Bug#364104: ooqstart: Fix build with GCC 4.2

2007-07-01 Thread Mark Brown
tag 364104 + patch thanks Please find enclosed a patch fixing compilation of ooqstart with GCC 4.2 - the issues were all const correctness problems with string constants. If desired I can prepare a NMU with this fix. Thanks. -- You grabbed my hand and we fell into it, like a daydream - or a

Bug#239193: openoffice.org: [powerpc] Setup fails to complete

2004-03-21 Thread Mark Brown
Package: openoffice.org Version: 1.1.0+1.1.1rc3-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Attempting to start openofficece causes my system to complian about its RC files. Deleting these and restarting as per README.Debian causes the following output: | $ rm ~/.sversionrc ; rm

Bug#206009: openoffice.org-bin: Prelinking question could be improved

2003-08-19 Thread Mark Brown
On Tue, Aug 19, 2003 at 01:09:32PM +0200, Chris Halls wrote: The libraries themselves are modified. This was my main reason for wanting it to be optional. After OOo is prelinked, the md5sum checksums become useless, so people who are very concerned about the integrity of their files should

Bug#206009: openoffice.org-bin: Prelinking question could be improved

2003-08-18 Thread Mark Brown
Package: openoffice.org-bin Version: 1.0.99+1.1rc-1 Severity: minor The Debconf question about prelinking simply says that if you prelink the program will start up faster without mentioning any downsides but then defaults to No. This is a bit confusing - the assumption given the description

Bug#206009: openoffice.org-bin: Prelinking question could be improved

2003-08-18 Thread Mark Brown
On Mon, Aug 18, 2003 at 07:47:51PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: I think if there really are no major drawbacks, why not? But we currently do not know and prelink's manpage does not say anything about possible drawbacks. Well, one thing to watch out for is that changes in the libraries being