Hallo,
I'm administrator of net with servers and thin-clients with debian. At this
time all machines has woody installed. Now I want upgrade to sarge. I have
installed a test-server (with dis-upgrade). But I have problems with
openoffice. The upgrade of package works. Openoffice is installed
Your message dated Fri, 18 Feb 2005 05:49:51 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#267963: fixed in openoffice.org-debian-files 1.1.3-5+1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
Rejected: openoffice.org_1.1.3-5.dsc: syntax error on line 18.
Rejected: openoffice.org_1.1.3-5.dsc: no Files: field.
===
If you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if the
override file requires editing, reply to this email.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
Your message dated Fri, 18 Feb 2005 07:19:52 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#288708: fixed in openoffice.org 1.1.3-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Accepted:
openoffice.org-bin_1.1.3-5_i386.deb
to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-bin_1.1.3-5_i386.deb
openoffice.org-dev_1.1.3-5_i386.deb
to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-dev_1.1.3-5_i386.deb
openoffice.org-evolution_1.1.3-5_i386.deb
to
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the
override file for the following file(s):
openoffice.org-mimelnk_1.1.3-5_all.deb: package says section is kde, override
says editors.
Either the package or the override file is incorrect. If you think
the override is correct
Your message dated Fri, 18 Feb 2005 07:19:52 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#288708: fixed in openoffice.org 1.1.3-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Fri, 18 Feb 2005 07:19:52 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#288708: fixed in openoffice.org 1.1.3-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Fri, 18 Feb 2005 07:19:52 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#288515: fixed in openoffice.org 1.1.3-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Fri, 18 Feb 2005 07:19:52 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#289715: fixed in openoffice.org 1.1.3-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Fri, 18 Feb 2005 07:19:52 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#289715: fixed in openoffice.org 1.1.3-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Fri, 18 Feb 2005 07:19:52 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#294634: fixed in openoffice.org 1.1.3-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Package: openoffice.org-kde
Version: 1.1.3-4
Severity: minor
openoffice.org-kde depends on an unavailable package openoffice.org-bin
version = 1.1.2+1.1.3 where as on sarge the candidate is 1.1.2dfsg1-3
which makes openoffice.org-kde uninstallable.
Regards,
Ritesh
-- System Information:
Debian
Package: openoffice.org-bin
Version: 1.1.3-5
Severity: important
bug #293551 complained about the same thing and it got closed with the
following explanation: build gnomevfs library sanely. obviously this
is not corect as the package suddenly (at least on i386) depends on
gnome libraries. please
Package: openoffice.org-bin
Version: 1.1.3-5
Severity: important
On i386, openoffice.org-bin 1.1.3-5 is about 60M bigger than 1.1.3-4.
As far as I can tell, the reason for this is that the binaries it
ships (in and under /usr/lib/openoffice/program/) are no longer
stripped, in violation of Policy
15 matches
Mail list logo