On Mon, 2009-01-12 at 00:34 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 08:59:06AM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
Steve Langasek wrote:
This bug appears to be fixed upstream now; has anyone isolated a pointer
to
the correct changeset that should be applied to the Debian
Hi there,
FYI, there's a purposed patch upstream, at
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=96878
Best regards,
--
Marcos Marado
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-openoffice-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
tag 507865 + patch
thanks
Hi,
marcos.mar...@sonae.com wrote:
FYI, there's a purposed patch upstream, at
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=96878
thanks, but I follow that issue.
Grüße/Regards,
René
--
.''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer
: :' :
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tag 507865 + patch
Bug#507865: openoffice.org-writer: OOo 2.4.x openinig OOo 3 files doesn't show
text (2.x implements standard wrong)
Tags were: upstream
Tags added: patch
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need
Hi,
Steve Langasek wrote:
This bug appears to be fixed upstream now; has anyone isolated a pointer to
the correct changeset that should be applied to the Debian package?
where do you see that? The issue doesn't talk about a commit and EIS
(eis.services.openoffice.org) doesn't show anything
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 08:59:06AM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
Steve Langasek wrote:
This bug appears to be fixed upstream now; has anyone isolated a pointer to
the correct changeset that should be applied to the Debian package?
where do you see that? The issue doesn't talk about a commit
Hello,
This bug appears to be fixed upstream now; has anyone isolated a pointer to
the correct changeset that should be applied to the Debian package?
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move
Package: openoffice.org-writer
Version: 1:2.4.1-13
Severity: grave
Justification: causes non-serious data loss
Hello,
sadly we found a IMHO bigger problem for the 2.x users which will be in lenny.
OOo 2.x implemented the ODF standard wrong which is fixed in OOo 3.0:
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
forwarded 507865 http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=96878
Bug#507865: openoffice.org-writer: OOo 2.4.x openinig OOo 3 files doesn't show
text (2.x implements standard wrong)
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to
http
forwarded 507865 http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=96878
tag 507865 + upstream
thanks
Noel Köthe wrote:
sadly we found a IMHO bigger problem for the 2.x users which will be in lenny.
OOo 2.x implemented the ODF standard wrong which is fixed in OOo 3.0:
[ oops, I noticed I did forget to Cc -release ]
Hi,
Rene Engelhard wrote:
Now the problem is that data exchange from 3.0 to 2.x results in documents
with blanked text so the user will not see the data of the text.
But only when the text was formatted as hidden if I read the issue right?
Hello together,
Am Freitag, den 05.12.2008, 09:40 +0100 schrieb Rene Engelhard:
Rene Engelhard wrote:
Now the problem is that data exchange from 3.0 to 2.x results in documents
with blanked text so the user will not see the data of the text.
But only when the text was formatted as
On Fri, 2008-12-05 at 09:40 +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
But only when the text was formatted as hidden if I read the issue right?
Not only then.
Conforming documents (e.g. documents produced by Abiword are known to
sometimes have this) might have text:display=true explicitly set,
which is then
Hi,
Tim Retout wrote:
On Fri, 2008-12-05 at 09:40 +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
But only when the text was formatted as hidden if I read the issue right?
Not only then.
Conforming documents (e.g. documents produced by Abiword are known to
sometimes have this) might have text:display=true
On Fri, 2008-12-05 at 10:16 +0100, Noèl Köthe wrote:
I prefer to put OOo 3.x into lenny because this is IMHO the major
desktop application for alot of users.
I am not so keen on this idea.
We can fix OO.o 2.x for lenny users by backporting half of a relatively
small patch; Chris Halls and I
15 matches
Mail list logo
