: no exam, valium, xanax, viagra, more

2003-03-31 Thread Murray Askew
This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --9F.3_AB7D6 Content-Type: text/html Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable html head /head body div align=3Dcenter table borderColor=3D#ff cellPadding=3D0 width=3D476 bgColor=3D= #f3f4fe border=3D3 tbody tr td

Unidentified subject!

2003-03-31 Thread bounce-debian-ocaml-maint=archive=jab . org
-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Cameleon completed

2003-03-31 Thread Jérôme Marant
Hi, I have the pleasure to announced that cameleon has been finaly built on ARM, after months of pain. Cheers, -- Jérôme Marant [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Cameleon completed

2003-03-31 Thread Sven Luther
On Mon, Mar 31, 2003 at 11:19:57AM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote: Hi, I have the pleasure to announced that cameleon has been finaly built on ARM, after months of pain. Note that i did ask on debian-arm last friday or so, and got a response there, i thought you did also, didn't you ? Ok, This

Re: Cameleon completed

2003-03-31 Thread Jérôme Marant
En réponse à Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED]: ocamlsdl : sdl-mixer1.2 is not ready to enter testing because of the libvorbis mess. The problem seems to have been solved, but other packages may hinder either sdl-mixer1.2 or libvorbis to enter testing. libpgsql-ocaml-dev :

Re: Cameleon completed

2003-03-31 Thread Sven Luther
On Mon, Mar 31, 2003 at 03:26:59PM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote: En réponse à Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED]: ocamlsdl : sdl-mixer1.2 is not ready to enter testing because of the libvorbis mess. The problem seems to have been solved, but other packages may hinder either

Re: Cameleon completed

2003-03-31 Thread Jérôme Marant
En réponse à Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Mon, Mar 31, 2003 at 11:19:57AM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote: Hi, I have the pleasure to announced that cameleon has been finaly built on ARM, after months of pain. Note that i did ask on debian-arm last friday or so, and got a response

Re: Cameleon completed

2003-03-31 Thread Sven Luther
On Mon, Mar 31, 2003 at 04:35:15PM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote: En réponse à Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED]: How would removing ocamsdl from testing solve problem? (if it solves problem, then I'm OK from removing it) If ocamlsdl is no more in testing, then ocaml 3.06 will not break the

Re: Cameleon completed

2003-03-31 Thread Jérôme Marant
En réponse à Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED]: OK. Let's go for it. Let's wait for Stefano's response too, and let's check first that there are no missing problems. Could you ask on irc about the testing scripts, and if it is true that it does only check the dependencies and not the build

Re: Cameleon completed

2003-03-31 Thread Sven Luther
On Mon, Mar 31, 2003 at 05:28:10PM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote: En réponse à Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED]: OK. Let's go for it. Let's wait for Stefano's response too, and let's check first that there are no missing problems. Could you ask on irc about the testing scripts, and

Re: Cameleon completed

2003-03-31 Thread Sven Luther
On Mon, Mar 31, 2003 at 08:41:56PM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote: Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Sorry, I don't have access to IRC currently. And last time I asked about testing scripts, I've been bashed. No problem, i read the testing FAQ, and it seems my guesses would be ok.

Re: Cameleon completed

2003-03-31 Thread Jrme Marant
Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I guess we have to file bug reports again ftp.debian.org. A yes, altough it is the same as writing to ftp-masters, and http://www.debian.org/devel/testing#faq says (sorry for the french, if you want it in your local, just follow the above link) :

Re: Cameleon completed

2003-03-31 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
On Mon, Mar 31, 2003 at 09:11:54PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: If it is all the same to you, i can do this, and sign the mail as both of you, and cc you to ? Ok, go for it. Cheers. -- Stefano Zacchiroli - Undergraduate Student of CS @ Uni. Bologna, Italy [EMAIL

Re: Cameleon completed

2003-03-31 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
On Mon, Mar 31, 2003 at 07:54:33PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: No problem, i read the testing FAQ, and it seems my guesses would be ok. I think we can ask for the removal (it is even documented in the FAQ) as soon as we have Stefano's approval. Approved! How do we best go about this ? Do you

Unidentified subject!

2003-03-31 Thread list

Cameleon completed

2003-03-31 Thread Jérôme Marant
Hi, I have the pleasure to announced that cameleon has been finaly built on ARM, after months of pain. Cheers, -- Jérôme Marant [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Cameleon completed

2003-03-31 Thread Sven Luther
On Mon, Mar 31, 2003 at 11:19:57AM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote: Hi, I have the pleasure to announced that cameleon has been finaly built on ARM, after months of pain. Note that i did ask on debian-arm last friday or so, and got a response there, i thought you did also, didn't you ? Ok, This

Re: Cameleon completed

2003-03-31 Thread Jérôme Marant
En réponse à Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED]: ocamlsdl : sdl-mixer1.2 is not ready to enter testing because of the libvorbis mess. The problem seems to have been solved, but other packages may hinder either sdl-mixer1.2 or libvorbis to enter testing. libpgsql-ocaml-dev :

Re: Cameleon completed

2003-03-31 Thread Sven Luther
On Mon, Mar 31, 2003 at 03:26:59PM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote: En réponse à Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED]: ocamlsdl : sdl-mixer1.2 is not ready to enter testing because of the libvorbis mess. The problem seems to have been solved, but other packages may hinder either

Re: Cameleon completed

2003-03-31 Thread Jérôme Marant
En réponse à Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Mon, Mar 31, 2003 at 11:19:57AM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote: Hi, I have the pleasure to announced that cameleon has been finaly built on ARM, after months of pain. Note that i did ask on debian-arm last friday or so, and got a response

Re: Cameleon completed

2003-03-31 Thread Jérôme Marant
En réponse à Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED]: How would removing ocamsdl from testing solve problem? (if it solves problem, then I'm OK from removing it) If ocamlsdl is no more in testing, then ocaml 3.06 will not break the version of ocamlsdl that is in testing, and will thus enter testing

Re: Cameleon completed

2003-03-31 Thread Sven Luther
On Mon, Mar 31, 2003 at 04:35:15PM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote: En réponse à Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED]: How would removing ocamsdl from testing solve problem? (if it solves problem, then I'm OK from removing it) If ocamlsdl is no more in testing, then ocaml 3.06 will not break the

Re: Cameleon completed

2003-03-31 Thread Jérôme Marant
En réponse à Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED]: OK. Let's go for it. Let's wait for Stefano's response too, and let's check first that there are no missing problems. Could you ask on irc about the testing scripts, and if it is true that it does only check the dependencies and not the build

Re: Cameleon completed

2003-03-31 Thread Sven Luther
On Mon, Mar 31, 2003 at 05:28:10PM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote: En réponse à Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED]: OK. Let's go for it. Let's wait for Stefano's response too, and let's check first that there are no missing problems. Could you ask on irc about the testing scripts, and

Re: Cameleon completed

2003-03-31 Thread Jérôme Marant
Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Sorry, I don't have access to IRC currently. And last time I asked about testing scripts, I've been bashed. No problem, i read the testing FAQ, and it seems my guesses would be ok. I think we can ask for the removal (it is even documented in the FAQ)

Re: Cameleon completed

2003-03-31 Thread Sven Luther
On Mon, Mar 31, 2003 at 08:41:56PM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote: Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Sorry, I don't have access to IRC currently. And last time I asked about testing scripts, I've been bashed. No problem, i read the testing FAQ, and it seems my guesses would be ok.

Re: Cameleon completed

2003-03-31 Thread Jérôme Marant
Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I guess we have to file bug reports again ftp.debian.org. A yes, altough it is the same as writing to ftp-masters, and http://www.debian.org/devel/testing#faq says (sorry for the french, if you want it in your local, just follow the above link) :

Re: Cameleon completed

2003-03-31 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
On Mon, Mar 31, 2003 at 09:11:54PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: If it is all the same to you, i can do this, and sign the mail as both of you, and cc you to ? Ok, go for it. Cheers. -- Stefano Zacchiroli - Undergraduate Student of CS @ Uni. Bologna, Italy [EMAIL

Re: Cameleon completed

2003-03-31 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
On Mon, Mar 31, 2003 at 07:54:33PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: No problem, i read the testing FAQ, and it seems my guesses would be ok. I think we can ask for the removal (it is even documented in the FAQ) as soon as we have Stefano's approval. Approved! How do we best go about this ? Do you